Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cultural intelligence the new emotional intelligence
The effects of family dynamics
The effects of family dynamics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cultural intelligence the new emotional intelligence
Late one afternoon, a couple sat quietly in the sofa of their matrimonial home. The wife was an active blogger, so her tablet was in hand; however, her husband worked during the day, at a downtown office, so his hands were pretty much empty. She thought to herself, he must really not want me blogging tonight, because he has been poking me for the last half an hour and telling me to look at him. Of course, he was being annoying, but she didn’t say that either. The husband, seeing the look on her face, said he was sorry for annoying her with his friendship; hence, retreating to the most ridiculous statement that required an “I’m listening” answer, all instead of just telling him to stop. Would you call this wife’s situation love or tolerance? Tolerance, which keeps a person at a distance to avoid unnecessary hurt, in contrast to love and affection, which embraces a person in all things, are often confused in this generation. A negative environment has led to the adaption of tolerance. Tolerance deals with man’s capacity to withstand something, whether it may be pressure, sadness, pain or pleasure. Everyone has their limits, and that is where tolerance steps into play. “Love is a strong liking or embrace of affection towards someone or something” according to (Collins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged). “Affection is a feeling of liking and caring for someone or something” as stated by (Mish, Tolerance) in the Merriam- Webster Dictionary. Love and affection are unconditioned and uncontrolled feelings from deep within, as opposed to tolerance, the controlled and conditioned, but not separate from humans who love and show affection as it is a sense of what is accepted.
Love and Affection are feelings from deep within that need...
... middle of paper ...
...ster. March 2014. .
Raffaele, Beverly J. Does Unconditional Love Mean Unconditional Tolerance? Vancouver: Salon Media Group, 29 May 2009. Weblog. 9 March 2014. .
Staff, Crossway. The Difference Between Tolerance and Love. 20 January 2010. Weblog. 9 March 2014. .
Tolerance Movie. By Morgan Chapman. Dir. Morgan Chapman. Prod. Beth Knight. 2013. Audiovisual. April 2014. .
"Weblog Comment." Does Unconditional Love Mean Unconditional Tolerance? Salon Media Group, 29 May 2009. Weblog. 9 March 2014. .
Weiss, Debra Cassens. "Promise of Love and Affection Isn’t Sufficient Consideration for Contract." ABA Journal (2012). Web. March 2014. .
Writer, Rabbit. My Love and Affection. 19 Aug. 2010. Poem. March 2014. .
In certain countries such as the U.S, people discriminate against others to a certain extent based off their gender, race, and sexuality. Butler states that “to be a body is to be given over to others even as a body is “one own,” which we must claim right of autonomy” (242). Gays and Lesbians have to be exposed to the world because some of them try to hide their identity of who they truly are because they are afraid of how others are going to look at them. There are some who just let their sexuality out in the open because they feel comfortable with whom they are as human beings and they don’t feel any different than the next person. The gender or sexuality of a human being doesn’t matter because our bodies’ will never be autonomous because it is affected by others around us. This is where humans are vulnerability to violence and aggression. In countries across the globe, violence and attack are drawn towards tran...
Milestone 1: Literacy Analysis Paper: Love means loving someone unconditionally. Loving them with flaws and all. Love is a part of being human. How can you love without accepting the society you live in? Nowlan’s poem
Affection and attachment, wanting intimacy and closeness with someone is imprinted in our very DNA. Our true natures are revealed in the existence of our desire for love. When an ill-intentioned external force denies us that desire through the use of fear however, it has the detrimental effect of keeping us locked in prisons of confusion and despair. There is hope, however, that redemption can come by finding affirmation of our individual identity. There is hope in identifying and knowing the true nature of our identities, in being okay with who we are because others are okay with who we are. We love because we were first loved.
This passage marks the first of several types of love, and gives us an intuitive
The concept of love is a very ambiguous, controversial, idea that is nearly impossible to come to a singular consensus on. In this essay I will be describing and comparing two philosophical views on the concepts and ideas behind love. Through the works of Todd May and Plato, different approaches to the concept of love will be illustrated as well as determining the similarities and differences between the two perspectives.
Q2) Tolerance (in a religious sense) is the ability to accept others that either practice different beliefs to your own, or have a quality about them that differs from you, that you disagree with. In the Christian Bible, it is commonly mentioned as an after-effect of things like impatience or ignorance.
