Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of self-interest
The importance of self-interest
Role of self interest explained
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of self-interest
Determining relevant and irrelevant information should consequently result in a deeper understanding of the situation that would moreover mean a proper examination into unhelpful or damaging outcomes (Donna McAuliffe and Lesley Chenoweth, 2008, pg. 45). In the decision to break Errol’s trust and tell his family, friends or emergency services, there is a great risk of losing Errol as a client and furthermore worsening his situation. In deciding to not inform anyone else, while you keep Errol’s trust, there is an even greater risk that Errol may take his own life, whether it be in that very moment or months down the track. This step focuses on the conception that foreseeable harm is not always possible. In both decisions in this, there are risks
For anyone who has ever worked in healthcare, or simply for someone who has watched a popular hit television show such as Grey’s Anatomy, General Hospital, House or ER know that there can be times when a doctor or health care provider is placed in extremely difficult situations. Often times, those situations are something that we watch from the sidelines and hope for the best in the patient’s interest. However, what happens when you place yourself inside the doctors, nurses, or any other of the medical provider’s shoes? What if you were placed in charge of a patient who had an ethically challenging situation? What you would you do then? That is precisely what Lisa Belkin accomplishes in her book “First Do No Harm”. Belkin takes the reader on
Silence or Omission: Not coming forward or withholding important information can be highly unethical if it leads to harm or damages
The phrase primum non nocere (‘‘first, do no harm’’) is a well-accepted ideology of the medical and mental health professions. Although developing research data indicate that several psychological treatments may produce harm in significant numbers of individuals, psychologists have until recently paid little attention to the ethical issues of hazardous treatments. The Ethics Code of the America...
What should I tell him? I refrained from selling him anything, but instead confronted him with a question, “What would have happened, Doctor, if you had died first, and your wife would have had to survive without you?:”” (Frankl 112). Whereupon hearing this query the practitioner morosely responds, “Oh, for her this would have been terrible; how she would have suffered!” (Frankl 112). This anecdote exemplifies Frankl’s proposition that human nature is motivated by the search for purpose in life; Logotherapy is the pursuit of meaning for one’s life. In The Longman Reader, “[A] form of logical thinking in which specific cases and facts are examined to draw a wider- ranging conclusion” (653) is called inductive reasoning which this anecdote exemplifies. With the example of his wife’s death, Frankl clearly presented this anecdote and then examined it to come up with a conclusion that would be applicable to other cases—indicating a process of inductive reasoning. The logical reasoning behind Frankl’s example provides his thesis with logos, or soundness of argument (Nadell 479). Frankl logically questions the practitioner and makes him realize that the death of his wife was far easier to bare whereas if he had passed away first she
The expectation in the practitioner/client relationship is that any information disclosed will not be shared with others. Confidentiality is emphasized to provide the client with a safe haven in which to share traumatic events or embarrassing personal information about themselves (Krase, 2013). Disclosing this type of sensitive information...
Firstly, by looking at the first patient, whether she gets a kidney from her father or a “cadaver kidney” , there will be no difference because she needs a kidney nonetheless. The second patient however, cannot agree to give his kidney away because one of the main reasons is that he’s scared and lacks “the courage to make this donation”9. So right at this point, it can be seen that it would be better if the father didn’t give his kidney away because it wouldn’t cause him any happiness, whereas the daughter has two options to gIn everyday life, whether on a personal base or on a professional base, difficult scenarios, or also known as moral dilemmas, are present. Depending on whom the person is or what their belief and value systems are, the issue can be ‘resolved’. In this particular case, questions arise about whether it is morally right to lie to family members when something can be done, ignoring the fact of its after effects. The case will be explained in details later on including the patient’s state, but to answer this ethical question, two theorists will be presented for the con and pro side. For the con side, the deontologist Immanuel Kant will be presented with his theory that lying is prohibited under all circumstances, as for the pro side, John Stuart Mill will be presented for the utilitarian theory stating that whichever decision brings out the most happiness is the right decision. After discussing the case, my personal view of what is right will be stated with my own reasons, which is that lying is the right decision to be taken.
