Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of organization behaviour to organization performance
Importance of organization behaviour to organization performance
Importance of organization behaviour to organization performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
21036 – Managing Strategic Performance
AUTUMN 2015
A distinct relationship exists between an individual’s psychological health and their performance-related behaviour. Such behaviour is assumed to flow from their attitudes in the workplace (Hutchinson, 2013). Hence to critically evaluate whether an unhappy worker is capable of displaying positive discretionary behaviour, we must first define what discretionary behaviour is by understanding the pseudo-psychology involved in causing voluntary acts. What causes an employee to feel happy or unhappy may be derived from the psychological impacts of work performance, expectations and the surrounding environment. Studying the cause of challenging behaviour in a social context can also contribute to understanding the relationship between the emotional health and how it influences discretionary behaviour.
An individual who performs tasks outside of their duties and responsibilities and what is expected of them without obligation is defined as discretionary behaviour. Both positive and dysfunctional work behaviour is sourced from the underlying motivations and incentives for work. Positive discretionary behaviour is largely referred to as ‘going the extra mile’ (cited in Hutchinson, 2013). Individuals who are committed to the organisation and/or are motivated and/or achieve a high level of job satisfaction generally are more likely to execute positive discretionary behaviour (Job Enjoy, 2015). Situations of positive behaviour include working overtime to complete unfinished tasks, aiding a work colleague by covering shifts or mentoring. Understanding what fosters discretionary behaviour is required to draw connections between an employee’s happiness level and performance. However, as positiv...
... middle of paper ...
...ance and by breaching the psychological contract and removing the incentives for work, we can expect an employee to feel unhappy and discouraged (Hutchinson, 2013). Both internal and external forces play a role in discretionary behaviour. Organisational injustice causes employees to similarly feel a sense of dissatisfaction and potentially rather damaging behaviours towards co-workers or the organisation itself. Finally, an unhappy worker can be subjected to external sources that cause a low level of happiness. Forces both inside and outside the professional that cause instability in both personal and professional lives of individuals. It is evident that the amalgamation of pseudo-psychological philosophy adds up to conclude that a dissatisfied worker is unable to display positive discretionary behaviour, but rather exhibit a harmful or counter-productive performance.
Over time, this dull pain can erode the self-confidence and passion of even the strongest people, which in turn, affects their spouses and children and friends in subtle but profound ways… Though it may be difficult to quantify, the dissatisfaction of employees has a direct impact on productivity, turnover, and morale, all of which eventually hit a company’s bottom line hard,” (p. ix –
The ingredients or factors that determine happiness on the job are universal in that all workers need a combina...
To be satisfied with one’s job, they must have optimistic feelings surrounding the job they are in, along with the physiognomies associated with it (Kroeger, Thuesen, Rutledge, 2002, p. 83). Not every single part of a job is always desirable, however, if the majority of responsibilities adequately challenge and stimulate, the job will, more often than not, satisfy the employee (Robbins, Judge, 2009, p. 84).
The creation of a strong working psychological contract is dependant on the commitment and effectiveness of the employee within in the organisation. The extent to which their own expectations of what the organization will provide for them and what they owe the organisation in return must match the organisation’s expectations of what it will give and get in return (Schein, 1965).
Judge, T. A., Locke E.A., (1993). Effect of dysfunctional thought processes on a subjective well-being and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 475-490.
Human resource management plays an important role in the organisation. It not only helps the employer evaluate employee accurately but also contribute to the firm’s development. Hence, the appearance of psychological contract is one of the most effective tools to help the organisation improve their HRM issues. However, it also has some challenges for the manager to overcome. Therefore, the main aim of this essay is to analyse the importance of the psychological contract in many aspects and support more evidences and experiences to support employers’ view in managing people.
