Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Golden age in spain philip ii
Golden age in spain philip ii
How did philip ii extend spain's power essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Golden age in spain philip ii
Philip II was born on on May 21, 1598 to the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V and Isabella of Portugal (Biography, 1). Philip II accepted his birthright as King of the Spaniards in 1556 (Biography, 1). He was later named King of the Pourtugese in 1580 after his nephew, King Sebastian of Portugal, died (Biography, 2). Philip was married four times, and had eight childre, four of which were sons (The Children, 1). As with many rulers, people had varying opinions of Philip II’s beliefs, methods, and mannerisms. Some who saw him in a bad light and disagreed with his actions referred to him as the “black legend” (Biography, 2). They saw him as a ruthless tyrant who was wrongfully ambitious, lustful and cruel (Biography, 2). Others believed this to be false and referred to him as “Philip the Prudent” (Bio, 1). To them he was the man that brought Spain to a literary golden age (Biography, 2), and helped “the Spanish empire attained its greatest power, extent, and influence” (Biography, 1). Opinions are based on point of views, and Philip II’s subjects saw him in different lights therefore seeing him as a different man. …show more content…
In Spain, Roman Catholicism was named the official religion in 589 A.D.
Throughout its history, the faith has been linked closely to the country (Castillian). Philip was raised Catholic, and he was known throughout his entire life for having strong religious views even to the point of enforcing Catholicism on his country and other territories (The Man, 1). Philip wrote to his ambassador in Rome saying, “You may assure His Holiness that rather than suffer the least damage to religion and the service of God, I would lose all my states and an hundred lives, if I had them; for I do not propose nor desire to be the ruler of heretics” (Biography,
2). For the first 20 years as king, Philip II kept peace with his European neighbors and didn’t interfere in there matters (Biography, 2). However, he ran his government in a way that angered many of his people causing tension and unrest. Philip received the Netherlands sometime after marrying Mary I, his second wife who was queen of England at the time (Biography, 1). The Netherlanders were the first to revolt against Philip’s rule in 1568 (Biography, 2).. Philip began to persecute protestants in the Netherlands causing Elizabeth, Mary I’s sister who became queen after her death, to send soldiers from England to protect the Netherlanders (Spartacus, 2). This only increased Philip’s drive to restore Catholicism to western Europe, and he soon set out to conquer England, in hopes of bringing protestantism to an end there (Spartacus, 2). In July of 1588, Philip II sent the Spanish Armada to England (Spartacus, 2). Each ship carried 17,000 soldiers and 180 Catholic priests to Calais Harbour (Spartacus, 2). Elizabeth’s English soldiers set ships on fire and let them sail towards the waiting Spanish Armada forcing them to retreat into open water (Spartacus, 2). After a short battle the Spanish Armada sailed back to their home with less than 10,000 of the 25,000 soldiers that sailed out. The exposes of trying to conquer England while fending off other revolts led Spain to bankruptcy (Spartacus, 2).
Demosthenes and Isocrates came to prominence in fourth century B.C.E. Athens as public speakers and as politicians. Isocrates was a teacher of rhetoric, or the art of public speaking, while Demosthenes was a professional litigator, writing speeches for clients arguing in the courts of law, and occasionally presenting arguments himself. Both men were highly respected citizens and opinion makers throughout the sphere of influence maintained by Athens, though they held opposing views regarding the proper course for Athenian government, warfare between the Greek city-states, and the prospect of invasion from the Persian Empire to the east. While the Greek city-states engaged in fratricidal warfare, Philip of Macedon began consolidation of his political power by essentially offering up his highly trained professional Macedonian army as mercenary soldiers to the various city-states requesting assistance or protection and demanding control as hegemon or monarch of the city-state in return for military aid. Following a declaration of truce, Philip would impose his rule upon the vanquished as well.
5 years and nearly an entire continent separated King Philip’s war from the great pueblo revolt. Compare and contrast the causes and consequences of these 2 conflicts.
