The Moral Aspect of Cloning
Cloning is not new; experiments with frogs and toads go back to the 1970’ with the experiments concerning animal and plant embryos have been preformed for
many years. But experiments relating to humans have never been tried or considered
possible, until “Dolly” (the first fully grown mammal to be cloned). A “human clone” is
an identical twin of another human being but only at a younger age. Scientist use cloning
techniques in their laboratory to make copies of cells or organisms with a valuable trait.
Their focus aims to find reasonable applications for cloning that will make advances in
medical breakthroughs, and biological research. For the past few years the topic of
cloning has been a very intense argument; human cloning is either “playing God” or (a
scientific process). Even though there is a large amount noted on the ill
outcome of human cloning, it could also be very valuable in our society.
Wouldn’t it be weird if a child were to grow up knowing that her mother is her sister, her grandmother is her mother, and her father was her brother-in-law? This can cause several emotional risks although this type of genetic selection may cause many sever risks. Every time her mother is to look at her, what she sees is herself growing up. There is a lot of emotional pressure on a teenager who is trying to establish his/her identity. What if everyone was to clone? What would happen to our individuality?. Cloning limits your genetic base because there are not enough individuals that would be the base of inherited material for the population. It would also stop the genetic progress since there is no combining of the genetic material and thus no opportunity to produce an animal that is superior to the parent. What if the child knows that he/she is the clone and now the identical twin of a dead sister/brother? What kind of pressure do you think that would put on the child, knowing they were made as a direct replacement for another? This child will not be the same in all ways as the other was, regardless of what the parents were hoping. One important concern is because this child will be brought up in an unusual household where unhappiness has been diverted into making a clone of the dead brother/sister instead of just adjusting to their loss. Now this child will be going through great pressures on his/her emotional...
... middle of paper ...
...lter the animals’ new traits so that they could resist diseases. Cloning could be performed on animals of all forms (i.e. fishes, poultry), to downsize the chance of spreading food diseases to the human race.
Both sides being scientific and ethnical have both very strong arguments. Yes, there are some risks with trying something new and different. But if people didn’t take risks we wouldn’t be were we are today, there wouldn’t be a cure for Polio, or any other diseases. As we become more knowledgeable we are able to find new cures, and new medicines. It makes us think, are we playing God? Or are we just scientists using the mind God gave us? I do not feel that cloning should just be used on an everyday basis; it should be used in moderation. Even though we would have the skill to “raise the dead” we should still treasure the importance of human life.
Bibliography
www.doegenomes.org
www.humancloning.org
www.globalchange.com
www.ornl.gov/hgms/elsi/cloning.html
www.louisville.edu/a-s/english/wwboard/goode/messages/158.html
www.srtp.org.uk/cloning.shtml
www.robbiep.com/humancloning.html
www.reason.com/biclone.html
www.cloning.tripod.com
Microsoft Encarda 2004
The idea of creating life has intrigued people since the beginning of time. Mary Shelly in her novel Frankenstein brought this idea to life. In this novel, Victor Frankenstein created life by using advanced science and spare body parts. The idea of creating life is a current controversy. Technology now allows for the cloning of sheep. Certainly, the ability to clone humans cannot be far away. It is necessary to place restrictions on cloning research and to ban humans cloning because human cloning is immoral. Furthermore, the expectations placed on a cloned creature by society would be unbearable for the creature, and would lead to its psychological demise.
While the problems within civil society may differ for these two thinkers it is uncanny how similar their concepts of freedom are, sometimes even working as a logical expansion of one another. Even in their differences they shed light onto new problems and possible solutions, almost working in tandem to create a freer world. Rousseau may not introduce any process to achieve complete freedom but his theorization of the general will laid the groundwork for much of Marx’s work; similarly Marx’s call for revolution not only strengthens his own argument but also Rousseau’s.
Many people say that everyone in the world has a twin. Today, science and technology has the ability to make this myth reality through the process of cloning. I am strongly against cloning for many reasons. People should not utilize cloning because it would destroy individuality and uniqueness, cause overpopulation, animal cruelty, it is against morals and ethics, and it violates many religious beliefs.
