Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conflicts between conflict and conflict management
Theory of conflict management
Conflict management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conflicts between conflict and conflict management
Conflict undoubtedly occurs in our lives and is inevitable. From arguing with your siblings about whose turn it is to use the computer to having issues over financial matters, conflict comes in many different forms. Scholars believe that conflict can cannot always be resolved and refer to conflict management, which is the way we address disagreements with our relational partners. There are three main strategies I’d like to focus on towards managing conflict: escapist strategies, challenging strategies, and cooperative strategies. An escapist strategy avoids direct conflict because of reasons such as personal safety and practicality. Challenging strategies uses more skills such as assertiveness to get what they want and essentially cause a winner and a loser to manage the conflict. Using a cooperative strategy focuses on the issues instead of using verbal aggressiveness and to consider options and other alternatives. These three concepts of conflict management is important to me because it relates to my relationship with my girlfriend Nancy and gives me a chance to see the positive and negative sides of the strategies to determine which strategy would work for me. An example of a scenario in which these strategies can be applied to is about having a game console. I recently bought a Playstation 4 and Nancy is not pleased about how I use all my time to play games. Hypothetically, Let’s look at how these strategies could be used to manage this conflict. An escapist strategist would prevent or avoid direct conflict and in my situation, I would ignore Nancy and her constant nagging to avoid any direct conflict. I would come to conclusion that all guys play video games and that it is not such a big deal. This strategy is effective beca... ... middle of paper ... ...ing strategy allows you to get what you want and for my scenario, I get to play my games. Although I may have won, my partner loses and this can cause long-term damage to the relationship and this strategy should be used wisely. The cooperative strategy does not have just one winner, but winners for all sides of the relationship. In the end of this strategy, I managed to talk things out with my partner to find and agreement and if necessary, I would have to give something to gain something and causes mutuality. What I learned in this application paper is the cooperative strategy is the best strategy for my particular scenario of a conflict but I have to be mindful to not ignore the other two strategies. With this knowledge, I finally know how to manage my conflicts more efficiently and know what strategy should be used best for any future conflicts that I encounter.
The purpose of this paper is to explore conflict and ways to manage it. I chose to explore this topic in depth because conflict touches all of our lives. Whether it is at work or in our personal lives. Like most people when you have a bad day at work; I have a tendency to bring the frustration home. Frustration at work causes me to be in a bad mood; hence that makes me argue with my spouse.
The first common theme is the importance of clear strategic intent and big picture thinking in negotiations. Before taking the Negotiation Behaviour unit, I always perceived negotiation as a fixed-pie, a zero-sum gain situation, where one party wins and the other party loses. This belief has often led me to a competitive behaviour in negotiation by trading the big picture thinking with the need to win, getting too detailed too quickly, leading to a positional approach instead of having a broad goal and explore for ways around problems to create value and get the best outcome.
Abigail, R. A., & Cahn, D. D. (2011). Managing conflict through communication. 4th Ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Interpersonal conflict is very common with many relationships. It occurs when two people can not meet in the middle or agree on a discussion. Cooperation is key to maintaining a healthy debate. More frequently; when dealing with members of your own family, issues arise that include conflict and resolution. During this process our true conflict management style appears “out of thin air”. (Steve A. Beebe, 2008, p. 191).
According to the article, An investigation into the relationships between psychological sex role, management experience, and preferred interpersonal conflict style /strategy in the workplace, a suppression conflict strategy “is based on the view that conflict ‘must be brought under control before it becomes unmanageable”’(Eckstat, 2002, p. 10). It is mostly used when a party needs an immediate decision, expects and appreciates a show of force, and the power between the parties are clear. One solution that The Cohesion Group came up with is having Gil try a different conflict strategy when he is reaching out to Gordon. A conflict strategy that Gil can try when talking to Gordon would be compromise. Compromise is “finding a middle ground between two opposed alternatives” where “the final position does not meet the full requirements of either alternative, but it does provide a middle position that people with different positions find better to accept than to retain their own position and to continue the argument” (Eckstat, 2002, p. 10). Compromise is mainly used when both parties stand to gain an advantage. The Cohesion Group came with this solution because Gil used a suppression conflict strategy with Gordon and it did not work. Trying a different one might solve the communication issue between them. To implement this plan, the Cohesion Group would show Gil several other conflict strategies and recommend to him to use the compromise strategy when talking with Gordon. If Gil compromises with Gordon, Gordon would be able to speak his mind freely without feeling overwhelmed by
Before understanding how to deal with conflict, one must understand what conflict is. Conflict can be defined as, “any situation in which incompatible goals, cognitions, or emotions within or between individuals or groups lead to opposition or antagonistic interaction” (Learning Team Toolkit, 2004, pp 242-243). Does the idea of conflict always have to carry a negative connotation? The growth and development of society would be a great deal slower if people never challenged each other’s ideas. The Learning Team Toolkit discusses three different views of conflict: traditiona...
