Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ikea porter's five forces analysis
Five force analysis
Ikea porter's five forces analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In his book, Leading Change, Dr. John P. Kotter communicates why organizations fail or succeed based on ten years of conducting research on more than 100 companies to see what contributed to their successful transformations and what hindered those transformations. “In October 2001 Business Week magazine reported a survey they conducted of 504 enterprises that rated Professor Kotter the number one “leading guru” in America.” The two significant aspects I took from this book were the reasons why change initiatives fail and an eight-stage process to lead the organization through a successful transformation. Dr. Kotter listed the following reasons why initiatives fail: allowing too much complacency, failing to create a sufficiently powerful guiding coalition, underestimating the power of vision, under-communicating the vision by a factor of 10, permitting obstacles to block the new vision, …show more content…
failing to create short-term wins, declaring victory too soon and neglecting to anchor changes firmly in the corporate culture. Complacency and underestimating the power of vision were two key points I have seen throughout my career. Allowing complacency hinders the ability to create a sense of urgency of the organization to take seriously the changes that need to take place. Complacency is something so many of us tend to gravitate towards because we typically believe if it is not broke, do not fix it. The second point, not clearly stating the vision is something many leaders fail to communicate to the lowest level, which causes the implementation of the reform to fail due to lack of understanding. The Army has seen many initiatives fail over the years. Leaders must take note from these reasons so they can understand the importance of their role in leading the reform, not just manage it. The eight-stage process, which ties to the reasons for failure is as follows: establish a sense of urgency, create the guiding coalition, develop a vision and strategy, communicate the change vision, empower employees for broad-based action, generate short-term wins, consolidate gains and produce more change, anchor new approaches in the culture. The process was well organized and clearly articulated. Dr. Kotter stated the importance of completing the steps in order. It is possible to be in multiple stages at once, but it is imperative not to overlook any one stage before moving forward. Today's Army is going through restructuring to reduce our end strength to 420,000 Soldiers. Although the senior leaders have created a sense of urgency, it is very unclear how well we will function as our smallest force in over 70 years. I believe mixed messages are being communicated about the strategy for us to maintain the same optempo with far fewer personnel. Additionally, consolidating gains and producing more change can limit complacency as we celebrate short-term wins.
Dr. Kotter emphasizes this stage is fragile and calls for more dedicated leadership to continue pushing the change vision. It is at this stage to remove unnecessary interdependencies to make way for the transformation to take hold. The Army fell victim to this phase when senior leadership claimed victory too early in the Iraq war and failed to provide a proper vision for the way ahead that resulted in an insurgency. There are many excellent takeaways that Army leaders at all levels of war can implement when making a change. Lessons learned by many companies were thoroughly discussed and clearly highlights the pitfalls and traps leaders fall victim to when making a transformation. Therefore, Leading Change is a must read for military professionals because there are two critical tools that all leaders need to put into their kit bag, the eight reasons why change initiative fail and the eight-stage process to lead the organization through successful
change.
For instance, the 4th ABCT deployed for a year-long deployment to Afghanistan, where a battalion was stripped off to work with another division, and two battalions were tasked to conduct security force advisor team (SFAT) missions, which is not their core combat mission and expertise. In addition, while in Theater COL Timmons, the brigade commander, the brigade CSM, and a battalion commander were killed in a convoy explosion, and COL Cutler was suddenly cast into the brigade command position. As soon as they returned from deployment, the 4th ABCT received word that they must conduct a brigade rotation through the National Training Center (NTC) before assuming a new committed period in the sustainable readiness model (SRM) with a regionally aligned force (RAF) mission in Africa. As you can see, due to the perpetual change and a lack of vision there is much uncertainty and stress for the 4th ABCT, in addition to the constant change and tempo that COL Cutler has not effectively managed. There are several change models available to use in leading change and one of the most effective and widely used is the Kotter Model. As I prepare for command, I will utilize the Kotter Model to help lead organizational
John Kotter, an expert on organizational change, conducted thirty years of research, coming to the conclusion that because companies do not completely investigate the whole picture when it comes to change, seventy percent of businesses crash by not finishing the change through to the end. For the reason that many businesses fail because of this reason, he created an eight-step process to help businesses succeed and move forward with their change (The 8 Step Process). This paper’s objective is to explain Kotter’s change process and link it to Target Canada’s decision to open in Canada, discussing what decisions fared well and the decisions that produced failure.
LM06-2, Change Management Student Guide. (2013). Maxwell-Gunter AFB. Thomas N. Barnes Center for Enlisted Education (AETC).
A most valuable opportunity exists for a leader to contribute in making a tremendous difference. New leadership at the top of the 4th Armored Brigade Combat Team (ABCT), a) gifted with wisdom to analyze an organization in identifying problems, b) capable of thinking creative in founding a vision for the future, and c) empowered with the reasoning ability to develop effective solutions to problems, will transform a declining unit to a new enhanced level of mission achievement and organizational effectiveness. 4th ABCT numerous problems are identified. A vision developed will guide the unit in the future. Most importantly, providing solutions to 4th ABCT problems occurs. Unit problems, vision, and solutions follow in order.
Leading Change was named the top management book of the year by Management General. There are three major sections in this book. The first section is ¡§the change of problem and its solution¡¨ ; which discusses why firms fail. The second one is ¡§the eight-stage process¡¨ that deals with methods of performing changes. Lastly, ¡§implications for the twenty-first century¡¨ is discussed as the conclusion. The eight stages of process are as followed: (1) Establishing a sense of urgency. (2) Creating the guiding coalition. (3) Developing a vision and a strategy. (4) Communicating the change of vision. (5) Empowering employees for broad-based action. (6) Generating short-term wins. (7) Consolidating gains and producing more changes. (8) Anchoring new approaches in the culture.
