Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ways to help endangered species
Ways to help endangered species
Protection of endangered species
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ways to help endangered species
Cloning of animals is one investment that should be denied funding. Scientists all over the world have been attempting for decades to perfect the cloning process of animals. All the problems that could occur to terminate the cloning process before the clone has a DNA sequence that can be capable of giving life to a creature. The numerous amount of clones that never see adulthood is a waste of technology, time and funding. Cloning to save endangered species sounds like a fantastic idea, but realistically with the technology is not sufficient enough to perform these requests.
Researchers go beyond the normal when it comes to the DNA used to attempt cloning. Two contributors to cloning figured out they could harvest sperm, umbilical cords and blood from roadkill that can be frozen and preserved. The Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation and the Brasilia Zoological Garden collected over 420 samples from various animals. Countries seem to be in a scientific evolutionary race with one another. Just like the countries involved in the space race, countries are in a competition to be the first to successfully clone an animal. The first successful animal cloned were northern leopard frogs in the 1950’s. The Lankenau Hospital Research Institute successfully cloned frog by a process called nuclear transfer. Robert Briggs and Thomas King cloned the frogs by extracting the nuclei of empty eggs, then proceeding to extract the nuclei of frog embryos and replace them with the nuclei from the empty eggs. . Scotland showed the world that they are a force to be reckoned with. They introduced the world to Dolly, the first female Finn-Dorset sheep to be cloned. With over 300 attempts to procreate only 30 embryos were created. Of those 30 onl...
... middle of paper ...
...end in failures. The few that make it past the first stage of nuclear transfer have problems developing.
Cloning is a very good idea but with the lack of technology needed to make it a successful tool in science it should not be a main focus. Scientists should be putting their times and their energy into figuring out the reasons for the endangered animals population instead of trying to make more the non natural way. Alought it may be more accepted than the cloning of humans it is still a subject people do not mind avoiding.
Works Cited
Genetic Science Learning Center. "What are the Risks of Cloning?." Learn.Genetics 27 March 2014
"Will Cloning Ever Save Endangered Animals?." (2013): n.pag. Scientific American. Web. 31 Mar 2014. .
Humans have driven many animals extinct, but should we bring them back is the question. Geneticists, biologists, conservationists and ethicists gathered to discuss the controversies. Some people say in doing this we are playing God, while others say we did by killing them. Other scientist say that it may be beneficial because it will add biodiversity, and medicinal properties back to the ecosystem. It is only possible to bring species back from around 10 thousand years ago. Recently scientists have vastly improved the cloning process. We can now coax adult animal cells into any type of cell, including eggs and sperm, then manipulating them into full-fledged embryos, which has led to the ideas and developments of reviving many other species including mammoths, frogs and
Today, we as a society world wide have a new issue to deal with. Science has discovered the means in which to clone animals, opening a whole new discussion. Many people are inclined to say why would science even wish to peruse this method of research. Lewis Thomas says in his essay "The Hazards of Science"
“Scientists Hope to Clone Extinct Species.” CNN. Cable News Network, 4 Nov. 2008. Web. 20
---. “Animal Cloning—How Unethical Is It?- Final Draft.” UTSA: WRC 1023, 7 Mar 2014. Print.
...rough cloning we could eliminate some disadvantages that some animal species have towards climates, or immune
Cloning has been in nature for thousands of years, a clone is a living thing made from another consisting of the same DNA. For example identical twins are clones because they have the same DNA but the differ because the twins begin after conception when a zygote, a totipotent stem cell, divides into two, some plants self-pollinate and produce a seed, which in turn, makes plants with the same genetic code (Hyde). According to the Human Genome Project there are three types of cloning, DNA, therapeutic and reproductive; DNA cloning involves transferring DNA from a donor to another organism, therapeutic cloning, known as embryo cloning, involves harvesting stem cells from human embryos to grow new organs for transplant, and last is reproductive cloning which creates a copy of the host (Conger). One of the earliest cloned animals was a sea urchin by Hans Dreisch in the late 1800’s. Unlike Victor Frankenstein, Dreisch’s goal was to prove that genetic material is not lost in cell division, not to create another being, (History of Cloning) stated by Frankenstein “that I might infuse a spark of being into the lifeless thing that lay at my feet.” There are many ways an animal...
