Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages and disadvantages of groupthink
Advantages and disadvantages of groupthink
Advantages and disadvantages of groupthink
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Advantages and disadvantages of groupthink
Groupthink: The Brainstorming Myth, written by Jonah Lehrer, explores the idea that true brainstorming (producing ideas with peers in the “absence of criticism and negative feedback” (Lehrer 2)) is less effective and produces fewer ideas than people who work alone and bring their ideas together at a later time. Lehrer implies that the presence of criticism and negative feedback is necessary when working in groups in order to generate ideas. He explains a study where teams of female undergraduates (each given one of three conditions) had to create as many solutions as they could that would reduce the traffic congestion in the San Francisco Bay Area. The team that was allowed to debate and criticize created more good ideas than the brainstorming …show more content…
During my internship, I was fortunate enough to sit in on a couple of meetings that involved the directors of BISD. During these meetings, which were facilitated by my supervisor, the team of directors had to generate ideas that would streamline the governance board structure. In order to get the most out of the directors, my supervisor used “Compression Planning” as the method of carrying out the meetings. In Compression Planning, the facilitator uses notecards to visualize the background information that is needed, the overall purpose of the project and the meeting, the non-purpose of the meeting, and the ideas that are generated. Furthermore, there is a meter, known as the “Permission Meter,” that is used to enforce how much negative feedback should be used. For example, during the session where the team is purely generating ideas (the “Explore” phase), the Permission Meter is set between 7 and 10, meaning that the team is free to explore any and all ideas with no judgement or criticism. The purpose is just to produce as many ideas in the time allotted. Later in the session, when the team is breaking down the provided ideas (the “Focus” phase), the Permission Meter is set between 1 and 3, meaning that the team should only be criticizing the ideas presented. The purpose is to examine the ideas and create a solution based on
Are you a self-reliant individual, or do you generate more ideas while working in a group? Groupthink has always been the dysfunctional idea that results from within a group that seeks harmony and conformity. Groupthink has been seen in Salem, MA, specifically in The Crucible, where townsfolk would go around accusing women, often innocent, of witchcraft. It has also been seen during the Red Scare, where Senator McCarthy would create a list of celebrities and other well-known people that he would accuse of being communists in the United States. At the time, Americans were against the idea of the communists and communism due to the fact that the Soviet Union, which had a communist government, was threatening to bomb the US. Thus, anyone who was
In the essay “Thought” by Louis H. Sullivan, he states that people don’t always need words just to communicate. There are several ways that individuals are able to communicate without words, they can express themselves by gestures and facial features, like explaining themselves to others. Sullivan believes that both thinking and creative thinking are better without words and that the minds is always working; therefore, it does not have time to place words together. In order to think clearly they must use other means of pondering; although, the mind works quickly it will take a long time to write what they are thinking because the mind continues without stopping. When individuals are reading they are not think their own thought exactly but what
This accredited notion that group work is going to work faster at producing a better solution to a problem is false. The logic behind this idea—more brainpower which would lead to more ideas then leading to better ideas—is fallacious. We, as a society, have entered into an era where we believe that the best work that is going to be done, is done collectively, not individually. In Quiet by Susan Cain, she calls this new idea “New Groupthink” she then defines it as “a phenomenon that has the potential to stifle productivity at work and to deprive schoolchildren of the skills they’ll need to achieve excellence in an increasingly competitive world. New Groupthink elevates teamwork above all else” (Cain 75).
In 1972, Irving Janis presented a set of hypothesis that he extracted from observing small groups performing problem solving tasks; he collectively referred to these hypotheses as groupthink¹. He defined groupthink as “a quick and easy way to refer to a mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members’ striving for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action²” A successful group brings varied ideas, collective knowledge, and focus on the task at hand. The importance of groups is to accomplish tasks that individuals can not do on their own. The Bay of Pigs, Watergate, and the Challenger disaster are all forms of failure within a group. Specifically, you can see the effect of groupthink of Americans before September 11, 2001. The thought of harm to the United States was unfathomable, but only after the attacks did they realize they were not invincible. When a solid, highly cohesive group is only concerned with maintaining agreement, they fail to see their alternatives and any other available options. When a group experiences groupthink, they may feel uninterested about a task, don't feel like they will be successful, and the group members do not challenge ideas. Stress is also a factor in the failure of groupthink. An effective group needs to have clear goals, trust, accountability, support, and training. Some indicators that groupthink may be happening are; making unethical decisions, they think they are never wrong, close-minded about situations, and ignore important information. Many things can be done to prevent groupthink from happening. One way is to make each person in the group a “critical evaluator”. The leader must ...
