Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
War poetry as a subject
War poetry as a subject
War poetry as a subject
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
How does Duffy use language to present the themes of power and conflict in her poem ‘War Photographer’
In the first stanza, Duffy uses juxtaposition and metaphors to portray a theme of conflict. The poet’s use of juxtaposition, “Spools of suffering set out in ordered rows”, could suggest that the photographer is feeling a sense of inner conflict. When Duffy uses the noun ‘spools’ it could suggest that the conflict and suffering is ceaseless; the suffering he witnessed is forever imprinted in his memory. However, when Duffy says “in ordered rows”, it might imply that the photographer is trying to control the chaos that developing the photos brings by filing them away, dealing with them neatly. It could also suggest that he is trying to depersonalise
…show more content…
the people in the picture by setting them out orderly which could be his way of coping with the trauma he is experiencing after coming back from the place he was photographing. This use of juxtaposition may connote that the photographer is feeling conflicted; he could feel that the conflict has followed him home and he should accept this because the suffering is ceaseless but on the other hand he wants to file it away neatly and forget everything he saw. This could make the reader sympathise with the photographer because he is so conflicted and damaged by the war zone he had to photograph. However, this may also make the reader think that the photographer could have not went to the war zone and therefore do not sympathise with him because he went there to make a living and he could have simply stayed away. Also the adjective ‘suffering’ could suggest that not only the people the photographer took photographs of are suffering, but he is also because what he saw in the conflict zone could have traumatised him and he could also be suffering because of the trauma and memories that developing the photographs remind him of.
Also Duffys use of caesura at the end of the stanza could suggest that even though the photographer is feeling conflicted he still feels he must remember each place, “Belfast. Beirut. Phnom Penh. All flesh is grass.” The use of caesura shows that even though similar events happened in all three conflicts, they each need their own personal reflection as the events that happened there were so horrific, the people affected must be remembered. Also, full stops make the reader pause reading which will in turn make the reader think about the conflict which will make readers more aware of their importance. Duffy’s use of the metaphor, “All flesh is grass” could imply that the poet was trying to connote that the photographer blames God for the events he witnessed. “All flesh is grass” is a bible reference taken from Isaiah 40:6; it tells us that we have no power over our own lives, God has the power, and it reminds us of the fragility of life. The poet may have used this to imply that the photographer blames God and doesn’t like the control and power he has over his life. The references to Beirut, Belfast and Phnom Penh could resonate with some readers because they may understand the events that happened in each
place for example the Lebanese-Israeli conflict, the Troubles in Belfast or Pol Pot’s control in Cambodia. Duffy’s use of these metaphors and various other literary techniques portray a theme of conflict. In the last stanza, Duffy uses metaphors and sarcasm to portray a theme of power that the editor has over the photographer and the public. When Duffy uses the metaphor, “A hundred agonies in black and white” she could be implying that the photographer thinks the people he works for are exploitative, that they take gain from those who are suffering and the more horrific the image he captures for them, the more they will earn. The reader could infer from this that the photographer feels resentment towards his editor for exploiting the suffering he is forced to photograph as the reader could infer that the photographer needs this job to support himself even though he may not like it. It could also suggest that he feels bad about capturing such pain into a still, black and white image. “Black and white” could suggest that the photographer sees the events very clear and vivid to him, there is no ‘grey’, he recalls everything clearly. The noun “agonies” could connote that the photographer feels he captured such horrific images that in the photograph itself you can see and potentially feel the essence of the person’s pain but of course, his editor will use the most horrific photographs to his advantage because they will make him the most money. It could also suggest that the photographer feels ‘agony’ because he needs to capture these images even if he doesn’t want to. Duffy’s use of enjambment could suggest that the suffering isn’t stopping because the lack of punctuation connotes no end. When Duffy uses a sarcastic tone, “from which his editor will pick out five or six/ for Sundays supplement”, she may be implying that the photographer thinks that the editor is so obsessed with money and exploiting the people in the pictures that he is desensitised and he doesn’t see the pictures as people’s lives; he sees them as a living and he will only pick a small percentage as ‘good enough’ to be featured in the paper. The reader could infer that the photographer is disgusted by the way his editor sees the people who essentially make his living and it may make them feel anger towards the editors of today’s papers that choose the war pictures. They could also infer that the editor has power over what is published in the papers even though the photographer is the person sent to conflict to take pictures of the war and witness it first-hand. Duffy also uses a sarcastic tone in the second stanza when she says “Rural England. Home again/ to ordinary pain which simple weather can dispel/ to fields which don’t explode beneath the feet/ of running children in a nightmare heat”, she may be trying to connote that in England we cannot not fully fathom what it is like to endure suffering, our suffering is the type that can be undermined by some sunshine; she is making England sound like the idyllic lifestyle by using the adjective “rural” which could make the reader imagine a cosy village where problems do not seem to occur. The latter part of this quote about “fields which don’t explode beneath the feet/ of running children in a nightmare heat” is referring to a particular image taken in the Vietnam War when the Americans used Agent Orange on a small village in Vietnam and children were photographed running from a large gas cloud screaming as their skin was burning. The poet has used this to provide historical context for the reader. When Duffy uses a sarcastic tone it could be implying that the photographer does not agree with what the editors do; he is mocking them. The final line in the stanza, “he earns his living and they do not care” could suggest that the horror that happens does not matter to the people he works for or the general public because the editors essentially indoctrinate the public to be against the refugees and readers do not understand the true suffering that happens in the places featured. Duffy’s overall use of adjectives, metaphors and sarcastic tone portray a theme of power which the editor has over the photographer but also the views of the general public concerning conflict.
