Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cloning of animals and humans
Why animal cloning is wrong
Cloning of animals and humans
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cloning of animals and humans
If a pet is cloned it will not act the same as it did before it was cloned. The pet could have been very gentle but after it was cloned it could be very agresive. Also cloning won’t get rid of any genetic deseases. It also won’t get rid of any deformities. Why cloning a pet is wrong.
Cloning pets is wrong because the clone only looks like the original. The pet will act differently from the original pet. The clone could turn out to be very scared, agressive, or kind. Cloning a pet will cost $ 100,000. Even though every atempt to clone something is sussesful.
Actully there are more fails than there are susseses. Even though you raise a pet in the same invierment it won’t act the same. They tell people it will be exactly the same pet. but it
won’t be the same exact pet because it acts differently. The pet can have a shorter lifespan than the original. When a pet gets cloned a part of it’s dna gets shorter. Also people have no garentee the clone will live for very long. It could live for only a day, month, or a year. It also might die the day it was cloned. People get a clone of there pet and it could die in a few days or months. They garentee people they will get there pet back but they really won’t. People pay $100,000 so they canget there pet back through cloning. The clone may not live as long as the original because it has a shorter lifespan. There is also more fails than susseses. This is why cloning is wrong.
To develop one living organism through the process of cloning, close to hundreds of organisms die in the process. In fact, during the process of making Dolly, the scientists went through 277 trials to create a clone, and only 29 trials demonstrated the characteristics to possibly survive. Out of all 277 trails and 29 possible survivalist, only Dolly survived (Anthes 62). So by wanting cloning to be successful, scientist completely avoiding animal welfare. The scientist slaughter 276 organism without considering animal welfare. South Korea took the experiments to a new extreme in the process of cloning a dog. The South Koreans experimented on 1,095 clones by putting them into 123 dogs. By the end of all of their trials, only one dog survived (Anthes 71). Through this example, the extreme slaughter of 1,094 dog displays the protection that animals need from ultimate death established through the means of cloning. If cloning somehow proves not to become more successful in the future, the number of dying animals will rise at a phenomenal rate. By taking a deeper look at the numbers, the successful cloning of one animal might be based entirely on lucky, and new scientific ways may not deem
Some do not know how much happens to animals in the labs and research centers. According to Francis S. Collins at www.peta.org,
The objective of this essay is to inform the reader(s) about human cloning. I believe that human cloning is morally wrong because one should not have the right to avoid daily responsibilities by getting someone else to handle them. There will be four sections of this paper that will be discussed. Firstly, there is an argumentative section, which will have premises along with a conclusion for an argument made against human cloning. Secondly, an explanation section, which explains how the argument against human cloning obeys the rules for a good argument. Thirdly, an objection section to where there are arguments that violates mine in order to demonstrate how objectors might object to the argument. Lastly, there will be a conclusion where I discuss
Human and animal cloning is still a debatable issue. People believe that cloning is playing God, just as Victor Frankenstein did when he created the Monster. While Victor Frankenstein’s creation ended in catastrophe, cloning’s seemly innocent side effects can still disrupt and alter the entire world.
Cloning, especially human cloning attracts increasingly more attention after the first mammal cloning animal Dolly born in 1997. Cloning is divided into two categories: therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning. Therapeutic cloning is more related to tissue level cloning to transplant healthy cells and reproductive cloning is individual level cloning. Thus, the term cloning in this essay is used to describe both individual level and tissue level cloning. Public have different views. Some people support it because of its medical value, yet some people argue that it may bring many safety risks and moral problems. Hence, decisions ought to be made to identify the extent of cloning. Therefore, this essay introduces two major benefits of human cloning on disease therapy and analysis two arguments against it on safety and ethical issues.
successful clones often have problems with their body and are subject to a short lifespan ridden with health problems. This hurts the person or animal cloned rather than to help them, making cloning an immoral
"Look how cute that Pit Bull is." "OH, NO I am not getting near that thing." " Pit bulls are so loyal to their owner." "It is not that." "What's wrong they are like to keep their owners safe, but they won't strike and maul on you." No need to worry, I took a survey and over half the people said they are well behaved pets." "OH, Okay."
