Animals vs Humans

1180 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Animal testing for human benefit and cure

A concept that I will never understand. Why is human life more important than an animals? Humans are the most selfish, greedy, and destructive creatures that walk this earth. So why are they so important? When I voice my opinion, religious views and reasoning are shoved down my throat; God created humans to dominate all other species. Humans are not anymore dominant than animals are, and those who thinks so are ignorant. I would protect an animals life over a humans any day, and others should understand why; animals are not given as much respect and credit they deserve, and society should care for the life of an animals just as much as their own. Animal abuse, testing, entertainment, and different religious views all can be argued back and forth between what is right or wrong, and this is because people view things as how they will be benefited from the situation, what the personal gain they receive is, instead of having an open mind to various options that benefit all species involved.

One of the most controversial arguments throughout society is the question: is it morally acceptable to experiment on animals for human purposes? In my eyes, of course not, there are prisons full of rapists, murderers, pedophiles etc. why should an animal that has done nothing wrong suffer? Now while giving my opinion it’s important to have an open mind and understand all aspects. And yes, I do agree that some animal testings for diseases or cures have been beneficial to us and worth it. If it weren’t for medical research with animals we would not know if the next drug we use would kill us. And in a lot of cases animal testing has saved many lives, both human and non-human. Due to animal based research scientist have gained a lot of beneficial kn...

... middle of paper ...

...ited States, 2013. Web. 3 Dec. 2013. .

“Fact Sheet: Cosmetic Testing.” The Humane Society of the United States. 2013 The Humane Society of the United States, 2013. Web. 2 Dec. 2013. .

Farley, Christopher J. “Foes Turn Up Heat on Cosmetics Testing.” USA TODAY (pre-1997 Fulltext): 0. Feb 12 1990. ProQuest.Web. 3 Dec. 2013 .

“Marine, Aqua Parks.” The Humane Society of the United States. 2013 The Humane Society of the United States, 2013. Web. 3 Dec. 2013. .

Vergano, Dan. “Law Injected into Animal Testing Researchers Cite Obstacles if Mice, Rats and Birds are Protected.” USA TODAY: 0. Oct 31 2000. ProQuest. Web. 2 Dec. 2013 .

Show More
Related

  • The Case for Animal Rights

    850 Words  | 2 Pages

    "The Case For Animal Rights" written by Tom Regan, promotes the equal treatment of humans and non-humans. I agree with Regan's view, as he suggests that humans and animals alike, share the experience of life, and thus share equal, inherent value.

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography On Animal Testing

    1631 Words  | 4 Pages

    SUMMARIZE: The article grants information on new models in cosmetics to take the place of animal experimentation. It goes on to talk about how the European Union has now banned using animal-based test for cosmetic reasoning. Pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies have been using computer-like tools to assess the toxicity it has for years. The author incorporates information on cosmetics and the outlook on further research. ‘According to experts, combination of laboratory-based with virtual work will be the future of testing and is progressing faster than they expected.” (87 words)

    Read More

  • We Must Eliminate Animal Testing for Cosmetics

    1515 Words  | 4 Pages

    Animal testing has long played a part in the science of testing, and it still plays a very important role in the medical world. Testing on animals in order to create a cure for AIDS is one thing, but testing on animals for human vanity is another. Animal testing is used to test the safety of a product. It has kept some very unsafe substances out of the cosmetic world. However, in this day in age, animal testing is not the only way to test the safety of a product. Animal testing in cosmetics has decreased over the years. However, it is still used by many companies in America. Animal testing is not only cruel, but it is also unnecessary in today’s advanced scientific world.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

    1261 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Web. 5 February 2016. Driscoll and Finley’s article, while including a historical view on animal experimentation, mentions information regarding the topics of product testing and the use of experiments simply for research. The use of animals to test cosmetics is introduced in their article.

    Read More

  • Pros of Animal Experimentation

    921 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although not as strictly addressed, there is still a schism when it comes to the matters of experimentation involving animals. Those in opposition of it see it as being against the will of the animal, because animals have no say in the matter. However, through animal experimentation there has been vast medical advances in hospitals and veterinarians , research has led to cures for various diseases that would normally take many more years to cure, and the use of animals is highly ethical considering what could be the alternative, although there is progress being made to change these measures. This is how animal experimentation is of use to society for humans and animals.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing

    1121 Words  | 3 Pages

    "Fact Sheet: Cosmetic Testing." The Humane Society of the United States. 30 May 2013. Web. 25 Nov. 2013.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing

    571 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animal testing has been used for developing and researching cures for medical conditions. For example, the polio vaccine, chemotherapy for cancer, insulin treatment for diabetes, organ transplants and blood transfusions are just some of the important advances that have come from research on animals (“Animal Testing”). Consuming animals for research benefits in developing various treatments and also benefits in discovery better methods for cures. According to the article “Animal Testing”, it says that the underlying rationale for the use of animal testing is that living organisms provide interactive, dynamic systems that scientists can observe and manipulate in order to understand normal and pathological functioning as well as the effectiveness of medical interventions. It relies on the physiological and anatomical similarities between humans and other animals (MacClellan, Joel). Meaning that animals have the same body components and features as humans and is the best thing to research on to better understand the human development. Even though several argue that animal testing is harming the animals, one has to think back to all the benefits that has come from it. There may be a little remorse for endangering animal lives, but realizing how far medicine has come makes it worth the while.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Persuasive Essay

