Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effect of population growth
Negative effect of population growth
Impact of growing population essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative effect of population growth
When we think of our existence on earth, we assume we are in fact, the dominant species, our expansion all across the planet and the amount of resources we abuse on a daily bases shows the unnecessary huge population we have on our planet. We are so dominant we take up the entire earth! Anywhere you go, a human has been there in some century or another to the point where no where but the seas have been explored. Our need to breed to a huge extent and produce more mouths to feed is something we should be proud of, after all, we’re obviously the only creatures whose children don’t end up being slaughtered for meat or kept as pets. Yes, life on earth is swell for our species, we care for all living creatures as long as they produce for us what …show more content…
we obviously deserve- after all- it's our god given right to rule the weak. We of all species should know how to handle overpopulated environments, simply release the predator to that species and watch as it clears up in no time. Doing this helps free up the amount of resources consumed and helps regulate the amount of supplies to go around. For us, we should release tigers and lions, maybe even poisonous snakes into highly populated areas such as cities and towns. Doing this will help us weed out the weak, who are using up resources in order to produce weak offspring who will also become the weakest links of our species. We of course are complete rulers of the animal kingdom and can handle anything “deadly” thrown our way. By helping kill off the weak, our species will thrive, no longer will we have to worry about 500lb Angie, who sits at home regularly referring to HSN to buy useless products such as TV tables that she’ll use to eat more resources that would better suited to those who are actually doing something with their lives. By killing off people like 500lb Angie and anyone who can’t fend off a tiger in close proximity, we will help show our dominance as a species. In killing off the weak, our gene pool will grow tremendously with the right genes, genes needed to fight these non dominant species that we overuse daily for resources not needed to survive. By killing off most if not a lot of our species, we no longer will have to worry about world hunger- if anything we’ll be more at peace with one another; all understanding what it means to hunt in a pack for survival, thus solving world peace. To help solve the problem of overpopulation, other than slurping down and fending for our lives, we could regulate OUR species production rates.
We know we produce offspring rapidly, if anything we should stop letting families like the Duggar’s have so many unneeded children. Who knows the amount of resources they use, just to produce more greedy slobs for people like 500lb Angie to watch on television. To really stop overpopulation we should also kill off the unusable, those who we deem as a society as unneeded such as hobos and the old. Why keep them around, both only sit around, the only difference is one will tell you something about war and the other will create …show more content…
wars. We as a species are so overpopulated we struggle to supply for our own kind.
We know for a fact kids in Africa and India, and some parts of the world are starving and dying of hunger, but who cares? We’re American, we’re European, we’re cultured enough, we care for those who really help our economies boost. After all, 500lb Angie’s HSN membership helps the world go round and our species thrive to the level we aspire to be. We need to start regulating our production of children, we don’t need all these children when we have millions in orphanages that are perfectly fine to use in our society. The old and poor only take up space and complain about why we’re not doing as much as them, even though they’re sitting around all day and planning our wars to fill the void of the past. Our species is dominant enough, we don’t need to be reminded by producing so much mouths and exemplifying the old. After all, maintaining production is a god given
right.
Do starving children have an effect on everyday life? Ethos, pathos, and logos shows in a modest proposal about how Starving Children affect America and solutions to the problem by John Smith.
“Is it any wonder that the slogan the advertising people came up with was “The Sooner You Believe It, the Sooner We Can End It”?”. Anna Quindlen has chosen to write about child hunger in America. She persuades her readers effectively because of her use of logos, pathos, and ethos.
Garret Hardin’s “Tragedy of the Commons” is an article that identifies the nation’s current problems and predicaments that can’t be resolved through the use of technical solutions. Hardin’s work heavily focuses on overpopulation, a prominent and unceasing issue that significantly distorts and affects the stability of the Earth and the abundance of the planet’s resources. In his article, he mentioned some reasonable and important solutions to overpopulation, but he also explained its downside and how the said solutions may not be ideal and practical. “Tragedy of the Commons” revealed that the human population will continue to flourish and how it will be greatly detrimental to our society unless individuals get the education that they need and
People like to read about topics that they can relate to, especially because world poverty and starvation are still issues in many impoverished countries. Both of these articles stir up a lot of controversy between people in wealthier nations such as the United States because not everyone is going to be willing to donate ten to twenty percent of their yearly income. I personally believe that it is not my moral obligation to feed the poor and hungry because I have my own life and my loved ones to worry about. I’m not saying we shouldn’t give anything to people in need of help, but there’s just so much you can do to help other people. Singer mentions that organizations like UNICEF and Oxfam America collect money to save the lives of children. Let’s say you donate $200 to one of these organizations. You might be able to help one “sickly 2-year-old transform into a healthy 6-year-old” but what happens after that? Does the 6-year-old child continue to be healthy? What can you do to make sure that your initial donation of $200 benefits the child in the long run? I’m sure you don’t just want to temporarily help a child in need (Singer
All of these are consequences of one question deep at the heart of the quest for sustainable human existence; the question of the maximum capacity supportable by the planet Earth. As is true of a good deal of the puzzles plaguing our time, little consensus is to be found surrounding this topic.
