Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of school of athens
Analysis of school of athens
Analysis of school of athens
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of school of athens
School of Athens is one of the most playful, fruitful artwork, created by one of the greatest artists in Renaissance period, Raphael. More so, School of Athens reflects an insightful stylization and artistic composition. Not only is this fresco tightly related to historical and political context during Renaissance time, but also presents the original and natural aspects of human kind and society. Belonging to the series called the Four Branches of Human Knowledge, School of Athens interpret humans’ interest in philosophy. Although Raphael depicts Plato and Aristotle with two contrast philosophical ideas, these two ideas complement one another, and together they form an entire and balanced philosophy — composition.
Decorating the walls of
…show more content…
Stanza della Segnatura was the first commission Raphael had had when he arrived at Rome. More so, Pope Julius II was the one who commissioned these works. In November 1507, Pope Julius II moved his quarters in the Vatican Palace from the Borgia Apartment to the floor above it, whose space received more sunlight and air. By the time Raphael had his commission, many other artists had been working on this project before him. (Garrigues, 408). Nonetheless, it did not stop Raphael to become one of the greatest Renaissance artists after his works were completed. Hall stresses in his introduction of the book Raphael’s School of Athens: “In Raphael’s Vatican paintings we sense that the intellectual climate of the papacy of Julius II (1503-1513) […] Comprehensiveness of Scheme, its internal logic, and its richness have awed visitors since the sixteenth century.” (Hall, 3) Essentially, Stanza della Segnatura was designed to be Pope Julius II’s personal library.
Nowadays, Stanza della Segnatura is the suite of reception rooms and the public art area in Vatican Palace. The Four Branches of Human Knowledge on Stanza della Segnatura’s walls are Philosophy, known as School of Athens; Theology, called The Disputa; Poetry in the painting The Parnassus; and Jurisprudence indicated in The Cardinal Virtues. School of Athens, painted between 1509 and 1511, is on the East wall of Stanza della …show more content…
Segnatura. Scholars believe that Plato and Aristotle are the most important presence in School of Athens because of Raphael’s use of linear perspective in which the vanishing point is in between Plato and Aristotle.
From the audience’s view, Plato is on the left and Aristotle is on the right of the center. Scholars are certain that it is Plato because he is holding one of his own books, Timaeus, and Aristotle is holding his book, Ethics. These two figures are displayed in the central of the painting, which helps keep the composition stay in balance. However, the depiction of Plato and Aristotle in the center means more than just the composition.
Plato and Aristotle also represent two contrast ideas of philosophy. Plato believed that philosophy is beyond the physical world. Plato’s outfit also represents his subject matter: the purple rope and the red garment, symbolizing air and fire, two essential elements that are basically untouchable. Plato was convinced by the theory of Ideas, that Ideas alone have any existence (Garrigues, 415). In his section of the book “Raphael’s School of Athens,” The Gymnasium of Athens, Bellori also elaborates what Garrigues
indicates: “Plato has under his left arm the book titled Timaeus, and the sign of his great doctrine is the gesture of his raised right hand, pointing to Heaven and the supreme cause, since this philosopher in the Timaeus contemplates the nature of the universe and natural things mysteriously as effects and images of things divine.” (Bellori, 53). Plato’s philosophical subject matter leans more toward a divine source, God, rather than physical, practical things on earth. This idea of Plato is as well included in his other book, Five Dialogues. Phaedo, the last dialogue, not only tells the story when Socrates was exiled and waiting to be executed, but also strengthens Socrates’ argument, as well as Plato’s himself, that the mind is the intellect, the true source of knowledge and righteousness, whereas the earthly body is a mere vase that contains the mind, which has no consciousness nor intelligence. Aristotle also has his hand rest on his thigh, holding his book, Ethics. However, Aristotle’s hand is stretched out toward the audience instead. Bellori addressed: “This gesture is properly suitable to Ethics, which claims the emotions and moderates human souls with the proportion of virtue.” (Bellori, 54). Aristotle is also wearing brown rope and blue garment, signifying earth and water, things that are, visible, touchable, and weighable. Thus, the discussion between Plato and Aristotle is the discussion of philosophy as natural versus moral, non-physical versus physical, and theoretical versus practical (Bellori, 54).
In the past thousands of years, many people, ideas, and cultures have help mold the Constitution into what it is today. Ideas have been taken from the ancient times, from the Romans and the Greek, and up to early American history with the Magna Carta and the House of Burgesses. In making the Constitution, the framers looked at ancient literature, and ideas from Plato and Aristotle, to more modern ideas and literature such as the works of John Locke and Baron de Montesquieu.
In the School of Athens, Raphael portrayed the splendid scenes of philosophers, scientists and artists in this school. The school of Athens was set up by Plato, who is the ancient Greek idealistic philosopher. The central side of the picture is Plato and his disciple Aristotle, who have intense discussions. Although Plato's teacher, Socrates, was no longer alive when he founded the Academy of Athens, however, Raphael drawn Socrates in the left of a group of characters, to show the hierarchy of philosophy. Different gestures of them illustrated different idea on philosophy. Plato stretched out his finger pointing on the above represents the idealism
The subject of The School of Athens is humanistic in and of itself. The Textbook Defines humanism in the glossary as “A philosophy emphasizing the worth of the individual, the rational abilities of humankind, and the human potential for good. During the Italian Renaissance, humanism was part of a movement that encouraged study of the classical cultures of Greece and Rome.” In this fresco, Raphael represents the worth and achievements of individuals, as well as the greatness of classical culture. The School of Athen...
