Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Self - managed work team
Self - managed work team
Logistics of self-managing teams
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Self - managed work team
Part 1:
Conventional leader-focused teams or work units miss out on the leadership potential of their members. Self-managed work teams are higher performing, more self-sufficient, and have more engaged members. Such teams set their own goals, plan and manage their work, and require little or no supervision. Their members are more accountable, better problem solvers, and more flexible. However, building effective self-managed teams requires personal and organizational commitment, considerable effort and time, and a willingness to change. Management must be willing to let go of authority, and team members must learn management skills and accept responsibility for their results. This transition is not easy, but it is possible. Total team cost includes the direct cost of team members salaries, wages, benefits, incentives, and discretionary expenses like travel and supplies and the indirect cost of management and organization overhead. These costs should be organized into a team “checkbook” showing budget, actual, and projected full-year amounts by category.
…show more content…
Team value can be determined using external benchmarks like industry best practice metrics or an estimate to outsource the team’s work or internal unit cost measures for the team’s output.
It is essential that the team determine the cost of both easier and more difficult tasks to get the most accurate picture of team value. This will also reward team members for working on more difficult tasks. Once the value creation model is built the team should review it regularly to see how they compare to other teams, ensure resources are well allocated and identify the team or organizational obstacles to improvement. The model itself should be periodically reviewed for accuracy and
usefulness. Part 2: The culture analysis toolset helps teams evaluate their knowledge, networks, and culture so they can make process and team structure design choices to improve their learning ability. The voice of the team assessment determines how well team members display the behaviors, feelings, and attributes required for team success. The knowledge assessment begins with a review of the team’s desired performance outcomes and the identification of the knowledge domains areas of organizational capability linked to them. The knowledge within each domain is classified as either fact-based or skill-based and learning methods for both types of knowledge are identified. The skills matrix outlines the skills and skill levels needed by a team. It focuses on both core skills needed by team members to perform their roles and enabling skills to help them become leaders. To become leaders, all team members must analyze their workflow to be sure they are doing essential work as quickly and as well as possible. This analysis starts with the process mapping tool and focuses on state changes. These are the groups of work activities that change or convert the characteristics of the product or service delivered by the organization. For example, an inside sales team converts general customer needs into orders for specific items. By evaluating state changes a team can eliminate variability, waste, and bottlenecks in its work processes. Visual management uses broadly accepted management principles combined with fine arts like photography, painting, music to improve team performance by transforming their workspace into an inspiring, data-driven environment. References: The Complete Guide to Hiring and Firing Government Employees, AMACOM, © 2009, ISBN 978-0814414507. Managing Government Employees: How to Motivate Your People, Deal with Difficult Issues, and Achieve Tangible Results, AMACOM, © 2007, ISBN 978-0814408872. Reply 1: I read your Discussion. Good work on it. I would like to add some more points to it. For teams to operate like self-contained businesses, they must know their cost and the value of their output. These form the team value creation model which is the business lens through which teams must view their outputs and processes. Organizing teams around a state change or group of state changes makes it easier to identify their output. To effectively measure cost and output, teams should directly receive feedback on a frequent and timely basis. Teams require data analysis, meeting management and problem-solving skills to make the right decisions with this data. Organizations must provide teams with time for these activities, a climate to identify problems and recommend solutions, and the authority to act on their decisions. The greatest barriers to implementing the Five-Stage Team Development Model are team member resistance and lack of knowledge. Power must be transferred; roles have to change, and people need to leave their comfort zones. The best first steps are to educate the team through formal training, observe successful teams, and describe how the change will benefit them and the organization. Also, soliciting and answering questions through group and individual channels, being candid about the challenges ahead, and involving everyone in planning and implementing the change can help. Anyone that is still resistant should ultimately be asked to leave the organization. By creatively displaying the team’s mission, vision, goals, and metrics, and emphasizing the importance of team members and customers, visual management uses the team’s physical environment to constantly focus them on their purpose and objectives. Reply 2: Good Discussion. I agree with your points. I am adding some more points to it. Total team cost includes the direct cost of team members salaries, wages, benefits, incentives, and discretionary expenses like travel and supplies and the indirect cost of management and organization overhead salaries, wages, benefits, rent, general administration. These costs should be organized into a team “checkbook” showing budget, actual, and projected full-year amounts by category. Team value can be determined using external benchmarks like industry best practice metrics or an estimate to outsource the team’s work or internal unit cost measures for the team’s output. It is essential that the team determine the cost of both easier and more difficult tasks to get the most accurate picture of team value. This will also reward team members for working on more difficult tasks. Once the value creation model is built the team should review it regularly to see how they compare to other teams, ensure resources are well allocated and identify the team or organizational obstacles to improvement. The model itself should be periodically reviewed for accuracy and usefulness. Discovering and diffusing new knowledge and using it to create value for customers is a high-performing team’s greatest advantage. The newly discovered knowledge that is not managed is soon lost or forgotten. Knowledge diffusion and use are inherently social activities that rely on the quality and reach of social networks—and are more difficult than discovery. Their environment reinforces their successes and helps make work more meaningful and fun. Visual management also shapes the way customers, peers, and stakeholders view a team’s contributions and prospects.
