INTRODUCTION
RL Wolfe is an engineering and productions company that deals with the production of plastic pipes. The company has its headquarters in Houston, Texas. It is worth 350 million dollars and has three branches that include Wolfe’s Austin based in Texas, Columbus based in Ohio and the most recent branch that the company acquired based in Corpus Christi, Texas. The company has been trying to adopt new human resource management (HRM) practices in a bid to increase the productivity. The new HRM strategy is the adoption of self-directed teams (SDTs). The strategy began as an experimental strategy on the workforce in Corpus Christi in a bid to raise the production of the company workforce to 95%.
HRM in any company is a weighty issue that needs much attention where business performance is linked to a HR strategy (Caldwell 2008; Ulrich et al. 2008). In the recent past, competition has become stiff, such that organizations need to come up with other means to compete in the extremely dynamic market world. Thus, companies have shifted their emphasis to Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) where they enhance and empower their personnel in order to increase the productivity and the services offered into the market (Mello 2006). This goes against the traditional ways of increasing the means of competition where organizations place emphasis on tangible resources. In the past, organizations competed in terms of machinery and acquisitions. This has changed greatly due to the changing customer tastes and the diversity of the market in the present (Delery & Doty 1996; Lengnick-Hall et al. 2009).
HR PROBLEM/MAIN ISSUE
RL Wolfe decided to try the SHRM through self-driven teams. In the past, the company had highly unionized stru...
... middle of paper ...
...elf-Directed Teams.” Briefcases, Harvard Business School, 4063, pp. 1-11.
Jiang, K.F., Lepak, D. P., Jia, J., and Baer, J. C. 2012. “How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms.” Academy of Management Journal, 55, pp.1264-1294
Lengnick-Hall M.L.; Lengnick-Hall, C.A.; Andrade, L.S.; Drake, B. 2009. “Strategic human resource management: The evolution of the field.” Human Resource Management Review, 19, pp. 64-85.
McShane, S.L., Olekalns, M. & Travaglione, A. 2013, Organizational Behavior: Emerging Knowledge, Global Insights 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, Sydney.
Mello, J.A. 2006. Strategic human resource management. Thomson Southwestern. Chapter 2 pp. 45-65.
Ulrich, D., Younger, J., and Brockbank, W. 2008. “The twenty-first century HR organization.” Human Resource Management, 47, pp.829-850.
Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2010). Human resource management (13th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomas/South-western
Bohlander, George, and Scott Snell. Managing Human Resources. 15th. Mason, OH: South-Western Pub, 2009. 98-147. Print.
Noe, Raymond A., et al. Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2010. Print.
Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2014). Fundamentals of human resource management (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Stewart, Greg L. and Kenneth G. Brown. “Human Resource Management.” Human Resource Management. 2nd Ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2010. 590.
Wolfe, R., Wright, P. M., & Smart, D. L. (2006). Radical HRM Innovation And Competitive Advantage: TheMoneyball Story. Human Resource Management, 45(1), 111-145.
McShane, S. and Von Glinow, M. (2012). Organizational Behavior: Emerging Knowledge, Global Reality. 6th ed. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, pp.103 - 131.
Before a group can achieve the synergistic performance Jimenez is looking for it must meet three preconditions. First, team members have to approach the task at hand with the motivation to work cross-functionally and the confidence that they can produce effective solutions. In Wichita, much of the motivation came from the evident crisis in performance. Everyone in the plant knew that it was underperforming and there is no stronger motivation for action than a survival crisis. The confidence came from Keller’s presence. His long history with the company his respect for coworkers and his reputation as a successful problem solver almost certainly reassured employees that a turnaround could happen.
McShane, Steven L.; Von-Glinow, Mary Ann: Organizational Behavior 6th Ed. Copyright 2013. McGraw-Hill Irwin. New York, NY.
McShane, S.L. and Von Glinow, M. A. (2009). Organizational Behavior: Emerging knowledge and practice for the real world. McGraw-Hill.
Ivancevich, J., Konopaske, R. & Matteson, M. (2011). Organizational Behavior and Management. NewYork, NY: McGraw Hill.
A team is a group of people who work in tandem to achieve a common outcome (Chatfield, 2011). A common type of team found in the workplace is self-managed teams (SMT). A self-managed team empowers employees to manage the day to day functions, operations, and tasks of a specific job area with little or no supervisory oversight or intervention. In other words, it is a self-contained unit (Williams, 2011). For example, self-managed teams handle work direction, job assignments, trouble-shoot problems, and handle all of the decision making aspects of the job (Silverman,1996). Moreover, companies that have used SMTs report an increase in productivity and quality, increased employee morale, creativity, job satisfaction, and a decrease in absenteeism (Silverman, 1996). Also, a 1990 study by Cohen (1993) found that forty-seven percent of Fortune 1000 companies used SMTs with some of their workforce. In two years the number of SMTs increased to sixty percent. Thus, the prevalence of SMTs in organizations can be contributed to its tangible outcomes.
Ivancevich, John, Knopaske, Robert, Matteson, Michael, Organizational Behaviour and Management (10 edition (January 30, 2013). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Human Resources Management (HRM) Interventions relates to the idea of improving an organizations overall performance and efficiency by improving the members (individuals and groups) performances, commitment, and flexibility. According to Beer et al. (1984), this is often a relevant intervention technique when organizations are facing increased international competition. They see the value of HR investments as a way to improve organizations competitive advantages. Further, they establish that HRM policies have long-term consequences and immediate organizational outcomes. These policies should include the overall competence of employees, the commitment of employees, the cost effectiveness of HRM practices,
Changing Roles. Traditionally, HR has been an administrative position-processing paperwork, benefits, hiring and firing, and compensation. However, recently HRM has moved from a traditional to a strategic role, the emphasis is on catering to the needs of consumers and workers. Before, HR was seen as the enemy and employees believed that HR’s main purpose was to protect management. Now, the position requires HRM to be more people oriented and protect their human capitol, the staff. In addition, human resource management has to be business savvy and think of themselves as strategic partners in the 21st century.