The Isabella Gardner Museum Heist: A Clever Ruse
On March 18th, 1990 in the early morning hours in Boston, MA, two men dressed like police officers their way into the Isabella Gardner Museum. In a matter of 81 minutes, while inside the building, they managed to pull off one of the biggest (approx. 500 MIL) and as of yet, unsolved art heists in the history of the United States. There have been many theories and suspects over the past 25 years, but there is one major theory that has not been in the media and yet seems so obvious: The heist was nothing more than a clever ruse thought up by the new art director Anne Hawley in order to save a dying museum. With the help of the FBI and the use of the museum itself to perhaps hide the 13 pieces,
…show more content…
it is the perfect, harmless crime of the century and perhaps of all time. The three main indicators that could lead a person to believe that this was the collaborative work of The Gardner Museum, Anne Hawley (the new director 6 months before the heist) and The FBI are: The Last Will and Testament of Isabella Gardner, The financial stability of the museum and the lack of diligence by the FBI to investigate the many leads that flooded in over the past 25 years. Isabella Gardner was a woman with strength, tenacity and a bit of a sense of humor. She was also known to be a bit stubborn and controlling and her will concerning the museum show this side of her and ultimately almost lost the city of Boston a very unique museum. Isabella stated very clearly in her will this: “Should anything leave or be added to the collection of more than 2,500 objects, or should Gardner’s meticulous installation of her art be altered in any way, the whole kit and caboodle would be shipped to Paris and auctioned off, with the profits going to Harvard University.” A museum that stands still in time will more than likely get left behind and be nothing but a fond memory, or will it? Enter Anne Hawley, the Museum’s fourth art director since the museum opened and the first one to not use the 4th floor of the facility as her home (this was stated in the will of Isabella, but there was a loophole that allowed Anne to wiggle out of this being her residence). Anne, like Isabella, was perhaps a woman ahead of her time with great strength, tenacity and if this theory proves right, a GREAT sense of humor! Anne came up with the ultimate plan. A plan that would give a museum destined to be doomed and frozen in time forever, NEW life! Anne has created the ONLY museum of its kind in the world: A museum where patrons come to look at 13 pieces of art that are NOT there and are nowhere to be found! Anne came to the museum at a time when the financial instability of the Gardner Museum was at an all time low and if it continued down this path much longer the museum would be gone forever.
The museum prior to 1990 was teetering on the brink of disaster. Attendance had declined and in January of 1989 the museum for the first time ever had to start charging admission. The 7 member board of trustees was unwilling to ask for donations for the museum, as they felt it was tantamount to begging. Isabella’s once very large and generous inheritance had dwindled significantly and there was no means as to how to generate income to keep the museum alive, a museum that was probably set to be auctioned off within a …show more content…
year. The best marketing tool out there can be controversy, mystery and intrigue.
That is just what happened on that night of March 18th, 1990 when the thieves took off with 13 pieces of what seemed to be random art selections out of a vast collection of 2,500 pieces (some way more valuable than what was taken.) Anne, completely understanding the last wishes of a stubborn and controlling woman, saw this as a way to make the museum unique, thus generating business. The museum now has empty frames and blank table tops where the 13 pieces used to be and THIS is why people come to the Gardner Museum, THIS is why the museum has stayed in the limelight for the past 25 years. Did Anne know that it was important to not have the pieces come back? Yes, because if the pieces came back the museum would start heading down the same dismal path it was on before the heist. Did Anne know a good hiding place within the museum? It is quite possible, as she had six months to check out the inner workings of a museum that no one was watching. One thing is for sure the FBI never searched the museum thoroughly for the missing artwork. But then again, the FBI was in on the master
plan. The FBI’s mission statement reads as such: As an intelligence-driven and a threat-focused national security organization with both intelligence and law enforcement responsibilities, the mission of the FBI is to protect and defend the United States against terrorist and foreign intelligence threats, to uphold and enforce the criminal laws of the United States, and to provide leadership and criminal justice services to federal, state, municipal, and international agencies and partners. And in most cases, the FBI is very thorough and diligent in following up on leads. So then, why did it take 20 years for the FBI to put the security guard that let in the thieves that night on trial before a grand jury? Why did the FBI tell the public they knew the names of the suspects in 2005, but did not release them or put them on trial? Why did they chase the leads that seemed so ridiculous? And, in this writer’s opinion, the biggest Faux-Pas the FBI committed was that within a year they put the whole investigation in the hands of a very young agent and his supervisor. This was a case load that was too big for one person much less one very young and green rookie. When looking over the antics in this case of the FBI over the past 25 years they come off more like the keystone cops than the professional agency they are supposed to be. And now, 25 years later, Anne Hawley is retiring from a very successful career as Art Director of a “one of a kind” museum. It’s time for the pieces to return to the museum and it is quite possible they will. There will more than likely be no reward paid out as the FBI in their infinite wisdom and power will follow up on an anonymous tip and miraculously the pieces will be replaced. The museum will continue to flourish because it has been established as one of the greatest heists in history. Unless, of course the truth is exposed, but as Isabella herself has been quoted “Don’t spoil a good story with the truth”.
Imagine that one piece of history that is taken from a town. This piece of history tells l people how this town was built and all the important people that were apart of the community. “Returning Antiquities to Their Countries of Origin” by Joyce Mortimer can many people about how objects are getting taken from Museums. They should be returned immediately. There are so many artifacts out there that could be so important to people, and if someone can just imagine what it would feel to have one of the most important object taken from a museum and to be never returned again. Many people enjoy seeing these objects so why are they being taken?
