To collect is to bring things together. However there is an art to collecting, as it is not simply just bringing miscellaneous things together. There is a common theme for the objects and together they serve as a special meaning to their collector. In both texts “The Museum and the Public” by Stephen Weil and Walter Benjamin “Unpacking My Library” by Walter Benjamin, and in the film “Mardi Gras: Made in China”, the purpose of collecting is to tell a story and to showcase the significance of the objects in the collection. In Stephen Weil’s essay, he argues “the museum’s role has transformed from one of mastery to one of service” (Weil, 196). According to him, museums have changed their mission from one that cultures the public to one that serves …show more content…
the public. Before the transformation, museums showcased their collections with a purpose “to raise the level of public understanding, to elevate the spirit of its visitors and to refine and uplift the common taste” (Weil, 196). However museums no longer collect with an intention to spread knowledge; instead their collection function as an educational resource, which aid people in their own learning process. This is especially evident in the majority of mission statements of current museum; many of them are committed to enhancing public education or serving public enjoyment. Weil goes onto question why it was possible for museums to transform, rather than to just simply “go out of business”. In order to answer this question, Weil argues the effect of seeing an object in person, stating that “it makes a claim to be ‘true’ in a way that words or picture can never be” (Weil, 206). In this sense, seeing an object confirms its authenticity. Furthermore, Weil also states that the objects within a collection tell a story or a “lesson that the curator was trying to teach” (Weil, 206). However each individual sees an object differently as they bring their prior knowledge and past judgments to perceive what’s in front of them and the objects may “resonate with their experience and provide new information in ways that confirm and enrich their own view of the world” (Weil, 206). This is why a museum’s collection and how they portray their collection is so important. Museums must recognize the diversity of their visitors; every visitor will perceive their collection different as they bring in their unique perspective. Therefore, Weil believes the purpose of collections in a museum is to enrich and deepen one’s existing belief. In this sense, museums’ purpose and aims for collecting to serve as a medium for learning, in which viewers bring in their own perspective to complete the collection’s overall story or lesson. Walter Benjamin writes about collecting and a person’s relation to their collection. Benjamin starts off his essay describing the act of unpacking his library and says that book collecting is “the spring tide of memories which surges toward any collector as he contemplates his possessions” (Benjamin, 60). As Benjamin is unpacking his library, he feels nostalgic, as if he is reunited with the books and is able to reminisce the experience of reading or acquiring each one. He then goes onto to talk about the thrill of the act of collecting: “Everything remembered and thought, everything conscious, becomes the pedestal, the frame, the base, the lock of his property. The period, the region, the craftsmanship, the former ownership—for a true collector the whole background of an item adds up to a magic encyclopedia whose quintessence is the fate of his object” (Benjamin, 60). The “magic encyclopedia” is the book’s background story, where it has been before the collector acquires it. To Benjamin, the thrill isn’t from getting the book itself, the thrill comes from being able to look through each books past and adding one’s own imprint to the book. This is different from Weil’s interpretation for collecting. For Weil it is about the education and how collecting can benefit the public good. However for Benjamin, it is a personal relationship. The collector values his collection but it can meaningless to other people. Additionally, Benjamin states “For him [the collector], not only books, but also copies of books have their fates. And in this sense, the most important fate of a copy is its encounter with him, with his own collection. I am not exaggerating when I say that to a true collector the acquisition of an old book is its rebirth” (Benjamin, 61). The collector gives each book its destiny and purpose. Benjamin believes the collector has the power to give books its value. Therefore to Benjamin, the purpose and aims of collecting is for one’s personal possession and the collector give his/her collection its value. At the end of his essay, Benjamin reasserts this personal relationship between a collection and their collector saying that “no one will be able to order a collection with the same understanding that the original owner did” (Benjamin, 67). Benjamin restates the personal relationship of collecting and for the collector, the aims of collecting is for to tell his/ her personal story. Therefore no one else but the collector will be able to understand the true significance of the collection. Mardi Gras: Made in China is a documentary film that juxtaposes American consumerism and Chinese working class.
