Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nature of authority in power
Nature of authority
Nature of authority
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Eliminate the notion of emotion and you have the essence of the film Equilibrium. The setting is in the future where all emotion and artistic tendencies are outlawed and those who commit ‘sense offenses’ are whisked away to be incinerated. In order for feelings to be suppressed everyone must take their daily injections. There is a group of people that enforce these laws known as Clerics. John Preston is the leader of that group. He starts out being very diligent about his duties. He even killed his own partner for reading a book of poetry. John is the epitome of an authoritarian type leader. He is well trained in martial arts and proves that he is not someone to be messed with. When John misses his daily dose of indifference (AKA
Prozium) he slowly begins to experience emotions. This sets him on a path to change the world that the dictator (known as “The Father”) created. He shifts from being a nefarious commander to taking command over his own destiny. John becomes determined to meet “The Father” and annihilate him. Unbeknownst to him, however, “The Father” is really dead and another dictator has secretly taken his place (Vice-Council Dupont.) Dupont is head of all the Clerics. He is cold, ruthless and personifies evil. John, (who is like Bruce Lee on steroids) discovers his secret and destroys him. Emotions led John Preston out of the state of nothingness and into the heartland of hope.
Though not necessarily a full, well-rounded package appealing to everyone and anyone, May’s article does resonate well with the readers that are inclined to pathos and allow themselves to become emotionally invested. This is due to May’s strong belief in nonviolence, which is most likely the very reason this article was written. As a philosopher, May is able to offer what some may consider to be a one-sided fix to a multidimensional problem. Unfortunately, not everyone is inclined to listen to their emotions or has strong, well-grounded
The late 1960’s famously introduced the idea of the “anti-hero”, which is defined as an individual with heroic qualities who is not in the position of an archetypal hero. One such example is the movie Cool Hand Luke, from 1967 starring Paul Newman. The movie surrounds a prisoner named Luke Jackson who refuses to comply or conform to the norms of the prison. The powerful Captain and the mysterious prison guard, whose silver reflecting sunglasses was the inspiration for one of the main prison guards in the popular Stanford prison experiment, tested his acts of defiance. This paper discusses the movie Cool Hand Luke and how the prisoners, Luke and the themes in the film relate to the Social Psychology 1ZO3 course focuses of conformity, non-conformity, and obedience to authority.
The films “Bladerunner” and “Fahrenheit 451” are similar in the way they show emotions in their depictions of distopias. The emotions shown are not normal to us, but are controlled by the government. The inhabitants of these worlds are being persuaded that emotions are bad, unhealthy. However, some do break free from the system. The cases in these movies are not of really living at all, but just of going through the motions of life.
If a person of authority ordered you inflict a 15 to 400 volt electrical shock on another innocent human being, would you follow your direct orders? That is the question that Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University tested in the 1960’s. Most people would answer “no,” to imposing pain on innocent human beings but Milgram wanted to go further with his study. Writing and Reading across the Curriculum holds a shortened edition of Stanley Milgram’s “The Perils of Obedience,” where he displays an eye-opening experiment that tests the true obedience of people under authority figures. He observes that most people go against their natural instinct to never harm innocent humans and obey the extreme and dangerous instructions of authority figures. Milgram is well aware of his audience and organization throughout his article, uses quotes directly from his experiment and connects his research with a real world example to make his article as effective as possible.
The film Casablanca, indeed, involves problems that Rick faced and he finally solved that problem, ending in a satisfying way. Risk’s equilibrium is disrupted when he is going to leave Paris with his girl friend Ilsa because Ilsa doesn’t showed up at last. Risk becomes a boss of a cafe in Casablanca but he never imagines that he would encounter Ilsa again. Ilsa walks into Risk’s life again by accident when she is planing to get a letter of transit in Casablanca in order to escape to America with her husband. At the same time, Nazi Major Strasser arrives in Casablanca and tries to stop Ilsa’s husband from leaving Casablanca. Risk’s equlibrium is disrupted again. Risk still loves and hates Ilsa, and moreover, he gets the letter of transit. Even though Risk wanted to stay with Ilsa and let her husband go to America alone, Risk finally let Ilsa and her husband go and killed the Nazi Major Strasser. That is a satisfying ending.
