Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of power in an organization
The importance of power in an organization
Autocratic, bureaucratic, laissez-faire leadership essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of power in an organization
There are various leadership styles that affect how managers and subordinates communicate and produce in the workplace. Having an effective leadership style can make communicating and producing in the workplace much easier for both the managers and employees. The ability to lead others is not easy, which makes having an effective leadership style a necessity for any manager. Leadership styles provide direction, motivation, and communication for employees. Therefore, leaders must choose a leadership style that best suits their own personal attributes, the subordinates, and the job itself. Some key ingredients of good leadership include, honesty, integrity, respect, and competency. Furthermore, employees have personal needs, which must be addressed …show more content…
Therefore, there are many resources available online about the various types of leadership styles. CambridgeDictionaries.com defined autocratic and BrainyQuote.com provided an interesting quote from Adolf Hitler. An online article called Leadership styles by Aastha Dogra provided evidence of a famous autocratic leader. Adviseamerica.com provided evidence of other famous autocratic, paternalistic, laissez-fair and democratic leaders. Pellegrini and Scandura gave great insight on the origins of the paternalistic leadership style in their journal article: Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Michael Maccoby pointed out Sigmund Freud’s theory: Why people follow the leader: The power of transference. Todd Wasserman discusses holacracy as a new management trend. A research study conducted by psychologist Kurt Lewin is explored in an article in the Journal of Social Psychology by Kurt Lewin and an online article written by Kendra Cherry at psychology.about.com. Lastly, retired U.S. Army Sgt. 1st Class Don Clark gave his philosophy on how a good leader uses three types of leadership
The post-bureaucratic era has seen changes in practices from an autocratic to a democratic leadership style. However, such dynamic changes have refurbished bureaucratic principles, characterising it as a “hybrid” of “democratic principles” and the “Weberian Ideal-type” (Clegg and Courpasson 2004, pg 54). In this essay, I argue that contemporary leadership practices embody post-bureaucratic ideals to an extent, as prior-bureaucratic methods are still interpolated. In section one, I’ll evaluate the competency-based management approach success and individualistic notion, however contrasting on how it’s “repetitive refrain” hinders Post-heroic” forms of leadership, by calling on the views of Bolden and Gosling (2006 pg3). In addition to I’ll be comparing research (e.g.
Leadership style is a behavioral model that leaders use it to interact with followers. Leadership is a combination of providing direction, making decision, motivating sub-workers and achieving goals (Fertman & Liden 1999). Furthermore, Chemers (2007) asserted that leadership is the executive of organizational intelligence in which leadership effectiveness is linked to organizational performance. In addition, Obiwuru et al (2011) stated that the leadership styles are predictor to leadership effectiveness whereby leadership style in an organization is one of the factors that play significant role in enhancing or retarding the interest and commitment of the individuals in the organization. In this paper, we will concentrate on three leadership
A leadership theory is a clarification of some features of leadership; theories have practical importance as they are being used for better understanding, anticipating, and controlling successful leadership. Hence, the main principle of any theory is to inform practice(Lussier and Achua 2009). Leadership theories could be classified into eight main categories: Great man, trait, behavioral, contingency, Situational, Participative, Relationship , management (Cherry 2010).
Edwin T. Cornelius III defined leadership style as the broad, characteristic way in which a leader interacts with others across in various situations and occasions. (Cornelius, 2006) However, many researchers would agree that leadership style is merely traits and they can change within an organization or between different situations. Annick M. Brennen in an article stated: A study of leadership styles therefore deals mainly with the manner in which the leader carries out his/her leadership functions or roles–the use of authority and power and the approach to the decision-maki...
