Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of globalization on culture
Reflection on globalization
Advantages and disadvantages of globalization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of globalization on culture
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)’s Bureau of Strategic Planning (2004) reported that globalization has not only contributed to the greater exchanges of ideas and awareness of the uniqueness of individual cultures and societies, but has highlighted the fundamental differences that result from these unique characteristics. There are many advantages for societies and cultures as they become increasingly interconnected (Heimonen, 2012) through the process of globalization. Interconnectedness allows for the sharing of assets and information that can aid in the development of nation-states and communities and can promote the acceptance of cultural diversity and encouragement of “multicultural contributions at different levels among countries” (Bakhtiari, 2011, p. 97). On the other hand, increased contact among developing nations with so called “advanced countries” (Bakjtiari, 2011, p. 97) has illustrated the ever increasing inequality among nations and has contributed to the promotion of the values of dominant cultures which has led to increased “inequalities and conflicts between areas and cultures” (Bakhtiari, 2011, p. 98).
In addition to the negative implications of globalization that have illustrated the growing divide between developing nations and economically advanced nations, anti-globalization advocates have claimed that globalization has contributed to an increased homogenization of cultures. On the other hand, globalization advocates have noted that as societies and cultures are exposed to other ideas and viewpoints, there can also be a tendency towards an “increased distinction” (Scheper-Hughes & Dalla-Dea, 2012, p. 5) or emphasis of cultural or national identities that...
... middle of paper ...
...92980902826427
Scheper-Hughes, J. & Dalla-Dea, A. (2012). Authenticity and resistance: Latin American art, activism and performance in the new global context. Latin American Perspectives, 39(5), 4-10. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0094582x11430051
UNESCO. (2004). New ignorances, new literacies: Learning to live together in a globalizing world. Paris, France: UNESCO.
Wang, Y. (2007). Globalization enhances cultural identity. Intercultural Communication Studies, 16(1), 83-86. Retrieved from http://www.uri.edu/iaics/content/2007v16n1/09%20Y%20wang.pdf
Wulf, C. (2013). Human development in a globalized world: Education towards peace, cultural diversity and sustainable development. Revisita Espanola de Pedagogia (254), 71-86.
Zayani, M. (2011). Media, cultural diversity and globalization: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 18(2), 48-54.
The Globalization Reader. 2011. Fourth Edition. Frank J. Lechner and John Boli, eds. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Poplin, M. (1999). The global classroom of the 21st century: Lessons from Mother Teresa and imperatives from Columbine. Educational Horizons, 78(1), 30-38.
Suárez-Orozco, Marcelo M., and Desirée Baolian Qin-Hilliard. Globalization: Culture and Education in the New Millenium. Berkeley (Calif.): U of California, 2004. Print.
Andy Green’s article on the role of globalisation and comparative education explores the effects of globalisation in changing education and its implication for comparative study. He questions whether the decline of nation states constructs the national system as obsolete. His article considers the importance of studying educational systems as well as inquires to define the field of comparative education by reviewing how globalisation is changing education and comparative study. Green assesses the changing relations between education and the nation states, and concludes that the national education system is far from obsolete.
In a recent study, the National Geographic Society and the Asia Society shed light on a growing concern that showed students from the United States lacked understanding and knowledge of different people, places, and cultures around the world. This growing concern demanded higher-quality education as well as for teachers to understand the value and necessity of developing lessons based on global education. Since the 1980s, the United States government has tried repeatedly to introduce and incorporate multiculturalism and global education into the system but was met with hostility and protests by many of its citizens. Many protestors believed that global education introduces anti-Americanism, and that multiculturalism introduces and encourages "separatism and disunity". Therefore, it is important and necessary to inform and introduce the general public to the benefits of global education, or cultural education in general to our youth. This will help rise a more knowledgeable generation that is better equipped to deal, communicate, understand, and help the rest of the world.
Strauss, Valerie. "Where U.S. Stands in Education Internationall." Washington Post. N.p., 25 June 2013. Web. 15 Mar. 2014.