Poetry has been used for centuries as a means to explore emotions and complex ideas through language, though individuals express similar ideas in wholly different forms. One such idea that has been explored through poetry in numerous ways is that of war and the associated loss, grief, and suffering. Two noted Australian poets shown to have accomplished this are Kenneth Slessor with his work ‘Beach Burial’ and John Schumann’s ‘I Was Only Nineteen’. Both of these works examine the complexities of conflict, but with somewhat different attitudes.
The imagery in this passage helps turn the tone of the poem from victimization to anger. In addition to fire images, the overall language is completely stripped down to bare ugliness. In previous lines, the sordidness has been intermixed with cheerful euphemisms: the agonizing work is an "exquisite dance" (24); the trembling hands are "white gulls" (22); the cough is "gay" (25). But in these later lines, all aesthetically pleasing terms vanish, leaving "sweet and …blood" (85), "naked… [and]…bony children" (89), and a "skeleton body" (95).
...ntation in 20th century war poetry undoubtedly shapes its type and purpose, be it for nationalistic propaganda or to prompt a global paradigm shift, the purpose can be seen to stem largely from the author’s involvement in combat or war life. Authors such as Owen Seaman, who have no first hand experience of the content of their poems, create patriotic propaganda in an attempt to keep young men enlisting, and others such as Rupert Brooke who exemplify blind optimism and nationalistic intentions in a romanticised view of what it would be to die.
Vivid imagery is one way with which writers protest war. Crane uses imagery to glorify, and shortly thereafter demean and undercut war, through the use of imagery, by placing positive and negative images of war close to eachother. “Blazing flag of the regiment,” and “the great battle God,” are placed before “A field where a thousand corpses lie.” (A) These lines’ purposes are to put images into the reader’s head, of how great war may appear, and then displaying that there are too many casualties involved with it. In Dulce Et Decorum Est, a man is described dyin...
War and its ramifications for those who are unfortunately entangled in it, is an issue that has fueled both political discussion and literary exploration throughout the previous century. Underived, authentic accounts of the experience and effects of war, from those who have served in it, can be especially enlightening for the majority of society who have had the fortune of not being intimately familiar with war. Through the examination of poems and stories written by soldiers, who were inspired by their involvement in conflict, one can obtain a greater understanding of this gruesome aspect of life, without having to directly experience it. Similarly, soldier turned poet, Bruce Weigl, has contributed his perspective on war through his literary
‘London’ for instance describes the brutal exploitation of the church towards the civilians in the streets of London whereas Duffy’s poem Havisham similarly evokes heartache, loss but not murderous intention like Havisham does, after the narrator’s fiancé left her at the altar. However, the two poems explore in the depth the feelings of immobility and lack of control of their own lives which leads them to realise these changes that have been inflicted on them cannot be altered.
I am going to compare and contrast the two poems ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ by Wilfred Owen and ‘War Photographer’ by Carol Ann Duffy. They both give a view of war. Owen gives first hand experiences he witnessed whilst fighting in World War One and where he unfortunately died one week before the war came to an end. Carol Ann Duffy may be writing about the feelings of her personal friends who were war photographers, showing some of the horrors they witnessed.
