Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection on self leadership
Reflection on self leadership
Limitation of traits in leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflection on self leadership
1 Introduction This report has as main goal to bring analysis of the sentence ‘The ability to lead often depends on your own perception of others but more importantly your personality and perception about yourselves’. To achieve the objective, the theory of perception, personality, and leadership will be touched in the second section and then they are going to be connected in section three named as discussion. Finally, two case studies are going to be described in order to illustrate how it has influence in practice. 2 Conceptions and Theory 2.1 Leadership Leadership refers to the ability to make full use of manpower and objective conditions within the jurisdictional limits and to do what is needed at the least cost to enhance the efficiency …show more content…
2.3 Personality Personality is a collection of habitual behaviors, cognitive and emotional patterns that evolve from biological and environmental factors (Robbins, Judge, Millet, & Jones, 2010). Personality is your unique way of thinking, feeling and behaving in a wide range of situations throughout most of your lifetime. So personality predicted leadership emergence across a variety of people and settings. The personality traits of the leaders are very important, but depending on the circumstances, the characteristics of these people vary greatly. (McGregor, 1960). Personality traits also shape who we are and how we are as a leader. Most relevant personal traits for corporate management encompass as follows (Judge, Bono, Ilies, & Gerhardt, 2002). Murray & Mount (1991) developed the “Big Five Personality Dimension” (extraversion, emotional stability, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness to experience) which is illustrated in Table 1. Table 1: The Big Five Personality Dimension The Big Five Trait Definition Examples Behaviours for Low Scorers Examples Behaviours for High …show more content…
Researches have shown that power is responsible for gradual changes in individual personality in the emerging process of leadership (Shamir, 2011). Also power changes the way that information are processed (more power more focus), confidence, impression from other (more power is directly related with more use of stereotypes); power also changes emotional connection and experience, behaviour (proactive and first move in negotiations) and individuals who hold power are more likely to actively try to influence others (Voyer & McIntosh,
Personality is defined as, “the combination of characteristics or qualities that form an individual's distinctive character.” There are many different theories for what makes up a person’s personality. These theories are classified under 5 general categories. These categories are: biological, behavioural, psychodynamic, humanist, and trait theories. If we look at the trait theories category, two particular theories come to mind. These two theories are, “Big 5 theory” and Eysenck's “Three Traits Theory.” In this essay, I will approach the question, which personality trait perspective is the best way to think about personality? To solve this question I will compare the Big 5 theory to the Three Trait theory.
These scales are commonly alternatively represented by the OCEAN acronym Openness to experience, Conscientiousness, Extraversion/Introversion, Agreeableness and Neuroticism. The Big Five structure captures, at a broad level of abstraction, commonalities among most of the existing systems of personality description, and provides an integrative descriptive model for personality research. (Oliver& Sanjay 1999)
This brings me to The Big Five Theory: extraversion and agreeableness. As a child I was very high in extraversion, and like psychologist predicted, I still am. I am a very positive person, I care about my family and friends more than I care about myself and I am an adventurer. I balance it out with also being high in agreeableness. I am a trustworthy person and I ...
The big 5 personality traits model measures the five largest dimensions of a person’s personality. The first one is openness, which measures a person’s level of creativity as well as their desire for knowledge and new experiences (O’Neill & Allen, 2011). The second trait is conscientiousness, which determines an individual’s level of care in their life and work. If they have high conscientiousness, they are very organized and thorough they make plans and follow those plans (O’Neill & Allen, 2011). The third trait is extraversion/introversion. In addition, extroversion person is outgoing and sociable and in introversion person is quiet and work well alone (O’Neill & Allen, 2011). The fourth is agreeableness and looks at a person’s level of friendliness or kindness to others as well as their level empathy and whether or not they synthesize with others (O’Neill & Allen, 2011). The last is natural reactions and can be referred to as a person’s emotional state ability, which measures how people react to situations (O’Neill & Allen, 2011). All five of these traits have an impact on how people react in teams and how team members react to
The Big Five is system of testing personality by fitting the person’s traits to a system of categories. The five categories are extroversion versus introversion, neuroticism versus emotional stability, agreeableness versus antagonism, conscientiousness versus impulsiveness, and openness to experience versus resistance to new experience. Extroversion versus introversion measures the social aspect of personality. Extroversion on the extreme is when a person totally depends on social contact while introversion is where a person totally avoids it. Neuroticism versus emotional stability measures a person’s natural outlook on life. A neurotic person suffers from anxiety, depression, and guilt while the emotionally stable person is able to experience a variety of emotions that appropriately fit the situation. The third factor is agreeableness versus antagonism. Agreeableness is simply how prone the individual is to accept information in cooperation. Too much agreeableness leads to gullibilit...
RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS ON PERSONALITY 2Retrospective Analysis of PersonalityHuman beings are described by the characters that they possess. The character is what is referredto like the personality of an individual. An analysis may be done on a personal basis or theanecdotes, and in recent times the science of psychology is being applied to research on thepersonality. Psychology states that the disadvantages of personal experience are that it maycontain inaccurate and bias information (Leary, 2004). In this short paper, we carry out acharacter analysis through personal experiences and psychology related
Personality is patterns of thinking, behavior and emotional responses that make up individuality over time. Psychologist attempt to understand how personality develops and its impact on how we behave. Several theories attempt to explain personality, using different approaches. The social-cognitive and humanistic approaches are two of many theories that attempt to explain personality. This essay will identify the main concepts of social-cognitive and humanistic approach, identify perspective differences and discuss approach limitations.
Personality is a branch of scientific discipline that studies temperament and its variation among people. It is a dynamic and a set of characteristics possessed by their atmosphere, cognitions, emotions, motivations and behaviours in various things. Personality conjointly refers to the pattern of thoughts, feelings, social adjustments and behaviour consistently exhibited over time that powerfully influences one’s exceptions, self-perceptions, values and attitudes. It also predicts human reactions to different folks, problems and stress.
A Comparison of the Main Approaches to Personality Psychology Psychology of personality is a difficult concept to define and quantify, therefore most personality theories, however different they may be in other respects, share the basic assumption, that personality is a particular pattern of behaviour and thinking, that prevails across time and situations and differentiates one person from another. Most theories attempting to explain personality represent part of the classic psychological Nature verse Nurture debate. In other words, is personality “inherited”, or developed through our interactions with the environment. In addition, we shall compare and contrast two of the main approaches to personality psychology by concentrating on Psychoanalytical Theory (Freud) and Social Learning Theory (Bandura). By looking at the Psychodynamic approach, developed by Freud, we can argue that it emphasizes the interplay of unconscious psychological processes in determining human thought, feelings, and behaviours.
The topic of this essay is about the trait of behavioral, leadership, comparing with contingency,
Personality is the "combination of stable physical and mental characteristics that give individuals his or identity and is influenced by our genetics and surrounding environment (Kreiner & Kinicki, 2013, p. 131). According to Choi, Oh, Colvert ( 2015) in relation to job attitudes, the big five personality dimensions (Extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness to experience) is one of the most examined trait taxonomies (as cited by e.g., Judge, Heller, & Mount, 2002; Swider & Zimmerman, 2010; Zimmerman, 2008).
In the day to day life, experiences and connections are made. Many things that occur in one’s life can all stem from their individual personality, but interpreting how one’s personality guides their life presents a difficult challenge. Many actions, quirks, and patterns that a person has are easily noted due to the ability to see it, but the puppeteer behind these habits is an individual’s personality. A certain personality type can affect the perception of certain events and the reactions/feelings to certain outcomes. While one person might see a situation as dreadful, another may see it entirely different. We tend to find ourselves side by side with people we see similarities between due to a parallel in certain traits, but no two individuals are exactly the same based on differences in personality. Success is hinged on many things and one of those things is the development of self-awareness. To know oneself is key to tackling on intimidating tasks and situations, but to also grow in terms of knowledge and synergy. In my attempt to
Leadership is the ability of a company's management to set and achieve challenging goals, take swift and decisive action, outperform the competition, and inspire others to perform well. (Retrieved from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/leadership.asp);
Personality are those charaeristics or qualities adquired that form an individual's distintive character this is what makes each one of different from another and sets us apart. In this essay I will be taking a look back at my life and discussing waht ascpets of my personality have changed and which ones have remained the same. Following it by analizing the roles of nature and nuture in the shape on my personality and the things in life that have made my personality change and those that have made some of the things stay. And describe the roles of nature and nuture in my personality.
The psychodynamic approach address the concept of self-awareness by placing emphasis on how leaders obtain insight into their own personality characteristics and gain understanding of the responses of their followers or subordinates, based on individual personalities. Self-awareness is described as a valuable part of leadership; as, it is considered the basic