It is worth noting that globalization - the world's exchange of people, goods and ideas - can some-times cases speed up cultural exchanges and promote economic and social enrichment of society, but also, it can serve to highlight and reinforce the cultural differences, creating fear, intolerance and conflict. Yet cultural diversity can be considered as an asset for the "sustainable" development of socio-economic policy.
While many Americans, and even more unfortunate is American teachers, claim that global education would harm American values and go against what America stands for (Webb), a global education presents the ability to either properly expand upon one’s knowledge of the world with accurate information about their true culture and their language, or a global education could either undeservingly demote or promote a country to a ranking it may or may not deserve. Without global education, our future generations will face unnecessary challenges and face the possibility of destroying everything that we, the world, built upon to maintain
Western countries have been suspected of using their position and power to cultivate cultures around the world through the use of media. These cultures are inspired by western cultures and are a powerful way to gain and maintain dominance especially in third world countries. This essay is aimed at arguing a case against global cultural imperialism. Key areas taken into cognizance in this work are, firstly the definition of key terms used in this essay. Secondly, this essay focusses on the demerits of global cultural imperialism though media use namely, erosion of the youth’s indigenous cultures, the use of media to portray western cultures as superior relative to other cultures, contamination of indigenous cultures through the unruly content found in western media productions, western cultures and living standards as shown though the media promotes brain drain in less developed countries, western produced products promoted on global media present unfair competition to local products and how global cultural imperialism is being used to spread western propaganda hence misleading the youth. Lastly this essay concludes with a conclusion.
The Global Partnership for Education (GPE) is a “multilateral partnership” (GPE, 2014a, para. 2) that is made up of non-governmental organizations, private donors, teachers, international organizations and donor governments in order to aid the nearly sixty participating, developing nations in the implementation of sound educational policy and programming. Through the sharing of curricular guidelines and effective instructional strategies, GPE promotes increased discussion concerning education among the developing nations participating in this partnership. The objectives for GPE are as follows:
Those who support globalization believe it is a positive concept because it promotes the diffusion of wealth, culture, knowledge, and technology. Proponents argue that the dissemination of information and wealth of this type will only benefit citizens, from the poorest in developing countries, to the wealthiest in established countries. In addition, they claim the integration of cultures and economies leads to the spread of information, which also increases religious, cultural, and racial tolerance. However, in spite of all these well-intentioned ideas, globalization h...
Since the late twentieth century, the world has experienced a vast transformation with regards to world economies, culture, and politics. The great advancements in technology and communication since the late twentieth century has served a catalysts for what is known today as globalization. The ambition to develop a single global economy along with a universal culture are the promises of globalization. Perhaps the clearest evidence that demonstrates globalization is a reality is the fact that at this point in time very diverse cultures form around the world closer to each other than ever before. That being said, when it comes to the spreading of democracy and human rights, having world cultures closer to each other can prove to be beneficial
Culture has a power to overcome boundaries and even conquer distances by migrating and interfering in foreign cultures, and doing so it can lead to homogenization- where this main characteristic unifies culture making it global and model for everyone. First, as a definition, globalization implies deep and fast interconnection with global countries all around the world, and technological changes made that interconnection possible and created more support for a homogenizing
CHENG, Yin Cheong. Fostering Local Knowledge and Wisdom in Globalized Education: Multiple Theories. Bangkok, Thailand: Centre for Research and International Collaboration Hong Kong Institute of Education, 2002.
We cannot stop the phenomenon of globalization due to strong interdependence of our lives on those things which are a product of globalization. It has complicated the process of education but has also created many opportunities for countries to break out of the traditional models of education. The idea of global citizen is seen as a person who can act locally but think globally, is a goal that keeps an eye on maintaining cultural diversity while exposing a country’s citizen to the benefits of globalization. Cultural diversity can be strengthened through globalization by providing means and resources to support cultural groups attempting to make a difference in society while maintaining their distinctive set of values and