Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The nature of authority
CM3100-Week One-1.6 Authority Systems
“Positional authority is critical to making the right decisions for the company, but it shouldn’t be used when managing and leading people” ("positional authority," 2014, p. 1).
In the military, there is a chain of command, a rank, and file. It is an example of positional authority as each level of authority is assigned by rank, each level has people under their charge. They have been assigned the responsibility to lead them as orders are passed down from the top brass to the squad leader.
In the secular world, organizations function on a similar order of authority. There are owners, boards, executives, CEO’s directors, managers, supervisors, and lead people who all have a title and have been delegated a position with some authority. In every area of our government, there are positions of
…show more content…
So, the questions at hand are, does positional authority matter? Is there a need for positional authority? And the answer is, of course, there is!
A person in a position of authority is task oriented. They are who are not intimidated by pressure to make decisions. They are people who seem to thrive on being under the gun to get things done. John Baldoni (2010) writes, “Authority is what holds leadership promise together. With it, you can lead; without it, you might as well do something else” (p. 1).
Making tough decisions and getting things done are critical and of great importance to a leader’s ability to be what I call the shot caller. People in a position of authority may possess a wealth of knowledge and skill of their position. They could be considered to be the experts in their field. They are good at commanding, but may not be so good at being able to have a positive influence over the people under their position of
While having too much authority can lead to complication and dilemmas, too little authority can lead to an overthrow of leaders in a situation. Authority is like a ticking time
One may wonder exactly what it is that qualities a strong leader possesses. A strong leader is determined, and strong willed. They must be of good judgment, and without bias. They cannot easily be persuaded, and they are firm, yet at the same time, a good lead must also empathize with his subordinates, and have the best interest at heart for said subordinates, at all times. However, with that being said, a good leader cannot be afraid to discipline his subordinates when necessary. Unmistakably, being a leader is a very difficult feat – one which not everyone can accomplish. A leader must be an authority, a friend and a counsellor, all at once. They must be responsible, and always take into account the disadvantages of a situation. Not everyone is suitable to be a leader, whereas, just about anybody can be a good role model.
To hold authority is to possess power, and when one has power over a person or people he or she is generally feared. In t...
Casey, C. (2004). Bureaucracy re-enchanted? Spirit, experts and authority in organizations. Organization, 11, 59-79. doi:10.1177/1350508404039658
Position power which refers to the amount of authority of a manager (Bolden, Gosling, Marturano & Dennison, 2003).
Leadership at times can be a complex topic to delve into and may appear to be a simple and graspable concept for a certain few. Leadership skills are not simply acquired through position, seniority, pay scale, or the amount of titles an individual holds but is a characteristic acquired or is an innate trait for the fortunate few who possess it. Leadership can be misconstrued with management; a manager “manages” the daily operations of a company’s work while a leader envisions, influences, and empowers the individuals around them.
According to Max Weber, there are three types of authority: traditional, legal-rational, and charismatic. Traditional authority is based on traditions and customs; for example, parents are a type of traditional authority since individuals are taught to respect and listen to their parents from a young age (Weber, 12). Legal-rational authority is based on relation to laws, rules, and the government; an example of a legal-rational authority would be the police due to its association with the government and its task of enforcing the law (Weber, 13). Unlike these two types of authority, charismatic authority is solely based on the personality of the leader such as the degree of charisma the leader has and how well his interpersonal skills are (Weber, 12). Charismatic authority may seem very simplistic as it is just based on personality, yet it is this very aspect that allows for the emergence of polar-opposite charismatic leaders. Furthermore, the simple basis allows for the leaders to guide the group towards any direction they desire, and this makes the distinction between certain charismatic leaders prominent. The contrast
Leadership is a process by which an individual influences others to accomplish a mutual objective and most scholars can agree that leadership can be defined as the nature of the influencing process. Leaders carry out this process by applying their leadership attributes, such as beliefs, values, ethics, character, knowledge, and ski...
Leadership has been defined in different ways, a definitaion of leadership that would be most commonly accepted would be “the ability of an individual to influence, motivate, and enable others to contribute toward the effectiveness and success of the organization…”(House et al., 1999, p. 184 as cited in Yukl, 2013, p. 19). After a comprehensive review of different leadership literature, Stogdill (1974, p. 259, as cited in Yukl, 2013, p. 18) concluded that “There are almost as many definitions of leadership as there are persons who have attempted to define the concept." Leadership can be viewed from two different angles one is shared influence process and other as a specialized role. Researcher who view leadership as a specialized role consider attributes as a factor in selecting a designated leader. On the contrast, theorist who emphasises on influence process considers “Leadership” as a social process or a pattern of relationship.
An effective leader is a person who is capable of making others follow him. A person who leads people becomes a leader. The quality of life of followers depends upon the quality of leader they have, so, it becomes important for a leader to be effective. Leaders possess certain traits that can be defined as relatively coherent and integrated patterns of personal characteristics, reflecting a range of individual differe...
As an officer in the United States Army, it has been imperative for me to understand every facet of leadership and why it remains important to be an effective leader. During this course, I have learned some valuable lessons about myself as a leader and how I can improve on my leadership ability in the future. The journal entries along with the understanding of available leadership theories have been an integral part of my learning during this course. For all of the journals and assessments that I completed, I feel it has given me a good understanding of my current leadership status and my future potential as a leader. All of the specific assessments looked at several areas in regards to leadership; these assessments covered several separate focus areas and identified my overall strengths and weaknesses as a leader. Over the course of this paper I will briefly discuss each one of these assessments and journal entries as they pertained to me and my leadership.
Similarly, the roles of power are confused. As I mentioned before, the hierarchy of command is thrown off when they become involved in decision making. Management wants them to feel like they have a commanding role in the company and simultaneously they are being ordered.
Legitimate Power – This is power that comes from holding a position within an organization
level of Precedence and standards in the formation. The roles of the non-commissioned officer is
the person in a system and context, offers a framework for thinking about leadership, depth