If people recognize that the human race as an invasive species then they can take steps to the give nature back some of it's space, they can restore the environment instead of damaging it, and they can save animals instead of killing them to extinction. Humans can be found on every landmass, water mass, and even soaring the skies. Humans are the cause of environment damaging things like acid rain and global warming. People also damage other species by killing them till extinction or causing things like oil spills that cause them to die. Why destroy the only place the human species lives on, instead people can spend their time restoring the planet and making it better, they can learn to coexist with other species instead of learning how to be the dominant and overpowering
It is about that time for families to start sending their children to school. The first thing that crosses their mind is “I hope my child gets the best education I can give them.” These parents want their children to excel in their math classes, pass that test in science class, and they want them to be the best they can be. These families want the teacher to give their child the best education that they can offer. So what if the best way that teachers could give the best education to that child was to have a class size reduction? What if the smaller the class, the more that child could achieve? That teacher would be able to focus on any
A growing population can mean two very different things for a developing nation versus an already developed nation. For example, in developing nations many people live off of less than a dollar a day, with multiple mouths to feed, clothe, and shelter, poverty remains a large looming reality for many people living within underdeveloped nations. Sernau explains these realities, “One billion of the world’s people are in abject poverty, earning less than the equivalent of a dollar a day (see Collier 2007, The Bottom Billion). The United Nations places this group in the category of “extreme poverty.” Another billion earn less than $2 a day, enough to escape starvation but not enough to move out of poverty” (Sernau 21). However, population rates continue to grow throughout developing nations while these same rates continue to drop within already developed nations. Meaning that
Eugenics is not some far-fetched idea that is unregulated and is going to be implemented without any specific rules or regulations.
Due to the lack of decency and respect in this generation, society has become very dark. There is poor parenting taking place in this overpopulated world, and it is effecting all the future generations. Teenage parents, are uneducated and unprepared to be to raise a child. They believe they are responsible enough to take on the world and raise a family. Unfortunately, this is false information. Considering they are teenagers, they were unable to get their lives set up for success, and then they make the same parenting mistakes multiple times and end up with a huge family way below the poverty line. For every married couple, two children are all it takes to keep the world’s population at a constant rate. In too many families, there are more than two children, causing to exceed the death rate. In Overpopulation: Causes, Effects and Solutions, Rinkesh Kukreja
I.Attention: Can you imagine a world without trees? It would definitely be a difficult and unwelcoming place to live.
America needs to fund more of its own child hunger issues, but we still however are avid contributors to “third-world” hunger issues. The burden of hunger and malnutrition are mainly in Africa, Latin America, and Asia. According to Sally Raphel (2104), each day in the developing world, 30,100 children die from mostly preventable and treatable malnutrition. Global recessions also cause higher food prices and foreign aid reduction. Statically, these developing world countries see child hunger the most; about 89% of undernourished people (including children) live in developing countries. The bulk (more than 70%,)of the world’s hungry are in the rural areas and villages in Africa and Asia. From a national standpoint, women and children suffer the most, and malnourished mother, and expecting mother soften give birth to underweight babies (ESchoolToday 2010). The global hunger problem is closely related to poverty, the economy, malnutrition, health conditions, unemployment; and it’s going to take a global change to totally eliminate
About ten years ago while in a science museum, I saw a counter that estimated what the world population was at that given moment. Innocuous at first glance, since a number in excess of five billion is difficult to comprehend, what became alarming after watching the counter for a minute was the continual increase in the population. Thinking about the circumstances related to the population rise logically made the problem seem apparent. The earth is finite both in terms of physical size and in resources but the population is growing towards an infinite value. At some point the steadily rising population will move from being a problem that is geographically distant to one that is immediate and more salient than just an increasing value on a faceless counter.
Managers nowadays do not actually do what a manager really should do back in the eighties. Changes that occurred in the new economy, the increasing use of technology in business, and the effects of globalisation towards business world have led management into a whole new dimension. New managers are expected to be able to manage on an international scale, act strategically, utilize technology, establish values, and of course, act responsibly as well. (Crainer, 1998) Henry Mintzberg once asked, "What do managers do?" After conducting his research based on a study of five CEOs, he concluded that managerial work involves interpersonal role, decisional role and informational role. And the fact is that, managers get things done through other people. Therefore, managers are required to possess certain skills and competencies which allow them to play these roles effectively and efficiently throughout the four functions of management. (Mintzberg, 1998)
Our world is too small for our ever-risingly growing population. One day, resources will run dry and vanish, which will bring death and loss to all nations on this planet. Many researchers and scientists have confirmed that the population will reach 10 billion by the end of the century and will continue to stream upward. There are many different ways of trying to decrease population, contain global warming and assist our environmental changes. The only way to succeed, families must be the regulators of their fertility and future.