Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths of Porter's five forces
Strengths of Porter's five forces
Strengths of Porter's five forces
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths of Porter's five forces
External Environment- Porter’s Five Forces
Porter’s Five Forces model can be used as the framework for the industry analysis and development of business strategy. Three of the five forces refer to rivalry from external sources and the other forces are from internal threats. The five forces are the threat of new entrants, the bargaining power of buyers, the bargaining power of suppliers, the threat of substitute of products and services, and the intensity of rivalry among competitors in an industry (Dess, Lumpkin, Eisner, & McNamara, 2014, pg. 49).
Threat of new entrants. The threat of new entry of competitors will always be a concern for companies, especially in the beverage industry. Pepsi and Coca-Cola are the main competitors in the soft drink market. Marketing and advertising is important for a company and need large amounts of money to spend on marketing and advertising. The average advertisement expenditure per point of market was $8.3 million, which makes it very difficult for a new competitor to deal with the current market and expand (Porter’s Five Forces Model of Coca-Cola, 2010). Coca-Cola has invested huge amounts of money on advertising and marketing since their existence, launching campaigns to attract customers. The reward for their marketing and advertisement efforts has resulted in higher bran equity and a strong, loyal customer base all around the world. Thus, making is difficult for a new competitor to counterpart this aspect in the soft drink industry. The soft drink industry provides margins to retailers. Many retailers get 15-20% while others receive 10-30% margins. The margins are reasonable enough for retailers to satisfy the existing participators. The already established margins would make it very diffi...
... middle of paper ...
...del of Coca-Cola, 2010).
Intensity of competitive rivalry. The soft drink industry is dominated by Coca-Cola and Pepsi, sometimes referred as a duopoly. Competition is low to result any turmoil of industry structure. The main competition for Coca-Cola is Pepsi and are not competing on prices, but on advertising. This resulted in higher profits and the pricing war became prevalent in the global expansion strategies (Porter’s Five Forces Model of Coca-Cola, 2010). The scope of competition is globally, since Coca-Cola is present in about 200 countries. The soft drink industry will most likely not see growth in the future, as they have steadied out. Market and product differentiation has become more significant. Coca-Cola advertises based on conditions and have their name recognition around the world, establishing loyalty (Porter’s Five Forces Model of Coca-Cola, 2010).
Porter’s Five Forces is defined as threats of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers, power of buyers, the threat of substitutes and rivalry among existing competitors. New entrants into the industry aim to gain market share from rivals, so the intensity of competition may require to make changes on current strategy of marketing to maintain existing market share. The bargaining power of suppliers is one of the threats on the industry where price changes or product quality by suppliers can impact the profitability. Therefore, it is important for the companies to keep alternate suppliers or a contract to ensure prices, quality and quantity of the product so to avoid the company's supply from falling behind. The power of buyers can force the companies to lower the prices and offer different type products and service. Buyer can threaten the company with the competitors which may cause a negative impact on the bottom line to the companies. Thus, it is important to create a loyalty market share to avoid this threat. The threat of substitutes increases when another industry offers a similar product or services to customers within the same industry with a lower price. In this case, the industry profitability sinks since the product is available at a better price. This threat forces most competitors to price match or better performance. Rivalry among existing competitors ...
Porters Five forces model is an analytical tool developed by Michael E. Porter in 1979 whilst he was studying at Harvard Business School. Understanding Ports Five Forces brings to light an industry’s current profitability and develops a framework for making educated calculations for anticipating and influencing the competition. Porter wished to create a universal framework which can be utilized in all industries such as the automobile and performing arts industries. The model has five key components which highlights a market’s competitive intensity and overall attractiveness. The strongest force or forces determine the profitability of the industry and form the basis for the strategies that are utilized by the company. The five components of the model are the degree of rivalry; the threat of new entry; the threat of new substitutes; buyer power and the supplier power. Porter describes the five forces as creating a significant framework for different industries such as the fierce rivalry and strong buyer power in the aircraft industry but with relatively benign threat of entry, threat of substitutes and supplier power. Porter envisioned the model to extend the knowledge of Industrial Organisation. The forces explain how a company organises itself in order to satisfy the needs of the consumers with both quantity and quality, while at the same time maintai...
The beverage industry is highly competitive and presents many alternative products to satisfy a need from within. The principal areas of competition are in pricing, packaging, product innovation, the development of new products and flavours as well as promotional and marketing strategies. Companies can be grouped into two categories: global operations such as PepsiCo, Coca-Cola Company, Monster Beverage Corp. and Red Bull and regional operations such as Ro...
The soft drink industry in the United States is a highly profitably, but competitive market. In 2000 alone, consumers on average drank 53 gallons of soft drinks per person a year. There are three major companies that hold the majority of sales in the carbonated soft drink industry in the United States. They are the Coca Cola Company with 44.1% market share, followed by The Pepsi-Cola Company with 31.4% market share, and Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. with 14.7% market share. Each company respectively has numerous brands that it sales. These top brands account for almost 73% of soft drink sales in the United States. Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. owns two of the top ten brands sold. Colas are the dominant flavor in the U.S carbonated soft drink industry; however, popularity for flavored soft drinks has grown in recent years. The changing demographics of the U.S population have been an important factor in the growing popularity of these flavored soft drinks. The possible impact of this factor will be addressed later in the case.
