Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Disadvantages of cloning animals
Cloning in animals and humans
Why animal cloning is wrong
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Disadvantages of cloning animals
Pet cloning is a controversial practice. The article, Should You Clone Your Pet? sheds some light onto both sides of the argument. Most of the reasons for people being against this have to do with moral or ethical dilemmas. Most of the arguments for cloning are fueled by powerful emotions. The main argument for cloning is that it helps people who've lost a pet get through that loss. The people for cloning are often acting out of grief or loss. When people lose their pets they become emotionally unstable. This puts an end to all logical processes. For these people, cloning is a way to soothe their agony. Cloning can end their pain and allow their relationship to continue with an old friend. Why be sad when you can have a new Scruffy? The main
Many people believe cloning is unethical and unusful. They believe that it should not be practiced, because it infringes upon their beliefs. They see cloning as a last resort and do not trust the science of cloning. “Several governments have considered or enacted legislation to slow down, limit or ban cloning experiments outright” (Freudenrich 5). Many people think that cloning a species is a very unideal situation. However the many benefits of cloning far outway the few disadvantages. Cloning endangered species is beneficial to saving most species around the world, in countries like the United States and China, from extinction.
In order to strongly argue against cloning, there must be an understanding of its process and what exactly it is. Simply stated, a clone is a duplicate just like a photocopy. A good example of such “copies” that occur are identical twins, which are duplicates of each other. “The first step of DNA cloning is to isolate a complete gene and is to chromosomal sequences and then to gradually begin flaking the chromosomal sequences of a single DAN molecule. Then the DNA clone can be electronically labeled and used as a probe to isolate the chromosomal sequences from a collection of different types of genes, which should contain cloned sequences that would represent the whole gene. This action will produce new sets of cloned cells identical to the mother cell. The new set of cells are isolated and likewise the simplified process is repeated all over again until the cells form a complete organ. In order to produce a complete organism the DNA must be altered in a variety of way to come out with the finished product to be the complete organism.” In simple terms, a cell is taken from a donor woman. Then an unfertilized egg is taken from a second woman. The DNA from the cell is removed and transferred to the egg. The egg is then implanted into a surrogate mother. The resulting baby is genetically identical to the original donor.
The world society as a whole does not support human cloning. There are several radical groups that do fully support and research the ideas of cloning and claim to have cloned a human, although there is no proof of this. The general public does not support human cloning based on health and religious concerns. The health concerns are a primary worry for the public. It has been shown in the clone of Dolly the sheep that the clone had side effects of accelerated aging. Not until the cloning process is proven safe and effective will people even begin to examine the issue. In a recent poll it has been revealed that less than half of the public support animal cloning. Another survey was done about the cloning of humans and the vast majority of American's oppose human cloning (four out of five people oppose cloning). At this point in time cloning and human cloning is not supported by the majority of the public.
The two most popular views are almost obvious; those who believe cloning should be pursued and encouraged, and those who believe that humans should not seek to clone themselves because they feel that is wrong. The two sides are there, but in between lies a large gray area of ethical and moral dilemmas. Questions such as, “Should we clone humans for the human organs they could provide (kind of use them as human 'cattle')?" “Should we draw a line as to the limit of human cloning, if so, where?" and others quickly arise in discussions on human cloning. So, although in essence there are only two major viewpoints, the area dividing them is not clear and contains a dense gray area clouded with ethical and moral dilemmas.
I don’t agree with the idea of cloning. In my opinion, I think that it shouldn’t even be in existence. The article about cloning the cat, was irrelevant to me because there’s no point in cloning, when the clone is going to die just like the original. In the article, it stated that if there was a cloning, then the clone wouldn’t be an exact replica of the original. The genes may be the same, but they may have a different complexion and their behavior may not be the same.
Based on Mills’ theory of greatest happiness principle, Mills would argue in support of cloning. Three desirable pleasures according to Mills’ ideals are having children, health, and life. Having children, health, and life all support the purpose and use of cloning. Cloning gives people unable to have children the possibility of children with a biological connection. Life is supported by good health. Health is supported by cloning to rid others of diseases and helping with transplants. The argument of clones being made for replacement parts is slightly extreme, immoral, and not the purpose of this discussion. Overall cloning provides happiness and extinguishes pain.