    1010 Words  | 3 Pages

    Right now, millions or animals including mice, rabbits, primates, cats, dogs and others are locked inside cold cages in laboratories across the country. More than 100 million animals each year suffer and die from chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics tests as well as biology lessons, medical training exercises, and curiosity-driven medical experiments at universities. Throughout history, animal testing has played an important role in harming animals for human advantages, making many animals suffer. Animal testing should be excluded because its inhumane, violates the rights of animals, and there are safer alternatives.

    Read More

  • The Unseen Cruelty: A Critique on Animal Testing

    1045 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the largest controversies involving the testing on animals is the harm that is inflicted on them. Proof lies in the many leaked photographs showing the horrific pain that has been forced onto beings that cannot speak for themselves. A test called Lethal Dose 50%, or LD50, is a test to assess cosmetics such as lipstick, nail polish, skin care products, and others. This can leave the rabbits, dogs, mice, or other unfortunate animals left crippled with severe untreated chemical burns. During the assessment of the product the animals are force...

    Read More

  • Cosmetic Testing with Animals is Cruel

    1300 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Cruelty of Cosmetic Testing on Animals Each year, thousands of animals are brutally tortured in laboratories, in the name of cosmetic research. A movement to ban animal testing for cosmetic purposes has been gaining popularity, with many companies hopping on the bandwagon against this research. New alternatives have been developed to eliminate the need to test on animals. This is only a small beginning of what is necessary to end these immoral acts. Animal testing in cosmetics is useless and cruel, and can be accomplished by other methods of research to end the suffering of animals.

    Read More

  • The Cons of Animal Testing

    1354 Words  | 3 Pages

    Millions of animals are used to test consumer products, but they also become victims of experiments for medical research. In The Ethics of Animal Research (2007) both authors state that there have been many medical advances with the development of medicines and treatments as a result of research conducted on animals (para 1). These medical improvements have helped many people be able to enjoy life, but some people still believe that animal research is mean and avoidable .... ... middle of paper ... ...

    Read More

  • Cruelty-free Cosmetics

    721 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is now required by law that cosmetics are tested for safety before being made available to the public. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is in charge of overseeing drug and cosmetic testing today. Animal testing was the most widespread form of cosmetic testing considered proven, but the technology that is now available may replace the need for animal test...

    Read More

  • Animal Rights Essay: Why Should Animals Have Rights?

    1667 Words  | 4 Pages

    Every year millions of animals are used in medical experiments for the benefits of human health. Animals are used from anything from vaccines and other pharmaceuticals to cosmetics. Luckily, in the latter years scientist have found other ways to test drugs and make-up rather than on animals in some cases. Medical testing, especially in the early stages, can be excruciatingly painful for animals and can even cause death. The same can be said about the cosmetics testing. There are many rallies against animal testing as to where the line is drawn when it comes to animal rights.

    Read More

  • Is Animal Testing Necessary?

    2044 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout the years animal rights groups and organizations have frowned upon animal experiments. Animal testing has been thought to be inhumane and cold-hearted to animals. Because of these accusations medical researchers have to suffer threats from individuals and the media. If animal testing weren’t allowed would that be a drawback in advancement in medical research? Animal testing is beneficial to people because these trails lead to improvements in medical research. Animal experiments have led to finding new cures and vaccines to fatal illnesses. Because animal experiments are helpful in making vaccines to prevent these sicknesses, these trails are the reason so many lives are saved. Animal testing is very necessary and useful to people, but animal rights groups believe that these trails doesn’t benefit humanity. According to Ellen Paul, “Breakthroughs in treating injuries, like practically all medical advances, depend upon experimentation on animals.” Animal experiments have given way to many new instruments to fight against diseases like cancer (Paul). For example, mice and other rodents contributed to scientists developing new tools for fighting different forms of cancers (Paul). Animal testing has helped science in many ways, but animal organizations like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) believe that these experiments are cruel to animals. Even though most animals endure some sort of pain during these experiments, the results are very beneficial to people.

    Read More

  • Essay On Animals In Human Life

    1008 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Animal abuse? I don’t look at it that way. It’s not testing cosmetics. It’s trying to save my life,” argues Eileen Youtie in Animals 2.0 a patient with cancer whose life relies on mice who have been experimented on in order to find a cure. Youties’ point is that the experiment done to animals to find a cure is not animal abuse because it is for the welfare of humans. “Animal research has also contributed to major advances in understanding and treating conditions such as breast cancer, brain injury, childhood leukemia, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis, and many others, and was instrumental in the development of pacemakers, cardiac valve substitutes, and anesthetics,” (“Animal Testing”). Yes, animal experimentation has saved millions of lives, but millions of animals have died and suffered. Animals’ purpose is not to serve as a scientific model to be used whenever it is needed.

    Read More

More about Animals vs Humans

Open Document