Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Transformational leadership theory challenges
Challenges of transformational leadership
Challenges of transformational leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Transformational leadership theory challenges
Discussed earlier was the fact that there are factors in place that should have identified the need for change. This organization has a yearly health and wellness survey that is completed anonymously to gauge technical growth and morale. This survey has been flagged for four years in a row as being “red” which indicates that there is a leadership issue. The other factor is a program that logs the organizations ability to do their job which has also been flagged for five years. These flags should have initiated a “Tiger Team” who would have been tasked to analyze the problem and generate courses of action to resolve the issue. However, this did not occur and business continued as is until recently when several outside agency inquisitions …show more content…
Due to the fact that these issues have been allowed to go on for so long this organization will need to undergo a major transformation. Group productivity is directly affected by the level of buy in from the employees towards change that will depict the ability to change. The need for change in this Squadron was identified and mainly comes from the job placement for specific skillsets and those who lead them. If change can be effectively implemented in this specific area, the rating of this Squadron will go from below satisfactory to an above satisfactory rating. The process of change for this organization can be created utilizing Kotter’s 8-step approach towards organizational change.
The first issue identified was the job placement for specific skillsets. A sense of urgency for this situation needs to be recognized and immediate work to rectify the issue to ensure no further damage or loss to technical ability is endured. The placement of unskilled members in critical areas has caused a relay of badly trained personnel that cannot do their job correctly. The second
…show more content…
By taking note of these items the change process can be improved and adjusted this step is called consolidating gains and produce more change. Yes, this will produce more change efforts but employees will be more familiar with the need for the modification. They can do this by utilizing their number one assets, the employees, they will know if a management structure or section structure would be better served differently or whether policies need updating to match the vision. The plan implementation will result in immediate improvements such as having more mission qualified and skilled personnel, a more structured work force, and a better understanding of what is expected to progress. In addition, a query can be taken to ascertain if anyone assigned to the squadron has special skills to assist in this project because “a person that operates in a space of presence can exercise greater influence on their environment, and becomes truly pro-active” (Gardner, 2010). Being proactive and actively seeking subject matter experts or even individuals that have experienced similar situations will have great insight to add but the organization would not know there assets if they do not inquire. Once these accomplishments are consolidated, the new approach can be anchored into the culture by documenting change the
...y understand of why the change is needed. For example he can provide the employees with the pros and cons of the current process and how the new implemented changes will improve the organization.
LM06-2, Change Management Student Guide. (2013). Maxwell-Gunter AFB. Thomas N. Barnes Center for Enlisted Education (AETC).
Leaders benefit from building a team to create and implement change, this is a key theme in the Kotter model of change. This teambuilding engages employees throughout the process. Allowing employees to be a part of the change process gives them the opportunity and trust to be creative moving toward the future (Cochrane, 2002). Leaders can create opportunity for employees and leaders to dialogue about the change, which can help troubleshoot the process. Leaders who engage employees throughout the organization from various levels of the organization will receive perspectives from the entire organization helping them make better-informed decisions. Employees want to be allowed the opportunity to help an organization they believe in, in a way that enhances the
Leading Change was named the top management book of the year by Management General. There are three major sections in this book. The first section is ¡§the change of problem and its solution¡¨ ; which discusses why firms fail. The second one is ¡§the eight-stage process¡¨ that deals with methods of performing changes. Lastly, ¡§implications for the twenty-first century¡¨ is discussed as the conclusion. The eight stages of process are as followed: (1) Establishing a sense of urgency. (2) Creating the guiding coalition. (3) Developing a vision and a strategy. (4) Communicating the change of vision. (5) Empowering employees for broad-based action. (6) Generating short-term wins. (7) Consolidating gains and producing more changes. (8) Anchoring new approaches in the culture.