Religious tolerance and religious pluralism have many different definitions, depending on the person’s interpretation of the word and where the person gets the definition. Every person of every faith and the people without a faith can have a different definition for tolerance and for pluralism. Diana L. Eck, the director of The Pluralism Project at Harvard University, gives a clear definition for pluralism. Pluralism is a two way street of dialogue, knowledge, understanding, and active participation (Eck 2 “From Diversity”). Pluralism is not meant to be an assimilation of religions or that a person of any faith has to believe all religious paths are true. Religious Tolerance is the continuous congruent relations betw...
Mickel, E., & Hall, C. (2008). Choosing to Love: The Essentials of Loving (Presents and Problems). International journal of reality therapy, 27(2), 30-34.
An essential question of mine while reading Love 2.0 by Barbara Fredrickson. After understanding Fredrickson’s point of view, it came to a certain point where I became convinced that “love" is not something that is quite special. The conception of Love 2.0 is not to diminish the meaning of love but to simplify the definition, to downgrade the specialty. Many micro-changes in the brain can indicate that love is growing because love is simply a “positivity resonance”. “Positivity resonance”, according to Fredrickson, is a term that is defined as it is shown. Positivity is being optimistic or showing positive actions and attitude. And “Resonance” is to be in sync with the sound and waves nearby. Fredrickson essentially replaces the word “love” with “positivity resonance” indicating that love is simply defined as a wave of positive emotion that is shared between two people. Fredrickson briefly sums up that “Love is a momentary upwelling of three tightly interwoven events: first, a sharing of one or more positive emotions between you and another; second, a synchrony between your and the other person’s biochemistry and behaviors; and third, a reflected motive to invest in each other’s well-being that brings mutual care”. It supports the concept that love is no more than a simple harmony between two people. The topic, idea, or pain they both share forms the conceptual and imaginative object called love inside the
Humboldt Journal of Social Relations 32.1, TRANSLATIONAL APPLIED SOCIOLOGY (2009): 158-83. JSTOR.Web. 11 May 2014. Chalmers, Jennifer H. "Romantic Love: Is It a Realistic Goal for Marriage Therapy?" Romantic Love: Is It a Realistic Goal for Marriage Therapy?
In today’s world, as humankind is still in progress, we have a much more liberated world compared to past. In terms of politics, we learned discrimination is not a honourable case to be involved in and we tried to minimize constraints reflected on “other” races, “other” nationalities, in short all of the others that are not similar to “us”. “Us” is, without doubt, white, Western man. Despite all the back-drawed prejudices of others in the name of liberation, respect and equality, it does not seem to be the situation for non-heteronormatives to live in a peaceful environment. Since I came to Amsterdam as an exchange student this term, I had the opportunity to experience daily-life with all the people from different sexes, genders not considered “normal” which is rarely the case in Turkey. Amsterdam made me face non-heterosexual world and I realized that these people do suffer from unequal rights mostly in other parts of the world. I questioned myself as being far away from that topic in the past and it really made sense to me to investigate about supremacy of heterosexuals.
Dickinson determines and acknowledges that relationships require a mutual risk. The speaker deliberately and courageously expresses the couple as not being interdependent towards one another. Yet, she merges through this affirmation that “some” couples require mutual gain in which both persons are content with their part of the bargain. The purpose is for the wife to have financial security while the husband gains a dedicated wife, very similar to the woman during the 19th century. Dickinson expresses that this obligation will require the woman to forever be indebted “Insolvent” to the husband and the intention to feel otherwise is
A society without love is a dark and gloomy dystopian place. In George Orwell’s famous novel 1984 Orwell depicts a totalitarian society that attempts to control every aspect of the human life, including the freedom to love, and succeeds at doing so. The government, or Big Brother, controls everything from thoughts to food to human emotion. As a result of this control the residents of Oceania know only to love one thing: Big Brother. This destroys relationships and creates division among people. Orwell displays the message that without the freedom to love, marriages are meaningless, the true meaning of family does not exist, and the only way to make up for the lack of love is to overcompensate with hate.
“Tolerance is the word used most often” (A.Q,13) In “ A Quilt Of A Country” a main focus was tolerance and as the
Accepting people for who they are has a huge role in tolerance. “Since most of the others stole glances at