Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Spanish civil war social problems
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Spanish civil war social problems
Comparative Essay of Francisco Franco and Roman Abramovich
The businessman, soccer team owner, and politician Roman Abramovich compares greatly with Fascist dictator, Army general and head of state, Francisco Franco. Although the two men are from different countries and different periods—Abramovich was born seventy-four years after Franco—their lives have similar characteristics with many similar undertones. The historical events that both these men affected only provide a glimpse of their personalities. However, these same events expose their moral fiber and general makeup, establishing each man’s level of integrity and reputation. We can see, by comparing these men’s lives side by side, that both men were obviously born of the same principles and inner drive.
Francisco Franco was born of humble beginnings in 1892, the son of a Navy paymaster. Although his mother descended from Portuguese royalty, he did not have the luxuries of life typically available to those reaching such high social and political standings. Though his professional expectations laid his future out for him, external elements changed his life’s direction. He was expected to follow his father’s example and enter the Navy. However, this changed when the naval academy temporarily closed to officer candidates because of the end of the Spanish-American War providing a surplus of officers. When he could not enter the Navy, he entered the Army. This shows how politically related events changed his life unexpectedly.
Roman Abramovich had similar humble beginnings; however, his were marked by tragic events. Born in 1966, Abramovich was the son of a construction supplier and his mother was a musician. He lost both his parents while he was still a very young child. Hi...
... middle of paper ...
...ut few dare ask how”(http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article4272531.ece) The times, 5 July 2008
9. Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich sued for billions in bitter “fraud and blackmail” battle with former business partner ] mail online(http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article 560523/chelsea-owner-Roman-abramovich-sued-billions-bitter-fraud-blackmail-battle-business-partner,html)
10. Spanish Civil war Casualties (http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/SPcasualties.htm)
11. Gilmour, David, The Transformation of spain: From Franco to the constitutional Monarchy, p7 1985 Quartet Books
12. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-444314/Abramovichs-wife-warns-new-squeeze-Hell-dump-too.html
13. Roman Abramovich admits paying out billions on political favors -, Times online (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article4272509.ece)
Judas at the Jockey Club, written by William H. Beezley, is used as a tool for those observing Mexico’s history during the Porfirian Era. This supplemental text addresses the social and political issues that were prominent during the Porfirian Era under the dictatorship of Porfirio Diaz; whose goal was to lead the modernization of Mexico. Porfirio Diaz was the president of Mexico in 1876; he made a false promise to resign in the Creelman interview in 1908 but did not officially resign until 1911. Beezley displays an analysis of the segregation between the common people and how they attempted to deal with an oppressive government. Judas at the Jockey Club is important to this Latin American course because of the extensive background Beezley provides to shed light on the tensions that allowed the socioeconomic gap to exist.
Teja, Jesus F. De La. A Revolution Remembered: The Memoirs and Selected Correspondence of Juan N. Seguin. Austin: State House Press, 1991.
Díaz del Castillo, Bernal. "The True History of the Conquest of New Spain." In Sources of Making of the West, by Katarine J. Lualdi, 269-273. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2009.
Francisco Franco (1892-1975) was a lifelong military leader. He rose through the ranks until the early 1930s, when he found himself, a right-wing monarchist, in the middle of a left-wing republic. He was demoted, but later rose up again, and by 1935 he had been named chief of staff of the Spanish Army, a position he used to get rid of left-wing figures and their military institutions. When the left- wing social and economic structure of Spain began to fall, Franco joined the rebellion. He soon led an uprising and took control of Spain after the Spanish Civil War (1939). From then unti...
The character of Demetrio Macias proves to be quite ironic. One facet of his character reveals his determination to find Pancho Villa’s army, while the other side of his character parallels the extraordinary qualities Pancho Villa had as a hero. People viewed Pancho Villa as a revered hero who pushed out foreign "proprietors" and fought for the common man. On one hand, there is the compassionate man who helped those in need and rescued orphans providing them with food, education, and a home. On the other hand, there was the ferocious general who destroyed villages and killed innocent victims. Villa was generous and helpful to his followers, of which he insisted on loyalty and trust, but to those who violated his trust and authority, he was merciless and cruel. We can clearly see the similarities of these two leaders when we analyze their noble actions. Demetrio’s reluctance to stop ...
Although Pancho Villa is known to be a rebel and a bandit, he wasn’t born into a life of crime. Due to an awful circumstance, in which a wealthy man attempted to rape his young sister, Pancho Villa killed the transgressor. Pancho Villa had no choice but to change his name, hide in the mountains, and live as an outlaw. Over the years he gained the public’s attention for being sneaky and cunning towards the wealthy, and generous amongst the poor. His popularity as a modern day Robin Hood caught the attention of Francisco Madero who promised change to the lower class if they fought alongside him. Azuela recounts some of the problems the poor people faced “…Government people who've declared war to the death on us, on all the poor.”(p7). Many soldiers were w...