Spector, B. (2013). Implementing organizational change: theory into practice. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ
In today’s ever changing world people must adapt to change. If an organization wants to be successful or remain successful they must embrace change. This book helps us identify why people succeed and or fail at large scale change. A lot of companies have a problem with integrating change, The Heart of Change, outlines ways a company can integrate change. The text book Ivanceich’s Organizational Behavior and Kotter and Cohen’s The Heart of Change outlines how change can be a good thing within an organization. The Heart of Change introduces its readers to eight steps the authors feel are important in introducing a large scale organizational change. Today’s organizations have to deal with leadership change, change in the economy,
Another area of improvement is not allowing people a great deal of freedom and choice in deciding how to do their work, which falls under the “Enable Others to Act” section of the model. One method of improving this section is by asking people more questions starting with phrases like, “how do you see…?” or “what do you think about…?” By seeking their input I can see where my influence is too great and not permitting them leeway to do the work. Additionally, I need to recognize when I am intervening in the process too much. Recently my two First Class Petty Officers and I had a discussion on how we can improve the way we are doing business. They confronted me on this specific topic and I have taken strides to improve. I will sit down with them again and check my progress and solicit feedback on how to improve the current processes
There are many excellent takeaways that Army leaders at all levels of war can implement when making a change. Lessons learned by many companies were thoroughly discussed and clearly highlights the pitfalls and traps leaders fall victim to when making a transformation. Therefore, Leading Change is a must read for military professionals because there are two critical tools that all leaders need to put into their kit bag, the eight reasons why change initiative fail and the eight-stage process to lead the organization through successful
As an emerging leader whose desire is to see progress in his/her organization change is inevitable and necessary. Although change is an important component of moving forward and growing a lot of people resist change, this resistance can be contributed to our fear of the unknown which is what change represent to many people. Hence, when it comes to implementing change it would be best to start off by recognizing and identify what needs to be change ad how to bring about that change. You can’t convince others to go on a journey if you are not aware where you are going.
This paper will be broken down into six sections profiling each critical part of implementing and managing change in an organization. The sections included are; outline for plan creating urgency, the approach to attracting a guiding team, a critique of the organizational profile, the components of change, and how to empower the organization.
For this assignment we will discuss some theories on organizational change learned during this class and how they relate to the case study of NASA (The Challenger and Columbia Shuttle Disaster). First we will look the images of managing change used by NASA in the case study. Then we will discuss the types of change(s) NASA under took. Next we will look at some of the challenges of change that NASA faced. Next we will discuss some of the resistance to change that NASA dealt with. Then we look at how NASA implemented change. Next we will discuss vision and change and the impact in the case study. Finally we will discuss sustaining change as it relates to the changes implemented by NASA in the case study.
Step2: Make Short-Term Wins. Nothing persuades more than achievement. Inside of a brief time frame outline this could be a month or a year, contingent upon the sort of progress, that need to have some fast wins for the staff can see. Make fleeting targets not only one long haul objective. Change group may need to work hard to think of these objectives, yet every win that create can further inspire the whole
Kotter’s 8-step model of transforming your organization is a linear top-down approach for managing change. The model is considered simple and intuitive by design (Venkatramani, V. et al, 2008), and is presented in a guide-like process. The model shares common features with other Change Models such as getting people attention, planning and implementing change, evaluation and institutionalization of change (Cepturenau, 2009). The case of the Glenrothes Colliery is considered to evaluate John Kotter’s model.
The change process within any organization can prove to be difficult and very stressful, not only for the employees but also for the management team. Hayes (2014), highlights seven core activities that must take place in order for change to be effective: recognizing the need for change, diagnosing the change and formulating a future state, planning the desired change, implementing the strategies, sustaining the implemented change, managing all those involved and learning from the change. Individually, these steps are comprised of key actions and decisions that must be properly addressed in order to move on to the next step. This paper is going to examine how change managers manage the implementation of change and strategies used
The world is constantly changing in many different ways. Whether it is technological or cultural change is present and inevitable. Organizations are not exempt from change. As a matter of fact, organizations have to change with the world and society in order to be successful. Organizations have to constantly incorporate change in order to have a competitive advantage and satisfy their customers. Organizations use change in order to learn and grow. However, change is not something that can happen in an organization overnight. It has to be thought through and planned. The General Model of Planned Change focuses on what processes are used by the organization to implement change. In the General Model of Planned Change, four steps are used in order to complete the process of change. Entering and Contracting, Diagnosing, Planning and Implementing, and Evaluating and Institutionalizing are the four steps used in order to complete the process of change in an organization. The diagnostic process is one of the most important activities in OD(Cummings, 2009, p. 30).