Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of leadership in helping teams achieve organisational goals and objectives
Leadership theories and styles
Compare and contrast various styles of leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There are all different types of organizations in the world today with all different types of leadership and organizational styles. Some a large and some are small and every one of them is managed a variety of ways. Most organizations have some sort of structure to them. Without this structure or organizational style, they would fail. Lately, there has been a number of different styles appear within teams. From manger-led teams that are very structured to self-governing teams that are wide open. Even with the rise of these different organizational styles, manger-led teams are still the most important form of team leadership. This assertion will be supported by three different claims. Manger-led teams are used in dangerous situations. Manger-led …show more content…
There are a lot of varying definitions, but our textbook defines it as such. A manager-led team has one person that is in charge of the team. This person gives direction, end state, and can decide how to get to that end state.(Thompson 8) The self-managing team, there is still a leader or manager, but the team decides how they will obtain the goals.(Thompson 9) A self-directing team decides goals and how to obtain them without a manager of a leader. (Thompson 10) Finally, a self-governing team answers only to themselves and decides how the group will be put together the goals they will obtain and how they will obtain them. (Thompson 12) When comparing these definitions there is one clear winner when it comes to putting team members life on the line and that is manger-led …show more content…
They are fundamental, adaptable and can be used when your life depends on it. They are fundamental in the fact that they are the first form of leadership you encounter as a child. You encounter this leadership style in sports and in the school. Manger-led teams are the most adaptable. They can be run like a dictatorship or a democracy. It is up to the manager’s discretion. When the team is just starting out the manager could micromanage more and when the team has matured the manager can release some of the direction to the team. A manager-led team can be used in every organization. Other styles cannot say that. A self-governing team does not work in industries like the military. Finally, when your life depends on it manager-led teams are used. Dangerous job more often than not use the manger-led style. This is true in the military and in the firefighting organizations. There are a number of different ways you can manage a team. Out of all the ways, the manager-led team approach is the most
...team dynamics “depends largely on how willing team leaders are to share authority, responsibility, information, and resources”(p.119). Hence, it is important that managers are actively involved in the development of teams, address conflicts immediately, and allow team members to participate in the planning, decision making, and problem solving in regards to team goals.
According to Northouse (2012), team leadership has become one of the most popular theories of leadership research. A team refers to a group of employees within an organization, who are interdependent of each, and share a common goal which can only be realized through coordination of their activities. Actually, this can be attributed to the fact that team members typically have dissimilar and unique roles that represent critical contributions to collective action. It goes without mentioning that a team can either be virtual or non-virtual (Tiffan, 2014).
Captains of sports teams are given the stereotype that they are the most athletic player on the team, scoring the most goals and handling the ball best. In truth, captains have a lot of work they have to do that doesn’t even involve playing the sport. Captains are the most looked at player of the game; other players, younger kids and coaches look to them to set examples. They have to set examples in every aspect of the game; athleticism might be part of their job but it is not limited to it. The captain of any sports team must set the leadership standard for commitment, confidence, intelligence, and attitude.
Management and leadership are viewed as two different perspectives in the business environment. As described by Dr. Warren Bennis ‘Managers are people who do things right, while leaders are people who do the right thing’, this means that managers do things by the set rules and follow company policy, while leaders follow their own intuition, which may in turn be of more benefit to the company.
Leadership involves a particular person who has ability to lead from front, who has power of understanding several people present in the group, and also have an alternate options ready to get rid of any problems accordingly which may arise in an organization. In that case Management involves kind of person who is smart enough to make certain systematic plans accordingly and taking care of everything in an organization by balancing three important factors which is required in any organization and are very important too; Cost, Schedule and Performance. So from this we can say that leadership and management are totally different aspects.
It is proven that teams who work well together perform and have a higher rate of success compared to teams who do not work well together or communicate with each other. A recent article with regards to leadership discussed the topic of group cohesion and how this is a factor for success. The article discussed several situations, one about a business company, one about a sports team and one about a military operation. The article closely analyzed the leaders of the three situations and discussed the similarities and differences between the three. The main similarity between was there focus on cohesion. The article contained facts about how the business was operating and how that in recent years, production and sales as increased drastically, and one factor for this increase was the CEO implemented a mandatory team building exercise each
An organisation is a deliberate arrangement of team consisting different personal identities to accomplish some specific goals and managers are the ones who hold the responsibility of mastering and placing them together to strive for that purpose (Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, and Coulter, 2008). Robbins et al. (2008) have stated that managers are people who coordinate and oversee the work activities of others so that the goal is accomplished effectively and efficiently. Managers usually possess qualities such as having strong communication skills, flexibility, imagination, enthusiasm, problem solving skills, and of course the desire to be a great leader (Phdinmanagement.org, 2014). The structure of management conducted by a manager is often influenced by the four functions introduced by Henri Fayol (planning, organising, leading, controlling); how Henry Mintzberg’s management roles play in the organisation and also the three essentials management skills proposed by Robert L. Katz (Robbins et al., 2008).
The area of team leadership attracts a lot of attention in the modern world because of the need to assemble and deploy diverse teams for the completion of projects. The future of many corporations relies more and more on the kind of team leadership they have for their projects. This paper explores a number of facets that constitute effective team leadership.
There is a difference between management and leadership but that does not mean that one is less important than the other. However, it takes an excellent leader and manager to be able to fulfill the Leadership and Management role successfully for the benefit of the company and his or her people in all aspects of the business fields. Therefore, every company, big or small, must have people whom they can depend on, whole heartedly, who can fulfill the Leadership and Management positions without worrying about negative outcomes or costly legal issues.
There are several differences between leadership and management leadership involves individuals who understand and trust in a vision and who work to accomplish the goals. While management is overseeing the day-to-day activities and ensure they are running smoothly. Management offers order and regularity throughout an organizations and leadership creates change and movement. Management seeks out order and stability while leadership is about seeking adaptively and construction change. Difference between leadership and management involves the approach that is used towards the individuals who follow the leader or work for the
Some people believe leadership and management are one in the same; however, this is not true because management involves planning, staffing, directing and controlling and, a manager is a person who performs these functions (Leadership Theories and Studies, 2009). The term manager is a formal title given to a person who has authority by virtue of his or her position or office. (Leadership Theories and Studies, 2009) Leadership, by contrast, is about influence; leaders use factors other than just their formal authority to influence subordinates. There are three major leadership theories developed from the 1930s to the 1970s which attempt to explain why some leaders are better than others, these theories are: trait leadership (1930s and 1940s), behavior leadership (1940s and 1950s), and contingency leadership (1960s and 1970s).
Teams sometimes take some direct-control away from managers. While many may be fine with this others are most definitely not. The point is that not all managers promote and encourage teamwork.
A manager cannot just be a leader; he also needs formal authority to be effective. In some circumstances, leadership is not required. For example, self-motivated groups may not require a single leader and may find leaders dominating. The fact that a leader is not always required p... ... middle of paper ... ...
Both perform different functions but when it comes to running an organization, then it will require both leaders and the managers. Managers build goals, they plan the work to be done, break it into various steps, decide the time taken to do each task, decide the sequence and the resources required to do the task, checks if the work is being done as indicated and at the end takes remedial measures if there is any deviation from the original plan. On the other hand, leaders create followers. Both are an inherent part of supervision and are required at every stage in an organization
Managers should be able to lead the members of their work groups toward the accomplishment of the organization’s goals. Leading is defined as motivating and directing the members of the organization so that they contribute to the achievement of the goals of the organization. In order for leaders and managers to be effective they must understand the dynamics of individual and group behavior, to be able to motivate their employees, and be effective communicators. It is said that a good ...