Introduction
As employees and sworn corrections officer of the Georgia Department of Juvenile justice (DOJJ) we are responsible when we are on duty for ourselves, juveniles, and staff members at all time. We are supposed to set the example daily because we are always being watch by others, display ethical behavior and maintain moral within our organization. Since juvenile correctional officers have many duties, like guiding and acting as life coaches for young inmates that might be mentally, emotionally, or psychologically which calls for them to have qualified staff members on hand to help with their situation. But like everything is this world this world we need to retain a wide variety of qualified staff members from all type of back ground.
…show more content…
This can be tricky because even with the DOJJ there is some form of discrimination that can cause conflict amongst staff, administration, and the community. Reform Discrimination is considered to some as an “economic condition that are contributing to African American or other ethnic culture involvement within the criminal justice system that directly speak to conflict theory” (“Theoretical Perspectives on”, n.d.).
Thereby, since we understand that organizational strategies are needed to eliminate on the job discrimination, we also must understand that defeating it can be very difficult and can cause conflict amongst everyone. We all have some form of bias, but within the DOJJ one would think that these bias whatever they maybe would remain off the job, but that can only happen in a perfect world. So, since our world in not perfect, we need to develop some form of strategy to avoid this type of conflict on the job. As we examine this issue we found out that “discrimination often occurs when one culture does not understand another, therefore, organizations need to spend time training staff in cultural diversity and strategies for effective communication” (“Best practice in”, …show more content…
n.d.). For the DOJJ to achieve some form of normality and try to empower our staff to rise above discrimination we will consider using these types of reform in order to tackle this issue, which are: Develop an anti-discrimination plan, and create an environment that allow for a great deal of conversation amongst participants; create a standard of conduct, and foster reciprocal admiration in the workplace; set up an advisory board with ethnic representatives; hearten and establish appropriate and positive relationships with employees, administration, and community from ethnically diverse backgrounds; and try to use correct terminology when referring to staff, administration, and the community from a culturally diverse background, which means to basically challenge derogatory or abusive. Conflict theory Conflict theory effectively defines examples where conflict may occur between groups like the DOJJ, for a diversity reasons, it is questionable if this represents our ideal society. Although other “theorists, like Marx, have claimed that growth and development occur through the conflict between opposing parties, cooperation is also a source of healthy growth” (“Conflict theory”, n.d.).With that being said in regards to on the job discrimination we should be determined to locate the necessary to procedures to change the overall thinking and atmosphere within the DOJJ to create harmony and cooperation. Conclusion On the discrimination of all kind has been around for a long time.
Therefore, we need to break the circle and create a world within a world of harmony, morale building, cooperation, and respect to accomplish our daily functions. As I have stated before we all have some form of bias towards something or someone, but we need to understand that when we are in the public eye that we need to check those bias at the door and leave them outside, and when you are off the clock and you are leaving you can pick up your bias and utilized them as you which. The working environment should not be a place to create more friction then necessary especially in the public safety field where your mind needs to be on alert at all times to deal with any type of crisis. By talking some of the above steps we should be able to achieve some type of success. But, we must not believe that this will happen in a day, after all Rome was not built in a day, so change will not happen that quickly either. By taking daily steps to achieve these goals we will be the organization that will exemplify change and lead the way for other organization within the public safety
field. References Best practice in service delivery - QCOSS Community Door (n.d.). Retrieved from http://etraining.communitydoor.org.au/mod/page/view.php?id=296 Conflict theory (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Conflict_theory Family Crisis Conflict Theories and Symbolic Interaction Theory The Conflict Theories of Marx & Simmel (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www3.uakron.edu/witt/fc/fcnote5a.htm Theoretical Perspectives on Race and Crime (n.d.). Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/40397_3.pdf
The human service model strives to integrate employees goals into organizational goals. However, it has such a reliance upon the most committed employees. These employees, therefore, must to accomplish job tasks and feel as though fulfilled in their distinctive roles within the criminal justice organizations. This model creates a much less centralized rules and bureaucracy as the supervisors and employees become part of a team governed by an agreement of purpose. Such agreement of purpose may appear to be blurred in terms of governance within the organization since it is in human nature to not wanting to share anything of values, especially money and power. Criminal justice organizations have multiple and sometimes conflicting goals. Those
