Cloning In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein '

Looking Into Our Future's Hands

In every aspect of our lives we have a choice that can determine our dishonorable effort

or the ability to become expertise. However, we all stick in the same identical path known as our religious beliefs that tell us who our creator truly is by scripture. Scientific theories will never apprehend the way we support our day to day lives, case in point, the creature can be exceeding or unfavorable in any emotional point of view coming upon a human. Victor Frankenstein took on the challenge to create a masterpiece to only look beastly upon everyone's eyes, after all, that was not the case when the creature arose beneath him. Scientists establish a new way of creating, such as cloning or in the world of genetic engineering,

that can be created by mindless scientists that sought better for the future. Although, it can either modify the future generations in a abhorrent or supportive way. Reading Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, prevails the characteristics that humanity has carried on its back, but finds shame in scientists that create new ways of generating life, despite the fact that we our held by God's hands, we want to dig deeper and interfere the destined life in our future. Defining life is not the hardest, wise definition to accomplish, but fumbling it can uproar any aspect of God.
Science is the new, natural way of learning and comprehending the way we choose our future. Selective structures, such as genetic engineering or cloning, can either ruin humanity in any way or have an impact that will change billions of lives forever. With that being said, cloning has a huge deliverable way of interpreting justice amongst humanity, however, can have determination to relentlessly change the moral of being on planet Earth. In fact, Leon Kass says "Cloning represents a very clear, powerful, and immediate example in which we are in danger of
turning procreation into manufacture." (Kass 67). Having this quote printed in your head, it is easy to say that cloning can be defined stronger than any weapon of mass destruction. The more reproduction of cloning can cause great chaos amongst the world, but, will deliver better causes and use in war. Life can be changed so easily by scientists that have knowledge about many intelligent theories, despite the fact that they would care not to destroy or uproar humanity which can cause great fear in society. We have the will power to destroy the world in a flick of a switch, but it relies on wisdom between science and characteristics of any person that seeks power over any country. We all love to solve something new for once in the world that can benefit others in the long run, such as creating cell phones or television for entertainment, although it can have many negative aspects to it. Science can live forever, but moral choices is the key point to always apprehend your life.
Although, Victor Frankenstein looks for the source of power, which in his eyes is through science, he rebels any subjective way of being a human himself. He can be looked at as a victim who is innocent by creating a creature that is abruptly gripping revenge by his finger tips who sought for Victor Frankenstein. Sadly, he never shows the creature a father like figure, in which, uproars his mood and continues to rebel against Victor. In an argument which is said by the creature to Victor continues , "You created me and so are obliged to me as your
creature." (Shelley 103). The creature feels entitled that his father is Victor Frankenstein and he wants to have a emotional relationship with him. Sadly, Victor does not see it that way and still shoves the creature away fiercely. The creature has no friends or family to go off to and feel comfortable with, although, the creature will need to get Victor's attention viciously. Victor finds
many ways to prevail the creature by running off to different countries to prevent any argument or conversation with his creation. However, Wesley Smith inputs, "The fact that human beings can be cloned is a scientific triumph, but it is also an ethical earthquake. Because these experiments offer the potential to advance scientific knowledge, they will tempt us—always for “the best” reasons—to set aside our convictions about the intrinsic dignity of all human
life." (Smith 75-79). Grabbing many publicity attention, it creates a hole in society by creating no more reproduction by humans. Realizing the benefits that Victor has being away from the creature happens for two years, although, bad news was sent to Victor by his father that abruptly interrupts Victor's plans ahead. The creature kills one of Victors closest foes, in return, the creature feels satisfied in doing so to gain much more attention by his father than he used to. The creature, having the wrong state of mind, runs off to search for Victor and offer him a settled to deal to leave Victor Frankenstein and his family alone.
The audience can look at the creature as a terrible character, however, he is two years of age and has no family to go to, but Victor Frankenstein. When science intervenes to reality, it can never work out so perfectly, so, the creature will ask vigorously to Victor to create a foe for him. The creature states, "If you do create a companion, we will run and never be seen
again." (Shelley 188). This argument by the creature shows full potential to leave Victor alone forever and will never show up on his doorstep again. Victor agrees to the idea, however, he has time to think when collecting all the female body parts. Victor relentlessly stops creating a female creature because he is going beyond science and will create something that can reproduce more creatures on its own. Science cannot be looked at as a result of mindless behavior towards
anything that is being created to benefit mankind. Most likely, it can benefit humans, but there is always a negative perspective amongst new creation of life. As of cloning it can take something to a whole new level, especially being looked at as the "new" future or a downfall problem that scientists can only solve. Although, figuring out a greater cause is well explained by Michael Sandel, "If cloning for stem cell research violates the respect the embryo is due, then, arguably, so do in vitro fertilization procedures that create and discard excess embryos." (Sandel 55-58). Chaos is so much to handle during this time period, the only way to figure out multiple agendas is for scientists to create cloning, however, many other solutions can be the face of humanity. Society takes things for granted, such as technology, but keeping our heads in the right sense can prevent new cloning tools and not jeopardize our religious values as a whole.
Cloning is a moral choice that can determine the new factors in society and how things can be handled, for insistence, clones can work jobs without being paid because they have no right to live a life that they are cloning for.