After five hundred years, Niccolo Machiavelli the man has ceased to exist. In his place is merely an entity, one that is human, but also something that is far above one. The debate over his political ideologies and theories has elevated him to a mythical status summed up in one word: Machiavelli. His family name has evolved into an adjective in the English language in its various forms. Writers and pundit’s bandy about this new adjective in such ways as, “He is a Machiavelli,” “They are Machiavelli’s,” “This is suitable for a Machiavelli.” These phrases are almost always the words of a person that understands more about Niccolo’s reputation than the man himself. Forgotten is that Machiavelli is not an adequate example of the ruler he is credited with describing; a more accurate statement would be to call someone a “Borgia” or a “Valentino.” Most of the time they are grossly mistaken in their references. All these words accomplish is to add to the legend, and the misinterpretation, of the true nature of Niccolo Machiavelli.
In the famed author William Shakespeare’s playwright Julius Caesar, we are introduced to an extraordinary plot of a powerful ruler, Julius Caesar, who gained power through astonishing victories and remarkable strategies but fell victim to betrayal. The betrayal that led to his demise was led by some of the very people that surrounded him the most, even some people that he considered as friends. The theme of betrayal and the notion of friendship and its validity are both topics that are worth examining but perhaps the most prevalent topic that drives this plot is the image of Caesar. Caesar ascended into power after a long period in Rome where the rise of tyranny had been fought systematically and physically. He had to not only be a powerful leader but also a wise politician when it came to his decisions. His image tarnishes more and more as his power increases and he too chases after it. He becomes so ambitious over power that he begins to feel immortal and free from danger. His conspirators do not just want him out of power for the simple sake of it but because some of them, either persuaded or not, earnestly believed that Julius Caesar’s death would save Rome not hurt it. What makes this playwright’s so extraordinary is not the dynamic drama alone, but also the depiction of Julius Caesar and how even in the monstrosity of his murder, his image was still arguable causing division amongst men. Although William Shakespeare has, for a very long time now, been known for his great writings it is clear that he himself depicted a ruler that would win favor in the eyes of the great Italian political philosopher and writer Niccolò di Bernardo dei Machiavelli but not the profound Italian writer Baldassare Castiglione. Both writers wrote ab...
Adams, Jerome R. Liberators and Patriots of Latin America. Jefferson, NC and London: McFarland & Company Inc., Publishers, 1991. Print.
A key proponent of Weber’s favouring of the EOR over the EOC when serving a cause is his assessment of the meaning human action. For Weber an action is given meaning by its relationship to the empirical world rather than its relationship to the original intention. Meaning the cause that a political leader commits to should be evaluated based on its effect on human society rather than the levels of advancement or sophistication of the cause itself. Evidence for this assertion is shown throughout Weber’s work. For example, in his critique of the Russian Bolsheviks and the German Spartacists Weber questions the morality of conviction orientated political actors, arguing “have we not seen that the Bolshevik and Spartacist ideologies bring about exactly the same results as any militarist dictator? What distinguishes the polemics directed by most exponents of the supposedly new ethics at the opponents they criticise from the polemics of any other demagogues?” (Weber, 1994, p357). As can be seen, Weber is critical of the idea that the presence of supposedly noble intentions on behalf of the
In order to understand the effects of the Spanish Civil War, the atmosphere of Spain prior to 1936 needs to be understood as well. Spain, unlike major European powers, never experienced a bourgeois revolution and was therefore still dominated by a significant aristocracy. However, Spain had gone through several civil wars and revolutions making violence one of the most common devices for change. It, also, had undergone several cycles of reform, reaction from the opposition, and reversal by military uprising led by a dictator before 1936 (Preston 18).
Olley, J. (01-Dec-2006). A Historical Analysis of the Spanish American War; 1898 - Associated Content. Retrieved July 20, 2008, from http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/93329/a_historical_analysis_of_the_spanish.html
The Roman Abramovich Effect Roman Abramovich the Russian billionaire turned owner of Chelsea. football club has turned the footballing world upside down. The The arrival of Roman Abramovich in July 2003 has stunned footballers and fans worldwide with his non stop spending and the rebuilding of Chelsea. Chelsea is becoming a dominant force in the English league. and is forever improving.
Nicandra Franco, my great-great grandmother was born in Toledo, Spain in May 10, 1884, there is not enough information of who her parents were or her life in Spain. During the Spanish Civil War, she was forced to leaved her homeland along with her only son Reynaldo Franco, and move to another country for political and ideological reasons, or for the reprisals on the part of the victorious party, and the authoritarian political regimen stablished in Spain, remaining abroad until the evolution of the internal circumstances allowed her to return home. But she never had the opportunity to return to Spain again.