The several factors that make it very difficult for the competition to enter the soft drink market include:
Control of market share is the key issue in this case study. The situation is both Coke and Pepsi are trying to gain market share in this beverage market, which is valued at over $30 billion a year. Just how is this done in such a competitive market is the underlying issue. The facts are that each company is coming up with new products and ideas in order to increase their market share.
These forces include the intensity of rivalry from traditional competitors, threat of new market entrants, threat of substitute products and services, bargaining power of customers and bargaining power of suppliers (Laudon & Laudon, 2007). See diagram below for more information. Traditional Competitors (competitive rivalry). McDonalds traditional competitors include many of the other fast food outlets across the country, i.e. Burger King, Taco Bell, KFC, Wendy’s. It has been shown by Professor Michael Waterson (2004) that the presence of a Burger King, for example, will increase the likelihood that McDonalds will open nearby.
Porter’s five forces is a framework for analyzing an industry and business strategy development. It looks at forces that determine the competitive intensity of an industry and hence the overall attractiveness of that industry. The configuration of the five forces differs by industry. Understanding the competitive forces and their underlying causes reveals the roots of an industry’s current profitability while providing a framework for anticipating and influencing competition over time.
The Porter five forces model (see Appendix 1) as an external analysis tool was established by Michael E. Porter and firstly announced in his book “Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors” in 1980 . The main idea of the Porter five forces concept is that the attractiveness of a market depends on the characteristic of the five competitive forces that have an impact on a company (see Appendix 2).
How has the competition between Coke and Pepsi affected the industry’s profits? Can Coke and Pepsi sustain their profits in the wake of flattening demand and the growing popularity of non-carbonated drinks? The soft drink industry is a highly profitable industry and its success is due to the large consumption of non-alcoholic beverages through which both concentrate producers and bottlers are profitable. Given the U.S. Industry Consumption Statistics, Exhibit 1, it is clear that, after deducting beer and wine, soft drinks account for about 90 % of the total liquid consumption, while Coke and Pepsi account for about 75 % of the soft drink industry. The high consumption of CSDs is related to the soft drink industry selling to consumers through five principal channels: food stores, convenience stores, vending, fountains and others.
Until the introduction of a “sixth force” in the mid-nineties, the “Porter’s Five Forces Model” as it was originally developed by Michael E. Porter in 1979 explained how “five competitive forces” determine industry attractiveness. Porter opined that in the fight to sustain long-term profitability, a firm must be strategic towards competition, and beyond competition, keep tabs on a broader set of competitive forces; customers who can drive prices down, suppliers who exercise some level of power, new entrants who might come in to compete for profits and substitute products and services that essentially place constraints on the profitability and growth on any industry. With the extension of this model, the sixth force (as shown in exhibit 1) included showed the impact of complimentary products and services on the attractiveness and overall profitability of an industry. In general, the Six Forces model proposes that the underlying structural drivers of any industry determine the performance of the players.
As the world 's largest manufacturer and distributor of non-alcoholic beverages, Coca-Cola is certainly no stranger to global marketing. Established in the US, Coca-Cola initiated its global expansion in 1919 and now markets to more than 200 countries worldwide. It is one of the most recognizable brands on the planet and also owns a large portfolio of other soft drink brands including Schweppes, Oasis, 5 alive, Kea Oar, Fanta, Lilt, Dr Pepper, Sprite and PowerAde. Despite this, Coca-Cola often struggles to maintain its market share over its main rival PepsiCo in some overseas markets, particularly Asian countries.
PepsiCo is one of the most recognized names in the snack and beverage industry, with brands like Frito-lay, Gatorade, Tropicana, and Quaker, however, it is best known for its flagship soft drink brand - Pepsi and its rivalry with Coca-Cola. To begin, PepsiCo first caught my Interest in the way it manages its business and markets its products. PepsiCo being a relatively young company compared to its rival Coke, has proven to be a formidable opponent going “head to head” with one of the biggest companies in the world (Coca-Cola). Now, when I notice PepsiCo’s growth, the first thing that came to my mind was that it is thanks to its great marketing campaigns, that Pepsi has grown to become the globally recognized brand that it is today. I also admire PepsiCo because I think the there is a high level of entrepreneurship in the way they acquired smaller brands like Gatorade thereby eliminating their competition before they become competition.
Learning from experience Coca-Cola has had some fierce competition over the years but nothing in the form of an entire health market shift like now. As well as mounting political persecution of its products like they are facing today. They must rely on past experiences to get through but likely will need to start studying the new trends to stay relevant.
Pepsi and Coca-Cola are both sodas, but they differ in terms of the satisfying flavors, the color and the graphic design that represents their two products, and then how Coke makes more money than Pepsi. With that said, you should have gotten the ideology of what we will go further in discussing about. Everybody loves these two very well-known sodas which can inject caffeine into you, which makes you all jittery in filling you up with an energetic energy. Alright, enough of this, let's go straight in-depth in talking about the two rivals throughout this paper of how Pepsi beats Coke in sales, but Coke is usually ahead when it comes to annual net income (Feigin) or how Pepsi is a sweeter brand compared to Coke, though Coke brand is more valuable