Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Book banning debate introduction
Books being banned essay
Banned book paper essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Book banning debate introduction
Banned Books
My grandparents always had a TV before they moved to Fayette and now all they do is read books. Some of you may think that's boring but many of you might like reading a lot and you might come to realize how bored you would be if they all were taken away. I know my grandparents would not know what to do in their free time if they could not read and possibly many of you would feel the same way. Our freedom to read what we like is a freedom that is being slowly taken away through the banning of books. This is why I feel books should not be banned in any way. Today, I will be discussing with you why and who ban books and I am going to tell you why books should not be banned and how it is unconstitutional. Throughout America, certain books are being banned. Many teachers in America want students to read books for the use of education, but many parents disagree and want the books out of schools for good.. Parents want these certain books to be banned because they want their children to avoid the profanity, racial remarks, sexual content and the things that go against their religious beliefs. But parents aren't the only ones not wanting them in schools. According to The School Library Journal, they found out of 655 librarians surveyed, that 70% of them want books to be
…show more content…
Students feel parents or teachers or even the government should not take away books they really want to read because of how they feel. Students should be allowed to choose what books they want to read. The books that are banned can give you are real learning experience, teaching you new language and how things were before our time. For example,In Fahrenheit 451, books were being burned and the firemen were not allowing people to read, which is similar to banning books. Life in that book was very uneventful and dull, all because the people did not get to enjoy reading. It is ironic because Fahrenheit 451 was
In order to understand how banning books in schools affect student learning, it is important to understand why books are banned in the first place. If parents describe a book as inappropriate or offensive for children, they can complain about it to the school district to have it banned. If the school district agrees with the parents, they will ban the book from the school curriculum and forbid teachers from teaching the book to students. Parents might think that the book goes against religious or moral...
The Constitution states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." Even though books may influence young minds with negative thinking, society shouldn’t ban books because it prohibits learning and it violates the First Amendment in the Constitution. Banning books takes away the author’s right, some books can be very educational, and it takes away the children’s choice of what they get to read.
The Perks of Being a Wallflower, by Stephen Chbosky, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, by Mark Twain, The Giver, by Lois Lowry, To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee, Harry Potter, by J.K. Rowlings, The Kite Runner, by Khaled Hossenini, what do these books have in common? They are books on the American Library Association’s list of top 100 Banned/Challenged Books: 2000-2009. For various reasons, these books were found unsuitable for public audiences, and an attempt was made to ban them. From profanity to sexual content to homosexuality, groups have found reasons to challenge the books. Banning books that some people deem inappropriate from high school libraries underrates youthful intelligence, clouds history and dilutes our culture to fit a mold of conformity. Schools, even religiously affiliated ones, should focus on education and actually encouraging their students to read rather than inhibiting them from using their
Banning a book takes a person’s rights away that have already banned guaranteed by the First Amendment. Congress can not make any laws that interfere with an individual’s rights. The First Amendment “protects an individual’s
Number one, as I said: quality of information. Number two: leisure to digest. And number three: the right to carry out actions based on what we learned from the interaction of the first two”(84-85). Books are where people get their information from, banning books basically means the censorship of information.
While we have our own rights such as; the freedom of speech, freedom of thoughts, and freedom to be ourselves, you'd think we'd be making more of a difference as a whole country. However, we are not, many of us have the same mindset as the people in Fahrenheit 451's society. Millions of us sit in front of TV's for hours doing nothing, others play video games, or are on the computer. No one is enjoying our rights to freely think, we just go along with the crowd. We need to see changes in our society today, so we do not end up like the one in Fahrenheit
Banning books from public schools and public libraries is wrong. It’s irrational to have a parent or school board member’s opinion determine what a school district should be reading. Books including and not limited to, The Scarlet Letter, The Great Gatsby, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Lord of the Flies, and Animal Farm all have one thing in common. They have all at one time or another been subject to banishment. These literary classics have been around for a long time and proved to be vital to the education of many, especially children and adolescents. These novels teach values and educate children about world affairs that can not come from an everyday experience. These controversial novels encompass the materials that ultimately boost our educational wealth. Banning books infringe
People should be allowed to read whatever they want to read, even if it is a touchy subject to someone else. Although some people mainly believe in the banning of books due to explicit content, it actually causes a negative effect on people and children. Not only does it take away the people’s first amendment rights, but it also shelters children from real life situations that might affect their future. Banning books is unconstitutional and shelters children.
...parents. Most people don’t know how bad book-banning has become; I for one thought book-banning was a thing of the past. But even as our society changes and people become more open to ideas, it is still a big problem. Unfortunately, those very people (teachers and librarians) who should be fighting against book-banning passively let it happen for fear that they will get in trouble and lose their job. As Judy Blume also said, “The real danger is not in the books, but in laughing off those who would ban them.” Unless someone fights against book-banning, eventually kids won’t have anything to read.
When a book is banned, reasoning should be backed up with many facts and teachers should be able to agree or disagree. Teachers are the ones who have graduated from colleges and have earned this right. Though the opinions of parents matter, their opinion does not necessarily take into account all that the book has to give. Parents may not see the potential of the book as a whole. They may just see the racist language or cruel behavior in a book. What their opinions are mostly based on is the information that will keep everyone the most comfortable instead of the importance behind the basics for students to learn (Hills). Some books may include opposing ideas like this, but that does not mean that they do not have something to teach us. Many teachers take it on themselves to determine what is appropriate. They take on a certain level of self-imposed censorship to make sure that they are teaching appropriate material. Along with this, books being bought with school funds have to go through a process of approval (Zimmerman). This should eliminate any problem areas that parents may have. Besides just having the school board approving the books, many teachers have the same basic outline of what a book should include and be like. They ag...
Book banning in the United States and anywhere else in the world I feel should be abolished. Books are published and written for a reason. The reason is to expand the mind to new things. Sure some books are better than others but there is no reason to challenge or ban books.
Some of the best literature, also happens to be some of the most controversial pieces. The books mentioned above, some were banned because of language, other because of racism and sexuality, but all of them were important pieces about life lessons people should read about. I believe that books like these actually enhance our learning abilities, and not daunt them. I believe that it should not be up to the government, or the FCC, to control what citizens do or do not read in school systems. They have taken away enough by taking The Bible out of schools, it is a right our founding fathers gave to us when this country was first established, t...
The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional. Censoring school books in libraries can often lead to censorship of our basic freedoms guaranteed in the First Amendment. In some cases, a minority ends up dictating the majority in censorship cases. To be told what is permissible reading material and what is not is a direct violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution.
The process of banning books has been around for ages, but the real question is why does this exist? Books are banned because of many reasons, and the reasons are that they have inappropriate content which is the reason for books being banned on school grounds, or they give out a message that governments are trying to prevent from reaching the public. Since the year of 1982 more that 11,300 books have been challenged for banning for multiple and vast reasons at Mansfield Personality of Pennsylvania where Scott DiMarco works at.
Those who are addicted to a recently outlawed substance will find a way to get it. "Brain changes interfere with your ability think clearly, exercise good judgment, control of your behavior, and feel normal without using drugs" according to national institute of drug abuse. Drugs target the limbic system, flooding it with large amounts of dopamine, causing the user to feel pleasure at the moment of use and for a short amount of time afterwards. Not using that substance for long periods of time can cause nausea, fatigue, etc..,making it a lot easier to continue using the substance. Once the substance is outlawed, it can no longer be bought in stores leaving very few options of where you can get the substance. "The black market is the world's