Cloning is a very controversial topic since it relates to moral values of human beings. In February 1997 scientists in Scotland announced the birth of the first cloned sheep named Dolly, this heralded the future of cloning possibilities and scientists began extensive experiments on cloning and have since then cloned both plants and animals successfully. The next step was to clone actual human beings but before experiments could have been carried out pressure started build on the scientists because people started to doubt if cloning was ethical and morally correct. Governments began to introduce bans and constraints on cloning, as they felt cloning was not correct and because they represented the people of its country, it had to act on it. Cloning has its cons but its pros seem to overcome them greatly.
“Despite years of research, over 95% of cloning attempts fail, even with extensive veterinary intervention.” Animal cloning is a huge problem in the US. Most people in the United States know little to nothing about what happens during animal cloning. Some people would even argue that animal cloning is a good thing and it should be legalized. Animal cloning should not be commercially legalized in the US, because it is too costly, it is cruel to animals, and the harmful effects it has on food.
Cloning your deceased pet either a cat or dog is now available to anybody who can properly preserve the DNA. Cloning animals have been around for many years according to the article, “Should You Clone Your Pet?”, but recently people have come accustomed to the idea of buying an identical twin of their closest pets. In a brief explanation of the process of cloning scientists simply extract the genetic material from the pet and make it into “cluster cells,” (Clone 28). Which is then placed into the womb of the female animal to take on a regular pregnancy. Something to consider would be the possibility of the clone not having the same personality because of how its determined by life experiences rather than genetic modifications. For the low cost of about $25,000 - $50,000 USD a distressed citizen can pay for the exact recreation of their beloved pet dog or cat that recently passed away. With the information provided at the website, “Viagen Pets,” anybody can visit and learn as much as they need to make a decision on cloning a pet. The process is explained in a socially readable way for people of all ages and have tabs for client stores as well as blogs and frequently asked questions. Some of the groups that do not support the programs of cloning would be those who worry about the huge populations of stray animals stuffed in humane organizations, animal pounds,
Cloning can change the way we live our lives. If we could perfect cloning we could do amazing things with science. For example, cloning could help out in many experiments. Maybe save lives by helping to find a cure for diseases by using a clone of someone you were examining, but died in the process. Like the movie “My Sister's Keeper”, in this movie the oldest daughter is diagnosed with Leukemia and the parents create a younger daughter that is almost an exact replica of her. The younger of the two is used for parts every time the older needs them. Cloning could be used a lot in situations like this. “I take the view that anything you can do to relieve suffering or improve human health will usually be widely accepted by the public - that is to say, if cloning actually turned out to be solving some problems and was useful to people, I think it would be accepted.” (John
Imagine having a favorite hunting dog die with that dog having the best personality, then you want a clone of your dog so you go through with it and get your dog and you find out it is really aggressive and it bites you. Dog cloning is possible, however you can only get your dog cloned in South Korea. Cloning is a terrible idea.
With the idea of cloning there are many causes. According to Emily Sohn , “ The goal of cloning is to take control of the reproductive process” (Sohn par. 11). This mean that if we take over breeding then we would have more clones than we do today. From the article “Animals Clones:Double Trouble” it said that “It might also be to save endangered animals if there are too few of them to reproduce well on their own” (Sohn par. 12). This is important because animals in the world play a part and if certain
If a pet is cloned it will not act the same as it did before it was cloned. The pet could have been very gentle but after it was cloned it could be very agresive. Also cloning won’t get rid of any genetic deseases. It also won’t get rid of any deformities. Why cloning a pet is wrong.
When an animal is cloned you will always know how it will turn out. Unfortunately, many cloned animals don't survive due to complications during birth and pregnancy. Cloning can boast health among livestock by replicating animals with a strong immune system. However, it can also be quite costly, especially when many attempts fail. Cloning is an amazing advance in science. But not everyone thinks it is right. Many think it is breaking the laws of nature.
Cloning is a very good idea but with the lack of technology needed to make it a successful tool in science it should not be a main focus. Scientists should be putting their times and their energy into figuring out the reasons for the endangered animals population instead of trying to make more the non natural way. Alought it may be more accepted than the cloning of humans it is still a subject people do not mind avoiding.