More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender differences in communication examples
Gender differences in communication examples
Effect of gender on communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender differences in communication examples
This activity is to understand how our conflict style can impact our relationships and to reflect on how we can improve our relationships by managing these conflicts. “Friend ship is a voluntary relationship that provides social support” (Adler, Rosenfeld & Proctor II, 2012, p. 384). Friendships we create, are managed and maintained through communication. Our level of communication depends on the level and depth of the friendship. There are different types of friendships, some last for short period, some last for years or life time. All friendships are not created equal. Gender of the friend plays a significant role in communication. Same-Sex friendships differs for men and women. Women tend to disclose personal matters more
For this paper, we will be talking about relational communications and Goffman’s terms. The definition of relational communication is “communication processes in personal relationships such as romantic, family, and friendships. We assess the role of communication in developing, maintaining, and dissolving relationships, how communication impacts partners and their relationships, and how to improve relational quality or individual well-being through communication. Recent topics examined include conflict mediation, relational standards, relational uncertainty in dating relationships, and communication environments in families” (n.d.). As it has said, it is about the relationships in our life. Goffman also stated that there was a front and
The purpose of this paper is to explore conflict and ways to manage it. I chose to explore this topic in depth because conflict touches all of our lives. Whether it is at work or in our personal lives. Like most people when you have a bad day at work; I have a tendency to bring the frustration home. Frustration at work causes me to be in a bad mood; hence that makes me argue with my spouse.
By watching this video, I have concluded that I rely on Compromising conflict style. Compromising style is beneficial for when there is a disagreement, though it doesn't always resolve problems. For example, when I am in a group and we all have disagreements, I try to come up with a solution in which they all have something they want, but not all of it. I would want my group to feel satisfied that they all have reached an acceptable solution.
Chapter eleven has very important key concepts when dealing with managing interpersonal conflicts. In order to realize how beneficial it is to incorporate the right set of communication skills in our daily lives, we must learn about some of the conflict styles that can arise when being in certain relationships. It’s easy to see throughout the movie Adam and Emma’s relationship have a parallel conflict style where both people shift there behaviors from one issue to another just most other relationships. Most often we see people use accommodating a lose-win factor, to handle and resolve the issue in the most calming way possible. This happens when we let the other person get their way instead of being able to express our own point of view within the relationship. Emma insists on
Hocker & Wilmot, 2007, Poole, & Stutman, 2005 Folger and 2007 Cahn& Abigail. "Interpersonal Conflict and Conflict Management." Devito, Joseph A. The Interpersonal Communication Book. Boston: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon, 2009. 276.
In every interpersonal relationship, whether it be with a friend, family member, or romantic partner, we constantly find tension occurring. This is not something we should run from. We are wired to naturally have a contradicting nature and have opposing desires to that of our partner. The constant contradiction that occurs in our closest relationships can be explained through the Relational Dialectics Theory. When reviewing the different theories and case studies, Case Study 6 was the obvious choice to use in my paper to exemplify issues that Relational Dialectics Theory addresses. In Case Study 6 – I Need Some Space: Friends Through Good Time and Bad, we see two friends, Ashley and Jacinta, continuously experiencing different relational behaviors between themselves. I will help explain these tensions by connecting key terms from the theory, such as openness-closedness, to issues occurring between the two friends.
When couples become romantically involved with one another, obviously, they cannot be expected to agree on everything at all times. Conflict becomes a normal part of every relationship. Some say it is harmful because it can lead to hatred. Some say it is beneficial for the relationship because it is a learning lesson on how to deal a problem in a healthy way. I say it can be both good and bad depending on how people manage it. If a conflict is not handled appropriately, it can really damage the relationship which can also affect the people around us. When conflict is managed in a positive way, it gives us many opportunities learn more about ourselves, as well as our partners. It can also help us grow maturely which can strengthen our relationship.
