Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect of social media on relationships
The effect of social media on relationships
The effect of social media on relationships
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effect of social media on relationships
Conflict is a natural part of being in a relationship, there are ongoing tensions in a relationship that can be the beginnings of conflict. “A relationship is a union where two individuals from different background compromise in many ways. People experience internal tensions inconsistently while being in a relationship” (Relational dialectics theory, 2010). To further explain and understand these ongoing conflicts, the theory of relational dialectics developed by Leslie Baxter explains the dialectical tensions which contain three tensions, including integration-separation, expression-non-expression, and stability-change. Each of the tensions then have an internal dialect and external dialect, which means there are different tensions within …show more content…
A study was done to find the influence Facebook has on relationships. According to Fox, the most relevant tension to social media practices is expression versus non-expression. The reason for this tension being the most relevant, is the contrasting difference in people’s posting habits. People may choose to post about personal information while others may feel awkward disclosing information to the public. Fox then goes onto explain that finding a balance between expression and non-expression in their social media habits so all relationships will be harmonious. “Within the couple, individuals may have differing privacy practices and expectations for SNSs, which may cause tension… As such, this wealth of information is likely to affect the expression–privacy struggle between the couple and the network” (Fox&Warber, 2014). Conflict may arise due to the social media habits of their significant other and it could be a branch of relational dialectics, to analyze the social media habits of partners. With technology becoming more present in society, social media is gaining more members and still continues to grow hence it is evident that open communication is necessary to establish the boundaries of social media habits within the …show more content…
Connection and autonomy seem to be the most important tension among interpersonal relationships, meaning people like to spend time with their friends or significant other but simultaneously require independence from them for a period of time. A study was done on international students and the friendships they formed with others, in which the dialectical tension if connection versus autonomy differed among the students. The author stated that the international students may develop more independence due to the western culture relying heavily on independence but at the same time, the students’s traditional culture would still be present which relies on interdependence (Terria Chia-Chia Chen & Sias, 2001). Connecting different cultures together can cause conflict in people’s relationships, due to the differences in their upbringing. Different cultures look at interpersonal relationships differently than western culture, for example marriage is practiced differently in Indian and Muslim culture than in the United States. With that being said, Nasser analyzed relational dialectics in arranged marriages within Lebanese Muslims. The tension of connection versus autonomy was changed to fit the cultural differences, instead the dialectic was named commitment versus
Using the informal tone he enhances his argument by providing several thought-provoking statements that allow the reader to see the logic in the article, “Social media is designed for the information shared on it to be searched, and shared- and mined for profit… When considering what to share via social media, don 't think business vs. personal. Think public vs. private. And if something is truly private, do not share it on social media out of a misplaced faith in the expectation of privacy” (134). The reader should agree with Edmond that when posting or being a part of the social media bandwagon, you’re life and decisions will be up for display. Moreover, the business vs. personal and public vs. private point is accurate and logical, because evidently if you post something on any social media outlet you should expect that anyone and everyone can see it, regardless of your privacy settings. Edmond highlights that Facebook along with other social networking sites change their privacy settings whenever they please without
“The standards of what we want to keep private and what we make public are constantly evolving. Over the course of Western history, we’ve developed a desire for more privacy, quite possibly as a status symbol…”(Singer) Technological change leads to new abuses, creating new challenges to security, but society adapts to those challenges. To meet the innate need for privacy, we learn what to reveal and where, and how to keep secret what we don't want to disclose. “Whether Facebook and similar sites are reflecting a change in social norms about privacy or are actually driving that change, that half a billion people are now on Facebook suggests that people believe the benefits of connecting with others, sharing information, networking, self-promoting, flirting, and bragging outweigh breaches of privacy that accompany such behaviours,”(Singer) This is obvious by the continuous and unceasing use of social media platforms, but what needs to be considered is that this information is being provided willingly. “More difficult questions arise when the loss of privacy is not in any sense a choice.”(Singer) When the choice to be anonymous it taken away through social media, the person loses the ability to keep their personal information
In fact, Facebook has become such a factor in a teenage relationship in recent years that the “Facebook official’ has become relevant, referencing the act of a couple mutually verifying and displaying their relationship status on the site. The phrase itself suggests that modern-day relationship between partners who both have Facebook profiles requires confirmation for everyone on their friend list to see, an idea that would have seemed risible to anyone in a relationship before the rise of Facebook. This phrase is referenced in the title of the article Are We Facebook Official? Implication of dating Partners’ Facebook Use and Profiles for Intimate Relationship Satisfaction”, and play a major role in the text of the article itself (Papp, Danielewicz, & Cayemberg 86).The article focuses on a study meant to discover the effect of Facebook on couples, primarily by testing the importance of how couples displayed their relationship status over the site (87). The results of the study varied between the two genders, but seemed to suggest that the way in which partners in relationships display their status could have a direct connection to how satisfied at least one partner was in their relationship (88).
