Governmental Morals

719 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Human behavior in the social environment theory

Morality is the differentiation of intentions, decisions, and actions between those that are "good" (or right) and those that are "bad", but who dictates the morals of society?. The government actually takes a big chunk of credit for giving society its current morals. The role of the government in morals of society should be to dictate them in “hope” of a society in constant improvement and try to eliminate possibility of chaos. Not all morals are dictated by the government because we are born with a human nature, but the government should enforce on this already planted morals and further expand them. In other words, the government laws are just an attempt to back up what is (or should be) already implanted on our brains.

In the book “American Psycho” published in 1991, Bret Easton Ellis criticizes de morals and the materialism of the average high class New Yorker, from the point of view of a psychotic protagonist, whose only intention in the world he lives in, is to fit in. The US government in the 1980-1990 has not changed that much compared to the modern day government, so we can infer that laws have not changed drastically. In the book, “American Psycho” Patrick Bateman and his colleagues, are on a non-official race for being the richest, best looking, most appealing man. This masculinity war is so intense that when the psychotic character, Patrick is beaten on something, he often feels that the way to surpass the competence again is by killing them, because there is when he sees that even though the other person might be better, Patrick wins because he is alive, this can be seen when Patrick surpassed by Paul Owen, and then kills him brutally. Because Patrick is a psychotic character, he lacks the morals that comes with...

... middle of paper ...

...a provisional set of morals when the natural ones are absent. If no government was around to make laws, then these people would be free to do everything they´d like. Therefore, governmental influence in morals are not enough to create a sort of impact in people, but its minimal influence is enough for society not to become a source of chaos or evil.

In conclusion, human morals and the fate of society depends on human nature and how people are influenced by society, not by the government. Still government plays a fundamental part on morality in society because it is the las finger holding the person who is about to fall from a ledge. A very thick finger, that is the last hope and support so that society does not end up falling into a sort of chaos of a moraless society, where life conditions would be miserable.

Works Cited

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morality

Show More
Related

  • Social Organizations and Moral Regulation Projects: Governing Morals by Alan Hunt

    1191 Words  | 3 Pages

    Moral regulation has been – and still is – a very heated topic for discussion. In chapters two and three of his book, Governing Morals: A Social History of Moral Regulation, author Alan Hunt speaks of various social organizations and their different attempts at moral regulation projects from the late 18th to early 20th century. Although the two chapters flow into each other, and time turns from one century to the next, various and complex societal changes, and in turn, approaches to moral regulation are noted. Said changes to society and regulatory approaches include evolving civil associations, the incorporation of character and females into the social sphere, and shifts away from the church. As society changes, so does the approach to, and implication of, moral regulation projects.

    Read More

  • Exploring the Anthropological Principles in Paine´s Common Sense

    1744 Words  | 4 Pages

    Thomas Paine begins his article by first exploring the differences between society and government. He explains that, “society in every state is a blessing, but government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil.” (Frohnen 179) What he means by this is that to have society and community is a privilege, because we as humans are designed to have a need for human interaction, while government on the other hand is only a necessary evil, simply because we as humans are also designed to be inherently evil, and therefore government is a necessary evil to have in order to monitor wrongdoing, or to keep us from our own vices in other words. This emphasizes the Classical Christian Anthropological principle of duality, which is the inner struggle that we as humans have between amor sui, the love of self, and amor dei, the love of God. This struggle springs from the fact that evil is found within man, and we must mak...

    Read More

  • Lord Of The Flies; An Attempt To Trace The Defects Of Human Nature

    1021 Words  | 3 Pages

    "An attempt to trace the defects of human society back to the defects of human nature. The moral is that the shape of a society must depend on the ethical nature of the individual and not on any political system however apparently logical or respectable."

    Read More

  • Morality and Social Welfare Programs

    1010 Words  | 3 Pages

    The morality of social welfare systems, or the morality of crafting laws to aid American citizens in poverty, is a subject that (like myriad ethical issues) is hotly debated to say the least. For example, some opponents of social welfare institutions maintain the view that such programs "increase the reward or reduce the penalties" of poverty; thereby ostensibly making an impoverished state appealing even to people who might initially have been motivated to earn a living by conventional means. In other words, welfare programs (according to opponents) encourage otherwise productive individuals to embrace laziness, for basic human needs would be met by such institutions, eliminating the need to work at all. Those opposed to social welfare plans have also been known to claim that an "unfair burden is placed upon workers who must pay for the system." When one considers the above opposing views, it would then stand to reason that proponents of social welfare programs might maintain that it is the moral responsibility of working citizens to provide assistance and funding for programs such as Aid to Families with Dependent Children, the Food Stamp program, or the like. This supposition is confirmed upon examination of the notion that, when basic human needs such as "food, housing, and medical care" are not met, one is consequently rendered unable to uphold any level of social freedom. Given the above information, one can safely deduce that modern supporters of social welfare organizations are under the impression that such programs provide the impoverished masses with the means by which to obtain the level of general well-being vital to acquiring work in the first place.

    Read More

  • Absolute Power: A State of War Against Its People

    1132 Words  | 3 Pages

    is at odds with the idea of a civil society since it is illogical to think that people would consent to be governed by a government that is worse than the state of nature. A society in which the government is above or outside the law remains in a state of nature because there is no security against violence and oppression. Therefore, this exercise of arbitrary power again puts the absolute government in a state of war against its people because, as Locke writes:

    Read More

  • Societys Influence On Morals

    1840 Words  | 4 Pages

    shared the same beliefs as everyone else, but they had to perform the dirty work

    Read More

  • Moral Essay: What Are Morals?