Why would anyone want to clone their pets or loved ones? Some say that if they have those who they love cloned, that they will not have to miss them once they die. If people want to clone their pets, or family members, and have the money and technology to do so, should they be allowed to do so? This is something important to discuss because as technology evolves and becomes more available, the demand for such procedures is greatly increasing. Each year the number of cloning attempts increases….and Cloning pets, humans, or any other organism, should never be allowed no matter their financial status, their ability to give permission for these procedures, or the amount of technology available.
In order to strongly argue against cloning, there must be an understanding of its process and what exactly it is. Simply stated, a clone is a duplicate just like a photocopy. A good example of such “copies” that occur are identical twins, which are duplicates of each other. “The first step of DNA cloning is to isolate a complete gene and is to chromosomal sequences and then to gradually begin flaking the chromosomal sequences of a single DAN molecule. Then the DNA clone can be electronically labeled and used as a probe to isolate the chromosomal sequences from a collection of different types of genes, which should contain cloned sequences that would represent the whole gene. This action will produce new sets of cloned cells identical to the mother cell. The new set of cells are isolated and likewise the simplified process is repeated all over again until the cells form a complete organ. In order to produce a complete organism the DNA must be altered in a variety of way to come out with the finished product to be the complete organism.” In simple terms, a cell is taken from a donor woman. Then an unfertilized egg is taken from a second woman. The DNA from the cell is removed and transferred to the egg. The egg is then implanted into a surrogate mother. The resulting baby is genetically identical to the original donor.
There is a wealth of evidence showing that animal “models” are not accurate and cannot be relied upon for safety testing and disease research. Scientists and doctors recognize that while animals are biologically very similar to human beings, they are not identical.
First of all, “Australia’s first cloned sheep appeared to be healthy and energetic the day she died, during the autopsy they could not find the cause (Castro, 2005).” There are many risks to cloning and you are seldom able to identify the cause of their death. “More than 90% of cloning attempts fail (Human Genome Program, 2006).” Most cloned animals died mysteriously even before they were born or when they were very young, so there is hardly any information on how clones age. Clones may be born with a normal looking body but may have internal functioning problems. “Cloned animals tend to have more compromised immune function and higher rates of infection, tumor growth, and other disorders (Human Genome Program, 2006).” There are many risks of cloning and a major factor is genetic differences.
In recent years our world has undergone many changes and advancements, cloning is a primary example of this new modernism. On July 5th, 1995, Dolly, the first cloned animal, was created. She was cloned from a six-year-old sheep, making her cells genetically six years old at her creation. However, scientists were amazed to see Dolly live for another six years, until she died early 2005 from a common lung disease found in sheep. This discovery sparked a curiosity for cloning all over the world, however, mankind must answer a question, should cloning be allowed? To answer this question some issues need to be explored. Is cloning morally correct, is it a reliable way to produce life, and should human experimentation be allowed?
Finally, human cloning for reproductive purposes is too expensive. The cost to clone one human could be more than $100,000 (Herper). That is extremely high considering the cost of in vitro fertilization. In vitro fertilization costs between $3,500 and $25,000 depending on the procedure (Advanced Fertility Services). If someone could not become pregnant it is much more likely that they would chose to use fertilization and be guaranteed a healthy, normal child rather than spend the money to clone a child that could have defects. With fertilization costing only one fourth of cloning, why would someone choose to clone?
I was in a local pet store buying food for my cat when I started discussing my potential new pet with the shop owner. He informed me that some people try to breed dogs with specific desired traits in mind. In this case it could have led to inbreeding and there was a chance that the dogs would have temperament issues as well. I felt bad for the dogs but I didn't feel comfortable a large dog that could have temperament problems.
With the idea of cloning there are many causes. According to Emily Sohn , “ The goal of cloning is to take control of the reproductive process” (Sohn par. 11). This mean that if we take over breeding then we would have more clones than we do today. From the article “Animals Clones:Double Trouble” it said that “It might also be to save endangered animals if there are too few of them to reproduce well on their own” (Sohn par. 12). This is important because animals in the world play a part and if certain