Ms. Conner maintains familiarity with all DHSS administrative policies, procedures and applicable rules and regulations. Ms. Conner understands and demonstrates knowledge of agency programs and willingly explains the goals/mission of the division, including services and programs. She adhered to HIPPA and applied her knowledge independently in her case work and conferred with her supervisor as needed. She provided resources to reported adults and those professionals and family members who want to assist them. She is familiar guardianship procedures and has advised reported adults and their families as well as VA staff on the guardianship process. She has informed them of and has obtained medical and psychological evaluations determining competency and decisional capacity to obtaining legal counsel in a financially affordable way. However, Ms. Conner has not completed any guardianship during this rating period. Ms. Conner also demonstrated technical program knowledge and has found ways to ease the Case Compass process by looking at tasks in the investigation plan and sorting out how to make
In today’s health care organizations, fewer and fewer individuals are working as solo practitioners ; instead, health care is increasingly delivered through teamwork, and teams are a vital component in health care organizations(McConnell,2006). Bauer and Erdogen (2009) define a team as a “cohesive coalition of people working together to achieve mutual goals”. (p.213). According to McConnell (2006) , teams are united by a shared purpose , regardless of the team’s type, composition, degree of performance, or reason for being. In health care organizations, teams are utilized by leaders to address problems and perform tasks. McConnell (2006) states that teams can benefit the organization because they provide greater expertise, enhance morale, improve personnel retention, increase flexibility, and create synergy in the workplace..
The exploration of two models will show an interesting relationship when compared and contrasted. Both can increase competency levels in team building. The models are the Drexler/Sibbet Team Performance model (Human Performance Strategies) and the Four Stage Team Performance model (Developing Management Skills). When they have been used correctly they’ve been shown to improve efficiency and profitability in organizations. “Developing team skills is important because of the tremendous explosion in the use of teams in work organizations over the last decade (Developing Management Skills).” An examination of these models will show the similarities and differences they have in the context of team building.
Effects of Team Leadership, Team Commitment, Perceived Team Support, and Team Size. Journal Of Social Psychology, 144(3), 293-310.
There are all different types of organizations in the world today with all different types of leadership and organizational styles. Some a large and some are small and every one of them is managed a variety of ways. Most organizations have some sort of structure to them. Without this structure or organizational style, they would fail. Lately, there has been a number of different styles appear within teams. From manger-led teams that are very structured to self-governing teams that are wide open. Even with the rise of these different organizational styles, manger-led teams are still the most important form of team leadership. This assertion will be supported by three different claims. Manger-led teams are used in dangerous situations. Manger-led
Thompson, L. (2011). Making The Team A Guide For Managers. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
When we think of the word team, individually many different ideas may come to mind about what a team really is. Some may think of an NFL team (Tennessee Titans), an NBA team (Sacramento Kings), or a NASA astronaut team with such pioneers as Edwin Aldrin, Jr. and Neil Armstrong as members. You might even think of the U.S. Navy, Air Force, Army, Coast Guard, or Marines as teams. In fact they all are, and they have a great deal in common as teams. However, for the purposes of this paper I will examine the characteristics of work teams, as they apply to organizations and I will supply answers to the following questions: What is a team? Where did the team concept come from? What are the types of teams? What are the advantages and disadvantages of having teams in organizations? What does it take to make a team effective?
