Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Philip ii golden age of spain
Philip ii golden age of spain
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Philip ii golden age of spain
King Philip II of Spain: How He Improved Spain
Absolutism was a form of government during the sixteenth through eighteenth centuries of Europe, which had made a huge impact on most of Europe. One of these rulers that helped improve the life of Europe was King Philip II, who ruled Spain. King Philip II made many contributions to the overall, well being of Spain. Philip II had made positive and negative achievements. He helped expanding upon the nation and improved spanish culture by improving arts and literature and represent a great ruler. Overall, King Philip II had improved the culture and strength of Spain, therefore, had become a great ruler.
King Philip’s life led up to his reign of rule in Spain. King Philip was born in Valladolid at 1527 and died from cancer at the age of 71. Before king Philip ruled Spain, Valladolid was a
…show more content…
place where he and his father lived until he was matured enough to rule. Philip’s dad, Charles V got a warning from god that if his son had trusted his advisors fully, that terribles things will come. This had made Philip more cautious during his reign of rule which helped him become a bigger impact in Spain. These events before his rule had helped him improve to be a better ruler. Philip II’s rule had many positive and negative effects during his rule.
One negative effect was Philip cooperating with the Church to persecute protestants during the Counter-Reformation. The reason why this was terrible is because of trying to force others into believing their own religion. “A league between Henry II of France and the pope was overthrown by Philip” (World Biography Online). This act was committed to gain more power so no one could overthrow him, this could be though as a positive or a negative affect. Another negative effect is opposing for public communication, the reason why this is a negative effect is not showing and/or telling what problems Spain had. A Positive effect that helped his reign of rule is being powerful and always hard working. “Personally, Philip was fair, spoke softly, and had an icy self-mastery; in the words of one of his ministers, he had a smile that cut like a sword” (Encyclopedia of World Biography). The reason why this a good effect during his reign of rule is that he could represent an excellent ruler during his reign. Due to Philip’s reign of rule, his legacy had improved Spain as a
whole. Philip II had made a huge impact on Spain when he died. One of the impacts he had made in Spain was improving the art and literature by studying the Renaissance. “However, his reign was subsequently dubbed a ‘golden age,’ not so much for its imperialist ventures as for its striking achievements in art, literature, and architecture, most of them derived from contact with Renaissance civilization” (Encyclopedia of the Renaissance). The reason to why this impact had improved Spain was improving art and literature can increase the popularity in art and create better books that had better information. Another impact he made when improving the country Spain was staying into high power for 50 years after Philip’s death. The reason to why this impact had improved Spain was having a better protection from invaders which will not lead to the destruction of Spain. One last impact that Philip II had made in Spain is letting the Counter-Reformation not creating any more conquests. The reason why this impact is fantastic is that the Counter-Reformation will have more religious tolerance to prevent riots made by the people. King Philip II had made many long lasting effects during and after his reign of rule. For example, he had helped represent a great ruler to his people which lead to a better understanding to rulership in the future.
Louis XIV is considered the “perfect absolutist” and he has been said to have been one of the greatest rulers in France’s history. He came up with several different strategic plans to gain absolute
During the 16th and 17th centuries a new type of ruling emerged as a result of unorganized government called royal absolutism. This type of government was seen in many European countries including France and Russia where King Louis XIV and Peter the Great ruled respectively. Both had ways of ruling that were similar to each other and different to each other. Politically, economically and socially both Louis XIV and Peter the Great were similar to and different from how they ruled and what their reign resulted.
In the Age of Absolutism, both England and France had strong absolute monarchies and leaders. Though Louis XIV, monarch of France, and Charles I, leader of Britain, both served as their country’s king and served in this role in different ways.
While the two kings had many differences their militaries were surprisingly similar. They both had military troops that guarded and walked around the palace. The kings’ military was not only used for protection but also for spreading their beliefs and ideals. Their military was alert and ready to protect if there was to be an attack on the palace. King Louis XIV and Philip II both would have enough troops to go to war and express their thoughts but also enough to protect the palace.
Absolutism was a period of tyranny in Europe during the 16th and 17th centuries because monarchs had complete power to do whatever they pleased. Since absolutism is a "monarchical form of government in which the monarch's powers are not limited by a constitution or by the law" essentially there are no boundaries for actions the monarch can and cannot take. The absolutists did not focus on the people under their rule, they ruled by fear and punishment, and believed they were equal to God.