Seattle, WA has a high rate of suicide and depression. Also Korea, which is my home country, is ranked on 2nd place on suicidal rate in the world. According to Korean Governmental Statistical Office, the leading cause of death of teenage group to 30th is a suicide which tells it is a big problem. Unemployment, depression, and social isolation are common reasons of committing suicide. Also in some of the East Asian countries, the hard pressure from studying and getting good grade for the college is one of the biggest reason of the suicide in teenage group, and that’s the reason why a lot of students in Korea committing or thinking about a suicide after the high school senior’s final test. Most of people kill themselves because of environmental factors so most of them think that they are victim who are damaged by social problems but I believe that committing suicide should be a criminal offense.
Cloning is a process in which a sequence of DNA is copied. This process happens both naturally, as in identical twins, and can also be created in a lab (Devolder, 2013). The lab created cloning has generated many questions on whether or not it is an ethical practice. This paper will explore what consequentialist, deontological and virtue ethicists’ views are for the moral dilemma of cloning.
Secondly, “the most the human race has to loose by playing around with cloning is that the genetic diversity would be lost (Andrea Castro, 2005).” Reducing the genetic differences will produce clones that are grossly overlarge, many animals will be born with genetic mutations, and there will be a higher “risk of disease transfer (Saskaschools, 2003). “A review of all the world's cloned animals suggests that every one of them is genetically and physically defective (Leake, 2002).” Mutations will be passed on to the younger generation because if a cloned species has a mutation in their DNA this mutation will be passed on. Cloning has been linked with diseases of ageing, arthritis and, cancer.
Cloning is a process by which genetically equal organisms are created with the same DNA. In simplest terms, clones are like twins born at different times. This procedure poses various dangers to society and humankind. One of the greatest threats this procedure creates is among
In the article that I chose there are two opposing viewpoints on the issue of “Should Human Cloning Ever Be Permitted?” John A. Robertson is an attorney who argues that there are many potential benefits of cloning and that a ban on privately funded cloning research is unjustified and that this type of research should only be regulated. On the flip side of this issue Attorney and medical ethicist George J. Annas argues that cloning devalues people by depriving them of their uniqueness and that a ban should be implemented upon it. Both express valid points and I will critique the articles to better understand their points.
In recent years our world has undergone many changes and advancements, cloning is a primary example of this new modernism. On July 5th, 1995, Dolly, the first cloned animal, was created. She was cloned from a six-year-old sheep, making her cells genetically six years old at her creation. However, scientists were amazed to see Dolly live for another six years, until she died early 2005 from a common lung disease found in sheep. This discovery sparked a curiosity for cloning all over the world, however, mankind must answer a question, should cloning be allowed? To answer this question some issues need to be explored. Is cloning morally correct, is it a reliable way to produce life, and should human experimentation be allowed?
Essentially, the cloning idea was created for the betterment of human
Cloning ought to be avoided as it is an abnormal style of living, along with clones being retained from the outside of their boundaries, and the fact that their future is set up for them no matter how they may feel about
Only having six months to plan the wedding was very stressful. I was so nervous that I would forget things or not have enough time in advance to book anything. The week after we got engaged I immediately went to Clemson to a place
Sally: Yes, it is true that a frog was cloned in 1952, but those scientists used an embryonic cell. Dr. Wilmut used an adult cell.
School: - Teachers play an active role in suicide prevention of young adults by fostering the emotional well being of all students. Teachers have day to day contact with many young people, some of whom have problems that could lead to suicide. Teachers can reach out to student and ask how she or he is doing. Teachers should mention changes they have noticed in student’s behavior.
Suicide is an individual act, but everything surrounding suicide such as the influences and factors are social. It is also social because it has to do with society; the stigmas, the way we respond and who it affects. Suicide is related to social factors that include but are not limited to; age, race and ethnicity, class and sexuality. Society plays a role in suicide and there is an explanation for suicide through society. Everything surrounding the topic of suicide is social, such as the reasons someone decides to do it. Social factors such as bullying, leads us into delving deeper into the topic. Why is bullying still continued when it is known to cause individuals to attempt/commit? Why aren’t schools doing more to prevent bullying? Will being homeschooled help? There are many unanswered questions which all link back to society and it’s impact of