But on the contrary, many scientists believe that cloning can be such a positive achievement, not only for medical purposes, but for fighting extinction. For example, what if they could clone many of the endangered species that exist today? There are very few hundred of many beautiful animals that if something isn’t done to save them, they will be extinct in a few years. So if scientists could successfully clone and create these endangered species, although it would still depend on the clone maturing correctly and being able to reproduce successfully, it could be a great
of nuclear transfer improves (Hawley, 1998). Nuclear transfer takes the nucleus of a cell. from one individual and places it in the egg or another individual, from which the nucleus. has been removed (Wertz, 1998b). The change in phenotype, the observable physical and biochemical characteristics of an organism, of livestock is accomplished by bombarding.
Cloning is not new; experiments with frogs and toads go back to the 1970’ with the experiments concerning animal and plant embryos have been preformed for
It's been three years since the birth of Dolly, the world's first successfully cloned animal. The announcement of her birth brought about much ado and sparked many debates concerning the morality of cloning. In the three years since Dolly was created, the debate over cloning has swelled and receded, but has never been put to rest. A compelling issue that has come into focus in the past several years is the idea of human cloning. Many scientists believe that it is inevitable because the technology is there, and anything that can be done eventually will be done. They preach the value of human clones, dropping phrases like 'cure for disease' and 'prolonged life' to entice the public into supporting their cause. Though these concepts seem beguiling, the notion of human cloning, when looked at as a whole, has serious repercussions and should not be entertained lightly.
Even though cloning methods have been in use for an extended period of time, the idea of a clone was never thought to be realistic until recently. For thousands of years, humans have been cloning plants through asexual propagation. This is simply the process of stem cutting or grafting a mammal was performed in Switzerland nearly 20 years after the carrot plant where mice cells were cloned. Later, in 1997, Dolly the sheep’s mammary cells were cloned (Lee). This was a major success for science because it was the first time an adult cell was used in which results in a clone of the previous generation of the plant and is still a method used today. It wasn’t until 1958 when modern cloning began with a carrot and in 1964 when scientist John Gurdon started the beginning of animal cell cloning of toad tadpoles. The first successful clone of embryonic cell. After scientists gained a greater knowledge of the process of cloning, they realized that it could possibly be used to benefit the world. In 2001, the first endangered species, the bull gaur, was cloned, and in...
Modern-day genetic technology has granted mankind with the opportunity to bring back extinct species from the dead. If humans have come to possess the DNA from an extinct animal population, it is possible to create an identical clone of the animal in question, effectively “bringing it back from the dead”. Many ethical dilemmas surround the practice of de-extinction, and rightfully so. Recreating an extinct species could produce groundbreaking scientific breakthroughs, generating exciting opportunities for future genetics-based research. However, there could also be monumental consequences: the newly revived, once-extinct species might destroy the ecological equilibrium of modern Earth
In recent years our world has undergone many changes and advancements, cloning is a primary example of this new modernism. On July 5th, 1995, Dolly, the first cloned animal, was created. She was cloned from a six-year-old sheep, making her cells genetically six years old at her creation. However, scientists were amazed to see Dolly live for another six years, until she died early 2005 from a common lung disease found in sheep. This discovery sparked a curiosity for cloning all over the world, however, mankind must answer a question, should cloning be allowed? To answer this question some issues need to be explored. Is cloning morally correct, is it a reliable way to produce life, and should human experimentation be allowed?
Australian researches have made major steps towards bringing frog that was extinct in 1983 back to life. Although the procedure of de-extinction is much more complex than cloning living animals. A group of scientists (Lazarus Project team) believe humans have the skill and obligation to repair the damage they have done to the world, which has caused numerous species to die out.