Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Personal values and decision making
Case study in corporate culture
Case study in corporate culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Personal values and decision making
Key Issues: 1. Communication between Jerrold and Knowlton was not open and honest. 2. Knowlton possessed a lack of sincerity in expressing his concerns and insecurities with Jerrold. 3. Jerrold’s inability to communicate his vision and goals with Knowlton contributed to the tension. 4. Jerrold did not have an accurate assessment of Knowlton’s work group due to Knowlton’s divergence from the truth. 5. Knowlton should have addressed Jerrold’s condescending interaction with the group during the first hint of discomfort amongst his subordinates. 6. Fester’s inability to assess his tone and overbearing attitude often undermined his co-workers ability, and his strong sense of individualism perpetuated a hostile work environment. Diagnosis: Additionally, there is a hint of cultural differences presented in the case study as Fester criticizes American “emphasis on team ideas” (p. 459). As I allude to above in the key issues, Knowlton’s lack of leadership in addressing the interaction between Fester and other subordinates contributed to the breakdown of the team concept promoted by Knowlton. Additionally, the text explains the behavioral issues that can ensue in the work place when an employee’s self-esteem is lowered (the book describes them as procrastination, stress, conflict, and poor working conditions). This led to a lapse in contributions from the group in pursuit of the “photon correlator.” In regards to Jerrold’s responsibility as a leader, he could have been more vocal in his vision for the organization and his expectations of his employees. Hellriegel & Slocum (2011) express the importance of leaders in managing the attitudes of “hope, job satisfaction, and organizational commitmment” as these are important to job performance. Thus, Jerrold failed to communicate to Knowlton his vision for his team and Fester’s role as only to support Knowlton’s overall success. This does not escuse Knowlton from openly commuicating with his superior, but could have curtailed Knowlton’s self-esteem
What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? Why was Anderson’s incompetence with language and household skills both a problem and a blessing for her work in Tarnby? Anderson’s incompetence with language and household problems were due to the translation and understanding of a new culture. Barbara’s confusion of flour with sugar caused her meat loaf to be a disaster. The two words are very similar in Denmark.
Lashinger et al highlights the need for communication within leadership as effective communication is essential to influence change and motivate others. Emphasising the need for communicating effectively towards all staff members, whilst undergoing change to ensure all staff feel supported and understand the process, allowing implementation to be more successful.
Erik Peterson faced a number of challenging situations with Jeff Hardy, a high level employee with CelluComm, the parent company of GMCT. At first we see an awkward relationship with Jeff Hardy whom Peterson had been assigned to work under by Ric Jenkins, partly due to the lack of concrete relationship guidelines between the two (Sami, 2013). Hardy had very little operational experience, and Peterson felt that he was unable to receive constructive guidance from Hardy. As a subordinate to Hardy, Peterson should have instead attempted to resolve this problem early on as it was a critical relationship within the GMCT Company. Consulting Hardy by letting him know of his concerns would have been a more efficient and respectful manner in handling the situation. This relationship building would also have been integral in facing the Peterson-Hardy communication issues with respect to the local municipalities and fire department. Operant Learning Theory (Johns & Saks, 2014, p.54) suggests that as a result of this negative consequence Peterson should be able to improve his interpersonal skills specifically with superiors within the organization moving forward. As a subordinate to Hardy, Peterson should have instead attempted to resolve this problem early on as it was a critical relationship within the GMCT Company.
Dobbs, Jeannine. “Viciousness in the Kitchen” Modern Language Studies, Vol 7, No 2. Modern Language Studies Autumn, 1977, pp.11-25. 6. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'?
Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0036-8075%2819560817%293%3A124%3A3216%3C322%3ATPP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-L This site is very reliable. This is the Scholarly Journal Archive. 3. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'?
The possible merger of client data might suit the 3 business owners well. For the most part each owner does most of their business at different times of the year. Because of the seasonal difference it lessens the chance of competition between the 3 since they are all in the same industry of property rentals. Barker’s need may differ slightly from Bickel and Baker because of the added apartment segment, but the overall theme is the same. Barker’s business is mostly in the Winter, Bickel’s business is mostly in the Summer, and Baker’s is primarily in the Summer and Fall. Since all 3 owners work with vacationers, for the most part their strategies will be fairly similar with a focus on differentiating themselves from one another and other competition.
