Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
South america the europeans and imperialism
South america the europeans and imperialism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Lope de Aguirre, better known as the Prince of Freedom, was a Spanish soldier who partook in not only the Spanish conquest and exploration of South America, but later on led the rebellion against Spanish rule in parts of the continent. Aguirre is not only known for his extreme acts of brutality against Spanish leaders, but for being one of the first to claim himself as an American. He played a key role in the fight for independence against the Spanish monarchy. His great acts of violence against Spanish leaders placed him in control of the Island of Margarita (Venezuela), Panama, Chile, and Peru. His betrayal to the Spanish crown was frowned upon and he was soon thought of as a symbol of cruelty and treachery in Colonial Spanish America. Lope de Aguirre payed the ultimate price for his acts of cruelty and violence and was captured and killed by the Spaniards in 1561. In July of 1561, Lope de Aguirre wrote a letter to the King of Spain, Phillip II, explaining his reasons to why he declaring independence from the Spanish rule. He begins by noting the importance and power of the king and explains how he is also a noble christian man. He Carries on to explain his services to the Monarchy which include but is not limited to the conquest of Peru and the search for the lost …show more content…
city of gold. He states that he believes the king has been cruel to those who have given their efforts without asking for compensation by placing individuals in power who only take advantage and do harm to the colonies. He demands the king to punish these individuals who he blames for the situation in Peru. He begs the king to agree to his term for there will be blood spilled if he doesn't, he threatens the crown and says that he will kill every single one of his ministers. He also threatens the king by the use of black mail and uprising scandals on the Catholic church and the Spanish monarchy. This letter represents a direct threat to both the Spanish monarchy and the Catholic church and is an example of independence efforts occurring at this point in latin American history. Throughout this letter, one can really notice the tone and soul of Aguirre by his use of strong and to the point language. He breaks things down in a very organized manner by successfully separating the introduction, body, and the conclusion of his letter. One can note the seriousness and anger in his tone by his use of strong and violent language and his mind-blowing threats he put on upon the Spanish monarchy and the Catholic church. Throughout the letter, I believe Aguirre changes his tactics in order to persuade the king. At the beginning I believe he attempts to make the King feel sympathetic towards him and his men and he wants the king to agree solely on feeling sorry for them, but towards the last half of the letter things completely change. One can notice a sense of violence and anger and he begins to threaten them not only physically by socially. He goes from the poor soldier to the Vicious, blood thirsty conquistador. Aguirre uses his tone to set the actual seriousness and importance of his requests to the king of Spain. This letter only gives you Aguirre's perspective on what is going on at this point in time.
He solely speaks about his opinions, requests, threats, and worth without ever bringing up the opponents point of view. Because this letter is meant to persuade the king to agree to his request, I believe he wanted to only focus on the problem at hand. He speaks about them being evil and corrupt and unfair but for all the readers know he could be indeed sick in the head. After all he's the one who committed horrifying acts of violence and is expecting to be unpunished. In his letter to Phillip II of Spain the reader is only informed of his points and ideals as an attempt to be straight to the point and
clear.
Don Simon Bolivar wrote a letter, which is known as La Carta de Jamaica, to an uncertain person but many believe it was the English Governor of Jamaica. The letter was dated September 6, 1815 and confirmed the revolutionary figure’s commitment and determination to rid latin American from the bonds of the Spanish Empire. Throughout his letter, Bolivar criticized spanish colonialism and called for unification and opposition against foreign rule. This was before Argentina, Chile, and Peru were liberated from the Spanish Conquistadores. However, Simon Bolivar was able to free his home country Venezuela from the Spaniards in 1811, but he knew that there was more he can do to help the other countries under Spanish rule. However, Bolivar also understood that uniting such countries could be difficult for many reaso, but th most difficult obstacle Bolivar had to overcome the fact he had been exiled. Banished, yet determined,
In both the movie, La Misma Luna, and the newspaper series, Enrique’s Journey, there is a demonstration of abuse of power. Judicial policemen, immigration officers, and bandits all take part in hurting migrants in various ways. If a migrant is lucky enough to make it across the borders, then they will most certainly have physical and emotional scars. They also have their own story of survival to tell. One of the main messages sent relating to this topic is immigration officers, judicial policemen, and bandits abuse their authority by beating, robbing, and raping vulnerable immigrants in fragile situations.
