Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of the internet on the world
Introduction of globalization
The impact of the internet on the world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of the internet on the world
Though the world is discovered to be round physically, it doesn’t necessarily mean that the world is round in the technology and business aspect. In fact, there are many reasons that prove the world is indeed getting flatter and flatter as time goes on; as more countries gain access to the internet, resources, and therefore knowledge, anyone from anywhere on the world is now gaining the ability to compete with the top leading nations such as the United States. As information and technology expand globally, the economy will be completely “flattened” in the future. According to Friedman, flattening is the causes and effects of globalization. Examples of flattening include various countries learning, inventing and cooperating with each …show more content…
In the book, Friedman states that there were ten incidents that converged to create the “flattened world” (Friedman, 2005). The first event was in November of 1989, which was when the Berlin Wall that split Germany into two different lands was destroyed. This mainly symbolized freedom between all people, allowing others to get involved with different people of different cultures, which is a huge part of the business world today (Friedman, 2005). The …show more content…
Without Globalization 3.0, there wouldn’t be as much competition in business making poor prices, quality, etc. There also wouldn’t be as much importing and exporting going on due to the lack of communication between different nations, and therefore there wouldn’t be much flattening taking place. But some nations still don’t have access to the internet to make some of these opportunities possible. As Evelyn Rusli says in an article called “Tech Firms Discover Web Isn’t World-Wide”, social barriers, poverty, lack of motivation, illiteracy, and lack of digital knowledge are keeping people off of the internet (Rusli, 2015). Rusli (2015) says that only 16% of the people in Indonesia use the internet, and there are even expectations in a few years that show there will still be around 4 billion people off of the internet. This raises some question about how flat the world really got looking at Friedman’s book and comparing it to Rusli’s article. Friedman explains that the playing field is becoming level for many different
Jones, Steven E. “Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?” Journal of 9/11 Studies 3 (September 2006): 1-48. 26 August 2008. http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/WhyIndeedDidtheWorldTradeCenterBuildingsCompletelyCollapse.pdf.
As domestic economies globalize, the line has blurred from where an item is built, where it is sold and where it is serviced. It provides opportunities for individuals in many communities to expand their knowledge and learn about other cultures. Outsourcing has flourished in China and it has enabled its citizens to hone their skills by broadening their education to learn new trades and has created new wealth in a rather lifeless economy. The internet and email has been the main force, for it provides people from all over the world the ability to communicate and learn about each other. The Internet is expanding people’s minds; it facilitates media reform, and to a certain degree may provide legal reform.
The Berlin Wall, built in August of 1961, was s physical symbol of the political and emotional divisions of Germany. The Wall was built because of a long lasting suspicion between the Soviet Union on one side and Western Europe and the United States on the other. For 28 years the Berlin Wall separated friends, families, and a nation. After WWII was over Germany was divided into four parts. The United States, Great Britain, and France controlled the three divisions that were formed in the Western half and the Eastern half was controlled by the Soviet Republic. The Western sections eventually united to make a federal republic, while the Eastern half became communist.
Globalization and the advance of technology in the last two decades as well as the growing role of the Internet and social media in the interactions of people have brought up the changes never seen before. For many the world has become a “smaller place” where distance and borders are hardly an obstacle anymore for conducting business or traveling. Thanks to improvements in transportation, we are able to cross borders with ease and go to any place on earth in a matter of hours.
The three Globalizations contrast in many ways. Globalization 1.0, lasting from 1492 to about 1800, was about countries and muscles. Its force driving the process of global flattening was the amount of "muscle" your country had. The key agent of change in Globalization 2.0, which lasted from 1800 to 2000, was the power of multinational companies, which went global for markets and labor. Globalization 3.0, beginning in 2000 flattened the playing field even more. The dynamic force was the power by which individuals could collaborate and compete globally. They could do so digitally with the convergence of the personal computer with fiber-optic cable. Globalization 3.0 differs from the previous two not only in how the world is flattening, but also in the types of people involved. In Globalization 1.0 and 2.0 it was mostly American and European businesses who...
The world is ever changing and has been that way even before humans dominated Earth. However, what we are interested in for this topic is in the last few decades where globalization has had an impact in the early 21st century, making the world "flat". The phrase that the world has become flat is a metaphor for viewing the world level in terms of commerce and competition, meaning a level playing field where everyone has an equal opportunity. However, opinions are divided on how much globalization has actually impacted the world as a whole. Critics argue that Friedman’s term "flat" is grossly exaggerated as his view is from an American perspective. This paper investigates major arguments for both sides.
Constant change and a flat, global competitive market landscape were described by Thomas Friedman, author of The World is Flat, as triple convergence and was a result of the ten flatteners. Friedman also stated that in “Globalization 1.0, countries had to think globally. In Globalization 2.0, companies had to think globally to thrive, or at least survive. In Globalization 3.0, individuals have to think globally to thrive, or at least survive.” (Friedman, 2007) The concept of needing individuals to think globally and thrive in the market led Friedman to travel and report on various educational cultures across the world. Friedman was determined to find “the right stuff” to make the youth in future generations competitive globally.
Cultures become more alike as they share technology and organizational structures in the modern world.
First of all, Friedman talks about the different levels of globalization. There are 3 different time periods in which the society has differed and changed, bringing us to where we are today. Globalization 1.0, which took place from 1492 to 1800, was the first step to making the world flatter. The coming to America, and the industrial drive that came along with this is what most characterized globalization 1.0. The industry drive was about things such as manpower and horsepower, and how well we could utilize these in the world market. This caused the world to “shrink” a little bit, and become flatter. With the discovery of a new world, it broadened the area in which business was conducted, but the commonality of rule and trade caused the distance to be spanned more frequently. I think Friedman’s notions regarding globalization 1.0 is very accurate. The world in our terms began in 1492 with the discovery of North America. Once the area began to be inhabited and settled, there was much more worldwide interaction. Communications and trade between the American colonies and England increased, and this began a more stable business of worldwide association. I believe that Friedman’s theory is true, because the discovery of a land across the ocean for th...
Understand and heed cultural differences - cultural variables in transacting international business. (1991, January 28). Business America. FindArticles.com., Retrieved March 20, 2009, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1052/is_n2_v112/ai_10412261/pg_4?tag=content;col1
Technological advances in communications and transportation have dramatically increased cross-cultural interactions and interdependence in all types of organizations. Many
...in the new “flat world” individuals need to figure out how to become “untouchable.” He explains that “untouchables are people whose jobs cannot be outsourced, digitized, or automated” (184). He explains that in a “flat world” there is no longer a job based solely on geographic, but rather in most cases an available job “will go to the best, smartest, most productive or cheapest worker-wherever he or she resides” (183). He goes on to show that companies and individuals have to look at the global picture today in order to succeed (183).
Since the WTO never defined “public interest” or “national security” in means of limiting their own states network, this leaves full rain for China (Mengin73). World community through the WSIS in both Geneva and Tunis had deemed both the United States and China are correct in the realm of Internet governance (Saleem 328).
Hofstede, G . (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices & theories. Journal of International Business Studies ,14 (2), 75-89.
...ndustrial capacity, technology, and infrastructure to compete with the industrialized countries, which have been honing their economic might for over a century.