Hays Case Study

1232 Words3 Pages

Self-Reflection using Hays ADDRESSING Model
Multicultural issues in the workplace manifest in different ways from communication style to political views. The purpose of this paper is to use Hays ADDRESSING model to reflect and evaluate multicultural issues in workplace, such as language diversity, political views, gender, and sexual orientation as it relates to professionalism, privilege, and personal bias.
Reflection
The Hays model acronym stands for age, disability, religion, ethnic/racial identity, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, indigenous heritage, national origin, and gender (Hays, 2008, p. 43). Hays (2008) and Crisp (2010) address the role cultural identity and privilege play in influencing the values, belief systems, biases, …show more content…

Especially, in small communities where it is more common for psychologists to interact with clients and/or patients on a regular basis, such as social events, personal engagements, restaurants, grocery stores, shopping centers, and/or church outside of the workplace (Knapp, Handelsman, Gottlieb, & VandeCreek,, 2013; Pipes, Holstein, & Aguirre, 2005; & Schank, Helbok, Haldeman, & Gallardo, 2010), where the line between professional conduct, personal values, biases, and beliefs blur. It is at these times the aspirational principles of the APA, such as beneficence and nonmaleficence, fidelity and responsibility, integrity, justice, and respect for people 's rights and dignity can provide guidance and remind psychologists of the necessity of upholding professional codes of conduct regardless of situation (APA, 2010; Fisher, 2013). Discriminatory remarks and prejudicial views on an individual 's gender, sexual orientation, language barrier, or political views can harm current clients and patients as well as prevent potential clients and patients for seeking services and/or treatment from psychologists in the future harming the profession. Additionally, as psychologists the need to understand an individual 's multicultural identities as an essential part in providing services and treatment and failure to recognize and understand these similarities and …show more content…

Although many actors in the case scenario were not in violation of ethical or criminal codes, their consultant firm went out of business in two years. Organizations and groups cancelled their contracts and community organizations removed them from their boards. While their comments made outside their professional roles in social setting and there was no evidence or allegations of malpractice or unjust treatment with the exception of Robert, in the eyes of the committee, they had broken public trust, faith, and confidence in the psychological profession to deliver services and therapy in manner free from harassment and discrimination based on gender, sexual orientation, national origin, and

Open Document