Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Managing change in the workplace
Case study of employee engagement
Case study of employee engagement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Managing change in the workplace
C&S Wholesale Grocers Readiness for Self-Managed Teams
As an OD practitioner, helping Cohen determine if self-managed teams are a good fit requires an organizational level assessment to see if changing C&S Wholesale Grocers operations and management of personnel can improve their effectiveness (Heskett, 2006). Using the open systems model, the first step is to assess the organizational level readiness; this will determine if the environment, inputs, transformations, and output is structured to accept self-management, the second assessment is to 2) assess the individual level readiness; specifically the job design and organizational structure to support a team structure (Cummings & Worley, 2009).
C&S Wholesaler Grocers had performed an experiment with self-managed teams; the result was positive with quality and productivity improving. The experiment provided two key benchmarks, 1) management was ready to consider changing the way they perform work and 2) employees were eager to be more engaged in their work and take full responsibility for performing their work. The benchmarks indicate that the environment at C&S Wholesaler Grocers is ready to consider implementation of self-managed teams to perform work in their warehouse.
Design of Self-Managed Teams
The design of the self-managed team starts with defining common objectives, clear responsibilities, defining a rewards and compensation system to incentivize performance improvements, and ensure that the self-managed team has support from C&S Wholesale Grocers management team (How does one build a self-managed team, 2009). Determining the autonomy and boundaries of a self-managed team has considerable impact on the teams’ ability to perform work and adjust tasks and responsib...
... middle of paper ...
...295-321. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Frankforter, S., & Christensen, S. (2005). Finding competitive advantage in self-managed work teams. Business Forum, 27(1), 20-24. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Heskett, J. (2006). Are we ready for self-management? Retrieved from http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/5507.html
How does one build a self-managed team? (2009). American Laundry News, 35(9), 9. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Kuipers, B., & Stoker, J. (2009). Development and performance of self-managing work teams: A theoretical and empirical examination. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(2), 399-419. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Langfred, C. (2007). The downside of self-management: A longitudinal study of the effects of conflict on trust, autonomy, and task interdependence in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 885-900. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
RL Wolfe decided to try the SHRM through self-driven teams. In the past, the company had highly unionized stru...
Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The discipline of teams (pp. 111-120). Harvard Business Press.
Self-organizing team, encouraging employees to feel a sense of ownership of their product. 8. What is the difference between a.. The product team kept in very close contact with the customers through phones, email, blogs, surveys, polls and feedback from the users. 9.
“The team is faced with creating cohesion and unity, differentiating roles, identifying expectations for members, and enhancing commitment. Providing supportive feedback and fostering commitment to a vision are needed from the team leaders (Developing Management Skills).” ... ... middle of paper ... ...
Self-managed teams have greater ownership of the task they perform and the end product or service they deliver. Decisions made by self-managed teams are more effective because they are made by the people who know most about the job. However, research says that the effectiveness of self-managed teams has not been uniformly positive. Some organizations are disappointed with the results of self-managed teams. Self-managed teams do not seem to work well during organizational downsizing. The effectiveness of self-managed teams is situationally dependent. The third type of team is the cross-functional teams, it is an organizational team consisting of members at the same level of hierarchy in organization but work in different
Larson, C. and LaFasto, F. (1989), Teamwork: What Must Go Right/What Can Go Wrong. Newberry Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
In today's corporate workplace, it is evident that the team – not the individual – holds the key to business success.In an endeavor to see how groups function, Michael Lombardo and Robert Eichinger originally came up with the T7 Model in 1995 to represent the key features that impact the effectiveness of work teams. based on their findings and their review of the research literature, they were able to identify five significant factors within the team and two factors outside the team which affect team effectiveness.(K.D.Meuse,
This research paper is based on Chapter 10, Understanding Work Teams in the Workplace. My research paper is based on my own work-related experiences (direct observation.) My organizational issue is Understanding Work Teams and will be analyzed using the following two core concepts: Problem-Solving Teams and Self-Managed Work Teams.
Singer, J., & Duvall, S. (2000). High-performance partnering by self-managed teams in manufacturing. Engineering Management Journal, 12(4), 9.
Stewart, G., Manz, C., & Sims, H., (1999). Teamwork and Group Dynamics. New York: Wiley. pp. 70- 125.
A team is a group of people who work in tandem to achieve a common outcome (Chatfield, 2011). A common type of team found in the workplace is self-managed teams (SMT). A self-managed team empowers employees to manage the day to day functions, operations, and tasks of a specific job area with little or no supervisory oversight or intervention. In other words, it is a self-contained unit (Williams, 2011). For example, self-managed teams handle work direction, job assignments, trouble-shoot problems, and handle all of the decision making aspects of the job (Silverman,1996). Moreover, companies that have used SMTs report an increase in productivity and quality, increased employee morale, creativity, job satisfaction, and a decrease in absenteeism (Silverman, 1996). Also, a 1990 study by Cohen (1993) found that forty-seven percent of Fortune 1000 companies used SMTs with some of their workforce. In two years the number of SMTs increased to sixty percent. Thus, the prevalence of SMTs in organizations can be contributed to its tangible outcomes.
...rs but the goal is not achieved until each member has completed his part. The Factors that influence teamwork are impacted trust and have an impact on trust. When communication breaks down, trust is reduced and communications can help to build trust (Rocco, Hofer, and Herbsleb).Research shows that conflict has a negative impact on performance. A conceptual model is developed which explores relationship between conflict and performance and conflict impact performance through its effect on exchange and trust (Lau & Cobb, 2009).
Teams are a major source of companies in these coming years. Teams are Heroes (Collins, 2009-08-27). Everyone wants to be a hero, therefore we need to build, follow, and be effective team members and effective team leaders.
Self - managing teams – self-managing teams are the teams, which complete the work without any close supervision. All the member in the teams has the high degree of autonomy in how they will do the work which includes planning, developing scheduling the work and give the task team worker.
Employee empowerment can be described as giving employees' accountability and ability to make choices about their work without managerial authorization. Good managers are expected to assist employees to improve job success by supporting, training, leading and giving advice. Employee empowerment can increase employees' motivation, job satisfaction, and loyalty to their companies. The power that managers comprise should now be shared with employees with confidence, assertion, inspiration, and support. Work decisions and the ability to control an individual’s amount of work are now being relied upon at lower-level management positions (Fragoso, 1999). Groups of empowered employees with little or no supervision are now being formed and these groups are being called self-managed teams. These groups can now solve work problems, make choices on schedules and operations, learn to do other employees’ jobs, and are held accountable for the quality of their finished products.