Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effectiveness of punishment
Essay on history of sexual abuse
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effectiveness of punishment
Justice for the Children
Sexual abuse is not a topic that we are unfamiliar with, but a subject that is usually not openly discussed. Many of these victims of sexual abuse have no voice and no justice. It has taken years for people in society to finally open their eyes and realize that this crime deserves to be noticed and the abusers punished. The laws are not made for the victims but for the predator. It is hard to believe that most abusers get away with this crime everyday. Before any laws came into effect society usually blamed the victim and the victim was sent away so they would not cause anymore problems. In the last twenty years through the laws changing and technology, but more importantly the public finally talking about it and wanting to do something.
In the Amish community it is very rare if the victim ever sees justice. If someone confesses in church a crime he or she is forgiven and the punishment is handled by the Bishops of the church. The outside world is not to be involved. Amish community is a very close knit people and they are very strict with their congregation. Women do not have any say when it comes to finance or other important matters. Women must do what they are told or there could be repercussions. Most wives know about the abuse and they do nothing, for fear. Most abuse is usually from the victims own family members like fathers, brothers, uncles. If abuse is reported outside of the church to the English community, that is rarely heard of. If the abuser is convicted of the crime and sent to prison the victim is shunned from the community and usually leaves. (Ferris, 2008)
What is sad about many laws, is that it usually takes a violent crime to start opening the eyes of law makers...
... middle of paper ...
...the public with a photo of the offender, where he lived and worked. (2006) The new sex offender site will allow the local and state agencies to work with the National Sex Offender Public Registry.
Steve Kiehl, who has been a probation officer for ten years. “This is not an easy job when you know the kind of people that you have to deal with but it a job that I take very seriously.” (Kiehl, 2010) When the sex offenders go through his office they have to go through very strict guideline that the law enforces. The State of Correction is in control of 92 counties in Indiana and they supply the data that they put of the registry. At this time there are 660 sex offenders in Allen County. Manpower is an issue. Steve Kiehl stated that “ This is a difficult job and it can be very challenging at time but I know that I am making a difference”. (Kiehl, 2010)
The following research will display an overview of the process in Texas on how sex offenders are registered along with the notifications that are followed after registration. Texas, as many other states, has a procedure which requires sex offenders to register with the local law enforcement agencies at the time of their discharge. In addition to registration, they must also comply with further probation regulations. Research has concluded that there are four basic phases of registration and notification. Beginning with offender notified, following the offender registration and community notified and ending with public notification
Sex offender notification laws have been among the most widely discussed and debated criminal justice policy issues in recent years. Numerous studies have been conducted on various views of sex offender notification laws. A vast majority of these studies have mixed research, some showing that sex offender notification laws are more beneficial than harmful and should continue, and others showing the exact opposite. Reasons such as public safety, the fear factor, and the hope for future recidivism to go down are some examples of why many believe that sex offender notification laws are beneficial to society. Others believe that such laws are a continuation of punishment for those who were convicted of a sex offense.
In the event that a prisoner (particularly a sex offender) does complete rehabilitation, he carries with him a stigma upon reentering society. People often fear living near a prior drug addict or convicted murderer and the sensational media hype surrounding released felons can ruin a newly released convict’s life before it beings. What with resident notifications, media scare tactics and general concern for safety, a sex offender’s ability to readapt into society is severely hindered (554). This warrants life-skills rehabilitation applied to him useless, as he will be unable to even attempt to make the right decision regarding further crime opportunities.
It is estimated that approximately 3% of the offenders who are currently incarcerated will likely commit another sexual-related crime upon release (Park & Lee, 2013, p. 26). There are several laws that have been in place regarding sexual offenses for decades, including Megan’s Law, which was enacted in 1996. The federal Megan’s Law establishes three specific conditions. The first condition required information from state sex offender registries to be distributed publicly so that all community citizens have access to it. The second condition requires any information collected by registration programs within the state to be released for any reason given that it is allowed under the state law.
Sex offender legislation has been encouraged and written to protect the community and the people at large against recidivism and or to help with the reintegration of those released from prison. Nevertheless, a big question has occurred as to if the tough laws created help the community especially to prevent recidivism or make the situation even worse than it already is. Sex offenders are categorized into three levels for example in the case of the state of Massachusetts; in level one the person is not considered dangerous, and chances of him repeating a sexual offense are low thus his details are not made available to the public (Robbers, 2009). In level two chances of reoccurrence are average thus public have access to this level offenders through local police departments in level three risk of reoffense is high, and a substantial public safety interest is served to protect the public from such individuals.
Sex offenders have trouble reintegrating into society and are often harassed by those who become aware of their status. The sex offender management tool restricts where the offender can live and sets boundaries of how close they can be to children. Research has shown most of these restrictions are viewed as more of a stress to the offender and it is not clear how the public is ensured.