The film starts with a scene from a Mardi Gras celebration in New Orleans, where drunk partygoers trade beads for nudity and follows the trail of the bead necklaces from New Orleans all the way back to its origins in China, where it was made. In China, the workers, mainly women, work and live in the factory under distressing conditions. These workers work for 11 hours a day and for extremely low wages. They live in crowded and dilapidated compounds and eat cheap factory food. The film also mentions some New Orleans partygoers can spend about $500 on the beads in a night, whereas the factory workers earn on average ten cents an hour and make around $2-$3 dollars a day. The workers have to fulfill a certain quota each day and failure to do so results in a ten percent cut in wages. Most of the money they make is sent back to their families. Toward the end of the film, pictures of the Mardi Gras celebration in New Orleans were shown to the Chinese workers and footage of the Chinese workers were shown to Mardi Gras partygoers. The Chinese were shocked to see that the beads were purchased at a thousand times higher than the amount that they are paid to make it. Similarly, American partygoers were also shocked to see that the seemingly worthless beads they throw around are made with such strenuous work effort. This stark contrast represents the different value of the …show more content…
beads to American and to Chinese factory workers. To Americans, the act of collecting these beads is one that is considered an enjoyment and an accomplishment; the more beads they get, the more amount of time they’ve showed their frontal nudity. Thus showing how much fun they’ve had. To them, these beads are worthless- nothing more than just string of beads used for entertainment. However to the Chinese workers, the purpose of collecting these beads is a way of life. Many of them have sacrifice their lives in order to support their family and many also work in hopes of a better life for themselves. The beads are much more valuable to the Chinese because it is how they make their living and it represents their dreams and self- sacrifice. In this sense the purpose of collecting the beads tells two contrasting stories from two contrasting collectors. The significance of the object is also opposite for each group of collector. This is similar to Benjamin who argues that purpose of collecting is for one’s own personal desire. The Chinese desire money, or rather they need money, and so to them they make and collect the beads for its monetary value. However the Americans collect the beads with a purpose to have fun. Throughout the following three examples, it is possible to see that the purpose of collecting is to tell a story.
Although the story many vary in its intended audience. In Weil’s essay, the story is intended toward for a public audience, whereas in Benjamin’s essay and the Mardi Gras documentary, the story behind the collection is one that is personal. Additionally, there are significances to the object itself within each collection. In Weil’s essay, the objects within a museum collection are used as a foundation for people to further build their knowledge upon. In Benjamin’s essay, each itself has a background story and the collector is able to complete the book’s journey by making it a part of their collection. In the Mardi Gras documentary, the significance of a specific bead necklace represents extra money for the workers and it makes the difference as to whether or not they fulfill their quota. Additionally, each bead is a symbol of how their work will pay off; whether they will use their wages to support their family or to pursue dreams of their
own.
As long as the demand for beads during Mardi Gras continues so will the profit made by US companies selling them. Over in China Roger Wong will continue to exploit his young women employees to bolster his bottom line. Other businessmen, corporations and the wealthy few will also benefit from this same strategy used for thousands of products that are part of ones life every day.
Imagine that one piece of history that is taken from a town. This piece of history tells l people how this town was built and all the important people that were apart of the community. “Returning Antiquities to Their Countries of Origin” by Joyce Mortimer can many people about how objects are getting taken from Museums. They should be returned immediately. There are so many artifacts out there that could be so important to people, and if someone can just imagine what it would feel to have one of the most important object taken from a museum and to be never returned again. Many people enjoy seeing these objects so why are they being taken?
The play “Permanent Collection” focuses on an African-American man who has just taken over an art museum named Sterling North. While digging through storage, he finds eight African sculpture pieces and wants to add them to the collection at the Morris Foundation on the campus of a college. The Director of Education Paul Barrow is hanging on to the words of Mr. Morris and his vision because he doesn’t want anything to change at the museum according to Mr. Morris’ will, which contributes to the title of the play “Permanent Collection.”
“The Necklace” gives a strong representation of what the story is about. When Madame Loisel was looking for jewelry with Madame Forestier, “She came
Baxandall, Michael. "Exhibiting intention: Some preconditions of the visual display of culturally purposeful objects." Exhibiting cultures: The poetics and politics of museum display (1991): 33-41.