An example is when a person threatens to transmit HIV and other diseases. It may be illegal in many countries for a person to infect other people with a disease knowingly especially HIV. However, a clinical psychologist should not be obligated to tell the other people of the risk of transmission. The client has a right to confidentiality. Duty to warn got developed when Tarasoff got murdered by a person who had threatened to do so. He had told the therapist that one day he would murder her, but the therapist protected the client’s confidentiality. When Tarasoff got killed in 1976, her parents went to court to report the Regents of the University of California. Another case was Jabloski by Pahls v. US. This case extended the duty to warn when it included reviewing history to detect history of violence. Jabloski had a history of violence that got discovered through an assessment by the doctors. Since the doctor failed to notify his girlfriend Kimbal, She got killed by him when Jabloski got released from the hospital (Cherry 2014).
...d how these determinations effect a physician’s approach to various types of critically ill patients? These types of questions come in to play when one attempts to critically analyze the differences between the types of terminally ill patients and the subtle ethical/legal nuances between withholding and withdrawing treatment. According to a review by Larry Gostin and Robert Weir about Nancy Cruzan, “…courts examine the physician’s respect for the desires of the patient and the level of care administered. A rule forbidding physicians from discontinuing a treatment that could have been withheld initially will discourage doctors from attempting certain types of care and force them prematurely to allow a patient to die. Physicians must be free to exercise their best professional judgment, especially when facing the sensitive question of whether to administer treatment.”
...ort her actions, then Jack must do so as he is too responsible for making this situation known to the appropriate people. However, one must acknowledge how difficult this may be for Jack due to the long-standing relationship he has with Linda. It should also be apparent now that Linda’s actions are unjustifiable. She is not only acting unprofessionally and unethically by not delivering the medication but she is committing an illegal offence by falsifying records and stealing from the ward. To conclude, it is important to remember that the Department of Health and Children (2008) acknowledge that healthcare has originated in a world which is not flawless and that as humans, errors are possible. However, members of the healthcare system must try and prevent these errors from occurring where possible to ensure a high standard of care which is owed to the service users.
Oncol, Ann. "Bad News for Taxpayers, Good News for Patients, in the UK." Annals of Oncology 13.6 (2002): 811-13. Oxford Index. Web. 16 Jan. 2014. This work is useful because it is a medical citation that gives the paper higher credibility and background. It helps provide a medical analysis on mercy killing and assisted suicide, the stance taken on the novel.
Truth-telling in nursing and the medical profession in general is an extensive area encompassing many ethical issues, not limited to and including the rights of patients or their families to receive information about their diagnosis and illness. The practitioner, on the other hand, must balance their obligation to tell the truth against the importance of Non-maleficence ,“do no harm”.
Identify the potential risks which affect the company and manage these risks within its risk appetite;
Supposing my client is distressed at the circumstance that I have to report her on behalf of informing me that she’s going to potentially harm her exboyfriend. It is my legal responsibility that I inform my patient in the calmest manner that their safety and wellbeing is my utmost concern as their psychiatrist. However, if what they had told me, needs to be reported and they need to be admitted into the Emergency Unit of the nearest hospital. I have to contemplate that I have the APA Ethical Aspirations to stand by. The APA Ethical Aspirations are Beneficence and Nonmaleficence, Fidelity and Responsibility, Integrity, Justice and Respect for People’s Rights and Dignity. It is understandable why the client got angry about me having to report her, nevertheless the aspiration “Beneficence and Nonmaleficence” does not just apply only to the client but to the community the client is in as well. My job as a clinical psychologist is to help my client be able to have a functional life in the community, minimize any negative risks. Then, in this situation, by informing me that she will be harming her ex-boyfriend with a weapon, she would be a danger to the
The slippery slope is the idea that any patient of any illness or age can ask to die they deem their lives unbearable. But many lawmakers don’t take into account that there can be restrictions and also freedoms. Peter Rogatz has devised a plan or at least rules to make P.A.S safe for all parties involved. This won’t simply let a patient decide how bad his or her situation is, but instead make a safe enviroment for the mentally incapable and
The writer discusses a situation of the doctor failing to disclose the nature of important medical condition which can jeopardize several of the patient’s family members and puts the doctor at odds with them. The problem is also discussed by Sutrop (2011) who show how protecting the patient’s confidentiality and self- decision capacity has actually caused severe hindrances to the field of scientific development and research.