The problem of dealing with juvenile justice has plagued are country for years, since the establishment of the first juvenile court in 1899. Prior to that development, delinquent juveniles had to be processed through the adult justic3e system which gave much harsher penalties. By 1945, separate juvenile courts existed in every single state. Similar to the adult system, all through most of the 20th century, the juvenile justice system was based upon a medical/rehabilitative representation. The new challenges of the juvenile court were to examine, analyze, and recommend treatment for offenders, not to deliver judgment fault or fix responsibility. The court ran under the policy of “parens patriae” that intended that the state would step in and act as a parent on behalf of a disobedient juvenile. Actions were informal and a juvenile court judge had a vast sum of discretion in the nature of juvenile cases, much like the discretion afforded judges in adult unlawful settings until the 1970s. In line with the early juvenile court’s attitude of shielding youth, juvenile offenders’ position was often in reformatories or instruction schools that were intended, in speculation, to keep them away from the terrible influences of society and to encourage self-control through accurate structure and very unsympathetic discipline. Opposing to the fundamental theory, all through the first part of the century, the places that housed juveniles were frequently unsafe and unhealthy places where the state warehoused delinquent, deserted, and deserted children for unclear periods. Ordinary tribulations included lack of medical care, therapy programs, and even sometimes food. Some very poor circumstances continue even today.
In today's society juveniles are being tried in adult courts, given the death penalty, and sent to prison. Should fourteen-year olds accused of murder or rape automatically be tried as adults? Should six-teen year olds and seven-teen year olds tried in adult courts be forced to serve time in adult prisons, where they are more likely to be sexually assaulted and to become repeat offenders. How much discretion should a judge have in deciding the fate of a juvenile accused of a crime - serious, violent, or otherwise? The juvenile crime rate that was so alarming a few years ago has begun to fall - juvenile felony arrest rates in California have declined by more than forty percent in the last twenty years. While California's juvenile population rose by a half a million since the middle and late 1970's, juveniles made up less than fifth-teen percent of California's felony arrests in 1998, compared to thirty percent in 1978; according to the Justice Policy Institute. The juvenile arrests have dropped back, even as the population of kids between ages of ten and eight-teen has continued to grow, and the number of kids confined in the California Youth Authority (CYA) has fallen. With all the progress our society has made in cutting back in juvenile crimes there is still a very serious problem. But if locking kids up is the best way to address it, how do we explain a drop in crime when there are more teens in California and fewer in custody? First we must look at the economy around us. With so many job opportunities available more and more teenagers find honest ways to keep busy and make money. Our generation has a brighter future than the generation a decade ago. Next we look at successful crime prevention efforts: after-school programs, mentoring, teen outreach programs, truancy abatement, anti-gang programs, family resource centers. There is evidence that these programs are beginning to pay off. Sending more, and younger teens through the adult court system has been a trend across the country in reaction to crimes, such as school shootings and violent rapes. Yet evidence shows that treating youth as adults does not reduce crime. In Florida, where probability wise more kids are tried as adults then in any other state, studies found that youth sent through the adult court system are twice as likely to commit more crimes when they're release...
The Juvenile Justice system, since its conception over a century ago, has been one at conflict with itself. Originally conceived as a fatherly entity intervening into the lives of the troubled urban youths, it has since been transformed into a rigid and adversarial arena restrained by the demands of personal liberty and due process. The nature of a juvenile's experience within the juvenile justice system has come almost full circle from being treated as an adult, then as an unaccountable child, now almost as an adult once more.
The historical development of the juvenile justice system in the United States is one that is focused on forming and separating trying juveniles from adult counterparts. One of the most important aspects is focusing on ensuring that there is a level of fairness and equality with respect to the cognitive abilities and processes of juvenile as it relates to committing crime. Some of the most important case legislation that would strengthen the argument in regard to the development of the juvenile justice system is related to the reform of the justice system during the turn of the 19th century. Many juveniles were unfortunately caught in the crosshairs of being tried as adults and ultimately receiving punishments not in line with their ability
Though crime, in general, is on the decline there are specific crimes and group offenders that are actually increasing. Specific crimes such as hate crimes, those crimes motivated by hostility to the victim as a member of a group, based on color, creed, gender, or sexual orientation, and juvenile crimes have become escalating debates. Lionel Tate, a 12-year-old boy at the time of his actions, is a suitable case to investigate. Using his case, I will address the increase in juvenile delinquency, the contributions to the malice acts, the severity of the crimes being committed by youth, and possible, yet reasonable repercussions.