Sir, I am honored by the privilege to once again serve in 4th Armored Brigade Combat Team (ABCT). Over of the last 30 days, I had an opportunity to reconnect, and reflect on the current state of the Brigade. The 4th ABCT has a rich history of success and glory. It is my goal to put in place the systems and practices for this great organization to exceed all past and present accomplishments. As a result of my assessment, I identified three areas of focus that will improve our organization: a unit vision, a change in organizational culture and climate, and building organizational teams. I have no doubt that with the implementation of these three areas of focus, I will be the transformational leader that 4th ABCT needs as we prepare for the upcoming National Training Center (NTC) rotation and tackle the task of the Regionally Aligned Forces (RAF) mission.
We can identify three major cultural dimensions that help us to understand what leaders must focus on as they guide the transition of the Army. First, professional Identity, which is guided by Soldiers at all levels who are striving for excellence in their functional specialty, i.e., HR Sergeants. Soldiers who have goals and ideals of the Army to ethically put service and duty first. HR Sergeants are trained and well educated in their field. They are taught to put Soldiers first and have great customer support skills. Second, community, the sense in which Soldiers stop thinking about “I” and start thinking “we”. The bond among units who not only believe in cohesion with Soldiers, but their families too. The HR Sergeants are there to take care of Soldiers when financial issues arise with them or their families and don’t back down until the situation is solved. Last, hierarchy, which leads to order and control and provides Soldiers with moral reference and a sense of direction. The HR Sergeant has the mentality of mission first, knowing who to contact at the next level for assistance helps get the mission
Regardless of the career you choose in your life, whether it be an accountant or a Soldier in the United States Army, someone, somewhere most likely had an influence to bring you to that decision. The Army defines leadership as the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation while operating to accomplish the mission and improve the organization (JP, p. 1). Now imagine you are a young Private, in one of the most dangerous places in Iraq and you have constant leadership changes, and not much support from your direct leadership. I am sure at this point you can imagine, it is not the best scenario to be in. Throughout the duration of this essay you will read about Sergeant First Class Rob Gallagher and Sergeant First Class Jeff Fenlason, their leadership abilities, and the techniques they attempted to use to resolve the issues in this Platoon that was in a downward spiral after losing many leaders to the hell of war.
The New England Wire and Cable (NEWC) present a situation that was quite possibly very common amongst many towns and smaller cities in the United States during the mid-1980s to the early 1990s. As large corporations with new technology swept across the country, small town American and its legacy manufactures and companies struggled to keep pace. This case study references the New England Wire and Cable Company that in some ways was resistant to change. John P. Kotter’s article, Why Transformation Efforts Fail, outlines eight classic errors that are made in the transformation process. Likewise, Kotter’s article also outlines eight steps that could spearhead transformation within an organization. There was clearly a commonly hidden problem within the NEWC the so many times goes unseen. That problem was the leadership of NEWC.
Change is the only constant in life. And therefore it should be understood as part of a continuing work in progress that calls for a much broader canvas that seeks out competing voices, and works with the resulting ambiguities, contradictions and tensions of messy reality (Graetz, F. & Smith, A., 2010). In this submission I try to show that organizational change is majorly based on the environment surrounding it much more than the desire of the members or change agents working in that organization. This view diverts from that of Lippitt, (1958) who suggests that implementing planned organizational changes successfully depends on premeditated interventions intended to modify the functioning of an organization. It also diverts from the traditional approaches to organizational change that generally follow a linear, rational model in which the focus is on controllability under the stewardship of a strong leader or ‘guiding coalition (Collis, 1998). In this discussion therefore, comparison made between the different philosophies of change and I try to show that successful change implantation largely depends on an organizations appreciation of what goes on around it rather than what they have planned as a strategic direction.
“Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail” is an article written by John P. Kotter in the Harvard Business Review, which outlines eight critical factors to help leaders successfully transform a business. Since leading requires the ability to influence other people to reach a goal, the leadership needs to take steps to cope with a new, more challenging global market environment. Kotter emphasizes the mistakes corporations make when implementing change and why those efforts create failure; therefore, it is essential that leaders learn to apply change effectively in order for it to be beneficial in the long-term (Kotter).
What usually happens when a certain change program does not provide the expected results is that another program is to be implemented. However, this only tends to exaggerate the problem. All these ongoing change programs end up undermining the credibility of the change effort. Those programs that are not specifically tailored to the problems or issues they are addressed ...
Kotter, J. P. (2007). ‘Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail’. Harvard Business Review, January: 96-103.
Kotter’s 8-step model of transforming your organization is a linear top-down approach for managing change. The model is considered simple and intuitive by design (Venkatramani, V. et al, 2008), and is presented in a guide-like process. The model shares common features with other Change Models such as getting people attention, planning and implementing change, evaluation and institutionalization of change (Cepturenau, 2009). The case of the Glenrothes Colliery is considered to evaluate John Kotter’s model.
The change process within any organization can prove to be difficult and very stressful, not only for the employees but also for the management team. Hayes (2014), highlights seven core activities that must take place in order for change to be effective: recognizing the need for change, diagnosing the change and formulating a future state, planning the desired change, implementing the strategies, sustaining the implemented change, managing all those involved and learning from the change. Individually, these steps are comprised of key actions and decisions that must be properly addressed in order to move on to the next step. This paper is going to examine how change managers manage the implementation of change and strategies used