In Stephen Weil’s essay, he argues “the museum’s role has transformed from one of mastery to one of service” (Weil, 196). According to him, museums have changed their mission from one that cultures the public to one that serves
Reynolds Price’s “The Great Imagination Heist” discusses how television has corrupted the imaginations of today’s American youth. The idea behind the word “heist” suits the title and story well; however, I disagree with his idea that television and video games have stolen youthful imaginations.
News articles began coming out reporting that the precious paintings were going to be ruined because the house was in disrepair with leaks and cracks in the foundation. Richard Glanton, who was caretaker of the collection for a short time took steps to go ahead and move the paintings and have the house repaired and made appropriate for the art collection to come back. Glanton took the art collection around the world to show and make money for the repairs of the Barnes Foundation building. After the repairs were made, the art collection came back home and it was never the
Many New Yorkers believe that the waiting period of a year was not enough time for the American citizens to grieve and rebuild their lives. This allows us to conclude that there is a respectable amount of time needed for healing of the mourners and respect of the dead before creating a memorable monument. Fischl’s Tumbling Woman is possibly one of the most scrutinized pieces of artwork surround 9/11 because of its release date on the first anniversary of 9/11. Many other artists and American citizens created sanctum like memorials with pictures and candles. These representations of 9/11 did not receive scrutiny like the Tumbling Woman monument, which leads me to believe that the timing of the release of the monument may not have lead to the scrutiny of the
...r figure out what these paintings really stand for. In recent years they have been painted over and redone in certain areas, so something needs to be found before there are no paintings left.
The media has come to dominate the lives of many of today’s youths. In The Great Imagination Heist, Reynolds Price expresses extreme dismay at the media’s ever-tightening grasp over the impressionable minds of adolescents. He sincerely feels that the effects of prolonged exposure to television, film, video games, and the Internet are detrimental to the development of a youth’s imagination and ability to think freely, without outside influence. The word “heist” indicates the intention to rob or steal. Price laments what he perceives to be the robbing of original, personal thought. He longs for the days when people read books freely and television was little more than a negligible aspect of our daily lives.
The Midwestern contemporary art case study revolves around the current MCA board chair Peggy Fischer, and former board chair Peter Smith. Smith had been elected to the board after individuals recognized him and his wife for the immense art collecting accomplishments put forth on the couples behalf. Initially Smith was indebted to pay $10,000 to even be elected onto the board chair. Smith indeed paid an initial pledge of $10,000 and financially made amends to put forth $5 million additional dollars towards museum improvements. It is no deniable fact that Fischer had recognized Smiths admirable job running the museum. Smith worked his way up from being a member of the board to board chair. Smith and his wife were highly recognized by the community and aimed to stay out of the spotlight whenever possible.
“Art Museums and the Ritual of Citizenship” by Carol Duncan: A Response to Western Cultural Imperialism and the “Ritual” of Modernity in European/American Museums
The Metropolitan Museum of Art came about as an idea from Jon Jay in Paris, France in 1866 with the idea of “national institution gallery of art” within the United States. Once this idea was proposed, it was immediately moved forward with his return to the United States. With the help of the Union League Club in NY they began to acquire civic leaders, businessmen, artists, and collectors who aided in the creation of the museum. For over 140 years, the visitors who go here have received everything the mission of the institution states.
The Tampa Museum of Art was not always the same museum that we see today. It went through multiple stages throughout the years. The works vary, creating a large spectrum from the old to the new. The social angles change with the exhibits in the museum, combining to create the diversity we see today. Visiting this museum in person helped me to appreciate it even more than I would have thought possible. Observing and analyzing the other visitors helped me to understand the museum’s impact on the community more than I would have been able to just by reading about it. This museum is much different from others than I have visited.
"You can wipe out an entire generation, you burn their homes to the ground and somehow they will still find their way back. But if you destroy their history, you destroy their achievements and it as if they never existed"(Cambell,2014). During World War II the Nazis would go through the countries they occupied. The art they took was either put in their own museums or they burned them. The Nazis stole millions of pieces of art, mostly pieces that were made from the end of the of the 18th century up until the 1900 's. Hitler ordered his soldiers to steal the art to gain power over other cultures. At the end of the war, the Allies were on a hunt to find all the missing and stolen art the Nazis hid at the end of the war. The big debate today is if the stolen art should go back to their rightful owners. Over a span of six years, the Nazis stole millions of paintings the trails to get those back to their rightful owners has had a lasting impression on today 's world.
The Museum Of Modern Art “MOMA” was firmly established on 53rd street in 1939 in Midtown Manhattan New York, after a decade of moving due to its growth in modern art pieces. Originally Patrons Miss Lillie P. Bliss, Mrs. Cornelius J. Sullivan, and Mrs. John D. Rockefeller Jr. wanted to establish a program dedicated to modern art in the late 1920s. A. Conger Goodyear, Paul Sachs, Frank Crowninshield and Josephine Boardman Crane, whom later became trustees, created the Museum Of Modern Art in 1929. It’s founding Director, Alfred H. Barr, Jr. wanted the MOMA to be "the greatest museum of modern art in the world." Its intent was to provide ordinary blue collar individuals with a better understanding and acknowledgment of art in its era.
The purse in Katherine Anne Porters' short story, "Theft", is linked to several episodes and in each event reveals the main character's inner personality. The first episode is her encounters with three men. The second event is the theft of her purse. Lastly, the protagonist confronts the thief. In each episode the main character displays her intimate personality.
One notable aspect in the Romanian museum market is that, whilst the number of museum visits recorded a significant decrease (12 million visitors to 9.5 from 2007 to 2011), the number of museums has increased from 679 to 709 (Pârvulescu 2013), according to Mediafax . The museum market equilibrium was affected due to a drastic decrease in demand, although supply increased by 30 un...