A team is a group of people who work in tandem to achieve a common outcome (Chatfield, 2011). A common type of team found in the workplace is self-managed teams (SMT). A self-managed team empowers employees to manage the day to day functions, operations, and tasks of a specific job area with little or no supervisory oversight or intervention. In other words, it is a self-contained unit (Williams, 2011). For example, self-managed teams handle work direction, job assignments, trouble-shoot problems, and handle all of the decision making aspects of the job (Silverman,1996). Moreover, companies that have used SMTs report an increase in productivity and quality, increased employee morale, creativity, job satisfaction, and a decrease in absenteeism (Silverman, 1996). Also, a 1990 study by Cohen (1993) found that forty-seven percent of Fortune 1000 companies used SMTs with some of their workforce. In two years the number of SMTs increased to sixty percent. Thus, the prevalence of SMTs in organizations can be contributed to its tangible outcomes.
Self-managed teams are work teams that are given permission to organize and control the work that they do. These group of people perform highly related or inter dependent jobs and take on many of the responsibilities of their former supervisors. This includes planning and scheduling of work, assigning tasks to members, collective control over the pace of work, making operating decisions, and taking action on problems. Fully self-managed work teams even select their own members and have the members evaluate each other‘s performance.
The area of team leadership attracts a lot of attention in the modern world because of the need to assemble and deploy diverse teams for the completion of projects. The future of many corporations relies more and more on the kind of team leadership they have for their projects. This paper explores a number of facets that constitute effective team leadership.
Teamwork is becoming more important in the work place, because of the leaders and the fact that it allows full participation with all employees. In order to complete several different tasks, managers and supervisors usually perform teams and assign different tasks to complete one major assignment. Team work starts at the top (Smikle, 2009). When supervisors or managers are willing to administer teamwork, they are enabling the employees to follow. Managers or supervisors set good examples when they delegate tasks, but more importantly express to the employees how teamwork is productive. Employees work by example, more so now than by demands.
Organizations today face many challenges that were not as prevalent decades ago. These challenges include workforce diversity, leadership style changes, ever-changing technology, and culture relevance to name a few. Organizations put emphasis on management and the effectiveness management has on those that work for them. In today’s philosophies, we shift from managers to leaders and from individuals to team based environments. Successful organizations realize that empowered employees can help make strategic decisions, especially in a team-based culture. Research shows that many leaders understand this concept and actually prefer working with teams versus working one on one with individuals.
Managers may encounter difficulties while establishing self-directed, high performing teams. Identification of those difficulties is key to overcoming them and moving forward with the team process. Misguided interpretation can come into play when the team lacks a clear and compelling vision and purpose for the organization. Teams need to know in which direction they are heading and a clear reason as to why they are heading in that direction and what it takes to make it to the destination as quickly and most efficiently. Without a clear vision team members tend to do whatever they want and want ever gets the job done and this can lead to the team members making sure that they do “over” work themselves cause lacking on the project.
The team members not only share expectations for accomplishing group tasks, but trust and support one another and respect one another's individual differences. Your role as a team builder is to lead your team toward cohesiveness and productivity. A team takes on a life of its own and you have to regularly nurture and maintain it, just as you do for individual employees. Teambuilding is important for several reasons. It facilitates better communication and it motivates employees. The more comfortable your employees are to express their ideas and opinions, the more confident they will become. This will motivate them to take on new challenges. Team building also promotes creativity and develops problem solving skills. It also breaks the barrier because team building increases the trust factor with your employees. The first rule of team building is an obvious one: to lead a team effectively, you must first establish your leadership with each team member. Communication should be clear and manager should describe team values and goal. Trust and cooperation is also important when building effective team. Opinions of all group members are important and all of them are equal. One of most important thing is encourage listening and
Adequate resource needs information, proper equipment, staffing, encouragement, and administrative assistance. Leadership and structure is important, because the team needs to know what each individual is responsible for including what they can do to help. Climate of trust is highly important, because the team members need to know they can trust each other with out taking advantage of them. The performance evaluation and reward system is important to know how each member of the team is doing overall. The reward system is given to the team as a group, and does not exclude anyone. ‘Work as a team, grow as a team, succeed as a team.’