King Philip's War King Philip's War, 1675-76, the most devastating war between the colonists and the Native Americans in New England. The war is named for King Philip, the son of Massasoit and chief of the Wampanoag. His Wampanoag name was Metacom, Metacomet, or Pometacom. Upon the death (1662) of his brother, Alexander (Wamsutta), whom the Native Americans suspected the English of murdering, Philip became sachem and maintained peace with the colonists for a number of years. Hostility eventually developed over the steady succession of land sales forced on the Native Americans by their growing dependence on English goods.
The naiveté of the main characters actions parallel the types of people that exist in society today. Such people strive for much more than they can realistically aspire to be with the belief of the possibility of success obscuring their perspective. On the other hand, people erring on the side of caution, or rather, pessimism, have a less biased opinion and thus mold their actions to better accommodate the possible adverse aftermath. Unfortunately for King Ferdinand and Queen Isabel, they had more in common with Don Quixote than the “Debbie Downers” of the world. Miguel de Cervantes alludes to the beginning of the gradual decline of Spain to point out that such optimism is prevalent in the everyday workings of society. During the late 1400s, the Spanish Monarchy, with the goal of spreading Christianity, outlawed the practice of Islam and Judaism, forcing followers of these “abominations” to flee. The grandeur of the aftereffects concealed the extent to which the so-called “Heretics” aided and catapulted Spain’s
Niccolò Machiavelli was a man who lived during the fourteen and fifteen hundreds in Florence, Italy, and spent part of his life imprisoned after the Medici princes returned to power. He believed that he should express his feelings on how a prince should be through writing and became the author of “The Qualities of a Prince.” In his essay, he discusses many points on how a prince should act based on military matters, reputation, giving back to the people, punishment, and keeping promises. When writing his essay, he follows his points with examples to back up his beliefs. In summary, Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of a Prince,” provides us with what actions and behaviors that a prince should have in order to maintain power and respect.
Plutarch presented history through biographical stories of the people that were important and influential during the time period he wished to address. However, after having read some of his work, one realizes that Plutarch inserts his own personal opinion and views of the people at hand into the factual documentation of their lives. For example, in The Life of Crassus, Plutarch expresses a general dislike and negative view of the man, but in The Life of Caesar he portrays the life through a lens of praise. It also seems that he uses his opinions of the people that he writes about to subtly extend moral lessons to the reader. What follows is a further isolation of Plutarch's opinions and lessons from within The Lives of Crassus and Caesar.
The modern world is linked through networks of communication and exchange between peoples. These exchanges between regions has changed cultures, economics, and politics. Through time the cultural influence between regions has consisted of many factors and elements but comes down to the spread of religion and religious teachings , movement of peoples, technological and cultural advancements affecting trade and commerce. Beginning with the Middle Ages in the years 1100-1500 , Africa, Asia, and Europe developed and influenced each other in several different ways. Starting with religion. The birth of Islam in the Middle East rapidly spread throughout Afro- Eurasia. Islam was attractive to people who were uninterested in the requirements of Christianity and the Church.
Philip II became king in 359 BCE. He took on a series of reform to strengthen and expand his kingdom. Under his leadership, a weak, backward country with an ineffective undisciplined army became am efficient military force. Philip II was able to take over many territories around Macedonia. Philip II used bribery, warfare, and threat to protect his kingdom. Over the next twenty-three years, Philip II took his soldiers and a cavalry and fought through Thebes, Corinth, Athens, and many other smaller poleis, gathering new forces and wealth (Acrobatiq,2014.) King Philip II’s insight and determination set the platform for his son Alexander. In 336 BCE, King Philip II was assassinated by a Macedonian and his son Alexander the Great became
Llorente, Juan Antonio [1967] A critical history of the Inquisition of Spain, from the period of its establishment by Ferdinand V to the reign of Ferdinand VII, composed from the original documents of the Archives of the Supreme Council of the Inquisition and from those of subordinate tribunals of the Holy Office. J. Lilburne Co. Williamstown, MA.