Absolute monarchs ruled though the policy of absolutism. Absolutism declared that the king ruled though divine right with a legitimate claim to sole and uncontested authority (French State Building and Louis XIV). On this basis, Louis XIV of France and Suleiman I of the Ottoman Empire were both absolute monarchs. Each ruler believed that his power belonged to him and him alone due to divine right. They showed their absolute power by living lavishly, increased their power by waging wars, and kept their power by ensuring complete loyalty of their subjects.
Many people have heard of King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain. However, only some know of all the things they accomplished. They might be best known for funding the voyages of Christopher Columbus, but they also greatly contributed to the unity of Spain (“Isabella l”). Together, they brought many kingdoms on the Iberian Peninsula together to form what Spain is today. Through Spain’s unification, King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella strengthened Spain into an economic and dominant world power, enabling the spread of Christianity and the colonization of a New World.
Of all the absolute rulers in Europe, by far the best example of one, and the most powerful, was Louis XIV of France. Although Louis had some failures, he also had many successes. He controlled France’s money and had many different ways to get, as well as keep his power, and he knew how to delegate jobs to smart, but loyal people.
Absolutism is defined as a form of government where the monarch rules their land freely without legal opposition. In modern times, when democracy is the ideal, this form of government seems cruel and tyrannical; however, there was an era when it thrived in European politics. During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, absolute rule was justified by the concept of divine right and its improvements to the security and efficiency of a nation.
Absolutism describes a form of monarchical power that is unrestrained by all other institutions, such as churches, legislatures, or social elites. To achieve absolutism one must first promote oneself as being powerful and authoritative, then the individual must take control of anyone who might stand in the way of absolute power. The Palace of Versailles helped King Louis XIV fulfill both of those objectives. Versailles used propaganda by promoting Louis with its grandiosity and generous portraits that all exuded a sense of supremacy. Versailles also helped Louis take control of the nobility by providing enough space to keep them under his watchful eye. The Palace of Versailles supported absolutism during King Louis XIV’s reign through propaganda, and control of nobility.
In the seventeenth century there were different types of leaders in Europe. The classic monarchial rule was giving way to absolutist rule. Absolute kings claimed to be ruling directly from God, therefore having divine rule that could not be interfered with. In 1643 Louis XIV began his reign over France as an absolute king.
While absolutism benefited Louis XIV and France during the 17th century, other countries were unable to sustain his model as long as he did. This model dispersed to as absolute monarchs were seeing the world change from when the Sun King reigned (491).
During the late 17th and early 18th century, many European nations such as France and Russia were absolute monarchies. Even countries such as England had kings who at least attempted to implement absolutism. Indeed the concept of absolutism, where the monarch is the unquestionably highest authority and absolute ruler of every element in the realm, is certainly appealing to any sovereign. However, this unrestricted power was abused, and by the end of the 18th century, absolutism was gone. Absolutism failed because the monarchs' mistreatment of the population caused the people to revolt against their rule and policies. There are many factors which caused this discontent. For one, there was a great loss of human lives. Louis XIV of France participated in four wars, while Peter of Russia ruthlessly executed anyone who stood against his will. Secondly, monarchs attempted to change religious beliefs. This was notable in England where rulers such as James II desired to convert the Anglican nation into Catholicism. Finally, the burden of taxation was more than the population could support. France was brought into huge foreign debt, English kings constantly attempted to raise money, and Peter of Russia increased taxes by 550 percent. These are some of the key reasons why absolutism failed in Europe.
Absolutism is when the sovereign power or ultimate authority rests in the hands of a monarch. There were several justifications for absolutism that existed in Europe, and especially in France. The main justification for absolutism was based on religion. In Europe, Louis XIV was the best example of an absolute monarch. In contrast, in England the monarchy was more limited and absolutism was not permitted to continue.
The term ‘absolute” defines the singular power of the monarch to control every aspect of governing without the aid of the aristocracy or parliamentary forms of governance. The example of Louis XIII defines the rise of absolute monarchy in the 17th century, which eliminated agreements, such as the edict of Nantes, which enabled to aristocracy rights and powers in governmental decisions., however, Louis XIII dissolved these laws in order to gain total dominance over governmental affairs through military and financial might. In this example. Louis XIII defines the role of absolute monarch and the individual powers that the king welled over the government in 17th century