Although they may be out of jail, they cannot be considered free. They are unable to make their own decisions: where they can work, where they can live, and how they can live their lives are all under control of the government. These people look the same as everyone else, but underneath the mask, lay a title they cannot shake. These people are sex offenders. A sex offender is defined as anyone who has committed a sexual crime. These crimes range from serious crimes, like rape, to minor offenses, such as urinating in public, or under age consensual sex. All sex offenders are placed on the registry and are required to follow a careful protocol. Registered sex offenders are paired with a Community Corrections Officer (CCO) who oversees and supervises the offender's actions. Many restrictions are placed on the offender, and although the laws can vary from state to state, there are some basic restrictions that apply to every offender. Some of these restrictions include: a sex offender cannot move without the permission and approval of their CCO, they can only live and work in certain areas, they cannot own any firearms, their personal computers are monitored and controlled by their CCO (many websites are blocked, including pornographic content), they are not allowed to take or consume any mind altering substances such as drugs or even alcohol, and they are required to get regular counseling (“Rules”). Currently there are 747,408 registered sex offenders in the United States. Some states such as Delaware and Oregon have a higher concentration of sex offenders (500 per 100,000) where as Pennsylvania has the lowest concentration of sex offenders (94 per 100,000) (“Sex Offender Statistics”). Due to the inefficiencies ...
Sex-offenders have to attend treatment, can be put on electronic monitor, submit to a polygraph test, give probation officer home address, register as a sex-offender, and has to let the Department of Public Safety know if they move or change their address. There is no drinking or drugs, they may have to give up their computers, tell sex partners about their history, and some even chemically castrated. Sex-offenders may have more than two probation officers or parole officers. An unit team will monitor and help to rehabilitate the offender. The sex-offender will have a curfew and have to pay fines and restitution.
3. Report of the Interagency Council on Sex Offender Treatment to the Senate Interim Committee on Health and Human Services and the Senate Committee on Criminal Justice, 1993
The lack of opportunities to secure housing and employment and loss of family and friend support are all consequences of community notification. More than one third of registrants surveyed in a study reported they had lost a job, been denied a place to live and been harassed and treated rudely in public as a result of public knowledge of sex offender registers. Offenders are more likely to be driven underground when they are unable to secure employment or a place to live due to their status on the sex offender register. Employers are less likely to employ a sex offender due to fear of losing business from an informed public. These issues on top of the stress of being released from prison and trying
of Sex Offenders Via the Internet. The John Marshal Journal of Computer and Information Law
Two of the sex offenders from the Worley study reported that during Halloween they are told by law enforcement to not answer the door or have outside lights on. Also, local television networks broadcast their picture to warn others of their sex offender status. This then leads to much embarrassment and shame, having their picture televised every year (Worley, R. M., & Worley, V. B., 2013). Today, anyone with Internet access can view and search the sex offender registries and this leads to the direct violation of privacy of these sex offenders. Not only are they tormented but their family members are as well. Their children are bullied at school and their spouses may be forced to quit their jobs (“US: Sex Offender Laws May Do More Harm Than Good,” 2007) As discussed earlier, the sex offender faces harassment and abuse constantly when they are placed on the sex offender
Englewood’s attempt to virtually outlaw the ability of registered sex offenders to live within its borders suffered a well-deserved rebuke three years ago when a federal judge overturned the ordinance because it was so restrictive. As Judge R. Brooke Jackson rightly observed, “Few sex offenders are incarcerated for life. Most will at some point return to the community, and there must be a place for them to live.” Unfortunately, Judge Jackson’s opinion was not the last word in the case, which was eventually dismissed after a complex series of rulings.
The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), in 2006, reported that the number of registered sex offenders in the United States was 747,408. Just imagine how much that number has increased from 2006 to 2018! Once a sex offender is released from prison, they must register with a law enforcement agency in the city or county in which they live in. Then, they must physically go to the police department or sheriff’s office and show them proof of residency, two photographs and fingerprints. The local agency then has to forward it to the State Police where the law requires them to send the information to school districts, day care businesses, children’s residential facilities or foster homes that asked to be notified.
Being sexually abused can have a huge impact on an individuals life. Victims are often left physically, mentally and emotionally damaged. A major issue when dealing with female sex offenders is the report of crimes, particularly when male victims are involved. “A variety of factors have been found to influence decisions to formally report sexual assault, including severity of the crime, injury, relationship to the offender, and anticipated reactions from others” (Wyatt and Newcomb 1990; Arata 1998; Smith et al. 2000; Felson and Paré 2005 as cited by Hlavka 2014). According to the Center for Sex Offender Management Sexual (2007) incidents involving female perpetrators are less likely to be reported and/or not pursued by law enforcement officers for many different reasons.