Slowly, Harold begins to let go of the societal-cultural standards that formerly held him captive-- expectations which were causing him to feel shame and loss of power. From a narrative perspective, he is becoming the author of his own story. SRT proposes that shame resilience is affected by recognition and acceptance of personal vulnerability. Harold realizes his own capacity for vulnerability when his uncle attempts to enlist him in the army and he calls on Maude for help. He also touches upon his mother’s lack of attention through emotional conversations with Maude. He develops the ability to engage in a mutually empathic relationship which strengthens his shame resilience. The entire movie is devoted to Harold’s growth in this area. To enhance Harold’s shame resilience, the psychiatrist could have explored this shame and further engaged Harold in dialogue to give meaning to his experiences. Harold not only felt shame about not living up to his mothers and societies standards, but also in not remembering his father. Harold, in keeping with SRT, would benefit from developing skills that identify and discuss experiences of shame. …show more content…
According to Denborough,(2014) “Everyone has the right to have their life understood in the context of their relationships with others” pg.9). By being accepted, cared for and loved by Maude, Harold was able to send the hearse to its final resting place, move past his hurt and gain a better self-image in the process. Denborough (2014) discusses another theme central to narrative theory: legacy. Maude’s legacy was the appreciation of life, and living to the fullest extent. She stressed and not letting others mold you into what they want you to be. An excerpt from the movie clues viewers into Maude’s existential
The narrative begins in the unassuming, yet ardent voice that carries the reader throughout his life story. He makes his plan...
In order to live a full, "wholehearted" life, we need to gain a better understanding of the true nature of vulnerability. Millions of children have been introduced to vulnerability by author J. D. Salinger. Salinger was vulnerable to rejection, criticism, failing. His novel, I’m sure you know it, “The Catcher in the Rye” was rejected 15 times. One editor tossed it aside as juvenile. Perhaps you remember the book’s last lines: “Don’t ever tell anybody anything. If you do, you’ll start missing everybody.” Sure Holden Caulfield put up a tough front but the character created by Salinger is endearing and enduring even to this day – in large part because of his vulnerability. So if we want joy, love, and empathy in our lives, we need to let vulnerability into our hea...
Often, when a story is told, it follows the events of the protagonist. It is told in a way that justifies the reasons and emotions behind the protagonist actions and reactions. While listening to the story being cited, one tends to forget about the other side of the story, about the antagonist motivations, about all the reasons that justify the antagonist actions.
The time Maud spends receiving her education is spent by Sadie enjoying her life. Maud, the educated sister, ends up “all alone in this old house” at the end of her life, while Sadie “left as heritage her fine-toothed comb” for her children. This result is not just a statement against education, but a statement against society. According to this poem, no matter which path a person chooses, there will be a negative in their life. If someone exceeds societal expectations as Maud does, then they will be accepted by society, yet sad. In contrast, the complete opposite path that Sadie follows allows her to be happy, but she is rejected and disrespected by society. Society has made impossible standards for African-American women; if they want to be happy, they will be rejected by society. When what limited opportunities available to women are seized, they are unable to enjoy their lives. The poem Sadie and Maud comments on the impossible standards set forth by society for African-American women, and even women in
People, influences, and choices can morph the idea of respect for an individual. In, The Other Wes Moore, the author, Wes Moore, describes how his life could have easily been someone else’s. Though his idea of respect eventually led him to be successful, another Wes Moore saw the opposite. The two Wes Moores lived in the same neighborhood for much of their lives; however, they did not know about each other’s existence until one made a choice that resulted in a life-long consequence. The other Wes Moore is described to have a different understanding of respect which ultimately leads him to a destination of confinement. How each Wes experienced respect was a noteworthy cause of his fate. In each Wes’s life, there are many similarities, yet countless
These two novels spoke about real powerful momentous events that occur in the authors’ lives. The authors emerged from the shadows and transformed their mishaps into motivation of overcoming life’s hardships. These two stories exemplify ways of overcoming Life’s hardships and finding sense of oneself. These authors break their vows of silence to prove the beauty of a broken person. They both converse on racial discrimination, relationships with God, & coming into themselves.
...of the characters’ lives as their motivation affects what they do. The play’s overall theme of manipulation for personal gain as well as general control transmits to me clearly that we are not in control, of the events that happen to us. In spite of that revelation we are in control of the way in which we react to the circumstances in our lives. Hence, no human fully grasps the capabilities to control the way we act. We simply allow certain circumstances to overpower us and dictate our actions. Ultimately, I learned that we are our actions and consequently we should acknowledge the accountability that is implied when we act a certain way. Instead of blaming others for the mistakes we make, we should understand that we have the control as much as the power to make our own decisions rather than giving that ability someone else.
For this assignment I chose to relate man versus himself conflict to my novel Quid Pro Quo, because throughout the story I felt that Cyril MacIntyre constantly felt oppressed because he didn’t have confidence in himself, whether it was about the way he look...
Brooks concludes the poem by explaining how Sadie's children receive an incredible gift of vitality from her. Sadie's daughters lead lives that are guided by their mother's example rather than by the restraints of society. Then there is Maud, "a thin brown mouse," "living all alone / in this old house" (18-20). Brooks uses this image of solitude to convey her message one last time. By doing only what society expects--by going to college and living a "respectable" life that is free of risk--one is likely to become unhappy and ultimately to die alone.
According to Dideon, the evolution of self-respect starts with trauma (Dideon, 1968). For Dideon, this trauma was not getting into the Phi Beta Kappa Sorority (Dideon, 1968). For Frankl, this trauma was surviving after being admitted into a German concentration camp (Frankl, 6). For Robinson, this trauma was trying to overcome the racism that he encountered from playing baseball on the Brooklyn Dodgers (Clark, Cook, & Hegeland, 2013). It is through this trauma that our childish invincibility is shattered (Dideon, 142-143). For example, this moment for Frankl came when his friend was killed on arrival to Auschwitz: “That’s where your friend is, floating up to heaven,” (Frankl, 13). This event shattered Frankl’s invincibility because he realised afterwards that in Auschwitz, nothing will be under his control.
This is an odd little book, but a very important one nonetheless. The story it tells is something like an extended parablethe style is plain, the characters are nearly stick figures, the story itself is contrived. And yet ... and yet, the story is powerful, distressing, even heartbreaking because the historical trend it describes is powerful, distressing, even heartbreaking.
“The story employs a dramatic point of view that emphasizes the fragility of human relationships. It shows understanding and agreemen...
The “cult film,” “Harold and Maude” was definitely a more than an interesting movie. I did not know what a “cult film” was and this was the first cult classic movie I saw. However, I must agree as to why this movie is considered to be a cult classic. I, myself became a solid fan of the movie after watching it. Being part of the modern era of Hollywood movies, it was even more surprising to actually watch this movie. Nowadays, the movies are very fast going, with high frame rates. However, this classic movie was probably shot at less than 24 frames per second, whereas now it’s in the 50s and 60s.
Anderson makes effective use of fantasy to teach a moral lesson. He builds up the story in such a way that the reader does not care for the validity of the incidents. The moral lesson is that the proud and the disobedient must suffer.
Michael Henchard’s constant exercise of jealousy, pride, immature actions and overwhelming emotions bring him to his tragic end. Although Henchard might have you think he is a victim, the reader can see that his personality leads to the conclusion of his downfall and that Henchard’s inability to learn from his first mistakes takes him down a path no one wants to face. He might have been able to survive his mistakes had he not been so self-destructive. But because of the combination of his personality traits and the complexity of his character’s mind, he is eventually led to the nothingness that engulfs him.