Victor had several moral choices to select on, which is to play with God and create a human like figure, or forbid natural philosophy and walk along a new journey. However, Victor chooses to create a new creature not thinking it would need to be cherished or loved by his own father. Victor made the creature with love and passion, but just like every single newborn baby, it needs its parents there to support and show emotional relations. The creature responds with, "This obligation is in part to be just to me, and do what you can as father to improve my lot." (Shelley 164). Creating a companion or not for the creature, Victor needs to prove his passion and emotions he has for his creation. Although, he forbids Frankenstein's obligation which changes the moral of the story to conquer revenge

on
Victor. Science is not a way to look at things obscurely, but to show how meaningful it can affect the Earth in the long run. Thus, Brendan Foht well explained this controversial topic by saying "Public opinion has always been squarely opposed to cloning-to-produce children, though some academics have defended cloning as an exercise of radical reproductive autonomy. But if there is ever a time when the interests of children should counter-balance the liberty interests of prospective parents, it is in the case of human cloning. The medical risks posed by cloning are well known, and the first experimental uses of cloning would pose unjustifiable risks to the children created." (Foht 12-17). Showing mankind how knowledgable you can be will never prove anything until you can show passion to what you have created afterwards. Scientists have full responsibility to make the world a better place, although it can be continued as cloning to be the main key point in any new enhancement.
In 1994, Steen Willadsen was able to clone a sheep.

His act of science would question if cloning was a practical and morally acceptable thing to do. Firstly, even attempting to clone insults God's role as a creator. Showing full determination, Aldona says, "Christian, however, feel that we have no right to play the role of God, because He is the only one Creator and act of creation depends on Him." (Zbikowska 13-16). We know God's role is to create men, women, animals and nature in his image in the way he sees perfect, not the way we see ourselves as perfect. God has the intention of making us, and when others try to mimic him it deteriorates his role in the world. Aside from the idea that cloning is insulting to God, it can also hurt others. Even though cloning has been developing for the past few decades, it is still a fairly unsuccessful procedure. In most cases, cloning is successful only less than one percent of the time. Moreover,

successful clones often have problems with their body and are subject to a short lifespan ridden with health problems. This hurts the person or animal cloned rather than to help them, making cloning an immoral

practice.
The honorable use of integrity that scientists feel they are entitled to can be misinterpreted by a huge amount of our society. The wrongful rights of wisdom can lead humanity into a hole that leads no where but disaster and chaos. Although, the mislead interpretation that Victor Frankenstein can determine is the wholesome of knowledge he has, but doesn't use it to lead society in the right way. Mary Shelley's Novel sends many readers into a mind state of having many different point of views toward the character, Victor, by having there own opinions towards scientific creations, such as genetic engineering or cloning. We all play a role in society day by day, however, we carry weight on our shoulder that can either be worth it or not, but having the thought of changing humanity by scientists creating different adventures can result into nothing but being atrocious.