An ethical problem that exists in the field of criminal justice is the incarceration of juveniles. While juvenile incarceration has been decreasing over the past decade, it is still an ethical dilemma that many criminal justice professionals will come across. Juveniles’ brains are not fully developed, incarceration is used when not appropriate to fit the problem, and some populations are over-represented in the criminal justice system.
Today’s modern workforce is made up of a diverse group of individuals. People of different nationality, race, creed, color, age, sex, and sexual orientation work side by side every day. This diversity has many advantages, but it also ads a level of complexity to management. The potential for discrimination is real, and needs to be managed so as not to incur lawsuits, loss of productivity, and unhealthy working conditions. Happy employees are productive employees, so it is in any organizations best interests to ensure that discrimination does not happen, but unfortunately, it does.
Discrimination is known to exist in all workplaces, sometimes it is too subtle to notice, and other times it is exceedingly obvious. It is known that everyone subconsciously discriminates, dependant on their own beliefs and environments that surround them. However, discrimination can be either positive or negative in their results, and sometimes discrimination is a necessary part of life.
Although police decide whether to arrest or release an alleged adolescent, prosecutors have the flexibility in prosecuting, diverting or dismissing the juvenile case altogether. While prosecutors are afforded more time to make decisions as opposed to officers in the field, the increase in arrests over the past few decades have strained their resources, thus requiring prosecutors to make snap judgments about their cases [citation]. Prosecutorial discretion authorizes a state or local prosecutor the option to file charges against juveniles directly in adult court [citing]. Prosecutors enjoy more discretion than most decision-makers in the criminal justice system since they determine whether an adolescent’s behavior should be preserved as age
In an ideal world, every person is treated equally when it comes to getting a job, advancing in his or her career and being treated fairly in the workplace. Unfortunately, discrimination still exists in hiring, firing and promotions; and the diversity of the workforce regrettably can cause hostility in the workplace when individuals do not appreciate and respect the differences among themselves and their co-workers.
The ways in which AFC seeks social change, specifically in populations where students face disciplinary issues, are over-age for their grade level or involved in the Juvenile & Justice system all vary. For students who are over-age for their grade level regardless if they are in middle school, high school or behind in getting credits, AFC provides resources such as individual case assistance, community education, and policy advocacy. Individual case assistance includes giving students access to alternative paths to a high school diploma, special education referrals, and evaluations, services available to address mental health and substance abuse issues and re-enrollment into school. Community education includes information o nworkshops and
Abstract- Racial discrimination happens all the time and most of us are unaware of it. The most common place for this to happen is in the workplace. Now people can be discriminated against because of their race, religion, or any other numerous things. Also, discrimination can occur during the job interview or even after you got the job. This paper will shoe the effects of racial discrimination and how it can be prevented. In addition there are some very important laws that deal specifically with discrimination, like the NAACP or Affirmative Action. These both will be discussed.
Within an organization, there are always people that think and behave differently, all dependent on their personal values and cultures. Efficient managing of the human resources is an art, and it is hard to find a perfect solution/combination. It is important that management recognize and understand that people work differently. This is why it is important to have strong cultural foundations that also guides how employees are expected to behave and work. Thereby it should be easier for management to utilize the work force diversity to something meaningful.
Work plays an important role in our daily life, it is considered much more huge part of our personal life. During our daily work we make many relationships throughout our career history. Sometimes these relationships become lasting, and sometimes employment discrimination might happen. This relationships that we thought it last could be cut off by the devastation of claims of discriminatory treatment. Discrimination in the workforce has been an issue since the first people of workers in United States in the present day and as well in the past. Some employees were subjected to a harsh working conditions, verbal abuse, denial of advancement,, and many other injustices. There was also the fact that certain employees were being treated differently than other employees.