During the movie, I found that these concepts that were taught in class helped me better understand and relate to certain clips of the movie. Throughout the rest of the paper, I will be going into a bit more detail about exactly what these concepts are and mean, following that I will be giving examples from the movie that demonstrate the concepts of conflict and politeness theory.
The protagonist, Harrison Bergeron, is not your average fourteen year old and ultimately proves what can go wrong when the rules are broken. This, futuristic society, heightened his sense of anger and due to his lack of
King used an appeal to pathos, in order to persuade his viewers to aid in the quest for equality. By using the power of human emotion, King established the connection needed to ...
“The Perils of Indifference” is a speech that Elie Wiesel delivered in Washington D.C. on April 12, 1999, exactly 54 years after his release from the Nazi concentration camp Buchenwald by American troops. Both Congress along with President Clinton and Mrs. Clinton were present to hear the speech. Wiesel spoke briefly about what it was like in the concentration camps, but he focused mostly on the topic of Indifference. His speech was effective in its use of rhetoric to convince the audience that as individuals and as a world culture we cannot afford to become indifferent to the suffering around us.
Although the governments in the two stories have similar ideas as to how they want the world to be, they approach the issue differently. In common, the governments both obligate organizational, technological, and disciplinary control, which really regulates the behavior of society. In the movie, the Tetragrammaton Council routes the society by compelling obligatory intake of a drug known as Prozium, which inhibits the ability to feel emotions. As mentioned, the Council believes that emotions are the main cause of tro...
I chose to analyze Despicable Me, an animated film geared towards a younger audience, because I was interested in examining underlying theories and messages that this film would be relaying to its viewers. Often times, when watching animated films, children are not aware of these messages, as they are absorbed by the characters, special effects, and humor. But as we have learned throughout this semester, our brains are subconsciously primed by the various surroundings we are exposed to. Since we also studied the impacts of entertainment, such as television and video games, on children, I wanted to see how a popular children’s film might also affect them.
Two movies, “The others” and “The Descent” demonstrate perfect examples of the return of the repressed. Grace in the first film becomes a murder, because she becomes crazy because of her difficult repressed life without husband. In the second film, Sarah transforms from a weak, unlucky woman to a primitive coldblooded killer. They have something in common: they are both lost their husbands, but their repressed states are different.
Even though Stanley Kubrick’s Dr. Strangelove, or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb screened in the midst of the sobering Cold War, critics were keen on praising the film for its mastery of humor applied to such a sensitive matter. The film is exceedingly loaded with metaphors, innuendos, and allusions that nothing can be left undissected or taken for face value; the resulting effect is understood to be part of Kubrick’s multifarious theme. Kubrick has stated that what began as a “the basis for a serious film about accidental war ” eventually birthed an absurd and farcical classic comedy. The director fuses together irony, satire, and black humor to create a waggish piece but most of all the situation of the times and its gravity is the essence of what the audience finds so hilarious . Using caricatures rather than characters, exaggerated script, and sexual undertones, Kubrick manifests to the audience their own predicament and just how ridiculous it is to even consider brinksmanship as a means to preserve the American lifestyle.
Unlike any other movie, Gasper Noe’s Irreversible (2002), with his own unusual but unique way of telling a story, shows how violence roots from love, how pain roots from pleasure, how imagination roots from reality and how death roots from life. This movie focuses Marcus and Pierre’s battle with the illusion of justice to avenge Marcus’ girlfriend, Alex, from her atrocious fate. And beginning this with the ending, Gasper Noe has created not just a realistic and powerful movie but has explained, as well, what it means
Tolerance Movie. By Morgan Chapman. Dir. Morgan Chapman. Prod. Beth Knight. 2013. Audiovisual. April 2014. .