Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Concept of employee engagement
Concept of employee engagement
Literature review employee engagement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Employee engagement, a term devised by Gallup research group, is viewed as an important management tool for any company who wants to be an effective and productive organization. Researches have shown that employee can contribute positively to the organization vision and goal when a company engage them effectively. The employee will also feel more passionate about their work and have a sense of belonging.
However, a study by Gallup shows that there only 13% employees worldwide are being engaged and the worrying concern is that companies are clueless why the majority are not engaged (Gallup, 2017). Employee engagement is not about employee satisfaction and should regarded as a continuous effort an organization must understand and undertake (Kelleher,
…show more content…
In his study about psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work, Kahn have shown that there are three psychological engagement elements that can influence an individual’s behaviour in relation to their job function. The elements are 1) meaningfulness - rewards from engagement, 2) safety - higher willingness to engage, and 3) availability - readiness to engage (Kahn, 1990). Because of his work, Kahn is widely regarded as the pioneer of employee engagement and his findings are still engaged and found in many references about employee …show more content…
It is this capability of the management to cultivate communication that is important towards effective engagement with the employee (Albrech, 2011). It is not just a one-sided affair of a company engaging employee, but also mutual loop where the employee is also engaging the company. After all, it takes two hands to clap. “Voice must be approached in a genuine and authentic way, and treated as more than just a cosmetic exercise. An authentic use of voice means that when the employee is invited to speak up, the company in return will both listen and will respond to what the employee says, even if just to explain why they cannot carry out a request for change. Feedback is vital and action must be seen to follow.” (Dromey et al, 2012, p.17).
Incentive reward engagement offers a win-win situation for the employees and the company. Kelleher believes that incentive is a form of recognition and builds engagement through company’s and employee’s obligations towards a common goal (2014). The company has a “Growth Incentive Scheme” for the production workers. Special monetary incentives are provided should the workers achieve the monthly output target. Through the rewards, employees feel motivated towards their work and thus, contribute towards the company’s
Workers feeling, which includes competitive compensation and reward strategies, professional growth and development, career paths and succession plans and the organizations leadership and culture are contributing factors of employee engagement
Boston, MA: Pearson Sivarethinamohan, R. R., & Aranganathan, P. P. (2011). Determinants of employee engagement
The company motivates employees by providing “reward” and “engagement”. Reward is evaluating the employees properly and giving reasonable salary, and are divided into three parts:
A study conducted by BlessingWhite (2013) highlights five levels of employee engagement. The first level is the “engaged”. The engaged employee exhibits high contribution and high satisfaction, these employees find great satisfaction in their work, they are strongly committed to the organizations mission and goals, and have a positive impact on employee morale. The second level of employee engagement is the “almost engaged” having a medium level of job satisfaction and contribution. These employees are genuinely satisfied with their job and are considered top performers within the organization. The third level are considered “honeymooners and hamsters” these employees exhibit a high job satisfaction but low contribution levels. Honeymooners are considered newer employees and are seeking their role with the organization, while also seeking ways to contribute to the mission. Hamsters, on the other hand, are sincerely hard workers, however they routinely work non-value added task, therefore contributing little to the organization. Level four consist “crash and burners”. The “crash and burners” have a high contribution level but also exhibit a low level of job satisfaction. The “crash and burners” often complain about decisions made by upper level management as well as complain about
All the more, essentially each employee wants to feel as if they are apart of something bigger that brings about promotion for someone or something greater than themselves. Therefore, that is why is it is pivotal for employers to cultivate high employee engagement.
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., Killham, E. A., & Agrawal, S. T. (2009). Meta-Analysis: The Relationship Between Engagement at Work and Organisational Outcomes. Retrieved February 13, 2014, from www.gallup.com/consulting/File/126806/MetaAnalysis_Q12_WhitePaper_2009.pdf
Saks, A. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement [electronic version]. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(1), 600-619.
Personal engagement based on psychological meaningfulness is when a sense of the value of their work and feel that they are receiving a return on an investment of self in the performance of their role (Saks & Gruman, 2014). When psychological meaningfulness is generated the person feels valued, useful and worthwhile about the work they’ve done. Usually influenced when work incentives for investments are involved (Kahn, 1990). A factor that correlates with psychological meaningfulness is job enrichment and role fit. This factor positively correlates because it integrates task characteristics, role characteristics and work interactions (Kahn, 1990). This illustrates when an employee job/task is more involving and challenging and making them feel independent of the work they’ve accomplished. A scenario that can represent psychological meaningfulness would be understaffed nurses working in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) receiving a trauma patient on a busy day, the administration (Doctors) may show their appreciation to the staff by ordering lunch for their hard work and to show they value their staff and their effective productivity. As a result, the nurses will feel valued in the work they’ve done after overcoming a challenging
In today's complex business environment; traditional approaches like monetary incentives are not the only prime motivators. In addition to expecting financial incentives for their performance, employee's expectations are much more. Appreciation, recognition and opportunities for personal growth; must be catered for to harness maximum productivity. Furthermore in an era where change is imperative for the organisation's survival, highly motivated employees, represent flexibility and show willing to change; a vital component for the success of any organisation.
Kahn, W.A. (1990), ‘Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 33, pp692-724
Definition. Schaufeli’s (as cited in Truss, Delbridge, Alfes, Shantz, & Soane, 2014, p. 26) ideas on employee engagement can be explained by using the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model. Job demands and availability or lack of resources, both job and personal, either contribute to or deter employee engagement, this is illustrated by the JD-R (Truss et al., 2014). On the positive side, according to Truss et al. (2014) job and personal resources “foster engagement in terms of vigor (energy), dedication (persistence) and absorption (focus)” (p. 26). An employee who has the resources needed to do their job is better equipped to do the job and thereby better able to perform their job (Truss et al., 2014). Employees who are better able to meet job
Within the academic literature, several definitions of employee engagement have emerged. Kahn defined personal engagement as the “harnessing of organization members’ selves to their work roles; in engagement, people employ and express themselves physically cognitively, or emotionally during role performances” (Kahn, 1990, p. 694). Kahn further defined personal disengagement as the “uncoupling of selves from work roles; in disengagement, people withdraw and defend themselves physically, cognitively, or emotionally during role performances.” (Kahn, 1990, p. 694).
Employee engagement is one of the biggest factors facing organizations today. According to Mindful Strategies, it is one of the most critical factors in business, but it has some rewarding results. If there are high results in employee engagement within an organization, then they will be high productivity, retention, and customer service according to Mindful Strategies. Also Mindful Strategies stated if employees are engaged within an organization, they are 43 percent more productive towards generating more revenue. This is why employee engagement should be implemented carefully and strategically. Employee satisfaction, productivity, retention and recruitment, innovation, and profitability are five strategies
Here are some figures that display how Employee engagement practices have bolstered up the efficiency and productivity of the employees and in return have augmented the profits of the companies. According to a new meta-analysis that was conducted by the Gallup organisation amongst 1.4 million employees, the organisations that focus on employee engagement practices to a large extent have reported 22% increase in productivity. These practices even impr...
Apart from the above classification, employee engagement can also be perceived as cognitive, emotional or behavioral. Cognitive engagement entails employees’ beliefs about an organization's leadership and workplace culture. The emotional aspect entails, how employees feel about the company, its leaders and other members of the workforce. Finally, the behavioral aspect entails the value based component exhibited by the amount of effort employees put towards achieving organizational goals. Lockwood (2007) argues that employees who are highly involved in their work processes are more engaged compared to those who do not play an active role in their work processes. As such, the link between work practices that require high involvement and positive beliefs and attitudes is a key driver for organizational