Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Animals v humans biology
One major similarity between humans and animals
Animals v humans biology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Animals v humans biology
Human Supremacy: Nowhere Near Reality
Human beings have advanced to a point where survival from the outside world is almost incredibly easy. They have created cures and inventions that could enhance their everyday lifestyles. They are also the only species to modify the planet in any way they can imagine. Does that make human beings the dominant species? Because most people presume they have the right to control other animals, they presume they’re the superior species. People’s lifestyles suggest that they are doing fine. However, people often seem to forget that they are animals too. People are not superior to animals, they are just different.
The belief of human superiority, also known as anthropocentrism, is vague and a biased opinion. It can be thought of like the idea of racial, gender or religious supremacy. People cannot go and compare themselves as a whole and animals if they have little understanding about how animals, other than them, think. As humans, they would like to think of themselves as important, but in most cases people think they, as a species, are the most impo...
Humans tend to think of themselves as the best of the best and consider other beings to be pathetic in comparison. In Mark Twain’s satirical essay,”The Lowest Animal,” he argues that in fact, humans are the ones that are the lowest animals, not the superior species as they like to think. Twain utilizes concrete examples, irony, and satire to make his argument that humans are greedy and foolish, making them the lowest animals.
Human beings. We are an exclusive species. Humans are able to achieve abstract thought, while most of the creatures in the animal kingdon have an attention span of only minutes. We are able to extract the purest elements from the most barren lands. We are also able to destroy the fragile biodiversity that has taken the earth millions of years to create. Should humankind, however, be punished for pushing so many different species into extinction by becoming extinct itself?
... life. What we are able to do is treat all species with respect and do what we can so that they can thrive in a world that we have altered. We can preserve a species without alienating another. Preserving the Australian fauna at the cost of some feral dogs is the choice we have to make for the good of the biological make up of that region. Dogs themselves won’t go extinct and we’ve also eliminated a threat to other species including ourselves. Species egalitarianism is an easily outmoded form of communicating treatment of species because of all the questions and speculation it ultimately raises. The equivocation of animals is absurd. We can’t compare them because of all their fundamental differences and to do so is insulting to all species that fall below the parameters we instill. Ultimately there is no possible situation in which species egalitarianism is correct.
Millions of years of evolution have taken us from a single cell to a genetically unique animal we now call humans. This progression and advancement has taken us from beings with no language or sense of thought, to what is now an extremely advanced human race, exploring the world as we know it. In Human Dignity, Francis Fukuyama explains the concepts of what makes an animal human. This can be a very hard concept to grasp and even Fukuyama cannot give a clear answer. Fukuyama agrees that there is not solely one characteristic that makes an animal human, it a group of elements, which he calls Factor X. These elements are what should ultimately give animals the right to be treated with dignity, honor, and respect. If animals can develop an advanced
But why? What puts above other species? If there is anything I have learned from researching genetics it is that we refuse to accept our DNA. Have you ever gone swimming? That act, although it may seem innocent, is defying our genes. Take this moment to examine your body… feel free to comment if you have gills, nuptial pads, or dorsal fins. Point proven. Evolutionarily speaking, Homo sapiens have no reason to swim as we are land-based creatures. Genetically speaking, our DNA does not code for proteins allowing some of our cells to specialize into the aforementioned features. Simply put, we are not supposed to swim yet we do anyway. Another example is how an estimated 0.3% of the population is transgender. Although, a few animals exhibited gender discomfort they still adapted and began to behave such as their gender. Humans defy their biology and their physical being due to mental discomfort. This suggests that our being is centered in our thoughts. After all, shockingly, humans do not have more DNA than most animals. This suggests a significant unknown variable is responsible for our complexity: conscious. As Descartes infamously once said: “I think, therefore, I
Men have thought themselves to be the superior species for a long time, but Peter Singer brings a new perspective on the topic in his essay entitled Speciesism and Moral Status. Singer’s new way of thinking of it states that determining morals status requires the comparison between the cognitive abilities of humans and nonhumans. The main points he focusses on in his essay are cognitive capacities between animals and humans with severe mental retardation, religion affecting human’s beliefs of superiority, and finally the ability to suffer and how similar humans and nonhumans are.
