Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Equity vs. equality essay
Equity vs. equality essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Question 5- Explain the difference between formal (or procedural) equality and substantive equality. Formal equality is known as the formal, legal equality. This is the equality that is seen as one law should be applied to all people, social and personal characteristics are no factor. Formal equality aims to distribute equality fairly and evenly, and aims to treat people the same. Formal equality does not ensure the wellbeing of individuals based on race, ethnicity, sex, age etc. Unfortunately, this side of equality does not recognize diversity and is insufficient for promoting social inclusiveness. Even though it may give the illusion of equality and justice, it is actually creating inequality and is actually ending up discriminating individuals (EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, 2004). Substantive equality is referred to as equity in the sense that equality also involves recognizing differences when they are becoming disadvantages (Cheyne, O’Brien, Grave, 2008). Substantive equality looks at the roots of inequality and identifies them, even if this involves removing the barriers that disadvantage individuals. There is no guarantee of the outcome that may be produced, but individuals do have the equality of opportunity. This model of equality recognizes differences and diversity, and can take those into account. Formal equality and substantive equality are two very different forms of equality. Formal equality does not recognize difference, whereas substantive equality takes sex, race, ethnicity etc. all into account. Substantive equality gives opportunity of outcome and may recognize different situations or circumstances, whereas formal equality applies one rule to fit all people so that does not allow for any diversi... ... middle of paper ... ...se rights of a citizen. Works Cited Capeheart, L., Milovanovic, D. (2007). Social Justice: Theories, Issues and Movements. USA: Rutgers University Press Conte, J., Landy, F. (2010). Work in the 21 Century: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology (3rd ed). USA: Wiley and Blackwell Publishings Cheyne, C., O’Brien, M., Belgrave, M. (2008). Social Policy: In Aotearoa New Zealand (4th ed). Australia and New Zealand: Oxford University Press Four types of Justice. (2002-20120. Retrieved from http://changingminds.org/explanations/trust/four_justice.htm EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. (2004). Retrieved From http://www.cite.auckland.ac.nz/index.php?p=quickcite Models of Equality. (2007). Retrieved from http://www.equalityrights.org/cher/index.cfm?nav=hr&sub=mod
The first standard of equality is ontological equality which is the notion that everyone is created equal at birth. Ontological equality often justifies material inequality. In fact, this type of equality is sometimes used to put forth the notion that poverty is a virtue. A second standard of equality is equality of opportunity meaning that “everyone has an equal chance to achieve wealth, social prestige, and power because the rules of the game, so to speak, are the same for everyone”( Conley, 247). Therefore, any existing inequality is fair as long as everyone plays by the rules. The standard of equality is equality of condition, which is the idea that everyone should have an equal starting point. The last form of equality is equality of outcome which states, everyone should end up with the same outcome regardless of
ROPER, B. S. 2005. Prosperity for all?: economic, social and political change in New Zealand since 1935, Southbank, Social Science Press.
Aamodt, M.G. (2010). Industrial / Organizational Psychology: An Applied Approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning
“Equality is based on the idea of fairness whilst recognising that everyone is different, and diversity is about the ways in which people differ and about recognising that differences...
Louis P. Pojman and Robert Westmoreland, eds., Equality: Selected Readings (New York: Oxford University Press, USA, 1997), 30.
Lamb, Kevin. "The Problem of Equality". The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies. v20, #4 (Winter 1995) 467-479.
I had never thought about the difference between equal opportunity and equal circumstances. I have always heard everyone talk about equality but, until reading Dr. Deaton’s book I had never thought about the roots of equality. No one has the same set of circumstances but generally to obtain something it must be worked for. I believe that in most cases if one wants equal opportunity, they must create it for themselves. For example, I love sports, everything about them. People come from all sorts of backgrounds and circumstances because they all worked hard enough to create the opportunity to play at a competitive level. To make it to the MLB/ NBA/NFL there is no minimum parent salary or minimum education level, just athletes that outworked their circumstances. However, I think that differences in circumstances can be a main cause for inequalities. For example, my older sister and I went to the same high school where if you want to learn something,
The Merrian-Webster definition of equality is the quality or state of having the same rights, social status, ect… While watching T.V. George peered at the ballerina who was wearing large heavy government issued handicap bags, handicaps being setbacks. She was also wearing an extremely ugly mask
Diversity, equality and fairness are the latest buzzwords being kicked around in academia and the media. Everybody is supposed to achieve the American Dream today, regardless of who you are, where you came from, or what you do to get there. According to their math, equality of opportunity equals equality of outcome, and if it doesn't, rig the formula so it does.
The issue of gender inequality will never truly be solved in the United States. This arises from differences in socially constructed gender roles as well as biologically through hormonal differences, chromosomes, and brain structures. Gender inequality is defined as unequal treatment or perceptions of individuals based on gender. One of the reasons for gender inequality is income disparities. Another reason is because of the positions in the workplace. Thirdly, the reason is because of beliefs that one another has. For these reasons is why these situations should be examined to get to the root of the problem.
Throughout history, wars over the meaning to equality have being expressed in different ways for the purpose to establishing one standard meaning of equality. The meaning to equal is a state of being equal. What it means to be equal between males and females is being treated with the same amount of respect based on qualification, skills, knowledge and the ability to acquire qualification, skills, and knowledge. The social and economic system has benefited greatly with the deontology theory in defining and developing gender equality. However, it has been a slow process. The meaning of equality between males and females has not always had a message of clarity. Miscommunication and misunderstanding of the meaning of equality between males and females has been responsible for tyranny. Happiness, fairness, and dignity has risen from social roles, poverty, and health reform that defined the message to the question of what it means to be equal and unequal among men and women using the deontology theory as this essay will demonstrate.
Arnold J., Silvester J., Patterson F., Robertson I., Cooper C. and Burnes B. (2005) Work Psychology: Understanding Human Behaviour in the Workplace 4th edition, Pearson Education Limited Essex
middle of paper ... ... Cherry, Kendra. What Is Industrial Organizational Psychology? About.com - Psychology. About.com, 13 Feb. 2014.
Levy, Paul E. Industrial Organizational Psychology. New York: Worth, 2013. Print. The. Laird, Dugan, Sharon S. Naquin, and Elwood F. Holton.
Gender inequality refers to unfair or unequal treatment of people based on their femininity or masculinity. This is often in reference to roles that society has stipulated by default for each gender type. Sexual inequality refers to bias treatment of people based on their male or female sexual traits. Awareness and sensitivity to gender and sexual inequity are vital in the functioning of a society; every society member ought to have equal status, voice and opportunities irrespective of their gender. In every day-to-day activity, gender and sexual insensitivity exhibits in peoples’ speech, behavior and delegation of duties. Insensitivity is often unintentional, thus the need to create awareness among people on what is insensitive and be enthusiastic to begin the change that society needs to be able to give equal chances to all its members and give them a sense of belonging despite their gender (Jackson, 1998).