Whyte, Glen. “Groupthink Reconsidered.” The Academy of Management Review 14.1 (Jan. 1989): 40-56. JSTOR. Web. 25 Jan. 2012.
An instance where I have participated in groupthink was during a conversation at work. Quebec recently put out a new law which does not allow Niqabi women to work government jobs. After seeing a Niqabi woman, my coworkers brought up the new law
A. Preventing "Groupthink" Psychology Today. 20 Apr. 2011. The. Psychology Today.
How many meetings do you find yourself in without a clear objective? How many times have you gone to a meeting that was a complete waste of time? There was no direction, no clarity on what the meeting was about, and no clear outcome or product after the meeting was over. Effective meetings don't materialize on their own.
Groupthink is the psychological phenomenon in which groups working on a task think along the same lines which could have drastic results. It is the result of group polarization where discussions are enhance or exaggerate the initial leanings of the group. Therefore, if a group leans towards risky situation at the beginning of the discussion on average they will move toward an even riskier position. (Marks, 2015). The idea when everyone think the same no one is really thinking. The drastic outcomes result from people trying to avoid conflict with one another, being highly cohesive, and results is questionable decision making (Oliver, 2013). Houghton Mifflin publication of Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions
After completing the group task of preparing a presentation on, transferring individual facilitation skills into a group work setting I will critically reflect upon my own participation. I will evaluate my self-awareness while working in the group, as well as those around me. The way that I personally dealt with any issues that arose within the group and how that affected the group dynamics. I will also briefly discuss the roles in which each member of the group took and how role allocation affected, the group dynamics and the working relationships. Finally I will evaluate my work having discussed it with my fellow group members.
In David Wright’s “The Myths and Realities of Teamwork,” (Wright, D., 2013), he outlines six myths that are ubiquitous and perpetuated by many people. Here is a short examination of all six.
our thought process, and how we contribute to the process of group work. This involves a
Group decision making has many benefits for the individuals involved and the organization itself. In order for group decision making to be efficient, it is important for a creative environment to exist. “Creativity is the mental and social process used to generate ideas, concepts and associations that lead to the exploration of new ideas (May, 2011, para.3). This allows each employee to explore ideas and feel comfortable to share them without fear of rejection.
Working in groups is challenging at times. Other times it is very rewarding. We are so focused on life that we do not take time to reflect on things as much as we should. Being in a Groups class has opened my eyes to a whole new world. I have begun to question, explore, and even understand how things work. I even get how they work sometimes. Not only is there a process involved in making individual decisions, process is involved in group decisions as well. This paper attempts give insight into my reflection of my group decision process.
The goal of this step is to come up with as many solutions as possible. There is no criticism or judgment during this stage just ideas being thrown into a pile of solutions. Ina group you want to keep generating ideas even if it seems like you are done. Often times in my group I think we stop to early instead of continuing the brainstorming activity. For a summer internship I did we had to brainstorm ideas to engage our customers (games, raffles, etc.) as soon as the group of interns and myself started to really get the ball rolling I felt as if we were just getting started. There were some long pauses in the brainstorming process, but I genuinely thought it was because we all were thinking. Another mistake that has happened during brainstorming has been storytelling. I have personally made this mistake a couple of times in my group projects. I come up with an idea and instead of just stating it in a couple of words I feel the need to story tell to explain myself. I realize now that I should not be explaining my idea or afraid someone will shoot it down because in a true brainstorming environment there should be no critiquing only jotting down of