Heart Of Change Essay

2170 Words5 Pages

INTRODUCTION

In today’s ever changing world people must adapt to change. If an organization wants to be successful or remain successful they must embrace change. This book helps us identify why people succeed and or fail at large scale change. A lot of companies have a problem with integrating change, The Heart of Change, outlines ways a company can integrate change. The text book Ivanceich’s Organizational Behavior and Kotter and Cohen’s The Heart of Change outlines how change can be a good thing within an organization. The Heart of Change introduces its readers to eight steps the authors feel are important in introducing a large scale organizational change. Today’s organizations have to deal with leadership change, change in the economy, …show more content…

The team that is chosen must be the correct team that will help implement or adapt to change. Kotter stresses the importance of gathering the right people with credibility and the right skill set to provide change. With the sense of urgency the group invests an emotional commitment, and will most likely add value to the group. Often times its one leader that steps up and pulls the group together selecting the right combination of capabilities within the team. Kotter and Cohen outlines somethings that work with building the guiding team, show enthusiasm and commitment to help draw the right people into the group, mirroring the trust and teamwork required in the group, setting meeting formats for the guiding team so to minimize frustration and increase trust, putting your energy into step 1 if you cannot take on the step 2 challenge and if the right people will not. (Kotter and Cohen 60) The text book, Organizational Behavior implies that formal groups are formed by management to accomplish the goals of the organization. (Invancevich 227) It is evident that a group needs to be developed to help deal with change rather it be formal or …show more content…

Often times when things are going well like short wins, a raise in performance, the sense of urgency goes down. A lot of organizations and or people get comfortable with current success that often times they lose site of the main goal. The we already won complex may approach once the organization already experienced a couple of short or small victories. Kotter and Cohen talks about how sometimes tasked are completed in the early stage may often be easier which gives a false sense of comfort. (Kotter and Cohen 146) Often times this has proven to be the case either the manager decided to take on easier tasks first or things just worked out that way. Managers might have to become more creative and set up new ways of completing a task to increase urgency. Although we want to keep the paddle to the medal we don’t want to over kill and create exhaustion. A lot of times you still have to complete the old work along with the new increased work load, so managers need to be aware of this. That’s why it’s very important that managers and others in leadership work together to coordinate the changes. Managers may also look at things that can be eliminated to help cut down on over kill or employee burnout. The different departments within an organization will have to play different roles in the structured change. A manager must know how to coexist with other departments to help get things done. In the evaluation

Open Document