The Almost Completely Idiotic Reasoning for Banning Books
The banning of literature has been around for many centuries and is apart of the larger issue of censoring. This process is used to censor the public from information. For example, many remember that Hitler banned many books and other forms of artwork during his reign over Germany. Other leaders of countries have done the same to prevent knowledge to their citizens or even due to the reasoning of them not liking the message that the book represents. The process of banning books has been around for ages, but the real question is why does this exist? Books are banned because of many reasons, and the reasons are that they have inappropriate content which is the reason for books being banned on school grounds, or they give out a message that governments are trying to prevent from reaching the public.
Since the year of 1982 more that 11,300 books have been challenged for banning for multiple and vast reasons at Mansfield Personality of Pennsylvania where Scott DiMarco works at.
…show more content…
The reasoning for the burning of these books was because they were written by Jewish, communist, or humanitarian authors. These book burnings were used to “cleanse” the mind of those under the control of Hitler. The burning of the books was questioned by some authors such as Heinrich Heine who warned the citizens that the burning of books would lead to the burning of humans. Although this is an extreme example of a situation that involves the banning of literature, it is an important example; the banning of literature removes freedom and knowledge that is necessary for the human mind’s expansion. Mette Newth once again points out that the suppression led to worse conditions and even deaths in this situation
There are multiple reasons why a book can be banned or challenged. Book banning causes the removal of materials in schools and libraries due to “inappropriate” content. The Lovely Bones, by Alice Sebold, was banned due to sexual content and language.
Books that have shaped America are slowly starting to disappear. Many of the previous social norms have fallen out of fashion, and because of this reason numerous books are beginning to become banned. Blasphemy, racism, sex, and violence are all ethical reasons for books to be censored.
Heinrich Heine’s article on the connection of the Holocaust to book burning presents multiple concepts on the idea of burning books. Throughout the text the author presents his overall purpose on the importance of the act of burning and reveals the possibility of burning burning being inherently sinister. Many of his comments relate to the novel Fahrenheit 451 in which book burning also takes place. Overall, Heinrich Heine opened up new ideas on book burning and its impact on societies over the years.
In order to understand how banning books in schools affect student learning, it is important to understand why books are banned in the first place. If parents describe a book as inappropriate or offensive for children, they can complain about it to the school district to have it banned. If the school district agrees with the parents, they will ban the book from the school curriculum and forbid teachers from teaching the book to students. Parents might think that the book goes against religious or moral...
The government believes it is much easier to control a society full of dumb people, so they put up an law to restrict books from the public. “We must all be alike. Not everyone born free and equal, as the constitution says, but everyone made equal... A book is a loaded gun in the house next door. Burn it. Take the shot from the weapon. Breach man’s mind”. Books are dangerous, not because they physically are, but because of the knowledge they contain can bring about any opponent. Ideas and knowledge makes people question how things are, and allows them to see all the problems within this corrupted
People ban or challenge books because they don't want other to read them because of their content, even thought we see most of it in our everyday life. To stop book banning and to keep books on the shelves; if a book has inappropriate content and someone wants to buy it or get it from the library or store they have to get the parents consent. This will also keep parents informed on what their child is reading.
As the American Library Association notes, books are usually banned "with the best intention…to protect others, frequently children, from difficult ideas and information." (Brunner). If a book has frightening or controversial ideas in them, adults willing often censor that book from children. From 2000 to 2009, of the 5,099 challenges that were reported, 1,639 of these challenges were in school libraries and 30 challenges in academic libraries. (Frequently Challenged Books). At various times in American history, even some of the tamest books have been banned. Harriet the Spy, was banned because it supposedly taught children to "lie, spy, back-talk, and curse." Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl was banned for being too depressing. A Light in the Attic, by Shel Silverstein, was banned because it might encourage kids to break dishes so they won't have to dry them. (Frequently Challenged Books). While some of these excuses are more reasonable than other excuses, the banning of these books prevents the children from empathizing...
Banning Books “It’s not just the books under fire now that worry me. It is the books that will never be written, the books that will never be read. And all due to the fear of censorship. As always, young readers will be the real losers” (Blume 1999). Judy Blume can not explain the problem of book censorship any clearer.
Banning books from public schools and public libraries is wrong. It’s irrational to have a parent or school board member’s opinion determine what a school district should be reading. Books including and not limited to, The Scarlet Letter, The Great Gatsby, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Lord of the Flies, and Animal Farm all have one thing in common. They have all at one time or another been subject to banishment. These literary classics have been around for a long time and proved to be vital to the education of many, especially children and adolescents. These novels teach values and educate children about world affairs that can not come from an everyday experience. These controversial novels encompass the materials that ultimately boost our educational wealth. Banning books infringe
School boards and teachers have a responsibility for protecting the minds of their students and covering age appropriate material. However, does this responsibility cover the extreme act of banning books from school classrooms? Does not the teacher have a duty to introduce to their students world issues in order to better the students ability to cope with problems in the world? How does a school decide which books should be banned from the classroom, and should it be left up to the teacher to decide what is decided in his/her classroom. By banning books from the classroom, we prevent our students from learning about controversial topics in a safe environment, and we also encroach upon the student’s freedom of reading what they want in school.
Book banning in the United States and anywhere else in the world I feel should be abolished. Books are published and written for a reason. The reason is to expand the mind to new things. Sure some books are better than others but there is no reason to challenge or ban books.
The subject of censorship is a very controversial one, especially the banning of books. Many people believe they must protect themselves and others from the "evils" of many classic books and works of art because they can be deemed "indecent" in one way or another. Many believe that this is absurd and censorship in its current form is a violation of our First Amendment right to free speech. Personally, I align myself with the latter, however I do feel there are occasions where censorship is justifiable.
Censorship in School Libraries The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional.
Retrieved December 2, 2002 from Lexis-Nexis/Academic database. This article addresses some of the reasons that censors attempt to remove books from the curriculum: Many censors feel that works are not age appropriate for students. Staff, Wire Reports. (2002 October 3). Book banning spans the globe.
“‘Where they have burned books, they will end in burning human beings,’” Heinrich Heine once stated through his famous 1821 play Almansor. The concept of Heine’s well-known relies on the fact that when people burn books, they are initially destroying the author's’ ideas and eventually the authors themselves. Nevertheless, the destruction of ideas through burning books has surfaced during the Nazi regime after World War I. During this time, the Nazi party burned books in Germany, with the most notable one being the May 1933 book burning in Nazi Germany.