Owen’s poem uses symbolism to bring home the harsh reality of war the speaker has experienced and forces the reader to think about the reality presented in romanticized poetry that treats war gently. He utilizes language that imparts the speakers experiences, as well as what he, his companions, and the dying man feels. People really die and suffer and live through nightmares during a war; Owen forcefully demonstrates this in “Dulce et Decorum Est”. He examines the horrific quality of World War I and transports the reader into the intense imagery of the emotion and experience of the speaker.
Ultimately, we have two poems which can be compared on the grounds of their subject, but are poles apart regarding their message. The structure of these poems is not what would be typically expected from a war poem, but are structured on the basis of these typical structures in order to create some sense of familiarity. Brooke’s poem expands on this familiarity while Owen attempts to deliberately sabotage it. In regards to content, Brooke shows throughout his perception of the nobility of dying for one’s country, whilst Owen uses all of his poetic techniques to show the opposite.
Considered the leading English poet of the First World War, Owen is remembered for realistic poems depicting the horrors of war, which were inspired by his experiences at the Western Front in 1916 and 1917. Owen considered the true subject of his poems to be "the pity of war," and attempted to present the true horror and realities of battle and its effects on the human spirit. His unique voice, which is less passionate and idealistic than those of other war poets, is complemented by his unusual and experimental style of writing. He is recognized as the first English poet to successfully use pararhyme, in which the rhyme is made through altered vowel sounds. Owen’s distinct way of both writing and reading poems led to influence other poets in the 1920s and 1930s.
‘’War Photographer’’ is a thought-provoking and mind gripping poem by Carol Ann Duffy. The poem revolves around the life of the photographer as he juggles between his two personas as he try to develop his photos and reminisce about the war torn countries, all the innocent people and the horrific and gory things he has witnessed. As the poem progresses and the pictures begin to develop the memories of pain and suffering from his past starts to unravel and becomes clearer and clearer. The main message the writer is trying to convey is the fact that through modern times news about the war is being published by the media in a truthful way that people feel less sympathy towards the innocent lives of the people dying all around the world. The writer effectively raises questions about our feelings and emotions that we feel towards war and death.
How Wilfred Owen Uses Language and Imagery in His Poetry to Communicate his Attitudes of War
The consistent pattern of metrical stresses in this stanza, along with the orderly rhyme scheme, and standard verse structure, reflect the mood of serenity, of humankind in harmony with Nature. It is a fine, hot day, `clear as fire', when the speaker comes to drink at the creek. Birdsong punctuates the still air, like the tinkling of broken glass. However, the term `frail' also suggests vulnerability in the presence of danger, and there are other intimations in this stanza of the drama that is about to unfold. Slithery sibilants, as in the words `glass', `grass' and `moss', hint at the existence of a Serpent in the Garden of Eden. As in a Greek tragedy, the intensity of expression in the poem invokes a proleptic tenseness, as yet unexplained.
‘The Falling Soldier’ is one of many poems by Duffy which deals with the subject of human mortality. Duffy expresses what could have been over a harsh reality; this is characteristic of her as also seen in ‘Last Post’ and ‘Passing Bells’ which both seem to be largely influenced by poet peer Wilfred Owen’s personal experiences of war. In the ‘The Falling Soldier’ Duffy paradoxically captures the essence of Robert Capa’s famous photograph of a man falling after being shot during the Spanish Civil War (1936). She employs the form of an impersonal narrative voice, using second person to question the possibilities, to explore the tragic and cyclical nature of war. The futile reality of war contrasts to her central theme in ‘The Bees’ anthology of bees symbolising the grace left in humanity.
One piece of the poem hints towards imagery involving slavery, this occurs when the speaker talks about the “charter’d street….charter’d Thames” and later on mentioning “The mind-forg’d manacles”. The street and Thames being described as charter’d shows the power of the government having the control of parts of the city such as a river and the streets. The use of “the mind-forg’d manacles” is symbolic by showing that their brains or minds are being controlled and limited by the government and is a symbol of enslavement. The poem seems to express a lot of imagery about death and sadness, terms such as cry, curse, plagues and hearse are used. The use of such words tells the reader that the soldiers are being forced by the government to kill. Therefore, causing the soldiers despair. Another portion of the poem uses phrases such as “in very infants cry of fear” and “how the chimney sweepers cry” to show an image of child labor. The term “appalls” is used to describe the “blackning Church” to allow the audience to realize that the church is horrified of the child labor. The chimney sweepers are a specific example of child labor. And the use of the word “blackning” suggests that a sin such as child labor is occurring. Lastly, imagery is used in the last stanza to show the horrifying cycle of living in London, England. “How the youthful Harlots curse, blasts the new-born Infants tear” describes how prostitutes are