Harrington & Braithwaite suggest as cited by West & Turner “It is through communication practices that people achieve dialectical unity, or the way in which people are able to make contradictions feel complete and satisfactory.” (West & Turner, 2010, p.201) What I perceive to be may be something different, however, once someone shows me who they really are; I can only believe what I see. No matter what, I choose to have in my relationship it has to be simultaneously in nature. If I decide to have behavior control this can still lead to contradictions in my relationship even though, I may change that does not mean that the other person in the relationship will. My boyfriend’s views of the relationship seem to be quite different than
Interpersonal conflict is. Every relationship has conflict and determining on how the conflict is resolved or handled can make the relationship stronger or weaker. If someone is more easily to come up with a compromise rather than always getting their own way, they may have stronger relationships (Bevan and Sole, 2014). Television shows also use interpersonal conflict between their characters to find a solution or compromise in the end. Interpersonal conflict is all around us, it is how we handle that conflict that makes or breaks our relationships.
Of the several theories we have discussed involving commitment, I have taken a particular interest in M.P. Johnson’s Theory of Commitment as I feel it very effectively dissects the primary drives that reside behind one’s desire, or lack thereof, to remain committed in a relationship. In his theory, Johnson describes three kinds of perceived commitment that ultimately lead one to the decision to stay in their relationship. These three kinds of commitment discussed are personal, moral and structural commitment (Berscheid & Regan, 2005).
Interpersonal conflict is very common with many relationships. It occurs when two people can not meet in the middle or agree on a discussion. Cooperation is key to maintaining a healthy debate. More frequently; when dealing with members of your own family, issues arise that include conflict and resolution. During this process our true conflict management style appears “out of thin air”. (Steve A. Beebe, 2008, p. 191).
Tokunaga, R. S. (2011). Social networking site or social surveillance site? understanding the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 705-713.
Social networking can connect strangers across the world. As the evolution of communication continues, technology progresses and social networking grows. Social networks like Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook have grown to have billions of users. In fact, in today’s society, it is necessary or nearly expected to use one, if not all, of these technological communication networks. The increasing use of social networking has had both a negative and positive effect on communication in relationships.
This paper will discuss developing and maintaining relationships in relation to my own relationships with my family, friends, and boyfriend.
Upon the advent of social networking websites, an entirely new level of self-expression was formed. People instantly share updates on their lives with family, friends, and colleagues, reconnecting with those they had lost contact with. Social networking has now become an integral part of contemporary society – a modern analog for catching up with friends over slow, conventional methods or finding upcoming events in newspapers. However, along with this freedom of information, the danger of revealing too much personal information has become apparent. As such, online social media poses an imminent danger to society as it blurs the line between private and public information, creating an obsession with sharing one’s personal life online.
If you are constantly using online communication it makes it harder for you to deal with conflicts face to face. A study shows that adolescents who frequently spent time on social media struggled to resolve conflict with their parents. (Drussell, J., 2014) This can bring about a lot of isolation and sadness, as their communication skills weaken. The form of touch and presence is a vital need that needs to be fulfilled for humans to be satisfied and that is why we turn to social media to satisfy our cravings of love and attention. Social media’s affects on communication among humans have replaced the sense of connectivity, changing how we deal with relationships. “Relationships are replying more and more on technology to mediate and nurture the and people are unable to pursue real life relationships because they fear failure (Giovanni,
What we post, share and do online depends mainly on two things. Firstly, the "friends" and our relationships with them on a social platform (Rowe, 2010). For each different relationship we have with people we choose to share certain information about ourselves, for example you won't share the same information with your friends than what you share with your mother or even your partner. As mentioned by (Rowe, 2010) th...
One of the main reasons why social media has positively affected our society is because of how it has made communicating with people much easier. “Today, four out of five active internet users maintain at least one social media profile” (Moe, 3). Using these websites, such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and etc., people talk about everything with anyone from what they are planning to do, also what they are eating and much more (Moe, 24). Also we can also send private messages to other users of these websites about personal m...
Social Networking sites play an essential role in today’s culture as they provide people with the ability to interact, blog, share pictures and videos, flirt, and date without having to move an inch. People pour their minds and hearts into the world of cyber communication; it is an easier way for them to clear their heads without having a face-to-face confrontation. Undoubtedly, this is advantageous to certain people. It helps establish connections with people, friends and family from any corner of the world, but one cannot ignore the extensive privacy breach that occurs in the universe of online social media.