Determining relevant and irrelevant information should consequently result in a deeper understanding of the situation that would moreover mean a proper examination into unhelpful or damaging outcomes (Donna McAuliffe and Lesley Chenoweth, 2008, pg. 45). In the decision to break Errol’s trust and tell his family, friends or emergency services, there is a great risk of losing Errol as a client and furthermore worsening his situation. In deciding to not inform anyone else, while you keep Errol’s trust, there is an even greater risk that Errol may take his own life, whether it be in that very moment or months down the track. This step focuses on the conception that foreseeable harm is not always possible. In both decisions in this, there are risks
workplace include greater total resources, greater knowledge band and a greater source of ideas. However, these advantages can also bring on conflict within teams and the entire workplace. Varney (1989) reported that conflict remained the number one problem within a large company. This was after several attempts were made to train management in conflict resolutions and procedures. However, the conflict remained. The conflict possibly remains because the managers and leaders did not pay attention to the seriousness of the issue. In order to maintain an effective team, leaders and team members must know and be proactive in the conflict resolution techniques and procedures.
The dual concern model of conflict resolution is a conceptual perspective that assumes individuals’ preferred method of dealing with conflict is based on two underlying themes or dimensions: concern for self (assertiveness) and concern for others (empathy). According to the model, group members balance their concern for satisfying personal needs and interests with their concern for satisfying the needs and interests of others in different ways. The intersection of these two dimensions ultimately leads individuals towards exhibiting different styles of conflict resolution.According to Anderson (2009), different combinations of these two dimensions result in five different conflict handling styles as displayed in Table
Levine, S. (1998) Getting to resolution turning conflict into collaboration. San Francisco, CA, Berrett-Koehler, (p.125)
Most people use different strategies to resolve conflict. As we discussed last week, our strategy usually depends on the situation. It’s important to recognize which we use most often, so we can recognize when we use a strategy that doesn’t work. Pass out the What’s
Conflict is a natural part of being in a relationship, there are ongoing tensions in a relationship that can be the beginnings of conflict. “A relationship is a union where two individuals from different background compromise in many ways. People experience internal tensions inconsistently while being in a relationship” (Relational dialectics theory, 2010). To further explain and understand these ongoing conflicts, the theory of relational dialectics developed by Leslie Baxter explains the dialectical tensions which contain three tensions, including integration-separation, expression-non-expression, and stability-change. Each of the tensions then have an internal dialect and external dialect, which means there are different tensions within
...w to apply these tactics into practice. Understanding the meaning of each tactics is just the first stage, flexibility in the use of appropriate tactics in future issues is more important. Besides, I need to make a detailed plan before the negotiation. Firstly, analyzing the interests, perspectives and weak points of the opposite side and selecting suitable tactics. Secondly, preparing several response strategies will help me to control the situations. Thirdly, setting the minimum level what I can agree on the issue is also essential part of negotiation.
In order of being able to analyze the sources of conflicts regarding the clothing manufacturer, I will present the Conflict Process Model according to McShane and Von Glinow. Therefore, I will first define what conflicts are, and second present the different sources of conflicts and carve out which conflicts are involved regarding to the given case. The third step is to explain two different strategies to minimize these conflicts in future. Finally, I will provide a recommendation and conclusion.
After reading the conflict strategy I realized I could have done a lot more things to have that conflict to move more smoothly. Knowing the information about the conflict management strategies I could have taken the situation in numerous ways. I could have let the person say what he wanted to say and