    945 Words  | 2 Pages

    When one thinks about morals, he or she often find himself in difficulty. It is a fact that morals are mostly passed from one generation to another. However, we all face challenges when trying to understand whether they are all accurate or not. To start with, Morals are those values that normally protect life and always respectful of the dual life value of individual and others. Therefore, Morals are those rules that normally govern actions that re wrong or right. We know that morals may be for all people in the society or individual beliefs in the society. Some of the great morals include freedom, charity, truth, honesty and patience and all of them have a common goal. It is a fact that when they function well in the society, they end up protecting and enhancing life. These morals need to be examined always to make sure that they are performing their mission of protecting life. As a matter of fact, morals are derived from the government and society, self and religion. When morals are derived from the government and society, they tend to change as the morals and laws of the society changes. An example of the changes is seen in the cases of marriage versus individuals living together. It is true that in the past generation, it was quite rare to see any couple living together without having any legal matrimonial ceremony. However, this

    Read More

  • Death of Prohibition

    1005 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Government cannot legislate morals, even though laws are based on them. “All laws bear some relation, however distant, to a moral evaluation of good and bad. We cannot escape making moral distinctions” (Esolen). In the instance of prohibition there were two different views of morality. Those who thought drinking led to sinful behavior, and those who thought alcohol wasn’t a bad thing. In the case of prohibition, people wanted there booze and they found a way to get it. They thought that drinking was okay. This shows that everybody has a different moral compass. “One man’s theft is another man’s redistribution of income. One man’s defense of family honor is another man’s murder” (Esolen). The legislation of morals by the government has proved to fail more than once. Joe Messerli says that the governments’ legislation on marijuana is based upon assumed morals and that in infringes upon citizens basic rights. (Messerli). This ties to prohibition because People felt very strongly about something

    Read More

  • Morality In Brave New World

    837 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mustapha Mond is the most powerful character in Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. Mond keeps scientific and historic documents from reaching the people. Mond believes that science, religion, and art threaten Brave New World if let out, but religion would be bane of Brave New World.

    Read More

  • Patrick Bateman In American Psycho

    996 Words  | 2 Pages

    On an original viewing of the motion picture you are sucked into the colourful world of a very wealthy and successful man engaged in the finance sector. Through the course of the story we can see more and more the great disturbance of the novels main character Patrick Bateman. He gets increasingly agitated by the success of others around him, so much so that he goes as far as to brutally murder a boasting colleague. This obviously isn’t a normal reaction to jealously and as the story continues we can get a greater sense of the lengths he will go to be the most successful out of his peers. We can also see that the character can’t be satisfied sexually as in one scene he engages in sexual activity with two escorts and after its cessed he cannot be satisfied until he causes them some physical harm, presumably against their will. He tries to cover his tracks very carefully in the beginning and throughout the course of the story he gets careless and this results in a large scale man hunt for the killer, which Bateman manages to escape. Throughout his murderous rampage we can clearly see that through Freud’s interpretation of the human mind set, Bateman displays a minimalist ego and superego and possess a very lenient ‘id’ that ultimately allows him to carry out all of his inner fantasies. Towards the end of the film we get the impression that all of these instances might not have taken place in reality and may o...

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Being Tyranny

    537 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Society can and does execute its own mandates: and if it issues wrong mandates instead of right, or any mandates at all in things in which it ought not to meddle, it practices a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression since, though not usually upheld by such extreme penalties it leaves

    Read More

  • Philosophy: Ethics and Morality

    2484 Words  | 5 Pages

    To act morally means one must think and act in such a way that always considers, supports, and attempts to improve general welfare; furthermore, such thoughts and actions must occur because of moral intentions, not just because one has to. Also, pre-defined rules exist for the common good and these rules help with moral judgment. Such rules would include “no killing”, “no stealing”, and “no lying”. These don’t exist to provide an advantage or cause disadvantage—they exist simply for the good of every individual. To have morality means one must always adhere to these rules no matter the consequences, who is affected, or how it happens, because they only ensure the most good for everyone. However, one’s own standards for morality must also remain considerate of that of others’.

    Read More

  • Government In Lord Of The Flies By William Golding

    1000 Words  | 2 Pages

    Government is defined as “a system by which society is run.” There are many examples of different types of government which exist in our society today. All forms of government have one single purpose: to guide society into a direction, be it considered good or bad. However, society demands a definition of itself to set the page for discussion. Society is defined as a group or an aggregate of people who work in a broad community and are interconnected by any means.

    Read More

  • Soul 31, By Oscar Wilde

    494 Words  | 1 Pages

    The definitions of such notions cannot be explained impartially because they always rest on cultural, societal and even personal values, and render morality arbitrary. If values are necessary in order to create a line of conduct and harmonious systems for some to live in, they are usually stripping others from their liberties. Governments and Church dictate their values to control the people, to subjugate them to the fear of laws

    Read More

  • Law And Morality Essay

    811 Words  | 2 Pages

    Both law and morality serve to regulate behaviour in society. Morality is defined as a set of key values, attitudes and beliefs giving a standard in which we ‘should’ behave. Law, however, is defined as regulating behaviour which is enforced among society for everyone to abide by. It is said that both, however, are normative which means they both indicate how we should behave and therefore can both be classed as a guideline in which society acts, meaning neither is more effective or important than the other. Law and morals have clear differences in how and why they are made. Law, for example, comes from Parliament and Judges and will be made in a formal, legal institution which result in formal consequences when broken. Whereas morals are formed under the influence of family, friends, media or religion and they become personal matters of individual consciences. They result in no formal consequence but may result in a social disapproval which is shown also to occur when breaking the law.

    Read More

More about Governmental Morals

Open Document