Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strength and weakness of participative management
Strength and weakness of participative management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strength and weakness of participative management
Participatory Management
In scanning the recent literature on participatory management certain themes arise. Participatory management is a way to empower employees and create a more innovative bottom up structure for organizations. It is a movement toward decentralizing power. There are many suggestions on how this type of structure is to be realized. Most articles I reviewed have positive views of this structural method.
Participative management is rooted in the human resource theoretical school. Using this type of model has a strong underpinning in utilizing people as a valuable resource. In fact many articles talk about the ability of peoples minds as the most important resource in today’s world. Most of the literature I reviewed seems to be asserting that this sharing of power within, and commitment to the product put out, is the only way to operate if organizations want to remain competitive. This organizational trend is definitely worker-friendly in its orientation and intended consequence.
One common positive theme in the literature on participatory management is the increased communication and unlocking of ideas that occurs when employees are not intimidated by a strict hierarchical and authoritarian organizational arrangement (Collins, 1995; Morvec, Jphannessen, & Hjelmas, 1997). The improvement of morale and lessening of work related stressors are other common premises observed (Slate & Vogel, 1997). Renewed commitment and increased worker knowledge are also constructive outcomes (Pine, Warsh & Maluccio, 1998).
Whereas most of the literature on this topical area is supportive and positive about participative management formats but there are pitfalls to avoid when implementing such a plan. Workers ...
... middle of paper ...
...have grown over time must be abandoned by those involved if it is vital to participative management to succeed. Those organizations characterized by a central office and separate field offices must make sure to pull their resources together and make sure the whole organization is on the same page (Foster-Fishman & Keys, 1997).
Overall participative management seems to be a potentially powerful way to structure an organization especially in the new ‘knowledge economy’ we find ourselves in today. Structuring these types of organizations takes commitment and patience but the ideas and innovations as well as the potential to increase morale and productivity are worthwhile goals to try and attain using this design.
Organizations that serve the public seem to be very well suited to this type of management structure (Pine, Warsh & Maluccio, 1998; Slate & Vogel, 1997).
In the past, decision making was a consensus among managers. They would debate for months on specific decisions that would impact each department. This type of participative leadership was what had worked in the past and driven
A participative leader consults with followers, obtains their ideas and opinions, and integrates their suggestions into the decisions about how the group or organization will proceed” (Northouse, 2016, p.118). As a participative leader, Vida often consults with her staff, obtains their ideas and opinions, and is open minded to their suggestions. For example letting us have flexible hours, because most of us were taking other classes, getting our ideas for recording sessions, and even choosing what snacks we wanted to have available at the
High cohesiveness is an effective tool in the success and effectiveness of an organization. However, in order for ...
The theory suggests that the nature and quality of the company’s leaders is an important factor of the performance and job satisfaction of their subordinates (Glisson 1989). The theory implies that managers while in control need to be capable of maintaining cooperation from his or her employees. In this type of leadership style, the employees would be encouraged to share opinions and ideas. Staff would feel engaged in decision-making and creativity would be rewarded. The leader would be flexible, open to communication, and respectful of new
This research paper is based on Chapter 10, Understanding Work Teams in the Workplace. My research paper is based on my own work-related experiences (direct observation.) My organizational issue is Understanding Work Teams and will be analyzed using the following two core concepts: Problem-Solving Teams and Self-Managed Work Teams.
Team management should be the ultimate goal. The employee feels their contributions matter and there is genuine effort to increase the productivity (Blake & Mouton, 1982).
Before a group can achieve the synergistic performance Jimenez is looking for it must meet three preconditions. First, team members have to approach the task at hand with the motivation to work cross-functionally and the confidence that they can produce effective solutions. In Wichita, much of the motivation came from the evident crisis in performance. Everyone in the plant knew that it was underperforming and there is no stronger motivation for action than a survival crisis.
Bateman, T.S., & Snell, S.A. (2011).Management: Leading and collaborating in a competitive world (9thed). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
West, M.A. (2004) Effective Teamwork: practical lessons from organization research. 2nd ed., Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Limited.
The purpose of present study was to take a look and to determine the degree of worker involvement and considerable impact of employee empowerment on teamwork effectiveness. The word Team refers to collectively every person reap extra. Effective Teamwork relies upon a lot on the team leader. However the team members are also critical to this system. After all, without its individuals a Team will not be a group. Sometimes it's far hard to make a group work. Various factors can destroy it and it can emerge as quite an assignment to deal with unruly and difficult individuals. Yet, it's miles nonetheless one of the maximum effective approaches of organizing work to be done in the corporation. Furthermore, the focal point of the present study is
This research has asked us to look into three different styles of management and find real life examples of companies or individuals who have or are currently using such styles of management. To begin we will take a look into the use of an autocratic style of management versus a participative. In this portion we will look into Leona Helmsley and her chain of hotels. Once this potion is completed, our next section will be looking into a centralized style of management versus a decentralized style. In this section of the research, we will be looking into Apple Inc and how they have built an empire with a centralized style of managing philosophy. Finally, in the final section of the research we will be taking a look at how Google has created an informal environment in which employees have direct access to executives and have the ability to share thoughts and ideas that are taken serious and to the heart.
It is this capability of the management to cultivate communication that is important towards effective engagement with the employee (Albrech, 2011). It is not just a one-sided affair of a company engaging employee, but also mutual loop where the employee is also engaging the company. After all, it takes two hands to clap. “Voice must be approached in a genuine and authentic way, and treated as more than just a cosmetic exercise. An authentic use of voice means that when the employee is invited to speak up, the company in return will both listen and will respond to what the employee says, even if just to explain why they cannot carry out a request for change. Feedback is vital and action must be seen to follow.” (Dromey et al, 2012, p.17).
Throughout my life, I have been fortunate to have many opportunities to take on leadership roles, and to use these roles to influence others in very positive ways. After taking the leadership quizzes or survey, I was able to determine that my personal leadership style is Participative. Participative style is the leadership style where a leader gives team the opportunity to wholly take part in
When an organization is looking for new creative ideas, they should ask their employees. The employees of the organization have an in depth look and are more understanding to the needs of the organization because it is where they work and are involved. Managers can call on a group of employees and together, they can come up with solutions for the organization. “Group decision making is a type of participatory process in which multiple individuals acting collectively, analyze problems or situations, consider and evaluate alternative courses of action, and select from among the alternatives a solution or solutions” (Group Decision Making, n.d.,para.1).
In Today’s world, the composition and how work is done has massively changed and is still continuing to change. Work is now more complex, more team base, depends greatly on technological and social skills and lastly more mobile and does not depend on geography. Companies are also opting for ways to help their employees perform their duties effectively so that huge profits are realized in the long term .The changes in the workplaces include Reduction in the structure of the hierarchy ,breakdown in the organization boundaries , improved and better management tactics and perspectives and lastly better workplace condition and health to the employees. (Frank Ackerman, Neva R. Goodwin, Laurie Dougherty, Kevin Gallagher, 2001)