Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of organizational culture
Culture within organizations
The strength and weakness of an organizational culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Jimenez was successful in Wichita not because of the monthly chats, weekly baseball games or Keller, but because she set up an environment conducive to attaining results she needed. This achieved two critical goals- it enabled the employees develop cross-functional solutions and fostered a sense of ownership and commitment. Jimenez misunderstood what made the Wichita project successful. Instead of trying to set up circumstances conducive to developing site-specific solutions in Lubbock, she simple imported the methods that the Wichita employees had created.
Before a group can achieve the synergistic performance Jimenez is looking for it must meet three preconditions. First, team members have to approach the task at hand with the motivation to work cross-functionally and the confidence that they can produce effective solutions. In Wichita, much of the motivation came from the evident crisis in performance. Everyone in the plant knew that it was underperforming and there is no stronger motivation for action than a survival crisis. The confidence came from Keller’s presence. His long history with the company his respect for coworkers and his reputation as a successful problem solver almost certainly reassured employees that a turnaround could happen.
Second, team members must appreciate one another’s perspectives and refrain from blaming one another for problems they may encounter. Before Jimenez’s team-based productivity project, the engineers and the operations workers at the Wichita site neither understood nor appreciated the other side’s contributions. Jimenez and Keller set up the monthly meetings to discuss problems and resolve them. That was an excellent mechanism for providing information on the different contributions and challenges of the various camps. Moreover, their active intervention during those meetings helped stop the blaming. Finally team members must create shared views of problems and shared approaches for resolving them. Those commonalities must be acceptable to everyone if they are to provide the core for new ways of doing things. The monthly problem chats represented the beginning of process if developing acceptable approaches. The company softball games provided a powerful way for the brains and the brawn to develop a shared picture if their plant and its goals, as well as to get to know individuals from the other side and to appreciate their perspectives.
Those changes set the stage in Wichita so that the SPITS teams were bound to make high-quality, innovative suggestions successfully though required employees who were highly committed both to the company and to the plans. That commitment came because employees were involved in the processes.
Cohesiveness was the factor that helped them the most. The 11 old employees were kept as the morning shift instead of two shifts, this allowed them to face the new environment and harder task together with cohesiveness they built in last 16
RL Wolfe decided to try the SHRM through self-driven teams. In the past, the company had highly unionized stru...
...th head office employees, Peterson could implement some of their ideas into his plans and give credit to these employees, bolstering future relationships with these credited individuals.
The purpose of this paper is to analyze a significant change within EmbanetCompass Knowledge Group the company I have been working for the last 3 year as a Program Coordinator. In this paper we will review the organizational structure, culture, explore the organization change, and the outcomes. In this analysis I had the opportunity to interview Jaclyn Kleinaitis who works as a Lead instructional Designer within the organization and can provide insight of the organizational structure, culture and management style.
“The team is faced with creating cohesion and unity, differentiating roles, identifying expectations for members, and enhancing commitment. Providing supportive feedback and fostering commitment to a vision are needed from the team leaders (Developing Management Skills).” ... ... middle of paper ... ...
...s continually asked are “How can we make that experience more available to more people? How can we make it better for people?” (Liedtka & Salzman, 2009, p. 9) In answering these question leads back to the evaluation strategy O’Neil developed to bring about lasting change.
All of these elements helped build a strong corporate culture for Southwest. Now that Herb Kelleher has departed, it can be easy to foresee some difficulties in maintaining that family atmosphere. One difficulty being whether the company has the ability to maintain such close relationships with its customers as the market changes and the company grows. We also foresee some problems in maintaining competitive benefits as other companies are modifying their employee policies to become more competitive.
It takes those who have innovation in their hearts to drive them towards this goal. It is important that staff on the units take time to assess innovators and brain storm areas in which they can empower and motivate the others to follow. The culture and environment of units must be that of being willing to be open to change and new ideas so they can be assessed during initial meetings.
Larson, C. and LaFasto, F. (1989), Teamwork: What Must Go Right/What Can Go Wrong. Newberry Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
➢ Empowering teams: Teams were initially resistant to change but upon understanding and clarity they soon embraced the new approach. People who never had a reason to speak to each other were now more comfortable to initiate conversation amongst each other. The teams had a challenge of delivering independently because outside dependencies slowed down the process, this was solved by equipping every team with the ability to reach and deliver the end product
First we must look at what kind of team it is Starbucks wishes to create. With the company 's emphasis on all of it’s partners to be able to perform a multitude of roles within the workplace it’s safe to say Starbucks operates as a cross-functional team. A team composed of individuals from various functional specialties. Now we must look at what makes a team effective. Effective teams have a clear set of goals, relevant skills, mutual trust, unified commitment, good communication, negotiating skills, appropriate leadership, and internal and external support. Starbucks seeks individuals who are self-motivated, adaptable, passionate, creative, and team players. Like it has been alluded to earlier self motivated, passionate, creative people want to be leaders (in control of their own destiny). They have a vision of what it is they believe their work should entail and the direction in which to go to achieve that vision. If each member of the team has his or her own vision on what it is they seek and how to go about doing so you may not have or be able to set an established set of clear goals. If there is not a set of clear goals and or everyone has their own goals then you can have mistrust within the team, a lack of commitment if the goal set is to not what a particular team member feels it should be and as a result communication skills and the teamwork as a whole could
Southwest’s fundamental success can be tied back to Herb Kelleher’s
A group of people working on a team means a group of different sets of minds working together. Thus, it is inevitable that there may arise conflicts on a certain topic within the team, as certain viewpoint may seem right for the circumstances for some teammates and may different for others. However, it is not that they are not solvable.
Organizations use teamwork because it increases productivity. This concept was used in corporations as early as the 1920s, but it has become increasingly important in recent years as employ...