Not all teams manage to execute their functions effectively or achieve all their goals. The performance of a team normally depends on some factors. There are a number of conditions that might also derail the progress made by a team. Hackman (2016) explores some of the common dysfunctions that might adversely affect the progress made by a team. The absence of trust can prove to be detrimental to the performance of various team members and even the general performance of the team. Without trust, it becomes difficult for team members to collaborate or forge effective work relations that are critical to the team’s performance. Hackman (2016) believes that the absence of trust is also a dysfunction with the potency to hamper the team’s well being.
different cultures, which is a huge part of the business world today (Friedman, 2005). The
Critics of Hofstede’s work argue that Hofstede’s study is flawed and outdated; for example, Hofstede’s analysis has a static and polarized vision of culture and is believed to be stable over time, whereas now with globalization, internationalization and convergence of cultures, cultures are rapidly changing (Fang 2009). Despite Hofstede’s work being nothing short of controversial, his work on culture, which Hofstede (1980, 1981) defines, as “the collective programming of the mind distinguishing the members of one group or category of people from others,” is still the most cited in the field of cross-cultural management in existence (Bond 2002). Furthermore, Hofstede’s groundbreaking research has successfully allowed for other cross-cultural scholars to comprehend and grasp the challenging concept of national cultural stereotypes in measurable and concrete terms (Fang
In life and academia, we try to understand behavioral patterns of people by categorizing, studying, and then grouping in effort to better collaborate. We see this application in assessments like the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), where Jung’s theory suggests that there is more to the seeming randomness, which makes up human personality preferences, tendencies, or desires. Professor Geert Hofsteder does the same thing with culture and leadership in order to improve not only collaboration but also understanding.
Mr. John Baker should remain in charge due to the rough discussion that determinate Mr. Rennalls to resign. This will not be accepted by the European, who by his culture would not consider himself guilty for the interview that went wrong. In this way, The Company will lose a great young becoming leader in terms of Rennalls who is extremely proud to recognize his mistakes.
There is one way she could have resolved the situation. The solution is simple; stop being immature and gossiping about others. I do not think there is anything wrong with communicating with your employees an...
In a team environment individuals lack the motivation to fulfill their full potential because there is no internal or external evaluation for their contributions, so they rely on others. Social loafers will tend to exert less work towards a task because the final evaluation does not just result on the individual but the team itself, which leads to less self awareness (Curt, 2007). An example of this is a sales team at Foxtel, that needs to exceed a certain expectation in the month sales, but they are not evaluated or assessed or an individual basis but a team.
Matthew R. Fairholm states, “Our leadership perspective defines what we mean when we say "leadership" and shapes how we view successful leadership in ourselves and others.” (Pg. )Therefore, change and modifications of desired behaviors must first stem from leadership, in order to achieve success. Follett does consider the challenges for “old-fashioned employers,” they have a difficult time transitioning and comprehending that training and employee is much different from providing orders. Therefore, these types of employers express their frustration with employees who are unable to complete tasks, when in actuality the employee is at a disadvantaged as they are not trained and new habits were not created and reinforced. Follett affirms that lack of training, is a deficiency in education. Therefore, it is crucial for leaders and employers to develop and plan ahead for modeled behaviors to gain the desired responses. Follett asserts psychology has a significant involvement because depending on the delivery of the order and how it is elicited can be the control of how responses are given
Peter begins to show up to work late (if he shows up at all), dress unprofessionally, and communicate with his peers and his superiors in an inappropriate manner. Peter’s new attitude and actions are unexpected, even shocking to others within the organization. According to the research conducted by Erbert, behavior such as Peters would be deemed as strange; “strange or unusual experience demarcates a disjunction in the patterns and routines of the workplace and may reflect uncertainty and ambiguity in organizing” (2014, p.288). By breaking Initech’s rituals, Peter creates an environment in which other employees feel insecure and unclear about their own stance in the company. It becomes apparent, through the chaos that is created by Peter’s conduct, that straying from any long-standing ritual will alter the overall cohesiveness of an organization. When people are dependent on certain habits, any disturbance to those habits can become detrimental and can prevent an organization from functioning properly. In the case of Initech, some employees (Peter’s friends) are even driven to quit their jobs to sabotage the