“Art Museums and the Ritual of Citizenship.” in Exhibiting Cultures. Eds. Ivan Karp and Steven Lavine. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1991. Print.
The Metropolitan Museum of Art came about as an idea from Jon Jay in Paris, France in 1866 with the idea of “national institution gallery of art” within the United States. Once this idea was proposed, it was immediately moved forward with his return to the United States. With the help of the Union League Club in NY they began to acquire civic leaders, businessmen, artists, and collectors who aided in the creation of the museum. For over 140 years, the visitors who go here have received everything the mission of the institution states.
New and interesting artifacts will not only entertain old customers but will also attract new customers to the museum. For example, the National Museum of the American Indian, the first national museum dedicated to the preservation, study, and exhibition of the life, languages, literature, history, and arts of Native Americans, is known for its variety of more than 800,00 works of extraordinary aesthetic religious, and historical significance (Source
Thesis: The Government can give permission to make the museum but it is usually business runned when it comes to maintaining it.
In the documentary film Mardi Gras Made In China, The director David Redmon shows the path of Mardi Gras bead necklaces, from China to New Orleans. While interviewing Chinese workers about knowing what the beads are used for, and Americans about where the beads come from. Redmon is trying to make his case of how the Americans are treating the necklaces like garbage, and the Chinese make a poor living while making the necklaces. When Redmon is interviewing people in New Orleans. Some American people don't care about where the necklaces come from. While he opens the eyes of others that are ashamed of wearing the necklaces after they find out the conditions with the workers making
Values are spread all around the world, and many people’s values differ. These can lead to people being judged, or indirectly characterized by other people. In “The Necklace” Mme. Loisel is a beautiful woman with a decent life, and a husband that loves her, and only wants to make her happy. She is not rich but she makes it along, she insists of a better, wealthier life. When her husband gets her invited to a ball, she feels the need for a brand new fancy dress and tons of jewelry. When the couple realizes they cannot afford jewelry as well, they search out to borrow her friend, Mme. Forestiers’ necklace. She comes to notice she no longer has the necklace on when she leaves the ball. This later troubles her, as she has to work for a long time to collect enough money to buy a new necklace. This story describes the relationship between a couple, who have different dreams, and how desires can revamp your life. Guy de Maupassant, the author of “The Necklace” uses literary devices to prove people come before materialistic items.
This review questions Maurice Berger´s assertion that “white [museum] curators, administrators, and patrons” seldom accept art outside the “mainstream” or art that “challenges dominant values.” Paradoxically, this quote supports the point of an article—Lisa C. Corrin´s “Mining the Museum”—rich in examples of exhibitions, curated by white artists and curators, and aimed at overcoming standard practices.
Individuals do not learn in a void; instead they build upon the knowledge and experience that they have developed over their lives. They use their identities to shape how they learn and view the world and themselves. If the identity of the learner is not accepted and allowed to influence learning, the desired outcomes may not be accomplished. The cultivation of identities is especially important in museums and other cultural institutions and they must adapt their techniques to accomplish this. These issues of identity and learning are complex so this paper will focus on issues of representation in regard to ethnicity and gender. Furthermore, solutions to proper exhibition display and facilitation will be theorized through the lens of critical
Values are spread all around the world, and many people’s values differ. These can lead to people being judged, or indirectly characterized by other people. In “The Necklace” Mme. Loisel is a beautiful woman with a decent life, and a husband that loves her, and only wants to make her happy. She is not rich but she makes it along, she insists of a better, wealthier life. When her husband gets her invited to a ball, she feels the need for a brand new fancy dress and tons of jewelry. When the couple realizes they cannot afford jewelry as well, they search out to borrow her friend, Mme. Forestiers’ necklace. She comes to notice she no longer has the necklace on when she leaves the ball. This later troubles her, as she has to work for a long time to collect enough money to buy a new necklace. This story describes the relationship between a couple, who have different dreams, and how desires can revamp your life. Guy de Maupassant, the author of “The Necklace” uses literary devices to prove people come before materialistic items.
Youngs, I. (2011). Museums enjoy 10 years of freedom. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15927593. Last accessed 4th Nov 2013.