The beginning of the document is worded in such a way that it has an almost patronizing tone as the emperor praises the king’s humility. However, as the document progresses it becomes much firmer and in the final lines the tone becomes very harsh as the emperor warns the king to never act on his denied demands.
Bolívar: American Liberator by Marie Arana is about Simón Bolívar’s life and his struggle against the Spanish Empire. Bolivar, also known as the “George Washington of South Americ,,” was born in Venezuela into one of the wealthiest families, but was orphaned at a young age. He was inspired by the idea of a free America and he dedicated his life to fighting for independence of South America from Spanish control. He helped lead and organize the independence movement of Venezuela, Panama, Ecuador, Bolivia, Columbia, and Peru. The novel follows his journey and his endeavors while fighting for freedom for the Spanish countries. I enjoyed the book and it made me feel empowered realizing how much drive was behind those fighting for their freedom from
Díaz del Castillo, Bernal. "The True History of the Conquest of New Spain." In Sources of Making of the West, by Katarine J. Lualdi, 269-273. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2009.
Showing that, not everything that is legal is fair and just, and that people have a responsibility to go against these unjust laws.... ... middle of paper ... ... He uses this letter in order to persuade the clergymen to understand his reasons for all the above.
Throughout history there have been several leaders who used their cunning and sly intelligence to trick the general population into following them and their beliefs. Eventually, these leaders had so much support, they could no longer be called leaders, but absolute and dictatorial rulers. However, during the period of Enlightenment and of the French Revolution, non-maleficent ideas, created by Locke, Montesquieu, Voltaire, and other Enlightenment Philosophes, were spread throughout the European population. They stated the opposition to absolute monarchies as well as a new focus on people’s innate rights and freedoms. Many leaders after this period of Enlightenment preached their ideas, while others simply used them to gain power.
The Marquis de Lafayette is best remembered for the part he played in the American War of Independence. He contributed in helping the Americans gain free control over the colonies by breaking away from British home rule. For sixty years he fought with consistency and insight for political ideals and social reforms that have dominated the history of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Hence, Lafayette can be attributed to the spreading of liberty and freedom throughout America and France. Therefore, he is viewed as a symbol of liberalism in a once absolutist world.
During 1563, Fray Pedro De Feria wrote a letter from Mexico City to the King of Spain about Paquiquineo; a native boy who was kidnapped and left to De Feria keeping. The letter explains what De Feria thought about while Paquiquineo came into his care.
They wanted them to love Spain and the royal family he was a “good” man this document was written in 1493 by Christopher Columbus to the king and queen.
Throughout history freedom has had many different meanings and definitions; based on race, gender, and ethnicity. According to the dictionary freedom means the state of being free or at liberty rather than in confinement or under physical restraint (“freedom” def. 1). Freedom may seem like something given to everyone however it was something workers had to fight for. Not everyone believed that workers’ rights needed to be changed, which led to a long battle between workers, employers and the government. To the working class people freedom meant making higher wages, having regulated hours, workable conditions and the right to free speech.
He proved to be a great hero by trying to warn the governor that they should abandon and destroy the alamo, but with no luck the governor took the other option. An opportunity
As with many rulers, people had varying opinions of Philip II’s beliefs, methods, and mannerisms. Some who saw him in a bad light and disagreed with his actions referred to him as the “black legend” (Biography, 2). They saw him as a ruthless tyrant who was wrongfully ambitious, lustful and cruel (Biography, 2). Others believed this to be false and referred to him as “Philip the Prudent” (Bio, 1). To them he was the man that brought Spain to a literary golden age (Biography, 2), and helped “the Spanish empire attained its greatest power, extent, and influence” (Biography, 1). Opinions are based on point of views, and Philip II’s subjects saw him in different lights therefore seeing him as a different man.
imprisoned. Napeleon then tried to destroy the Spanish independence. This started a whole crisis within
He displays his empathy in lines 6-7 when he declares “I thought it wrong, my sons, to hear your words through emissaries, and have come out myself…” Which show that he wants the people to know he cares personally about what is going on, and will be there to help in any way he can, which leads to his sympathy “…that I’ll do anything. How hard of heart if an appeal like this did not rouse my pity!” (12,13).