This theory implicates a logical illustration that if the nature of a job sufficed and met the five core characteristics, the employee would feel a sense of fulfillment that would result in excellent work performance (Armstrong, 2017). The job design prefigures the significant relationship of the five core dimensions as to how a worker perceives the three vital psychological states – meaningfulness of work, responsibility and knowledge of outcomes – that would eventually contribute to a sense of general job satisfaction, personal growth, increased motivation and effectiveness of work (DeVaro, Li, Brookshire, 2007). There is a dynamic suggestion in JCM that acclaims the correlation of positive feelings with an excellent performance, and negative feelings with poor performance (Mukul, Rayhan, Hoque, & Islam,
“enriching certain elements of jobs alters people’s psychological states in a manner that enhances their work effectiveness.” (Lunenburg,
Conte, J., Landy, F. (2010). Work in the 21 Century: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology (3rd ed). USA: Wiley and Blackwell Publishings
Organization citizenship behavior has been emerging as an interesting topic for any organization these days. Katz and Kahn (1996) were the first people to identify this kind of autonomous behavior in workplace. The term Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB’s) was first coined by Dennis Organ and his colleagues (Cf. Bateman & Organ, 1983; Smith Organ, & Near, 1983). Organ (1988: 4) defined Organizational citizenship behaviors as “individual behavior that is discretionary, not directly or explicitly recognized by the formal reward system, and that in the aggregate promotes the effective functioning of the organization. By discretionary, we mean that the behavior is not an enforceable requirement of the role or the job description, that is, the clearly specifiable terms of the person’s employment contract with the organization; the behavior is rather a matter of personal choice, such that its omission is not generally understood as punishable.” Organizational citizenship behavior occurs when the individuals in organization implicitly go beyond the formal boundary of work required to do by him/her. Organization citizenship behavior can also be said to be the choice of individual to work beyond any limitation or expectations of their employers for the overall betterment of the organization. This is completely voluntary action and the employee’s work beyond the expectation of their organization. Organization citizenship behavior is gaining much attention in today’s organizations as it has several positive implications on the organizations. Organization citizenship behavior makes the employee more committed to the organization willingly and helps in promoting overall health of the organization. The employee...
Psychology plays a very important role in organisations today, in particular, positive psychology. It can be noticed across all industries in today’s workplace, from the IT sector to factory work, and it affects all levels in an organisation. Positive psychology can have an enormous impact on organisations. Everything from moral to employee turnover can be drastically affected.
It is important that employees do not fear for their jobs, are stressed of their tasks and their deadlines, etc. Employee happiness should be one of the most important topics for any organizations. If they are happy, they are more likely to focus on their own tasks, work hard, and create a good environment. If they are stressed they are more likely to make mistakes and influence the environment
...vation of their employees. All the theories brought forth regarding employee motivation rotate on the need to make sure that employees are fully satisfied by offering both monetary and non-monetary incentives such as training, promotion and a safe working environment. It is often difficult for employees to devote themselves and engage fully in teamwork activities whenever their leaders favor some of their counterparts while showing bias against others. As the Two Factor Theory puts it, employee satisfaction and dissatisfaction have to be handled separately to ensure that the right measures are initiated whenever there are challenges that jeopardize the prospect of organizations attaining their goals. It is therefore the role of managers to make the environment of their workplaces ethical to attain the level of motivation needed to make employees perform effectively.
Individuals behave in a given manner based not on the way their external environment actually is but, rather, on what they see or believe it to be. An organization may spend millions of dollars to create a pleasant work environment for its employees. However, in spite of these expenditures, if an employee believes that his or her job that assigned to them is lousy and feel unsatisfactory, that employee will behave accordingly.
Job satisfaction has been defined in many different ways. Some believe it is simply how content an individual is with his or her job, in other words, whether or not they like the job or individual aspects or facets of jobs, such as nature of work or supervision (www.boundless.com). According to Colquitt, Lepine, and Wesson in Organizational Behavior, 5th ed., job satisfaction is a pleasurable emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or job experiences. However, after careful research we found that job satisfaction is not just one thing. It is several different facets working together that determine job satisfaction. We will show how pay satisfaction, supervision satisfaction, and satisfaction with the work itself all play a volatile role in developing job satisfaction.