Rossian Pluralism claims that there are multiple things that we have basic, intrinsic moral reason to do, which he names as the prima facie duties. These duties are not real, obligatory duties that one must follow under all circumstances, but are “conditional duties” (Ross 754) that one should decide to follow or reject upon reflection of their circumstances. This moral theory has faced criticisms, most strongly in the form of the problem of trade-offs. However, I will demonstrate that the problem of trade-offs is an issue that can be neglected as a valid objection to Rossian Pluralism because it is applicable to other theories as well and it is a factor that makes a moral theory more valuable than not. The prima facie duties that William David Ross has listed include duties of fidelity, reparation, gratitude, justice, beneficence, self-improvement, and non-maleficence. Duties of fidelity and reparation rest on previous acts that one has performed, and acting on these duties are acts such as promise-keeping (duties of fidelity) and making amends for previous wrongful acts (duties of reparation), while duties of gratitude rest on previous acts that others have performed. There is a duty associated with the distribution of pleasure or good regardless of its recipient, and this is termed as duties of justice. An additional duty rests on the mere fact that there are other beings in this world to whom we can be of assistance to: duties of beneficence. Duties of self-improvement claim that there are intrinsic moral reasons for one to improve oneself and finally, duties of non-maleficence states that there are intrinsic moral reasons to not harm others. Duties are placed on the list only when they have been judged to be basic moral reaso... ... middle of paper ... ... with which you’re living your life. Works Cited Gaut, Berys. "Rag-bags, Disputes and Moral Pluralism." Utilitas 11 (1): 37-48. Obtained from PHIL 250 B1, Winter Term 2014 Further Readings – Ethics. University of Alberta eClass. Hooker, Brad. "Ross-Style Pluralism versus Rule-consequentialism." Mind 105 (420): 531-552. Web. http://mind.oxfordjournals.org/content/105/420/531.full.pdf Mcnaughton, David. "An Unconnected Heap of Duties?" The Philosophical Quarterly 46: 433-447. Obtained from PHIL 250 B1, Winter Term 2014 Further Readings – Ethics. University of Alberta eClass. Nye, Howard. PHIL 250 B1, Winter Term 2014 Lecture Notes – Ethics. University of Alberta. Ross, William D.. "What Makes Right Acts Right?" The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930. 753-760. Obtained from PHIL 250 B1, Winter Term 2014 Readings – Ethics. University of Alberta eClass.
Cahn, S.M. (2011). Exploring Ethics: An Introductory Anthology, 2Nd Edition. (pp. 239-253) Oxford University Press
Monistic theories have failed to be sufficiently broad to provide an adequate answer to any moral scenario they are given. Furthermore, of the main Pluralistic theories, Rossian Pluralism 's inclusion of weighting rules makes it a better candidate for a moral theory than Virtue Ethics, which is far too relativistic to be viable. Finally, although Rossian Pluralism 's weighting rules cannot give an adequate answer to all moral conflicts, one must accept that this is simply the nature of morality itself. It seems unlikely that we will ever find the answer to all conflicts between moral duties, just as it is unlikely that we will find out whether or not paintings by Michelangelo are objectively better than paintings by Picasso, or whether or not one should save ten burning Picasso paintings instead of three burning Michelangelo paintings. Because morality is subjective, we will never find answers to questions that require one to draw meaningless lines where one thing becomes more important than another. Therefore, despite this universal issue, Rossian Pluralism still seems to be the most sensible moral
Cahn, Steven M. and Peter Markie, Ethics: History, Theory and Contemporary Issues. 4th Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Thiroux, J. P., & Krasemann, K. W. (2009). Ethics: Theory and practice (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
duties: 1. the duty not to cause further pain or suffering; and 2. the duty to
Sidgwick, Henry (1907): The Methods of Ethics. 7th ed. London: Macmillan and Co.; reprint: Indianapolis: Hackett, 1981.
Culver, Keith Charles. Readings in the philosophy of law. 1999. Reprint. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 2008. Print.
Birsch, Douglas. Introduction to Ethical Theories A Procedural Approach. Long Grove: Waveland Pr, 2013. Print.
(8) D., Lyons, Ethics and the Rule of Law, Cambridge University Press, 1989, p. 81.
As opposed to Naturalism, the ethical theory of duty occupies a completely different domain. Immanuel Kant, the major advocate of this ethical appro...
Thiroux, Jacques P., and Keith W. Krasemann. Ethics: Theory and Practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2009. Print.
Boss, J. A. (2014). Ethics for Life (Sixth ed., pp. 252-255). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
1) Feldman, Fred. ‘Kantian Ethics’ in [EBQ] James P Sterba (ed) Ethics: the Big Questions, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1998, 185-198.
The. Print. The. O’Neill, Onora. “Kantian Ethics.” A Companion to Ethics.
Furrow, Dwight. Ethics- Key Concepts In Philosophy. New York, NY: Continuum, 2005. Print. 20 Oct. 2011