Society has placed humans to be the highest life form because of their ability to think and reason and give consent. On these grounds it has allowed society to become numb to any injustice done to animals in any way. This essay will argue whether the subjugation of minority women is linked to the way society views and treats animals by defining current animal rights, the Women’s rights Movement and the process by which the minority is seen as an animal.
For many years, people assumed that humans are significantly different from other species, which made them somewhat superior. However, research on animal behavior, especially our closest relatives, the apes has led to new discoveries that show many similarities between human and animals. Some of these similarities have questioned the uniqueness of humans and have led to debates not only among scientists but in the public as well. Frans de Waal, a renowned primatologist and the author of The Ape and the Sushi Master, is among the scientists that claim animals and humans are quite similar. The main focus of his book is to show that culture is not exclusive to humans. De Waal was not the first scientist to propose the theory that animals have culture nonetheless; it was received with a lot of enmity. He attributes this to the fear of losing the qualities that make humans special. Claims of language in apes became so threating that animal research was almost banned. According to de Waal, “attempts of censorship do reveal just how much insecurity surrounds human uniqueness”. (32) In an attempt to support his argument, he addresses the controversial issue of morality in animals. Morality is considered a cultural aspect and therefore people often use cultural biases in decision making. Dan Kahan, a psychologist, referred to this as cultural cognition, which “refers to the tendency of individuals to conform their beliefs about disputed matters of fact to values that define their cultural identities”. Subsequently, theories on morality depend on the perspective of the scientists who carry out the research. De Waal supports his theory by analyzing aspects of morality in humans and comparing them to animal behavior.
In your essay “The Lowest Animal,” you believed that humans are the lowest of all animals because they exhibit negative behaviors unlike that of other animals. Some of the negative behaviors you pointed out were greed, cruelty and pride. Because these behaviors were present in some humans, you felt it was just to group not only those humans into being the lowest animal, but all humans; these include the ones that do not demonstrate greed, cruelty and pride. Additionally, you did not take any positive behaviors associated with humans into account.
In the article Are we in Anthropodenial it talks about animals having human qualities. The author begins with a...
This view, that humans are of special moral status, is constantly attempted to be rationalized in various ways. One such defense is that we are not morally wrong to prioritize our needs before the needs of nonhuman animals for “the members of any species may legitimately give their fellows more weight than they give members of other species (or at least more weight than a neutral view would grant them). Lions, too, if they were moral agents, could not then be criticized for putting other lions first” (Nozick, 79). This argument, that we naturally prefer our own kind, is based on the same fallacy used by racists while defending their intolerant beliefs and therefore should be shown to have no logical merit.
Is the species of man superior to every other creature of God? As humans, some, but not all, tend to have a mindset of being the superior race and the most potent force driving the world due to our seeming superiority to every other creature of nature. Even though man may assume that they are higher than most, accepting the thought that the human race weaved the beginning of all life, Chief Seattle’s quote “man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it” reinforces the fact that our lives are actually just intertwined with nature, and in the grand scheme of things the creatures we discredit are actually the basis of our survival.
“Simple things which the other animals easily learn, he is incapable of learning” (Twain). Mark Twain’s essay over “The Dammed Human Race” is full of satire when he describes humans and their behaviors. In his piece, he compares humans and their lack of morals against animals who exhibit stronger morals. Mark provides several examples in the form of tests to back up his theory. In doing so, he denounces the Darwin theory and comes up with what he believes is more suitable, the Descent of Man from the Higher Animals. Mark comes to the conclusion that humans are the least evolved and should remain at the bottom of the species list rather than the top. Although Mark conveys false credibility, speculative generalizations, and a somewhat critical satire, his essay is indeed successful.
When we think of our existence on earth, we assume we are in fact, the dominant species, our expansion all across the planet and the amount of resources we abuse on a daily bases shows the unnecessary huge population we have on our planet. We are so dominant we take up the entire earth! Anywhere you go, a human has been there in some century or another to the point where no where but the seas have been explored. Our need to breed to a huge extent and produce more mouths to feed is something we should be proud of, after all, we’re obviously the only creatures whose children don’t end up being slaughtered for meat or kept as pets. Yes, life on earth is swell for our species, we care for all living creatures as long as they produce for us what
== = = Human beings are dependent on the Earth's diversity of species for our survival. Wild species play a vital role in the maintenance of the planets ecological functions, yet everyday on the planet 40-100 species become extinct.