They further stated that most leadership forms a new paradigm for understanding both the lower and higher order effects of leadership style. The style of leadership which is adopted by a leader is influenced by the leader’s background, personal experience, religion, political affiliation, ideology, inclination, culture and even orientation without necessarily being based on the dynamics of the situation. The major leadership constructs consist of transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and lazzirfair leadership others that are going are common are democratic and autocratic types of
The principles of leadership and management are helps to understand the management style and make the effective decision. An effective decision helps to gain the success of an organization. Lots of way to manage and collect information/question for leadership and management which are describing in the below:
Since elementary school I have been in Celina's Boy Scout Troop 69. Starting as a Tiger cub and after many years eventually becoming a Boy Scout. 10 years later it is my last year of being a Boy Scout and I will be aging out in April. From building fires, tying knots, and learning first aid, scouting has taught me life skills that I will never forget. The greatest lesson of all though has to be grasping the skills of being a leader. The character and roles of a leader are very important for everyone to understand. But they can also be hard to grasp. I was 16 and decided to run for the position of SPL or Senior Patrol Leader. The SPL is in charge on all troop activities and is tasked with running things smoothly. The
Leadership is not defined by position. Leadership is an extraordinary responsibility given only to those willing to exude selflessness, decisiveness, and wisdom. CSM William R. Hambrick, Jr is an accomplished leader that embodies the values, attributes, and competencies that I aspire to convey to my subordinates. The impact that CSM Hambrick has had on my career and leadership philosophy is immeasurable. His far-reaching legacy is one of confidence, sound judgment, and empathy.
This study aims to find the relationship between leadership performance style and project success and to research that whether the project success is influenced by leadership style. According to Belout and Gauvreau (2004), “Nowadays, project management has become a key activity in most modern organizations. Projects usually have a wide variety of objectives, involve numerous internal and external actors, and are conducted in various activity sectors”. Many researchers have agreed that project leadership is one of the most crucial elements of a project’s success. There are many views on leadership and according to Dulewicz and Higgs (2005), leadership has been studied more than any other aspect of human behavior. Higgs (2003) identified six
On projects I have taken the lead on, I have always valued input from other employees. This assumes the fact that the employee is competent in their area, and have a willingness to share ideas with management. I encourage active participation, and I am often surprised at some of the answers that have come out of collaborative meetings. When employees feel at ease to share their ideas, genuinely good things
Over the course of my professional career in different organizations in the past three years, I have worked under many managers. This has been a learning curve for me to understand the different managing styles and leadership characteristics of people. One of the managers whom I worked under, was the lead in a government project which also happened to be my last project before I took a break for continuing my studies, is a person I admire till date. I learned several life lessons in addition to the technical subject associated with the industry. This paper demonstrates the leadership styles exhibited by my manager with suitable examples.
In this paper I will look at the four major leadership styles, their characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and in what situations a particular leadership style is desired. Additionally, I will look at my leadership style and how I acquired this style throughout my career.
What is leadership? Leadership is defined as a process by which a individual will influence others to obtain goals. Leaders will guide, direct motivate, or inspire others. Leadership is defined by not only traits but actions as well. Leaders are inspirational, trustworthy and charismatic. Many people may think a manger is leader. Although leadership and management go hand in hand, they are not the same. Everyone has their own beliefs about what characteristics an effective leader should have. To me, communication skills, critical thinking skills, and having a vision are few characteristics of becoming an effective leader. A leader is not only born, but made. Some are born as leaders or some are made to be leaders.
There are a few different types of well known leadership styles, authoritarian, delegative, and democratic. To assess my leadership style I used two online tests to help me determine my style. I felt the results were accurate and I fall into a democratic style/participative style. If I am leading I prefer to include the group and get their feedback on solving issues. However, I still make the final decision after listening to the thoughts of the group on a particular topic. This is considered to be a positive style of leadership that is inspiring to the group involved. The leaders decision making tends to be more accurate due to the input of other experts. (Cite)
When in a leadership role, it is important to consider both the task and relationship aspects of a situation. Both of these aspects are essential in order to achieve the goal successfully. Task aspects are more or less directly related to achieving the end goal. It incorporates the actions required from a leader’s followers in order to achieve the desired results. It is much more geared towards performance than the relationship aspects are. Looking at the relationship side of leadership, it focuses more so on the followers and their well-being. A leader who is more relationship oriented will spend more time talking to their followers and trying to understand how to motivate them. They try to make more of a personal connection than task-oriented leaders do.