King Philip’s War, also known as the Great Narragansett War, has been named “America’s most devastating conflict,” and “was a violent and bloody battle between the Wampanoag and English colonists” (Messina). “King Philp’s War settled who controlled Southern New England, and cleared the way for colonial expansion. It also set the tone for future relations between the Native American people and the United States” (“Metacom’s (King Philip’s) War). On January 29, 1695, John Sassamon, a Christian “praying” Indian who had been acting as an informer to the British, died at Assawampsett Lake. Although Sassamon’s exact cause of death is unknown, most likely, Sassamon was murdered by three members of King Philip’s tribe, under the orders of King Philip
Throughout history, there have been numerous instances in which certain political figures have attained rule in a particular country and used their power and control to govern the people. In some cases, one can be successful and sustain their domination for an extensive period of time. For others, however, the situation can turn out differently and can ultimately result in a disastrous end to a leader’s rule. The success of a ruler is dependent on numerous factors. The way a leader should and should not rule his/her people is not always clear cut and can vary based on the time period, and characteristics of the region. Such matters are discussed and explained by Niccolò Machiavelli in The Prince. Throughout the novel Machiavelli discusses an assorted variety of scenarios in which one can acquire rule over a region. Machiavelli goes on to further elaborate how a ruler should act in order to be triumphant and achieve a desirable outcome. Although the novel was written centuries ago in the 1600s the information and advice it contains still remains prevalent today. In fact, when studying the history of selected political leaders, such similarities can be seen. One of modern history’s leaders that exemplifies and has used a handful of Machiavelli’s advice is Charles de Gaulle, military leader and president of France. Serving as an important and influential figure by running the Free French Forces, de Gaulle played a central role in shaping the way France is today. Charles de Gaulle’s political methods and approaches, such as his rise to power, characteristics as a leader, and the means by which he ruled France, are largely paralleled in The Prince by Niccolò Machiavelli.
The businessman, soccer team owner, and politician Roman Abramovich compares greatly with Fascist dictator, Army general and head of state, Francisco Franco. Although the two men are from different countries and different periods—Abramovich was born seventy-four years after Franco—their lives have similar characteristics with many similar undertones. The historical events that both these men affected only provide a glimpse of their personalities. However, these same events expose their moral fiber and general makeup, establishing each man’s level of integrity and reputation. We can see, by comparing these men’s lives side by side, that both men were obviously born of the same principles and inner drive.
Those who hear the name of William Penn may know him as the founder of Pennsylvania, or even recognize him on the Quaker Oat's logo. But this man is more than a another governmental leader or the face of a successful breakfast brand. Penn is, in my opinion, a figure to be admired both in politics and in the Christian faith and I argue that he is highly worthy for the 11th House of The Kings College dawning his name. Although it just so happens that my family is related to William Penn, I am not offering him as an option only because of that fact, but because I discovered his humble and dedicated life to God and people and cannot help but admire this quintessential Christian leader.
Biographical - Philip Sidney was born on November 30, 1554, in Penhurst, Kent. Philip came from a long line of notable Sidneys. His grandfather was Sir William Sidney a courtier to King Henry VIII and tutor (later steward) to King Henrys son Edward. Philips father Sir Henry Sidney was close friends with Edward. He was the lord deputy (governor) of Ireland on three separate occasions. He married Lady Mary Dudley who was the grand-daughter to Henry VIII. Philips godfather, after whom he was named, was Philip II of Spain, husband of Queen Mary I. In 1564 at the age of ten he entered Shrewsbury school. While attending Shrewsbury he met Fulke Greville who became his life-long friend and biographer. He then attended Christ Church college in Oxford from 1568-1571 where he made many influential friends such as Sir Walter Raleigh and Richard Hakluyt.
One of Philip’s greatest tactics in this piece, to convey her intense grief and desolation, is her use of promising phrases about her son’s future, and her sheer joy about what it holds for him. In doing this she is able to build an emotional connection between herself and the reader, “Seaven years Childless Marriage past/ A Son, A Son is born at last…”(5,6), “As a long life promised,” (9), and “Full of good Spirits, Meen, and Aier,” (8). The emotional feelings that are withdrawn from these phrases all resonate with the reader, and allow us to become much more sensitive to not only her and what she is going through, but also her son and his lack of life. The repetition of “Son” is very effective in showing how elated she was, and actually makes the depressing realization that follows even darker and more troublesome.