Though Plato was Aristotle’s teacher, their ideas could not differ more in relation to Doryphoros. While Plato would feel that it is worthless, Aristotle would feel that it is very valuable to the process of learning more about our very natures. The duality of their opinions is very similar to the duality we can see in Doryphoros mentioned above. Plato was on a kind of warpath with creative expression, yet student Aristotle embraced it with calm analysis. In Doryphoros we see their opinions in juxtaposition to one another. If nothing else, Doryphoros expresses the masculine, logical side of human nature with near effortlessness.
We have two great philosophers, Plato and Aristotle. These are great men, whose ideas have not been forgotten over years. Although their thoughts of politics were similar, we find some discrepancies in their teachings. The ideas stem from Socrates to Plato to Aristotle. Plato based moral knowledge on abstract reason, while Aristotle grounded it on experience and tried to apply it more to concrete living. Both ways of life are well respected by many people today.
Plato vs. Aristotle Plato and Aristotle, two philosophers in the 4th century, hold polar views on politics and philosophy in general. This fact is very cleverly illustrated by Raphael's "School of Athens" (1510-11; Stanza della Segnatura, Vatican), where Plato is portrayed looking up to the higher forms; and Aristotle is pointing down because he supports the natural sciences. In a discussion of politics, the stand point of each philosopher becomes an essential factor. It is not coincidental that Plato states in The Republic that Philosopher Rulers who possess knowledge of the good should be the governors in a city state. His strong interest in metaphysics is demonstrated in The Republic various times: for example, the similes of the cave, the sun, and the line, and his theory of the forms.
The Italian Renaissance and the Baroque era are two major periods in art history, some of the types of art in those periods were painting, sculpting, and architecture. During these periods, many artist gained enormous fame from creating wonderful pieces of work that represented their beliefs and artistic thinking. This essay will analyze and evaluate two pieces from those major art periods. Rembrandt 's painting The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp and the sculpture David, by Michelangelo. These two masterpieces shed light of their significance in art history. David represents the Italian Renaissance for it being a strong symbol of the new republic, The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp depicts the focus on human progression.
Even though Plato and Aristotle lived in the same country during the same time period and Plato was Aristotle’s teacher, they had very different ideas about politics and metaphysics while both maintaining traditional ancient Greek ethics.
Many philosophers are well known for their stances or beliefs. One of the most well-known philosophers are Plato and Aristotle. Plato once being a pupil himself of Socrates found himself being a teacher to Aristotle. This is why both Plato and Aristotle cover most of the same issue topics and have direct contrasts on topics as well as similarities. Most of Plato and Aristotle comparisons can be found in their forms of “Problems of the universals” and Realism verse Idealism.
Greek philosophers Aristotle and Plato were two of the most influential and knowledgeable ancients in our history. Their contributions and dedication to science, language and politics are immensely valued centuries later. But while the two are highly praised for their works, they viewed several subjects entirely differently, particularly education practices, and human ethics and virtue.
...ion to the correct text itself there is also a rich and valuable essay as well as indexes and a glossary of terms, which will better enable the reader to approach the heart of Plato’s intention. The first translation of Plato’s Republic that attempts to be strictly literal, this volume has been long regarded as the closest and best English translation available. This second edition includes a new introduction by Allan Bloom and a valuable new essay, as well as indexes and a glossary of terms to better enable the reader to approach the heart of Plato's intention. Plato is one of the most accomplished intellectual human race has ever known. In him are combined the hypothetical and methodical consciousness and the sense of aesthetic beauty, the effect of which have been felt in all the periods of times. Works Cited Plato's Republic, http://www.friesian.com/plato.htm
As literary critics, Plato and Aristotle disagree profoundly about the value of art in human society. Plato attempts to strip artists of the power and prominence they enjoy in his society, while Aristotle tries to develop a method of inquiry to determine the merits of an individual work of art. It is interesting to note that these two disparate notions of art are based upon the same fundamental assumption: that art is a form of mimesis, imitation. Both philosophers are concerned with the artist's ability to have significant impact on others. It is the imitative function of art which promotes disdain in Plato and curiosity in Aristotle. Examining the reality that art professes to imitate, the process of imitation, and the inherent strengths and weaknesses of imitation as a form of artistic expression may lead to understanding how these conflicting views of art could develop from a seemingly similar premise.
Though Plato and Aristotle both share identical opinions in which that art is a form of imitation, both have different views towards whether art should be viewed from an educational standpoint in which it gives impartial truth of knowledge, or that it is a form of pleasure that allows for the learning through imitation.
As has been illustrated, both Plato and Aristotle had compelling arguments and influential ideas about the nature and purpose of art. If Aristotle would most certainly applaud Antigone, then Plato would be far more reserved. One cannot deny that their theories made complete sense in their historical contexts, even though they might not hold up as well in this day and age. Without a doubt, their works have been instrumental in laying down the framework of the philosophy of art for future generations.
In Plato’s Republic, one of the most influencing books in history of philosophy, Plato begins with several crucial arguments. First he states that the artist produces an insubstantial “imitation” of objects in the sensible world that are themselves less real than the forms, which comprise reality itself (Plato.2009.598b). Further, he states that poesis is psychologically damaging in its subversion of reason (Plato.2009.441e).The intensity of Plato’s argument consists from his desire to supplant art as a platform for modern education in Athenian education. However, it made him miss one point. Philosophy, similarly as art, has its own methods using enchanting rhythms and charming images to influence the reader. Hence, philosophy has the same advantages and disadvantages of art. As a result, if Plato’s statement is one hundred per cent true, it would make philosophy not seeking the truth, but seeking something less than th...