If anything as a response, I modified my behavior to make doubly-sure that we did not have the same discussion again (avoidance/accommodate). This involves me thinking ahead of someone else’s observed behavior or listening to the right people. It is surprising how honest people are about each other when the other person is not around. In the case where I discredited someone, it was out of a well-intentioned purpose and the other person realized that (Example: Telling my Safety Officer he should be working with his staff the way his job title implies; a safe
Large components within this theory is that humans wish to have predictability and novelty, protectiveness and openness, autonomy and connection. Within a relationship people communicate in attempt to reconcile disputing desires, but they never completely lose their desire for both of the opposing pairs. Balance is vital in relational dialectics because it produces positive outcomes and is the reason that contradictions occur. Similarities and differences within a relationship are created and sustained by communication or dialogue. A main concept of relational dialectics is unity, to construct one's reality is a unified process created by every relationship maintained within one’s lifetime.
In developing my ability to analyze conflict from different theoretical perspectives, I have learned through different theories how to practice different steps to manage my reactions to them. What I hope to accomplish within my paper is a general broad overview analysis of my experience with both Interpersonal Theories and Relationship Theories. I also wish to explain how when conflicts do arise, the steps on what people should do when making choices when they communicate in conflict situations. The reason why conflict is worth examining and experiencing, is because it shows us how we can develop better communication with the foundation of our mistakes; and what we can learn from them. By learning from our mistakes we can expect to gain more knowledge on how to acquire different behaviors to manage conflict.
Should conflict be avoided? The answer is no. One may consider conflict to be negative and that it is harmful. Whereas, conflict is natural and can be a positive force or benefit in a work group’s performance or in relationships. It is actually inevitable among human relations overall. Conflict arises when there is a disagreement between individuals and a party feels that there is a threat to their well-being, needs, interests, or concerns (Office of Quality Improvement and Office of Human Resource Development, n.d.). According to Robbins and Judge, conflicts can be functional or dysfunctional. Functional conflicts are constructive, they support the goals of the group and improve its performance. Dysfunctional conflicts are destructive,
The words that I used in my conflict word cloud reflect on both my professional and personal experiences as the selected words and terms express my experience as an information technology and information security project manager and that of a community activist. Conflict is almost completely inevitable in any situation where individuals are involved. In fact, conflict in itself takes place even within an individual. People in general have different needs, interests, beliefs, or values and will always want their position to be addressed. These individual differences result in interpersonal conflict. (Cahn and Abigail 2011) defines interpersonal conflict as a problematic situation with the following four unique characteristics:
Conflict undoubtedly occurs in our lives and is inevitable. From arguing with your siblings about whose turn it is to use the computer to having issues over financial matters, conflict comes in many different forms. Scholars believe that conflict can cannot always be resolved and refer to conflict management, which is the way we address disagreements with our relational partners. There are three main strategies I’d like to focus on towards managing conflict: escapist strategies, challenging strategies, and cooperative strategies. An escapist strategy avoids direct conflict because of reasons such as personal safety and practicality. Challenging strategies uses more skills such as assertiveness to get what they want and essentially cause a winner and a loser to manage the conflict. Using a cooperative strategy focuses on the issues instead of using verbal aggressiveness and to consider options and other alternatives. These three concepts of conflict management is important to me because it relates to my relationship with my girlfriend Nancy and gives me a chance to see the positive and negative sides of the strategies to determine which strategy would work for me. An example of a scenario in which these strategies can be applied to is about having a game console. I recently bought a Playstation 4 and Nancy is not pleased about how I use all my time to play games. Hypothetically, Let’s look at how these strategies could be used to manage this conflict.
I found the Conflict Style inventory assessment test to be informative as it explains the five styles of how one responds to conflict. The information gleaned from the Style Matters assessment equips individuals to assess their strengths and weaknesses of their own conflict resolution styles and the styles of others, and how best to respond and engage in low and high-level conflict. Therefore, the report was detailed as it indicated and rated one’s reactions to low-level disagreements specified as calm, when using the five conflict management styles as compared to the storm classification indicting high stress and heated emotions (2005).
The avoiding handling mode is categorized by low assertiveness and cooperation. The conflict is not being resolve or directly addressed. Over avoiding can contribute to resistance and resentment over time. Failure to use avoiding as a handling mode can be a problem when it can be useful as a tool to cool of a conflict before further addressing it in another manner.